On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Nataraj wrote:
>>
> Does backupPC have the abilty to easily be configured so that each daily
> incremental and each weekly full backup are stored on different drives,
> i.e. to rotate drives based on your backup schedule and not just when a
> drive fills up? I thi
On 12/16/2011 06:16 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Jonathan Nilsson wrote:
>>
>>> >From the little I've read it seems to be very similar to BackupPC.
>>
>> I think the only thing they have in common is that they both use rsync as
>> the transfer agent.
> Well, they are
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Jonathan Nilsson wrote:
>
>
>> >From the little I've read it seems to be very similar to BackupPC.
>
>
> I think the only thing they have in common is that they both use rsync as
> the transfer agent.
Well, they are both perl scripts... Backuppc just has more of
good info in this thread -but so far no mention of rsnapshot
>
> Any comment on it ?
>
we use rsnapshot. i think of it basically as a wrapper around rsync. it
isn't a fully featured backup solution just on it's own, but it is a great
tool. we have written a bash shell script wrapper around rsnapsh
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
> OK, I'm getting ready to finally dig into replacing our backups. Lots of
> good info in this thread -but so far no mention of rsnapshot
>
> Any comment on it ? Our environment is all Linux except for Mac desktops
> which would like have a di
OK, I'm getting ready to finally dig into replacing our backups. Lots of
good info in this thread -but so far no mention of rsnapshot
Any comment on it ? Our environment is all Linux except for Mac desktops
which would like have a different solution for backups.
>From the little I've read it s
>> Anyone have any experience with this, which just came to my attention
>>
>> http://www.arkeia.com/en/solutions/open-source-solutions
I have used Arkeia for a few customers .. it works well. Do you have any
specific questions about it?
Barry
___
Cen
--On Friday, December 09, 2011 02:59:08 PM -0600 Les Mikesell
wrote:
> I doubt if it can match
> the bandwidth efficiency of backuppc with rsync as the transport (not
> sure - how does the bacula agent deal with growing files, or big files
> with small changes?).
There is a relatively new block-
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
> --On Friday, December 09, 2011 01:03:18 PM -0600 Les Mikesell
> wrote:
>
>> I'll be happy if I never see a tape again.
>
> Likewise.
>
> Skipping forward to the present, I'm doing normal backups in Bacula
> to virtual volumes on hard disk. As
--On Friday, December 09, 2011 01:03:18 PM -0600 Les Mikesell
wrote:
> I'll be happy if I never see a tape again.
Likewise.
Skipping forward to the present, I'm doing normal backups in Bacula
to virtual volumes on hard disk. As for offsite/archival backups, using
the bacula add-on 'vchanger' a
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
> --On Friday, December 09, 2011 11:48:49 AM -0600 Les Mikesell
> wrote:
>
>> Errr, what? Amanda is a little cumbersome to set up, but it doesn't
>> bite. If gnutar works, amanda should work or tell you why.
>
> As I said, it's been at least
--On Friday, December 09, 2011 11:48:49 AM -0600 Les Mikesell
wrote:
> Errr, what? Amanda is a little cumbersome to set up, but it doesn't
> bite. If gnutar works, amanda should work or tell you why.
As I said, it's been at least 8 years since I dealt with Amanda.
Going by memory, though, in
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Devin Reade wrote:
>
> Being bit by Arkeia (and previously Amanda and others)
Errr, what? Amanda is a little cumbersome to set up, but it doesn't
bite. If gnutar works, amanda should work or tell you why.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
__
--On Thursday, December 08, 2011 01:06:10 PM -0500 Alan McKay
wrote:
> Anyone have any experience with this, which just came to my attention
>
> http://www.arkeia.com/en/solutions/open-source-solutions
Yes, I've used it (albiet about 8 years back or so), as well as
many other solutions (both co
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:38 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/08/11 11:26 AM, Mikael Fridh wrote:
>> For more redundancy and performance, add more ZFS boxes, do
>> replication between them.
>
> what zfs replication is that? last I heard, the only supported
> replication was physical block replicat
On 12/08/11 11:26 AM, Mikael Fridh wrote:
> For more redundancy and performance, add more ZFS boxes, do
> replication between them.
what zfs replication is that? last I heard, the only supported
replication was physical block replication of the underlying device(s)
(avs in solaris cluster, drbd
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I just went through the archives to see what people are doing for backups,
> and here is what I found :
> - amanda
> - bacula
> - BackupPC
> - FreeNAS
>
> Here is my situation : we have pretty much all Sun hardware with a Sun
> Sto
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
>
>
> I use backuppc, but find that in order to restore one has to be or know the
> admin user password.
> There appears to be no way to open this up to users to directly see and
> restore from the file tree that it manages.
You can delegate
> I use backuppc, but find that in order to restore one has to be or know
> the admin user password.
> There appears to be no way to open this up to users to directly see and
> restore from the file tree that it manages.
>
>
Huh? No. Users can do their own restores from the web interface with
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:31 AM, wrote:
I just went through the archives to see what people are doing for backups,
and here is what I found :
- amanda
- bacula
- BackupPC
- FreeNAS
You missed rsync.
Rsync is another one-off approach where you have to roll
Anyone have any experience with this, which just came to my attention
http://www.arkeia.com/en/solutions/open-source-solutions
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food"
___
CentO
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:00 AM, wrote:
>
I just went through the archives to see what people are doing for
backups,
and here is what I found :
- amanda
- bacula
- BackupPC
- FreeNAS
>>>
>>> You missed rsync.
>>
>> Rsync is another one-off approach where you hav
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:31 AM, wrote:
>>
>>> I just went through the archives to see what people are doing for
>>> backups,
>>> and here is what I found :
>>> - amanda
>>> - bacula
>>> - BackupPC
>>> - FreeNAS
>>
>> You missed rsync.
>
> Rsync is another one-off approach w
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:31 AM, wrote:
>
>> I just went through the archives to see what people are doing for backups,
>> and here is what I found :
>> - amanda
>> - bacula
>> - BackupPC
>> - FreeNAS
>
> You missed rsync.
Rsync is another one-off approach where you have to roll your own
command
Alan McKay wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I just went through the archives to see what people are doing for backups,
> and here is what I found :
> - amanda
> - bacula
> - BackupPC
> - FreeNAS
You missed rsync.
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@ce
>
> I'm pretty sure I saw a note on the networker list that 7.6 SP3 works
> with update 27, update 29, and java 7.
>
>
Well we don't have a support contract - is it a free upgrade?
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Foo
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Philippe Naudin
wrote:
>>
>> If you want mostly-online backups with perhaps an occasional tar
>> archive, it will be hard to beat backuppc because of it's storage
>> pooling and ability to run over rsync or smb with no remote agents.
>> For all-tape, I'd probably go
Le jeu 08 déc 2011 09:43:21 CET, Les Mikesell a écrit:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Alan McKay wrote:
> >
> > Here is my situation : we have pretty much all Sun hardware with a Sun
> > StorageTek SL24 tape unit backing it all up. OSes are a combination of
> > RHEL and CentOS. The software
On Dec 8, 2011, at 8:43 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Alan McKay wrote:
>>
>> Here is my situation : we have pretty much all Sun hardware with a Sun
>> StorageTek SL24 tape unit backing it all up. OSes are a combination of
>> RHEL and CentOS. The software we are us
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Alan McKay wrote:
>
> Here is my situation : we have pretty much all Sun hardware with a Sun
> StorageTek SL24 tape unit backing it all up. OSes are a combination of
> RHEL and CentOS. The software we are using is EMC
>
> NetWorker Management Console version 3.
> NetWorker Management Console version 3.5.1.Build.269
> based on NetWorker version 7.5.1.Build.269
>
> The pickle we are in right now is that this software is Java based, and
> stops working at a very specific release of JRE (1.6.26 or something like
> that). We still have some machine
Hey folks,
I just went through the archives to see what people are doing for backups,
and here is what I found :
- amanda
- bacula
- BackupPC
- FreeNAS
Here is my situation : we have pretty much all Sun hardware with a Sun
StorageTek SL24 tape unit backing it all up. OSes are a combination of
RH
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:52 AM, ken wrote:
> Though I've worked with enterprise systems, I'm not familiar with FOOS
> backup software. Which of those recommended would allow me to backup a
> system while users are active on it? If it matters the system uses LVM.
> I'd also like to be able t
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:52:15 -0400
ken wrote:
> If it matters the
> system uses LVM. I'd also like to be able to avoid needing the
> network if possible. That is, I'd plug in a disk into a USB port and
> backup the system onto that... again, while the system is live.
If it should be an exact cop
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 9:52 AM, ken wrote:
> Though I've worked with enterprise systems, I'm not familiar with FOOS
> backup software. Which of those recommended would allow me to backup a
> system while users are active on it? If it matters the system uses LVM.
> I'd also like to be able to
ken wrote:
> Though I've worked with enterprise systems, I'm not familiar with FOOS
> backup software. Which of those recommended would allow me to backup a
> system while users are active on it? If it matters the system uses LVM.
> I'd also like to be able to avoid needing the network if pos
Though I've worked with enterprise systems, I'm not familiar with FOOS
backup software. Which of those recommended would allow me to backup a
system while users are active on it? If it matters the system uses LVM.
I'd also like to be able to avoid needing the network if possible.
That is,
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Denis wrote:
>> Hi - I have a NFS/NIS server environment running CentOS 5.5 on a Dell
>> Optiplex 240. I would like to back it up and then move it to a new
>> machine.
>
> You don't mention the type of the new machine. If it is not identical
>
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Denis wrote:
> Hi - I have a NFS/NIS server environment running CentOS 5.5 on a Dell
> Optiplex 240. I would like to back it up and then move it to a new
> machine.
You don't mention the type of the new machine. If it is not identical
hardware you are probably bet
On 10/03/11 1:16 PM, Denis wrote:
> Hi - I have a NFS/NIS server environment running CentOS 5.5 on a Dell
> Optiplex 240. I would like to back it up and then move it to a new
> machine. Couple of questions:
>
> 1. This is an older computer Dell Optiplex 240 that I am unable to
> connect a USB drive
Hi - I have a NFS/NIS server environment running CentOS 5.5 on a Dell
Optiplex 240. I would like to back it up and then move it to a new
machine. Couple of questions:
1. This is an older computer Dell Optiplex 240 that I am unable to
connect a USB drive to. In the "linux rescue" environment fdi
On 03/20/2011 08:31 AM, madu...@gmail.com wrote:
> Recall..
> I run now the following task every day tar -cvzf
> /rescue/website-$(date +%u).tgz /var/www/htdocs/*
> I want now to move these files from the local server to a remote server via
> ftp.
>
> any help.
>
> Thanks
man lftp
t
__
Recall..
I run now the following task every day tar -cvzf
/rescue/website-$(date +%u).tgz /var/www/htdocs/*
I want now to move these files from the local server to a remote server via ftp.
any help.
Thanks
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:33 PM, wrote:
> madu...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Should I add to
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 1:03 PM, madu...@gmail.com wrote:
> home folder for backup /backup
This is a tactical problem. If you actually read the "File System
Hierarchy" guidelines, you'll see that it should be in "/var" as
dynamic, volatile content, probably undar "/var/backup".
If that backup r
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us
> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 1:07 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] backup script
>
> madu...@gmail.com wrote:
&g
madu...@gmail.com wrote:
> home folder for backup /backup
>
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:49 PM, wrote:
>> madu...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> I have reallocated it to /home
>>> thx
>> Please stop top posting.
>>
>> Relocated it to /home, as in /home/backup? Don't clutter your base
>> directories, that's
home folder for backup /backup
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:49 PM, wrote:
> madu...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I have reallocated it to /home
>> thx
> Please stop top posting.
>
> Relocated it to /home, as in /home/backup? Don't clutter your base
> directories, that's very bad practice.
>
> mark
>
madu...@gmail.com wrote:
> I have reallocated it to /home
> thx
Please stop top posting.
Relocated it to /home, as in /home/backup? Don't clutter your base
directories, that's very bad practice.
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
htt
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, madu...@gmail.com wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list
From: "madu...@gmail.com"
Subject: Re: [CentOS] backup script
I have reallocated it to /home
thx
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:33 PM, wrote:
madu...@gmail.com wrote:
Should I add to my tar the following
I have reallocated it to /home
thx
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:33 PM, wrote:
> madu...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Should I add to my tar the following option
>> -p, --preserve-permissions
>> extract all protection information
>> tar -cvzfp ..
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at
madu...@gmail.com wrote:
> Should I add to my tar the following option
> -p, --preserve-permissions
> extract all protection information
> tar -cvzfp ..
>
> Thanks
>
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 7:10 PM, John Doe wrote:
> > From: "madu...@gmail.com"
> >
> >> I want to create bas
Should I add to my tar the following option
-p, --preserve-permissions
extract all protection information
tar -cvzfp ..
Thanks
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 7:10 PM, John Doe wrote:
> From: "madu...@gmail.com"
>
>> I want to create bash script to have a zip copy from a website runn
From: "madu...@gmail.com"
> I want to create bash script to have a zip copy from a website running
> on linux /var/www/htdocs/* local on the same box on different
> directory
> I am thinking to do a local backup using crontab (snapshot my web)
> tar -cvzf /tmp/website-$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M).tgz
On 25/01/11 21:56, madu...@gmail.com wrote:
> Am thinking to have this in my script
>
> #!/bin/bash
> tar -cvzf /tmp/website-$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M).tgz /var/www/htdocs/*
> find /tmp/website/website*.tgz -ctime +5 -exec rm {} \; # removes
> older then 5 days
That should do in your case. Though, in
Am thinking to have this in my script
#!/bin/bash
tar -cvzf /tmp/website-$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M).tgz /var/www/htdocs/*
find /tmp/website/website*.tgz -ctime +5 -exec rm {} \; # removes
older then 5 days
crontab it
30 6 * * * /mypath/myscript
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Nelson wrote:
> You
You could create a script and have a variable date --date="5 days ago"
append to your tar file and after that, combine it with if syntax. If match,
then rm.
HTH
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 3:31 PM, madu...@gmail.com wrote:
> I want to create bash script to have a zip copy from a website running
>
Hi,
Try the ff:
On 1/25/11 4:31 PM, madu...@gmail.com wrote:
> I want to create bash script to have a zip copy from a website running
> on linux /var/www/htdocs/* local on the same box on different
> directory
> I am thinking to do a local backup using crontab (snapshot my web)
> tar -cvzf /tmp/w
I want to create bash script to have a zip copy from a website running
on linux /var/www/htdocs/* local on the same box on different
directory
I am thinking to do a local backup using crontab (snapshot my web)
tar -cvzf /tmp/website-$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M).tgz /var/www/htdocs/*
This command will creat
This is what lvm snapshots are for. Make a snapshot, back it up, delete
it. VM keeps running on the 'real' lv.
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Georghy wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I have a CentOS system with virt-manager installed on it,
> the system is installed on a LVM partition with one PV for swap and one
> fo
Hi guys,
I have a CentOS system with virt-manager installed on it,
the system is installed on a LVM partition with one PV for swap and one
for "/",
I only use KVM and qemu virtual machine on this server,
I want to do a backup from my Virtual Machines on this server
should I use LVM backup or an ot
Greetings,
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 5:50 AM, Benjamin Smith wrote:
> Years ago, I set up a backup tool that wrapped rsync. It has faithfully and
> reliably backed up a dozen hosts and too many TB of data to mention,
> offsite,
> automatically saving as many backup points as disk space allows.
> Yo
Years ago, I set up a backup tool that wrapped rsync. It has faithfully and
reliably backed up a dozen hosts and too many TB of data to mention, offsite,
automatically saving as many backup points as disk space allows.
You're certainly welcome to try it!
http://www.effortlessis.com/thisisnotba
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 02/24/2010 07:44 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> Err.. raid is NOT backup solution.
>> Neither is a snapshot in another location on the same machine.
>
> Thats not true, raid is an online setup - different location could be
> point in time, and on blockdev;s that dont share
Agnello George wrote:
> The requirement fro backup is not primarily for HDD failure , but human
> error failure . In case one of our user ( eg: the COO with huge mailbox
> size has delete all his certain very important mails, and he want to recover
> them , the contacts us as we are supposed to
From: Agnello George
> is it possible with " brackup " to back it up to a different server on the
> same lan instead of /backup . Is there any documentation on the same .
It apparently support:
Brackup::Target::Amazon backup to Amazon's S3 service
Brackup::Target::CloudFiles backup
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 12:33 +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
> [1] Changeset and data/system model over time relation mapping for an
> adaptive system sizing feedback loop! ( how'se that for buzzword
> injection! )
---
Well if you run vacum on a Postgres DB then all that goes to the
crapper...
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 02/24/2010 07:44 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> Err.. raid is NOT backup solution.
>> Neither is a snapshot in another location on the same machine.
>
> Thats not true, raid is an online setup - different location could be
> point in time, and on blockdev;s that dont share
On 02/24/2010 07:44 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Err.. raid is NOT backup solution.
>
> Neither is a snapshot in another location on the same machine.
Thats not true, raid is an online setup - different location could be
point in time, and on blockdev;s that dont share user access load. Which
in t
Have you read Brackup::Manual::Overview? Your questions are all answered in
the man pages there or linked from there.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 05:21:47PM +0530, Agnello George wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Gavin Carr wrote:
> > Brackup will backup to local disk, or remotely to ftp, sf
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Gavin Carr wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 05:06:08PM +0530, Agnello George wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Eero Volotinen >wrote:
> > > 2010/2/24 Agnello George :
> > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Gavin Carr >
> > > wrote:
> > > >> You might
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Mike McCarty wrote:
> Eero Volotinen wrote:
> > 2010/2/24 Mike McCarty :
> >> Agnello George wrote:
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> We have an issue with one of our clients , they have a mail server
> with
> >>> the /var/spool/imap partition as 150 GB . They need to take
>
Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2010/2/24 Mike McCarty :
>> Agnello George wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> We have an issue with one of our clients , they have a mail server with
>>> the /var/spool/imap partition as 150 GB . They need to take differential
>>> backup on to /backup partition ( a different HDD of to
On 2/24/2010 1:31 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>>>
>>> We have an issue with one of our clients , they have a mail server with
>>> the /var/spool/imap partition as 150 GB . They need to take differential
>>> backup on to /backup partition ( a different HDD of total 250 GB space ) .
>>
>> You've s
2010/2/24 Mike McCarty :
> Agnello George wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> We have an issue with one of our clients , they have a mail server with
>> the /var/spool/imap partition as 150 GB . They need to take differential
>> backup on to /backup partition ( a different HDD of total 250 GB space ) .
>
> You'
Agnello George wrote:
> Hi
>
> We have an issue with one of our clients , they have a mail server with
> the /var/spool/imap partition as 150 GB . They need to take differential
> backup on to /backup partition ( a different HDD of total 250 GB space ) .
You've stated things in terms of solut
On 02/24/2010 01:07 PM, Agnello George wrote:
> yes just spoke to my senior and confrimed that this was alreday tried
> out a delayed replication is possible .
> but the current suitation is we need to take backup on the same
> server on a different partition /backup :(
you can replicate to
Agnello George wrote:
> Hi
>
> We have an issue with one of our clients , they have a mail server with
> the /var/spool/imap partition as 150 GB . They need to take
> differential backup on to /backup partition ( a different HDD of total
> 250 GB space ) . We have tried dar , rsync, rdiff
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Gavin Carr wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 05:06:08PM +0530, Agnello George wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Eero Volotinen >wrote:
> > > 2010/2/24 Agnello George :
> > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Gavin Carr >
> > > wrote:
> > > >> You might
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 05:06:08PM +0530, Agnello George wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> > 2010/2/24 Agnello George :
> > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Gavin Carr
> > wrote:
> > >> You might want to try brackup (http://code.google.com/p/brackup/). For
> > >>
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 02/24/2010 11:21 AM, Agnello George wrote:
> > -rw--- 1 cyrus mail 4805500 Feb 24 16:23 4799.
> > -rw--- 1 cyrus mail 22920 Feb 24 16:23 cyrus.cache
> > -rw--- 1 cyrus mail 204 Dec 10 16:27 cyrus.header
> > -rw--- 1 cyrus
On 02/24/2010 11:21 AM, Agnello George wrote:
> -rw--- 1 cyrus mail 4805500 Feb 24 16:23 4799.
> -rw--- 1 cyrus mail 22920 Feb 24 16:23 cyrus.cache
> -rw--- 1 cyrus mail 204 Dec 10 16:27 cyrus.header
> -rw--- 1 cyrus mail 896 Feb 24 16:23 cyrus.index
> -rw--- 1 cyrus mail 8669 F
2010/2/24 Agnello George :
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Eero Volotinen
> wrote:
>>
>> 2010/2/24 Agnello George :
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Gavin Carr
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:38:32AM +0100, David Hrbáč wrote:
>> >> > Dne 24.2.2010 10:00, A
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2010/2/24 Agnello George :
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Gavin Carr
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:38:32AM +0100, David Hrbáč wrote:
> >> > Dne 24.2.2010 10:00, Agnello George napsal(a):
> >> > > We have an is
2010/2/24 Agnello George :
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Gavin Carr wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:38:32AM +0100, David Hrbáč wrote:
>> > Dne 24.2.2010 10:00, Agnello George napsal(a):
>> > > We have an issue with one of our clients , they have a mail server
>> > > with
>> > > t
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Gavin Carr wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:38:32AM +0100, David Hrbáč wrote:
> > Dne 24.2.2010 10:00, Agnello George napsal(a):
> > > We have an issue with one of our clients , they have a mail server
> with
> > > the /var/spool/imap partition as 150 GB . Th
2010/2/24 Eero Volotinen
> 2010/2/24 Agnello George :
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 3:08 PM, David Hrbáč
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dne 24.2.2010 10:00, Agnello George napsal(a):
> >> > Hi
> >> >
> >> > We have an issue with one of our clients , they have a mail server
> with
> >> > the /var/spo
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:38:32AM +0100, David Hrbáč wrote:
> Dne 24.2.2010 10:00, Agnello George napsal(a):
> > We have an issue with one of our clients , they have a mail server with
> > the /var/spool/imap partition as 150 GB . They need to take differential
> > backup on to /backup partition
2010/2/24 Agnello George :
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 3:08 PM, David Hrbáč wrote:
>>
>> Dne 24.2.2010 10:00, Agnello George napsal(a):
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > We have an issue with one of our clients , they have a mail server with
>> > the /var/spool/imap partition as 150 GB . They need to take
>>
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 3:08 PM, David Hrbáč wrote:
> Dne 24.2.2010 10:00, Agnello George napsal(a):
> > Hi
> >
> > We have an issue with one of our clients , they have a mail server with
> > the /var/spool/imap partition as 150 GB . They need to take differential
> > backup on to /backup parti
Dne 24.2.2010 10:00, Agnello George napsal(a):
> Hi
>
> We have an issue with one of our clients , they have a mail server with
> the /var/spool/imap partition as 150 GB . They need to take differential
> backup on to /backup partition ( a different HDD of total 250 GB space ) .
> We have trie
2010/2/24 Agnello George :
> Hi
>
> We have an issue with one of our clients , they have a mail server with
> the /var/spool/imap partition as 150 GB . They need to take differential
> backup on to /backup partition ( a different HDD of total 250 GB space ) .
> We have tried dar , rsync, rdiff
Hi
We have an issue with one of our clients , they have a mail server with
the /var/spool/imap partition as 150 GB . They need to take differential
backup on to /backup partition ( a different HDD of total 250 GB space ) .
We have tried dar , rsync, rdiff and impasync . But its is not sufficin
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Arturas Skauronas
>Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 6:50 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
Guys, BackupPC works like the proverbial char
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of m.r...@5-cent.us
>Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 5:14 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
>>>> I was thinking about your lon
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> I think nobody has yet mentioned rdiff-backup. I have very good
> experiences with it. Easy to setup and control (only remember first to
> install the required packages, and I think rsync-devel was not mentioned
> but is required).
>
> Rdiff-ba
> Sorin Srbu wrote:
>>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>>> Behalf Of Benjamin Franz
>>> Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 2:26 PM
>>>
>>> I was thinking about your long term here. Make sure to use LVM to
>>> create your underlaying partition. Then you can add di
From: Benjamin Franz
> Oh, one last thing. Don't forget to use the '-E
> stride=XX,stripe-width=YY (where XX and YY are replaced with the
> appropriate values) options creating your filesystem on the RAID.
> Otherwise your disk drive usage will have 'hot spots' and slower than
> optimal speed.
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Les Mikesell
>Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 2:49 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
>You might want to jo
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Benjamin Franz
>Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 2:43 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
>> With six drives installed, there i
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Les Mikesell
>Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 2:42 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
>The other question to ask is whether an offsit
101 - 200 of 326 matches
Mail list logo
