Le 23/03/2018 à 16:52, Kay Schenk a écrit :
> Great! Would love to hear more about your experience!
Here's the happy end in detail.
https://blog.microlinux.fr/centos-pc-engines/
Works like a charm.
Cheers,
Niki
--
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
7, place de l'église - 30730 Mon
Le 27/03/2018 à 15:50, John Hodrien a écrit :
> If you're going to do an interactive install, do it graphically via
> VNC, as has already been suggested.
After much more experimenting, I can report a full success. I managed to
install CentOS 7 on the board, using a mix of serial console and VNC.
W
On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
The next step is to find the right combination of boot parameters so I
can install through the text console. So far, I've had no luck.
Any suggestions ?
If you're going to do an interactive install, do it graphically via VNC, as
has already been sugg
Le 23/03/2018 à 16:52, Kay Schenk a écrit :
> Great! Would love to hear more about your experience!
Right, here goes.
So, I got the hardware this morning: Calexium router board with a
quad-core AMD processor, 4 GB ram, 1 TB SATA disk, a serial console and
all the cables.
I have the board connect
On 03/16/2018 10:09 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
Le 16/03/2018 à 14:29, Leon Fauster a écrit :
We use a DIGITUS USB2Serial Converter (Prolific based USBID: VID:067B PID:2303)
and then
screen /dev/DEVICE 115200
Thanks everybody for your numerous suggestions. As soon as I have the
hardware, I'l
Le 16/03/2018 à 14:29, Leon Fauster a écrit :
> We use a DIGITUS USB2Serial Converter (Prolific based USBID: VID:067B
> PID:2303) and then
>
> screen /dev/DEVICE 115200
Thanks everybody for your numerous suggestions. As soon as I have the
hardware, I'll fiddle with it and then report back my fi
> Am 16.03.2018 um 14:21 schrieb isdtor :
>
> Nicolas Kovacs writes:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have to install CentOS 7 for a client, to act as cache & filtering
>> proxy using Squid.
>>
>> I'd like to use this piece of specialized hardware :
>>
>> http://store.calexium.com/fr/systeme-pre-assemble/869-sy
Nicolas Kovacs writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have to install CentOS 7 for a client, to act as cache & filtering
> proxy using Squid.
>
> I'd like to use this piece of specialized hardware :
>
> http://store.calexium.com/fr/systeme-pre-assemble/869-systeme-pre-assemble-rackmatrix-apu-amd-gx-412tc-quatre-co
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
I have to install CentOS 7 for a client, to act as cache & filtering
proxy using Squid.
I'd like to use this piece of specialized hardware :
http://store.calexium.com/fr/systeme-pre-assemble/869-systeme-pre-assemble-rackmatrix-apu-amd-gx-412tc-quatre-
On 16/03/18 12:57, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
Hi,
I have to install CentOS 7 for a client, to act as cache & filtering
proxy using Squid.
I'd like to use this piece of specialized hardware :
http://store.calexium.com/fr/systeme-pre-assemble/869-systeme-pre-assemble-rackmatrix-apu-amd-gx-412tc-qua
Hi,
I have to install CentOS 7 for a client, to act as cache & filtering
proxy using Squid.
I'd like to use this piece of specialized hardware :
http://store.calexium.com/fr/systeme-pre-assemble/869-systeme-pre-assemble-rackmatrix-apu-amd-gx-412tc-quatre-coeurs-1-ghz.html
There is no VGA or HDM
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Can you try to see if Fedora 27 has the same problem? If it has then
> this is a problem that upstream needs to fix on EL releases. If it
> isn't then I would lean more towards the motherboard/bios combo
> saying something which says "my legacy support is iffy.. use
So is the end goal to have dual boot? You want to preserve the existing
Cent OS installation on this drive and also install Cent OS 7?
The biggest problem is the installer is really not very smart when it comes
to this use case. It's friendly for Windows and macOS dual boot, but fairly
well facepl
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 5:18 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
> The only other thing I can think of is that the disk was already
> formatted to GPT. In that case it has to be EFI. [I had a disk which
> was GPT partitioned and removing that was quite a challenge as I had
> done a 'dd if=/dev/zero o
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018, 4:18 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> The only other thing I can think of is that the disk was already
> formatted to GPT. In that case it has to be EFI. [I had a disk which
> was GPT partitioned and removing that was quite a challenge as I had
> done a 'dd if=/dev/zero of
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018, 3:19 PM Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
> I have a UEFI system, but I want to install CentOS on a MBR (not GPT)
> hard disk.
>
Why?
While the UEFI spec permits using MBR for booting, it's confusing because
there's no actual single standard for MBR. There is for GPT.
Anyway, all
On 15 February 2018 at 21:48, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
> Stephen J Smoogen wrote:
>
>> OK wild guess on install options as sometimes they will do this but
>> not say they did it. Try adding inst.gpt=false to the boot line.
>
> Sorry, that didn't work. Nor did installing CentOS 7 without a boot
>
Stephen J Smoogen wrote:
> OK wild guess on install options as sometimes they will do this but
> not say they did it. Try adding inst.gpt=false to the boot line.
Sorry, that didn't work. Nor did installing CentOS 7 without a boot
loader, chroot-ing into it, and trying to install grub2 manually:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 06:45:51PM -0500, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> > I am guessing because my drives were blank and smaller than 2 TB that
> > it defaulted to MBR even when the system had a UEFI BIOS (as long as
> > the firmware is in legacy mode).
>
> Right, th
On 15 February 2018 at 18:45, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>> I am guessing because my drives were blank and smaller than 2 TB that
>> it defaulted to MBR even when the system had a UEFI BIOS (as long as
>> the firmware is in legacy mode).
>
> Right, the problem seems
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> I am guessing because my drives were blank and smaller than 2 TB that
> it defaulted to MBR even when the system had a UEFI BIOS (as long as
> the firmware is in legacy mode).
Right, the problem seems to arise if you already have partitions on
your MBR disk. Perhaps
On 15 February 2018 at 18:29, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>> OK I am going with documentation not being right and/or I have been
>> very lucky with my installs.
>
> If you read
> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html/installat
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> OK I am going with documentation not being right and/or I have been
> very lucky with my installs.
If you read
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html/installation_guide/sect-disk-partitioning-setup-x86#sect-bootloader-mbr-gpt
On 15 February 2018 at 18:05, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 05:31:42PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> On 15 February 2018 at 17:19, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
>> > I have a UEFI system, but I want to install CentOS on a MBR (not GPT)
>> > hard disk.
>> >
>> > The installation p
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 05:31:42PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 15 February 2018 at 17:19, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
> > I have a UEFI system, but I want to install CentOS on a MBR (not GPT)
> > hard disk.
> >
> > The installation program keeps telling me that I must create an "EFI
> > s
Stephen J Smoogen wrote:
> If the installer is doing that then it usually means that the UEFI
> firmware is either
> a) not in BIOS compatibility mode
> b) does not respond in a way that Linux detects or
> c) the disk is larger than what BIOS compatibility mode will allow.
On the MBR disk, I
Sometimes in bios it is called legacy mode
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 15, 2018, at 5:31 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>> On 15 February 2018 at 17:19, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
>> I have a UEFI system, but I want to install CentOS on a MBR (not GPT)
>> hard disk.
>>
>> The installation p
On 15 February 2018 at 17:19, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
> I have a UEFI system, but I want to install CentOS on a MBR (not GPT)
> hard disk.
>
> The installation program keeps telling me that I must create an "EFI
> system partition on a GPT disk mounted at /boot/efi".
>
> I can't find a way to wor
I have a UEFI system, but I want to install CentOS on a MBR (not GPT)
hard disk.
The installation program keeps telling me that I must create an "EFI
system partition on a GPT disk mounted at /boot/efi".
I can't find a way to work around this. Is there a solution?
--
Yves Bellefeuille
__
Kk sir.
-Original Message-
From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 10:37 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Install Centos not detect the hard drive
On 12/12/2016 8:55 PM, JEYARAJ wrote:
> I'm instal
On 12/12/2016 8:55 PM, JEYARAJ wrote:
I'm installing the Centos 7.0 from Intel 2u chassis server, Not detect the
hard disk.
Please help me sir.
Had drive --> Intel SSD -240 GB
insufficient information.
'intel 2u chassis server' could describe most anything. the size of
the chassis and the
Hi All,
I'm installing the Centos 7.0 from Intel 2u chassis server, Not detect the
hard disk.
Please help me sir.
Had drive --> Intel SSD -240 GB
Regards,
Jeyaraj. M
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo
On Tue, September 9, 2014 9:33 am, Mark Tinberg wrote:
>
> On Sep 8, 2014, at 10:25 AM, Valeri Galtsev
> wrote:
>
>> Mark Tinberg wrote:
>>>
A lack of updates can also mean that there is a lack of effort or
>>> competence
is tracking down and fixing bugs, or not a large enough customer
On Tue, September 9, 2014 9:37 am, Mark Tinberg wrote:
>
> On Sep 8, 2014, at 11:57 AM, Valeri Galtsev
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, September 8, 2014 9:19 am, Mark Tinberg wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sep 6, 2014, at 3:42 PM, Valeri Galtsev
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Sat, September 6, 2014 2:27 pm, Jonathan Billin
On Sep 8, 2014, at 11:57 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Mon, September 8, 2014 9:19 am, Mark Tinberg wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 6, 2014, at 3:42 PM, Valeri Galtsev
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, September 6, 2014 2:27 pm, Jonathan Billings wrote:
I choose vendors that make it relatively pain
On Sep 8, 2014, at 10:25 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> Mark Tinberg wrote:
>>
>>> A lack of updates can also mean that there is a lack of effort or
>> competence
>>> is tracking down and fixing bugs, or not a large enough customer base
>>> with
>>> the same bugs to generate sufficient, actionable
On Mon, September 8, 2014 2:45 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2014-09-08, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> I gave on the SiperMicro quite a while ago. Not because of BIOS, but
>> because of hardware engineering flaws. Which at least manifests itself
>> with system boards for AMD CPUs. These (AMD) boards
Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2014-09-08, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> I gave on the SiperMicro quite a while ago. Not because of BIOS, but
>> because of hardware engineering flaws. Which at least manifests itself
>> with system boards for AMD CPUs. These (AMD) boards work reliably for
>> only 2-4 years
On 2014-09-08, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> I gave on the SiperMicro quite a while ago. Not because of BIOS, but
> because of hardware engineering flaws. Which at least manifests itself
> with system boards for AMD CPUs. These (AMD) boards work reliably for only
> 2-4 years, after that they die. Not
On Mon, September 8, 2014 9:19 am, Mark Tinberg wrote:
>
> On Sep 6, 2014, at 3:42 PM, Valeri Galtsev
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, September 6, 2014 2:27 pm, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>>>
>>> I choose vendors that make it relatively painless to apply the firmware
>>> updates under Linux.
>>
>> This is on
On Mon, September 8, 2014 9:48 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Mark Tinberg wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 09:46:36AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
But that is exactly what I said: if the hardware was released and sold
with this piece of crap BIOS, then you shouldn't be buying that j
On 2014-09-08, Mark Tinberg wrote:
>
> On Sep 7, 2014, at 1:35 AM, Keith Keller
> wrote:
>
> This is why I would say that firmware updates are part of the preventative
> maintenance in the same way kernel updates are, if the bug was already fixed
> and if you had flashed this during a normal m
Mark Tinberg wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 09:46:36AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>> But that is exactly what I said: if the hardware was released and sold
>>> with this piece of crap BIOS, then you shouldn't be buying that junk in
>>> the first place. Or at least stop buying the crap made
On Sep 7, 2014, at 1:35 AM, Keith Keller
wrote:
> On 2014-09-06, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> ... I've mentined manufacturers in another reply: tyan, lsi, 3ware, ati...
>
> Even 3ware has had buggy firmwares. I once had to flash a 3ware card
> years into production because it was not until t
On Sep 6, 2014, at 3:42 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On Sat, September 6, 2014 2:27 pm, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>>
>> I choose vendors that make it relatively painless to apply the firmware
>> updates under Linux.
>
> This is only so for either very rich, who can afford to have stand by
> hard
On Sep 6, 2014, at 2:27 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 09:46:36AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> But that is exactly what I said: if the hardware was released and sold
>> with this piece of crap BIOS, then you shouldn't be buying that junk in
>> the first place. Or at le
On Sun, September 7, 2014 8:55 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2014-09-07, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> I guess after that I should declare myself to be lucky. None out of more
>> than a couple of dozens of 3ware cards ever did harm for me. I did once
>> had one of them fried (my clumsiness most like
On 2014-09-07, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> I guess after that I should declare myself to be lucky. None out of more
> than a couple of dozens of 3ware cards ever did harm for me. I did once
> had one of them fried (my clumsiness most likely), which then just didn't
> come up (3ware just replaced car
On Sun, September 7, 2014 1:04 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2014-09-07, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> It doesn't sound like you are flashing all 3ware cards you have in
>> production every time new firmware release it out. It doesn't sound
>> either
>> like you had fatal failure of production box b
On 2014-09-07, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> It doesn't sound like you are flashing all 3ware cards you have in
> production every time new firmware release it out. It doesn't sound either
> like you had fatal failure of production box because of bug in 3ware
> firmware. Correct me if I'm wrong, other
On Sun, September 7, 2014 1:35 am, Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2014-09-06, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> ... I've mentined manufacturers in another reply: tyan, lsi, 3ware,
>> ati...
>
> Even 3ware has had buggy firmwares. I once had to flash a 3ware card
> years into production because it was not un
On 2014-09-06, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> ... I've mentined manufacturers in another reply: tyan, lsi, 3ware, ati...
Even 3ware has had buggy firmwares. I once had to flash a 3ware card
years into production because it was not until then that this particular
bug was exposed by my configuration.
On 9/6/2014 4:02 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
That doesn't mean that you have to flash firmware onto LSI controller
every so often after you placed controller into production because
original version of firmware is crap, and updated version will turn out to
be crap several Months after its release,
On Sat, September 6, 2014 4:52 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 9/6/2014 1:53 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> ... I've mentioned manufacturers in another reply: tyan, lsi, 3ware,
>> ati...
>
> A few months ago, I had to flash the firmware on a LSI 2008 aka 9211-8i
> because I needed the card in "IT" (In
On 9/6/2014 1:53 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
... I've mentined manufacturers in another reply: tyan, lsi, 3ware, ati...
A few months ago, I had to flash the firmware on a LSI 2008 aka 9211-8i
because I needed the card in "IT" (Initiator Target) mode rather than
"IR" (Integrated Raid), and this
On Sat, September 6, 2014 2:16 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2014-09-06, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> I get rackmount
>> ones assembled by small company (companies) and about 1/2 of cost of
>> similar hardware from Dell. Those are for the most part based on Tyan
>> barebones. And during last at least
On Sat, September 6, 2014 2:27 pm, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 09:46:36AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> But that is exactly what I said: if the hardware was released and sold
>> with this piece of crap BIOS, then you shouldn't be buying that junk in
>> the first place. Or
On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 09:46:36AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> But that is exactly what I said: if the hardware was released and sold
> with this piece of crap BIOS, then you shouldn't be buying that junk in
> the first place. Or at least stop buying the crap made by _this_
> manufacturer in a f
On 2014-09-06, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> I get rackmount
> ones assembled by small company (companies) and about 1/2 of cost of
> similar hardware from Dell. Those are for the most part based on Tyan
> barebones. And during last at least decade I never had a "must to" flash
> newer BIOS situation wi
On Sat, September 6, 2014 10:07 am, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 9/6/2014 7:46 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> But that is exactly what I said: if the hardware was released and sold
>> with this piece of crap BIOS, then you shouldn't be buying that junk in
>> the first place. Or at least stop buying the
On 9/6/2014 7:46 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
But that is exactly what I said: if the hardware was released and sold
with this piece of crap BIOS, then you shouldn't be buying that junk in
the first place. Or at least stop buying the crap made by_this_
manufacturer in a future. I'm still not convinc
On Sat, September 6, 2014 9:21 am, Steven Tardy wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Valeri Galtsev
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I was always fascinated: why [some] people are dying to upgrade
>> firmware?
>> It doesn't matter whether by firmware you mean system board BIOS, or
>> firmware of some card. W
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Valeri Galtsev
wrote:
>
> I was always fascinated: why [some] people are dying to upgrade firmware?
> It doesn't matter whether by firmware you mean system board BIOS, or
> firmware of some card. Why taking chance having your machine hosed?
Because BIOS updates o
On Fri, September 5, 2014 2:20 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> By the bye, about firmware updates: I like Dell's the best of all. HP, run
> it from some kind of DOS, and hope. Dell, you can do from a running CentOS
> system (I've done it a few times), and unlike everyone else's firmware
> updates, i
Hey just coming into this conversation. Here is an Idea.. Why not
install a SATA card into the machine, one that supports AHCI. I'm
guessing there is a free PCI or PCI-E slot.
They are made, here is a link, I found quickly with a google search..
Bang for buck, it could be the cheapest option.
Jason Pyeron wrote:
>> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
>> Dumb question: these machines are getting very long in the tooth, but
>> you're putting SSD's in them? New, or newer machines, would
>
>> solve a lot of problems
>
> Their warrantees are good for another few years... And the money is not :)
War
> -Original Message-
> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 15:19
> To: CentOS mailing list
>
> Jason Pyeron wrote:
> >> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
> >> Jason Pyeron wrote:
> >> >> From: Jason Pyeron
> >> >> > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce
>
By the bye, about firmware updates: I like Dell's the best of all. HP, run
it from some kind of DOS, and hope. Dell, you can do from a running CentOS
system (I've done it a few times), and unlike everyone else's firmware
updates, it says, "collecting information", then *tells* you that a) this
upda
Jason Pyeron wrote:
>> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
>> Jason Pyeron wrote:
>> >> From: Jason Pyeron
>> >> > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce
>> >> > On 8/31/2014 2:03 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>> >> > > Yes. They support internal SATA drives, we are changing
>> >> > from spinn
---Original Message-
> >> > From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> >> > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce
> >> > Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 17:34
> >> > To: centos@centos.org
> >> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Install
ce
>> > Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 17:34
>> > To: centos@centos.org
>> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Install Centos 6 x86_64 on Dell
>> > PowerEdge 2970 and aSSD (hardware probing issues)
>> >
>> > On 8/31/2014 2:03 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>>
2014 17:34
> > To: centos@centos.org
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Install Centos 6 x86_64 on Dell
> > PowerEdge 2970 and aSSD (hardware probing issues)
> >
> > On 8/31/2014 2:03 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > > Yes. They support internal SATA drives, we are changing
On 8/31/2014 3:15 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> Good question, I will ask Dell. The BIOS only has Off and Auto as choices. Is
> there a preference I should shoot for?
ACHI is pretty much required for SSD support.
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the midd
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce
> Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 17:34
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Install Centos 6 x86_64 on Dell
> PowerEdge 2970 and aSSD (ha
On 8/31/2014 2:03 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> Yes. They support internal SATA drives, we are changing from spinning drives
> to SSD. I am working with Dell to get a BIOS patch, but I wont hold my breath.
is the SATA interface in AHCI mode or legacy IDE emulation?
--
john r pierce
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rainer Duffner
> Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 17:09
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Install Centos 6 x86_64 on Dell
> PowerEdge 2970 anda
Am 31.08.2014 um 23:03 schrieb Jason Pyeron :
>>
>> Is that actually a supported configuration (in the Dell-sense)?.
>>
>
> Yes. They support internal SATA drives, we are changing from spinning drives
> to SSD. I am working with Dell to get a BIOS patch, but I wont hold my breath.
>>
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rainer Duffner
> Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 16:54
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Install Centos 6 x86_64 on Dell
> PowerEdge 2970 and a
Am 31.08.2014 um 21:52 schrieb Jason Pyeron :
> I have a fleet of 2970s and we are upgrading the hardrives on the motherboard
> SATA ports (A/B not the PERC backplane) when a "detecting hardware" is
> performed the system crashes, reboots and gives an E1422 error code (useless
> video: https:/
I have a fleet of 2970s and we are upgrading the hardrives on the motherboard
SATA ports (A/B not the PERC backplane) when a "detecting hardware" is
performed the system crashes, reboots and gives an E1422 error code (useless
video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhyMeUHJar4).
We narrowed it d
> I also tried with other distributions and every time I get the same
> result side bios and there 'no setting for secure boot or similar
In short, enter the UEFI setup and disable secure boot (UEFI replaces
BIOS). There's information at:
http://www.eightforums.com/tutorials/17058-secure-boot-ena
On 10/12/13 02:49 PM, Paolo De Michele wrote:
> hello everybody,
>
> before you come to write this post I checked the official documentation of
> centos. to be brief:
>
> - I format my usb pendrive in fat
> - Using the command dd if =name.iso of =/dev/sdx (with or without bs for
> the purposes of i
hello everybody,
before you come to write this post I checked the official documentation of
centos. to be brief:
- I format my usb pendrive in fat
- Using the command dd if =name.iso of =/dev/sdx (with or without bs for
the purposes of issue, and 'indifferent)
Restart the system and remains in t
On 07/11/12 15:43, Hal Martin wrote:
>
> The software we're testing does not support being installed on LVM, so
> if we want vendor support we need to install it on a partition.
>
> Hardware RAID is going to be used for deployment, but for lab testing
> we were hoping to use mdadm and avoid buying
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Nux! wrote:
> On 07/11/12 15:10, Hal Martin wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I'm trying to install CentOS 6.3 to an mdadm partitionable array and
>> not having any luck.
>>
>> The installer only allows me to create one file system per md device,
>> or specify the md devi
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Nux! wrote:
> AFAIK installing on to partitionable md is a hack that is not
> supported; it's cool, but is not supported by upstream. And when it
> breaks I hear it can be quite unpleasant to fix.
Then perhaps this link should be removed from the CentOS wiki:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Hal Martin wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm trying to install CentOS 6.3 to an mdadm partitionable array and
> not having any luck.
>
> The installer only allows me to create one file system per md device,
> or specify the md device as a LVM physical volume. I don't want
On 07/11/12 15:10, Hal Martin wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm trying to install CentOS 6.3 to an mdadm partitionable array and
> not having any luck.
>
> The installer only allows me to create one file system per md device,
> or specify the md device as a LVM physical volume. I don't want to do
> eithe
Hello all,
I'm trying to install CentOS 6.3 to an mdadm partitionable array and
not having any luck.
The installer only allows me to create one file system per md device,
or specify the md device as a LVM physical volume. I don't want to do
either, I want to create one md device and create multip
That's a neat device you have there.
If you had a DB9 serial port I'd say you'll really want a null modem
cable to interface with the device (but it doesn't) - hopefully you
know or have the cable necessary to talk to it via the RJ-45 console.
You may consider using CentOS 5 for the reason below.
From: Mihamina Rakotomandimby
> I would like to install CentOS on this:
> http://www.lannerinc.com/x86_Network_Appliances/FW-7520
> - No VGA/DVI
> - Only a "console" port (the old 9600 baudrate one)
> - Boot on USB actived by default
> Would you know a tutorial helping on installing CentOS on this
Hi all
I would like to install CentOS on this:
http://www.lannerinc.com/x86_Network_Appliances/FW-7520
- No VGA/DVI
- Only a "console" port (the old 9600 baudrate one)
- Boot on USB actived by default
Would you know a tutorial helping on installing CentOS on this?
I guess I have to
- download the
Juergen Gotteswinter wrote:
> Am 12.10.11 16:48, schrieb Marko Weber:
>>
>> i have to an remote server contact via rescue console.
>> How can i install centos there without any image or cd?
> http://evcz.tk/blog/2008/10/21/remote-centos-install/
>
> works with centos 4 / 5 / 6 and fedora
Please d
http://evcz.tk/blog/2008/10/21/remote-centos-install/
works with centos 4 / 5 / 6 and fedora
Am 12.10.11 16:48, schrieb Marko Weber:
>
> hello ,
> i have to an remote server contact via rescue console.
> How can i install centos there without any image or cd?
>
> with gentoo i untar a stage3 tarb
hello ,
i have to an remote server contact via rescue console.
How can i install centos there without any image or cd?
with gentoo i untar a stage3 tarball and latest portage , baking kernel
- go! (shortversion)
but how to do this with centos?
i gooled last hour but only find howtos with cd / d
On 4/29/11, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> Only problem is... networking still isn't working although brctl show
> on the host shows that a vnet0 had been created and attached to the
> bridge. Any pointers would be appreciated!
Just to close off on this issue for the benefit of any future clueless
On 4/28/11, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> of virt stack. You should use libvirt or virt-manager instead. Especially
> if you are concerned about security. I think libvirt can start guest on
> headless server.
>
> If this still fails for you you need to complain to libvirt developers
> (not in a rant mode,
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> BTW, can guests be installed on raw (unformatted or formatted)
> partitions (not images)? Can virt-install do that? I tried it and had no
> luck.
>
> - Jussi
You can install them to logical volumes...
Season to taste
virt-install -p -n test_phys -r 512
On 28.4.2011 20.29, Tru Huynh wrote:
> does that mean that you volonteer to add some pages to wiki.centos.org
> (-> centos-docs mailing list for more) ? ;P
>
Maybe I could, How could that be done? Though I should have started to
think about that earlier, now the big install hassle starts to be ov
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 08:17:46PM +0300, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> On 28.4.2011 18.58, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> > like anaconda not seeing the "dvd"
> > (mounted ISO specified using --location) that it just booted from.
>
> That's ok, once you know that... But I agree, it is frustrating, because
>
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo