Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 / Kickstart Using degraded mdadm RAID1

2012-06-10 Thread Stephen Harris
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 09:34:16PM +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > Based on some reading, it seems that I should be able to use kickstart > with the PRE scripts to do this. However, after trying for a couple of > hours, it doesn't seem that anaconda will allow it, it just boots the > created arr

[CentOS] Centos 6 / Kickstart Using degraded mdadm RAID1

2012-06-10 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
I'm trying to install a bunch of C6 involving initially degraded mdadm RAID 1 Anaconda refuses to let me create a RAID 1 array with only one member. Based on some reading, it seems that I should be able to use kickstart with the PRE scripts to do this. However, after trying for a couple of hours,

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - Networking: Some Queries -- GURUS HELP PL

2012-06-08 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 06/08/2012 06:32 AM, Sanjay Arora wrote: > In case of a separate network, should it not be possible to create a > dummy bridge or something and forward packets through maybe...NAT If you want to use NAT and keep your guests in a segregated network, that is exactly how the default install b

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - Networking: Some Queries -- GURUS HELP PL

2012-06-08 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Sanjay Arora wrote: > > > Any ideas of how to do it with separate IP addressing? The main > network is out of my control and I cannot use its IP addresses. Bridging will require everything to have it's own IP address from the main network - which might work if it h

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - Networking: Some Queries -- GURUS HELP PL

2012-06-08 Thread Sanjay Arora
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > >> On a separate note however, I'd still like to know how to use a bridge to >> route packets between two networks.say network card having >> address...192.168.1.3 and a kvm based virtual network say >> 172.31.1.0/24needing to use this

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - Networking: Some Queries -- GURUS HELP PL

2012-06-04 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 06/01/2012 02:38 AM, Sanjay Arora wrote: > With NM_Controlled=No in the ifcfg file, NM applet shows "Not Managed", so > the ifcfg file is being read. What is the extent of interaction of > NetworkManager with ifcfg files is unknownvery little information on > the net. Seems Network Manager i

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - Networking: Some Queries -- GURUS HELP PL

2012-06-01 Thread Sanjay Arora
With NM_Controlled=No in the ifcfg file, NM applet shows "Not Managed", so the ifcfg file is being read. What is the extent of interaction of NetworkManager with ifcfg files is unknownvery little information on the net. Seems Network Manager is still mostly unplublished compared to other utilit

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - vnc - authentication is required to set the network proxy used for downloading packages

2012-05-23 Thread John Stanley
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 23:24 -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > On Tue, 22 May 2012 23:11:43 -0600 > Frank Cox wrote: > > > So what am I missing? Best way I found was to remove PackageKit and all its packages (Desktops it causes a major user whine and loads of complaints). > I think I've found it. I ran

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - vnc - authentication is required to set the network proxy used for downloading packages

2012-05-22 Thread Frank Cox
On Tue, 22 May 2012 23:11:43 -0600 Frank Cox wrote: > So what am I missing? I think I've found it. I ran gnome-session-properties and un-checked PackageKit Update Applet I just restarted vncserver and this time I don't have that annoying window popping up on my remote desktop. So it appears th

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - vnc - authentication is required to set the network proxy used for downloading packages

2012-05-22 Thread Frank Cox
On Wed, 23 May 2012 00:12:45 -0400 John Stanley wrote: > On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 18:26 -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > > A window keeps popping up on my remote desktop stating "authentication is > > required to set the network proxy used for downloading packages. An > > Sounds like PackageKit to me. DBU

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - vnc - authentication is required to set the network proxy used for downloading packages

2012-05-22 Thread John Stanley
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 18:26 -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > A window keeps popping up on my remote desktop stating "authentication is > required to set the network proxy used for downloading packages. An Sounds like PackageKit to me. DBUS controls it. I find it really annoying /etc/yum/pluginconf

[CentOS] Centos 6 - vnc - authentication is required to set the network proxy used for downloading packages

2012-05-22 Thread Frank Cox
A window keeps popping up on my remote desktop stating "authentication is required to set the network proxy used for downloading packages. An application is attempting to perform an action that requires privileges. Authentication as the super user is required to perform this action" and asking for

[CentOS] Centos 6 - tigervnc - numbers on keypad

2012-05-22 Thread Frank Cox
I have a ncurses-based program that runs on a vnc desktop on a remote computer. On Centos 5 you could enter numbers into the program using the numeric keypad. I just installed a new machine running Centos 6 to do this same job and now numbers can only be entered using the numbers across the top o

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - Networking: Some Queries

2012-05-22 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
On 05/21/2012 03:26 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > >> NetworkManager does not (as far as I know) use ifcfg files unless you >> select "Available for all users" checkbox, but rather keeps interface >> data somewhere inside $HOME directory (.gconf subdirectory maybe) in >> u

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - Networking: Some Queries

2012-05-21 Thread Timothy Murphy
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > NetworkManager does not (as far as I know) use ifcfg files unless you > select "Available for all users" checkbox, but rather keeps interface > data somewhere inside $HOME directory (.gconf subdirectory maybe) in > unreadable format for humans. Is this true? I have th

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - Networking: Some Queries

2012-05-21 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
On 05/17/2012 10:51 PM, Sanjay Arora wrote: > Hello all > > I am setting up a Centos 6 machine with one network card& one onboard > network port. Both are recognized& work. Onboard Network port is unused > yet, but is required for dedicated access to LTSP LAN, which would allow > older PIII machi

[CentOS] Centos 6 - Networking: Some Queries

2012-05-17 Thread Sanjay Arora
Hello all I am setting up a Centos 6 machine with one network card & one onboard network port. Both are recognized & work. Onboard Network port is unused yet, but is required for dedicated access to LTSP LAN, which would allow older PIII machines to boot from this system. I have installed LTSP but

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, Raid 1, and LVM

2012-05-14 Thread bob
On 5/14/2012 11:58 AM, Gene Poole wrote: > I'm in the process of rebuilding one of my machines and I've been using > Raid 1 with LVM on a CentOS 5 OS. I'm trying to get my ducks in a row to > move to CentOS 6. However, I can't seem to locate and on the > instructions/tutorials that show how to du

[CentOS] CentOS 6, Raid 1, and LVM

2012-05-14 Thread Gene Poole
I'm in the process of rebuilding one of my machines and I've been using Raid 1 with LVM on a CentOS 5 OS. I'm trying to get my ducks in a row to move to CentOS 6. However, I can't seem to locate and on the instructions/tutorials that show how to duplicate my Raid 1 LVM environment running Cen

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 ASSP ( anti-spam-smtp-proxy)

2012-05-09 Thread Les Mikesell
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Tom Bishop wrote: > Need an anti-spam proxy and looking at options, was wondering if anyone is > using ASSP with Centos 6 and if so does anyone have any goo How-to links > they have...I have managed to find this one - > > http://www.how2centos.com/fight-spam-with-as

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - x11vnc auto probing to port 5903

2012-05-09 Thread Giles Coochey
On 06/05/2012 16:20, aurfalien wrote: Hi all, I was at one time able to get x11vnc to start on 5900 but for some reason its listening on port 5903. Here is what the logs say; -- snippet X display :0.0 -- snippet The VNC desktop is: hostname:3 Why is the VNC desktop going to 3? I was w

[CentOS] Centos 6 ASSP ( anti-spam-smtp-proxy)

2012-05-08 Thread Tom Bishop
Need an anti-spam proxy and looking at options, was wondering if anyone is using ASSP with Centos 6 and if so does anyone have any goo How-to links they have...I have managed to find this one - http://www.how2centos.com/fight-spam-with-assp-anti-spam-smtp-proxy-on-centos-5-4/ Probably most still

[CentOS] Centos 6 - x11vnc auto probing to port 5903

2012-05-06 Thread aurfalien
Hi all, I was at one time able to get x11vnc to start on 5900 but for some reason its listening on port 5903. Here is what the logs say; -- snippet X display :0.0 -- snippet The VNC desktop is: hostname:3 Why is the VNC desktop going to 3? I was working on 5900 previous to a reboot, uns

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - Create raid 1 + LVM during gui install

2012-04-27 Thread aurfalien
On Apr 27, 2012, at 10:51 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote: > On 4/27/2012 10:35 AM, aurfalien wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Does any one know of a how to for creating raid 1 + LVMs during install for >> Centos 6? >> >> Do I create the physical LVM first and then raid or vise versa? >> >> Its seems diff then d

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - Create raid 1 + LVM during gui install

2012-04-27 Thread Bob Hoffman
On 4/27/2012 10:35 AM, aurfalien wrote: > Hi all, > > Does any one know of a how to for creating raid 1 + LVMs during install for > Centos 6? > > Do I create the physical LVM first and then raid or vise versa? > > Its seems diff then doing it for Centos 5. > > - aurf > The way I did it was one dr

[CentOS] Centos 6 - Create raid 1 + LVM during gui install

2012-04-27 Thread aurfalien
Hi all, Does any one know of a how to for creating raid 1 + LVMs during install for Centos 6? Do I create the physical LVM first and then raid or vise versa? Its seems diff then doing it for Centos 5. - aurf ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.x, kernel-2.6.32-220.7.1, EC2 and drive enumeration

2012-04-17 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 04/17/2012 06:27 AM, Steph Gosling wrote: > (bad form replying to myself) > > I've found the issue upstream: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729586 > > Last comment there saying there are patches in an as yet unreleased > kernel-2.6.32-229.el6. I've had a quick look at the SRPMS

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.x, kernel-2.6.32-220.7.1, EC2 and drive enumeration

2012-04-17 Thread Steph Gosling
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:35:07 +0100 Karanbir Singh wrote: > hi, > > Please dont toppost, trim your reply and keep context in your replies. Apologies (mail sent before coffee this morning!) > On 04/17/2012 08:04 AM, Steph Gosling wrote: > > them as 'xvdN' but N in this case is 'e', not 'a', 'f',

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.x, kernel-2.6.32-220.7.1, EC2 and drive enumeration

2012-04-17 Thread Karanbir Singh
hi, Please dont toppost, trim your reply and keep context in your replies. On 04/17/2012 08:04 AM, Steph Gosling wrote: > them as 'xvdN' but N in this case is 'e', not 'a', 'f', not 'b' and so > on. And labels dont help here ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.x, kernel-2.6.32-220.7.1, EC2 and drive enumeration

2012-04-17 Thread Steph Gosling
(bad form replying to myself) I've found the issue upstream: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729586 Last comment there saying there are patches in an as yet unreleased kernel-2.6.32-229.el6. I've had a quick look at the SRPMS upstream and don't see that one yet so a related question:

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.x, kernel-2.6.32-220.7.1, EC2 and drive enumeration

2012-04-17 Thread Steph Gosling
Hi Karanbir, That's the thing, older (non pv-grub aware kernels) did used to map them with the old scsi device names, but here now it's still mapping them as 'xvdN' but N in this case is 'e', not 'a', 'f', not 'b' and so on. Upstream seem to have a handful of bugs related to dracut and initramfs

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.x, kernel-2.6.32-220.7.1, EC2 and drive enumeration

2012-04-16 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 04/16/2012 10:44 AM, Steph Gosling wrote: > Does anyone have any similar experience or advice? > because the devices are now mapped as sda/sdb instead of xvda/xvdb ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219| Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtal

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.x, kernel-2.6.32-220.7.1, EC2 and drive enumeration

2012-04-16 Thread Steph Gosling
Hi, On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:55:17 +0200 wwp wrote: > Hello Steph, > > Check if the thread "Recent kernel update vs usb disk" is related to > your issue (I presume so), thread is from early March 2012. > > > Regards, Think the problems are different as this isn't related to the USB subsystem.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.x, kernel-2.6.32-220.7.1, EC2 and drive enumeration

2012-04-16 Thread wwp
Hello Steph, On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:44:24 +0100 Steph Gosling wrote: > Hi all, > > Is anyone successfully running/has succesfully upgraded to 2.6.32-220 > from, say, 2.6.32-71.29.1? (i.e. done a normal run-of-the-mill yum > update on, say a 6.0 instance all the way up cleanly to 6.2? > > Reas

[CentOS] CentOS 6.x, kernel-2.6.32-220.7.1, EC2 and drive enumeration

2012-04-16 Thread Steph Gosling
Hi all, Is anyone successfully running/has succesfully upgraded to 2.6.32-220 from, say, 2.6.32-71.29.1? (i.e. done a normal run-of-the-mill yum update on, say a 6.0 instance all the way up cleanly to 6.2? Reason I ask is that booting into -220 (and I think also into -131 as well) results in a ke

[CentOS] CentOS-6, Postfix and Mailman

2012-03-22 Thread James B. Byrne
We have a bunch of lists hosted on a CentOS-4.9 server running sendmail and mailman that we are moving to a CentOS-6 vm running postfix and mailman. I am testing the setup and I am running into a problem no doubt caused by my own ignorance wrt postfix. Based on groking the web I discovered that t

[CentOS] CentOS 6 connection with sieveshell failed

2012-03-06 Thread Michael Nausch
Hello, I've some difficulties with my installation, specially with sieveshell. O.K., just have a look on my site: intranet : 10.0.10.0/24 DMZ : 10.0.0.0/24 My IMAP-server is based on DMZ-site on my host vml70 (10.0.0.70): # netstat -penlut Active Internet connections (only servers) Pro

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.x and Freenx issue..Solved!!

2012-02-28 Thread Tom Bishop
Thanks much to* Christoph *for pointing me in the right direction, appears to be an issue with the latest Vmware -tools, not sure I did a clean install with the opensource ones to see if they had the same issues but applying both of the fixes in the link post solves the problem with running the lat

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.x and Freenx issue..

2012-02-28 Thread Tom Bishop
Looks like it might be this, will not get a chance to test until tonight but this reads just like what I am seeing...will post back, I debated on going with the esx tools vs the open source tools, looks like I guessed wrong :( From: christoph.galuschka@chello.a Tom, take a look at this post, may

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.x and Freenx issue..

2012-02-28 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Tom Bishop wrote: > Finally got a chance to install Centos 6.x x86_64 version and having an > issue with the latest version of freenx.  This is a desktop install on a > esxi 5 with all updates and only thing I have installed is the latest > vmware tools.  When I en

[CentOS] Centos 6.x and Freenx issue..

2012-02-27 Thread Tom Bishop
Finally got a chance to install Centos 6.x x86_64 version and having an issue with the latest version of freenx. This is a desktop install on a esxi 5 with all updates and only thing I have installed is the latest vmware tools. When I enable the extras repo and install the nx-3.5.0-1.el6.ay.x86_6

Re: [CentOS] centos 6 - 1 of 2 machines starts and not the other

2012-02-23 Thread fakessh @
Le vendredi 24 février 2012 à 01:50 +0100, fakessh @ a écrit : > Le jeudi 23 février 2012 à 18:36 -0600, Les Mikesell a écrit : > > 2012/2/23 fakessh @ : > > >>> > > > > > > > i execute /sbin/service httpd restart > > > result > > > [root@localhost ~]# tail -f /var/log/httpd/error_log > > > [Fri Fe

Re: [CentOS] centos 6 - 1 of 2 machines starts and not the other

2012-02-23 Thread fakessh @
Le jeudi 23 février 2012 à 18:36 -0600, Les Mikesell a écrit : > 2012/2/23 fakessh @ : > >>> > > > > > i execute /sbin/service httpd restart > > result > > [root@localhost ~]# tail -f /var/log/httpd/error_log > > [Fri Feb 24 01:06:33 2012] [error] Connect Failed Access denied for user > > 'rt_user

Re: [CentOS] centos 6 - 1 of 2 machines starts and not the other

2012-02-23 Thread Les Mikesell
2012/2/23 fakessh @ : >>> > > > i execute /sbin/service httpd restart > result > [root@localhost ~]# tail -f /var/log/httpd/error_log > [Fri Feb 24 01:06:33 2012] [error] Connect Failed Access denied for user > 'rt_user'@'localhost' (using password: YES)\n at > /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/RT.pm

Re: [CentOS] centos 6 - 1 of 2 machines starts and not the other

2012-02-23 Thread fakessh @
Le jeudi 23 février 2012 à 17:52 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us a écrit : > fakessh @ wrote: > > hu guys > > > > I regularly read this list I can usually find me in the excellent > > documentation apache. > > I'm in front of a very strange problem I possess two desktop machines > > which works with the Ap

Re: [CentOS] centos 6 - 1 of 2 machines starts and not the other

2012-02-23 Thread m . roth
fakessh @ wrote: > hu guys > > I regularly read this list I can usually find me in the excellent > documentation apache. > I'm in front of a very strange problem I possess two desktop machines > which works with the Apache server with centos 6 > > 1 of 2 machines starts and not the other. > > I use

[CentOS] centos 6 - 1 of 2 machines starts and not the other

2012-02-23 Thread fakessh @
hu guys I regularly read this list I can usually find me in the excellent documentation apache. I'm in front of a very strange problem I possess two desktop machines which works with the Apache server with centos 6 1 of 2 machines starts and not the other. I use the apache config file here th

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 vps

2012-02-07 Thread nux
Bazy writes: > Hello, > > I'm looking for two hours now for a VPS provider offering CentOS 6 in > DE or UK. Can you please point me to one, maybe where you currently > own a virtual server and have a good experience with it. > +1 Hetzner for DE. In UK check Bytemark.co.uk. ___

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 vps

2012-02-06 Thread Frank Ochere
+1 Linode.com On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Digimer wrote: > On 02/06/2012 01:21 PM, Bazy wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm looking for two hours now for a VPS provider offering CentOS 6 in > > DE or UK. Can you please point me to one, maybe where you currently > > own a virtual server and have a

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 vps

2012-02-06 Thread Digimer
On 02/06/2012 01:21 PM, Bazy wrote: > Hello, > > I'm looking for two hours now for a VPS provider offering CentOS 6 in > DE or UK. Can you please point me to one, maybe where you currently > own a virtual server and have a good experience with it. > > > Cheers, > Bazy I just got this last week

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 vps

2012-02-06 Thread Alex Marz
http://www.linode.com On 2012-02-06, at 12:21 PM, Bazy wrote: > Hello, > > I'm looking for two hours now for a VPS provider offering CentOS 6 in > DE or UK. Can you please point me to one, maybe where you currently > own a virtual server and have a good experience with it. > > > Cheers, > Baz

[CentOS] CentOS 6 vps

2012-02-06 Thread Bazy
Hello, I'm looking for two hours now for a VPS provider offering CentOS 6 in DE or UK. Can you please point me to one, maybe where you currently own a virtual server and have a good experience with it. Cheers, Bazy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos

Re: [CentOS] centos 6 on ppc64

2012-01-19 Thread fakessh @
Le vendredi 20 janvier 2012 à 00:20 +, Karanbir Singh a écrit : > On 01/20/2012 12:18 AM, fakessh @ wrote: > > I write following the announcement on twitter Port centos 6.3 on ppc. > > what about the port on ppc64 and PS3 later old school > > the first target is going to be power7 - anything

Re: [CentOS] centos 6 on ppc64

2012-01-19 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 01/20/2012 12:18 AM, fakessh @ wrote: > I write following the announcement on twitter Port centos 6.3 on ppc. > what about the port on ppc64 and PS3 later old school the first target is going to be power7 - anything and everything else is do-able, but it needs more people to come in and help.

[CentOS] centos 6 on ppc64

2012-01-19 Thread fakessh @
hello guys hello centos list hello master of "Fu" I write following the announcement on twitter Port centos 6.3 on ppc. what about the port on ppc64 and PS3 later old school sincerely -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC2626742 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key C2626

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 (G)parted re-aligning existing partitions?

2012-01-16 Thread Patrick Lists
On 16-01-12 22:25, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > I used Hiren Boot CD (Some tool on it) to create 8 partitions for > Windows XP and CentOS 6. > > Now, CentOS6 Disk Utility reports for first partition: > > "Warning: The partition is misaligned by 512 bytes. This may result in > very poor performances

[CentOS] CentOS 6 (G)parted re-aligning existing partitions?

2012-01-16 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
I used Hiren Boot CD (Some tool on it) to create 8 partitions for Windows XP and CentOS 6. Now, CentOS6 Disk Utility reports for first partition: "Warning: The partition is misaligned by 512 bytes. This may result in very poor performances. Repartitioning is suggested.", and similar warnings a

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and glib 2.24

2012-01-16 Thread John R Pierce
On 01/16/12 11:16 AM, Grendel wrote: > Hi all, > when will be glib 2.24 in CnetOS 6 releases? short answer: when RHEL 6 releases one. which very well may be 'never' as changing lib versions tends to break binary compatibility. instead, they'll backport any critical fixes to the version they d

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and glib 2.24

2012-01-16 Thread dnk
On Monday, January 16, 2012, Grendel wrote: > Hi all, > when will be glib 2.24 in CnetOS 6 releases? > > grendel > I assume it will happen once the upstream provider puts it in. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/l

[CentOS] CentOS 6 and glib 2.24

2012-01-16 Thread Grendel
Hi all, when will be glib 2.24 in CnetOS 6 releases? grendel pgp8Jz45xZk2t.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and screenshot of website

2012-01-06 Thread John Doe
From: Ljubomir Ljubojevic > Maybe recompile Fedoras 'gnome-web-photo" package? > http://vertito.blogspot.com/2008/02/howto-thumbnail-website-from-linux.html Or maybe try: http://khtml2png.sourceforge.net/ JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org h

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.X compatible to ORACLE DB verssion????

2012-01-05 Thread Hakan Koseoglu
On 5 January 2012 22:26, John R Pierce wrote: > this doesn't mean it won't work, but what it does mean is that if > something goes sideways on you, oracle won't help you one bit, and since > you pay a substantial chunk of money annually for that precious support, > its insane NOT to use a supporte

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.X compatible to ORACLE DB verssion????

2012-01-05 Thread Hakan Koseoglu
On 5 January 2012 22:47, Craig White wrote: > seems to me that the sanity issue was forefront at the point before when they > chose to use Oracle in the first place but Larry loves you. > There are plenty of good reasons for using Oracle DB products - it's definitely one of the best out there - b

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.X compatible to ORACLE DB verssion????

2012-01-05 Thread Hakan Koseoglu
On 5 January 2012 22:11, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > http://en.community.dell.com/techcenter/b/techcenter/archive/2012/01/03/dell-engineering-preview-oracle-11gr2-rac-on-rhel6.aspx > http://en.community.dell.com/techcenter/enterprise-solutions/w/oracle_solutions/3336.aspx And? First paragraph from t

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.X compatible to ORACLE DB verssion????

2012-01-05 Thread Craig White
On Jan 5, 2012, at 3:26 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > this doesn't mean it won't work, but what it does mean is that if > something goes sideways on you, oracle won't help you one bit, and since > you pay a substantial chunk of money annually for that precious support, > its insane NOT to use a s

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.X compatible to ORACLE DB verssion????

2012-01-05 Thread John R Pierce
On 01/05/12 2:11 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > http://en.community.dell.com/techcenter/b/techcenter/archive/2012/01/03/dell-engineering-preview-oracle-11gr2-rac-on-rhel6.aspx > http://en.community.dell.com/techcenter/enterprise-solutions/w/oracle_solutions/3336.aspx the bottom line for Oracle Suppo

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.X compatible to ORACLE DB verssion????

2012-01-05 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 09:53:16AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/04/2012 04:29 AM, Christopher J. Buckley wrote: > > 2012/1/4 An Yang > > > >> Somebody in Oracle told me, they need one year to test, I'm not sure, > >> it's true or not. > >> > > That's about right. The testing isn't done by O

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and screenshot of website

2012-01-05 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
On 01/05/2012 01:53 PM, Jani Ollikainen wrote: > On 5.1.2012 13:52, John Hodrien wrote: >> So he wants to be able to capture an image of what a website looks like from >> the command line, and not really take a screenshot at all. >> I think that's a fair summary anyway... > > Yes, well, not native

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and screenshot of website

2012-01-05 Thread Walter Haidinger
Am 05.01.2012 12:52, schrieb John Hodrien: > So he wants to be able to capture an image of what a website looks like from > the command line, and not really take a screenshot at all. Indeed, as there is no screen... This is diffcult, as websites need to be rendered and one just has to google for

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and screenshot of website

2012-01-05 Thread nux
Jani Ollikainen writes: > Hi, > > How one is supposed to do screenshots of a website with CentOS 6? If you're not looking for something strictly command line I've found Shutter to be the most excellent screenshotting tool. ___ CentOS mailing list Ce

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and screenshot of website

2012-01-05 Thread Jani Ollikainen
On 5.1.2012 13:52, John Hodrien wrote: > So he wants to be able to capture an image of what a website looks like from > the command line, and not really take a screenshot at all. > I think that's a fair summary anyway... Yes, well, not native english speaker so I would call those screenshots of th

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and screenshot of website

2012-01-05 Thread John Hodrien
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012, Walter Haidinger wrote: > Am 05.01.2012 09:19, schrieb Jani Ollikainen: >> Yes, the need was for automated command line tool which I can use >> without requiring any user interaction. > > Use option -id or -name of xwd(1) to specify the window, e.g: > xwd -id 0xc000c5 | xwdtopn

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and screenshot of website

2012-01-05 Thread Walter Haidinger
Am 05.01.2012 09:19, schrieb Jani Ollikainen: > Yes, the need was for automated command line tool which I can use > without requiring any user interaction. Use option -id or -name of xwd(1) to specify the window, e.g: xwd -id 0xc000c5 | xwdtopnm | pnmtojpeg > win.jpg To find the id or name, parse

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and screenshot of website

2012-01-05 Thread Walter Haidinger
Am 04.01.2012 10:46, schrieb Jani Ollikainen: > How one is supposed to do screenshots of a website with CentOS 6? For X11, there is xwd(1): X window dump. Prompts you to click on a window and dumps its contents. To "screenshot" a single window and save it as a jpeg, e.g.: xwd | xwdtopnm | pnmtojp

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and screenshot of website

2012-01-05 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Jani Ollikainen wrote: > > I'm just wondering what has been RedHat's idea of not supporting > python with mozembed nor webkit and is there alternative that I don't > know about. But based on first answers, maybe not. This is very likely why RedHat dropped mozembed

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and screenshot of website

2012-01-05 Thread Jani Ollikainen
On 4.1.2012 18:54, John Hodrien wrote: >> I think maybe he wants command line tools... >> But if that is not the case, there is the Screengrab! Firefox addon that can >> screenshot a complete page, only the visible part, or just a selection... > For a command line tool, how about 'import' from imag

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.X compatible to ORACLE DB verssion????

2012-01-04 Thread Hakan Koseoglu
2012/1/5 An Yang : > Greate! > "end vendor" people said, Consequently, we confidently recommend the > deployment of Oracle 11gR2 in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 production > environments today. Your database support agreement is not with "the end vendor" but the database software supplier and as far

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.X compatible to ORACLE DB verssion????

2012-01-04 Thread An Yang
At 2012-01-04 Wed 09:53 -0600,Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/04/2012 04:29 AM, Christopher J. Buckley wrote: > > 2012/1/4 An Yang > > > >> Somebody in Oracle told me, they need one year to test, I'm not sure, > >> it's true or not. > >> > > That's about right. The testing isn't done by Oracle btw,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and screenshot of website

2012-01-04 Thread John Hodrien
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, John Doe wrote: > From: Ljubomir Ljubojevic > >> On 01/04/2012 10:46 AM, Jani Ollikainen wrote: >>> How one is supposed to do screenshots of a website with CentOS 6? >> pres PrtScr key, save, open and crop image with gThumb (Image->Crop), >> then upload it. > > I think maybe

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and screenshot of website

2012-01-04 Thread Frank Cox
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:23:09 +0100 Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > > How one is supposed to do screenshots of a website with CentOS 6? > > > > pres PrtScr key, save, open and crop image with gThumb (Image->Crop), > then upload it. PrtScr key alone screenshots the whole desktop. Alt-PrtScr screens

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and screenshot of website

2012-01-04 Thread John Doe
From: Ljubomir Ljubojevic > On 01/04/2012 10:46 AM, Jani Ollikainen wrote: >> How one is supposed to do screenshots of a website with CentOS 6? > pres PrtScr key, save, open and crop image with gThumb (Image->Crop), > then upload it. I think maybe he wants command line tools... But if that is

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and screenshot of website

2012-01-04 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
On 01/04/2012 10:46 AM, Jani Ollikainen wrote: > Hi, > > How one is supposed to do screenshots of a website with CentOS 6? > pres PrtScr key, save, open and crop image with gThumb (Image->Crop), then upload it. -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe Google is

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.X compatible to ORACLE DB verssion????

2012-01-04 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 01/04/2012 04:29 AM, Christopher J. Buckley wrote: > 2012/1/4 An Yang > >> Somebody in Oracle told me, they need one year to test, I'm not sure, >> it's true or not. >> > That's about right. The testing isn't done by Oracle btw, it's done by the > end vendor. > > The "end vendor" submitted the

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.X compatible to ORACLE DB verssion????

2012-01-04 Thread Jim Perrin
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 6:30 AM, mcclnx mcc wrote: > Does anyone know CENTOS/Redhat 6.X compatible to ORACLE software (X86 and > X86_64) version like 9.X, 10GR2, 11G and 11GR2. > > Any official document say that? Apart from everything else said here, this is well worth a read -> http://en.commun

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.X compatible to ORACLE DB verssion????

2012-01-04 Thread Christopher J. Buckley
2012/1/4 An Yang > Somebody in Oracle told me, they need one year to test, I'm not sure, > it's true or not. > That's about right. The testing isn't done by Oracle btw, it's done by the end vendor. -- Kind Regards, Christopher J. Buckley ___ CentOS

[CentOS] CentOS 6 and screenshot of website

2012-01-04 Thread Jani Ollikainen
Hi, How one is supposed to do screenshots of a website with CentOS 6? The usual and normal ways I know doing it is: http://www.coderholic.com/pywebshot-generate-website-thumbnails-using-python/ https://github.com/AdamN/python-webkit2png/ But then from some reason RedHat doesn't support them: gn

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.X compatible to ORACLE DB verssion????

2012-01-03 Thread An Yang
Somebody in Oracle told me, they need one year to test, I'm not sure, it's true or not. At 2012-01-02 Mon 09:46 -0600,Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/01/2012 06:07 PM, Christopher J. Buckley wrote: > > On 29 December 2011 19:15, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> They can't very well (at least not with a s

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.X compatible to ORACLE DB verssion????

2012-01-02 Thread Hakan Koseoglu
On 2 January 2012 15:46, Johnny Hughes wrote: > And my point is, right now Oracle can say that they have not certified > their own OEL6 either ... therefore, one can not expect RHEL6 to be > certified either.  If they certify OEL6 for a version of Oracle > Database, it would be difficult for them

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.X compatible to ORACLE DB verssion????

2012-01-02 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 01/01/2012 06:07 PM, Christopher J. Buckley wrote: > On 29 December 2011 19:15, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> They can't very well (at least not with a straight face) tell Red Hat >> that RHEL6 is not certified while saying that OEL6 is certified can >> they? If they do that for very long, they will

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.X compatible to ORACLE DB verssion????

2012-01-01 Thread Christopher J. Buckley
On 29 December 2011 19:15, Johnny Hughes wrote: > They can't very well (at least not with a straight face) tell Red Hat > that RHEL6 is not certified while saying that OEL6 is certified can > they?  If they do that for very long, they will be breaching their > support agreements. Really? In what

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 x86_64 can't detect raid 10

2011-12-30 Thread Ken godee
> Dear All, > > I just got a new server with the following specifications: > motherboard : Intel S5500BC > CPU : Xeon Quad Core 2.6Ghz > RAM : 8GB > HDD : 4 x 2TB SATA with configured raid 10 using raid embedded > server. > > The problem is the centos installer can't detect

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 x86_64 can't detect raid 10

2011-12-30 Thread Rob Kampen
On 12/31/2011 04:31 PM, David wrote: > Dear All, > > I just got a new server with the following specifications: > motherboard : Intel S5500BC > CPU : Xeon Quad Core 2.6Ghz > RAM : 8GB > HDD : 4 x 2TB SATA with configured raid 10 using raid embedded > server. > > The problem

[CentOS] CentOS 6 x86_64 can't detect raid 10

2011-12-30 Thread David
Dear All, I just got a new server with the following specifications: motherboard : Intel S5500BC CPU : Xeon Quad Core 2.6Ghz RAM : 8GB HDD : 4 x 2TB SATA with configured raid 10 using raid embedded server. The problem is the centos installer can't detect raid virtual disk

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 x86_64 can't detect raid 10

2011-12-30 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
On 12/30/2011 12:46 AM, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Either get a real RAID controller which does hardware RAID or use > CentOS's software raid function. +1. For Linux/CentOS/mdadm RAID 10 use "far" setting to get better (2x ??) read speed on mirroring. -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air)

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 x86_64 can't detect raid 10

2011-12-29 Thread Alexander Dalloz
Am 30.12.2011 00:41, schrieb David: > Dear All, > > I just got a new server with the following specifications: > motherboard : Intel S5500BC > CPU : Xeon Quad Core 2.6Ghz > RAM : 8GB > HDD : 4 x 2TB SATA with configured raid 10 using raid embedded > server. > > The proble

[CentOS] CentOS 6 x86_64 can't detect raid 10

2011-12-29 Thread David
Dear All, I just got a new server with the following specifications: motherboard : Intel S5500BC CPU : Xeon Quad Core 2.6Ghz RAM : 8GB HDD : 4 x 2TB SATA with configured raid 10 using raid embedded server. The problem is the centos installer can't detect raid virtual disk

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.X compatible to ORACLE DB verssion????

2011-12-29 Thread Hakan Koseoglu
On 29 December 2011 19:31, wrote: > As I said, there are many, many more RHEL installations, and most of them > will want to go to RHEL6 within the coming year. And, of course, some of > those installations are LARGE$$$ customers of Oracle (for example, I > have personal knowledge that AT&T u

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.X compatible to ORACLE DB verssion????

2011-12-29 Thread Hakan Koseoglu
On 29 December 2011 19:01, John Broome wrote: > So if oracle isn't certified to run on OEL 6, did oracle roll it out > just for shits and giggles? solaris ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.X compatible to ORACLE DB verssion????

2011-12-29 Thread m . roth
Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 12/29/2011 01:19 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 12/29/2011 01:01 PM, John Broome wrote: On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 13:57, John R Pierce wrote: > On 12/29/11 4:30 AM, mcclnx mcc wrote: >> Does anyone know CENTOS/Redhat 6.X compati

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.X compatible to ORACLE DB verssion????

2011-12-29 Thread John R Pierce
On 12/29/11 4:30 AM, mcclnx mcc wrote: > Does anyone know CENTOS/Redhat 6.X compatible to ORACLE software (X86 and > X86_64) version like 9.X, 10GR2, 11G and 11GR2. 11.2.0.3(I think is latest?) seems to work fine on CentOS 6.1, however RHEL6 (and all versions of CentOS) are completely unsupporte

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >