In article <50117.213.157.4.156.1314117697.squir...@nimrod.dscd.de>,
Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> > In article
> > ,
> > Anne Wilson wrote:
>
> >> I removed sendmail - but it also removed clamav-milter. When I tried
> >> to re-install clamav-milter it would have pulled sendmail back in so I
> >> a
On Aug 23, 2011, at 9:41 AM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>> In article
>> ,
>> Anne Wilson wrote:
>
>>> I removed sendmail - but it also removed clamav-milter. When I tried
>>> to re-install clamav-milter it would have pulled sendmail back in so I
>>> aborted. Advice?
>>
>> milters are specific
> In article
> ,
> Anne Wilson wrote:
>> I removed sendmail - but it also removed clamav-milter. When I tried
>> to re-install clamav-milter it would have pulled sendmail back in so I
>> aborted. Advice?
>
> milters are specific to sendmail. clamav-milter is a linkage between
> ClamAV and sendm
On 8/23/2011 4:46 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
>
>> I removed sendmail - but it also removed clamav-milter. When I tried
>> to re-install clamav-milter it would have pulled sendmail back in so I
>> aborted. Advice?
>
> milters are specific to sendmail. clamav-milter is a linkage between
> ClamAV a
Anne Wilson wrote:
On 23 August 2011 10:46, Tony Mountifield wrote:
In article ,
Anne Wilson wrote:
On 22 August 2011 20:50, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
One of the first things I do after the installation of a system is a yum
install postfix followed by a yum remove sendmail
On Tuesday 23 Aug 2011 Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 8/23/11 3:51 AM, Anne Wilson wrote:
> >> mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, $mydomain, xxx.lan,
> >> xxx.org
> >
> > This morning I restored the old main.cf, which uses the old network
> > settings of xxx.net. Now mail is being receiv
On 8/23/11 3:51 AM, Anne Wilson wrote:
> >>
>> mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, $mydomain, xxx.lan, xxx.org
>
> This morning I restored the old main.cf, which uses the old network
> settings of xxx.net. Now mail is being received, but sending mail is
> being refused by my server.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:59:08AM +0200, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
> On 23/08/2011 11:46, Tony Mountifield wrote:
> > Anne Wilson wrote:
> >> I removed sendmail - but it also removed clamav-milter. When I tried
> >> to re-install clamav-milter it would have pulled sendmail back in so I
> >>
On 23 August 2011 10:46, Tony Mountifield wrote:
> In article
> ,
> Anne Wilson wrote:
>> On 22 August 2011 20:50, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> > One of the first things I do after the installation of a system is a yum
>> > install postfix followed by a yum remove sendmail. No need to deal w
On 23/08/2011 11:46, Tony Mountifield wrote:
> In article
> ,
> Anne Wilson wrote:
>> On 22 August 2011 20:50, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>>> One of the first things I do after the installation of a system is a yum
>>> install postfix followed by a yum remove sendmail. No need to deal with
>>>
In article ,
Anne Wilson wrote:
> On 22 August 2011 20:50, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> > One of the first things I do after the installation of a system is a yum
> > install postfix followed by a yum remove sendmail. No need to deal with
> > alternatives if you don't intend to deal with sendma
On 22 August 2011 20:50, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> One of the first things I do after the installation of a system is a yum
> install postfix followed by a yum remove sendmail. No need to deal with
> alternatives if you don't intend to deal with sendmail anyway.
>
I removed sendmail - but it
On 23 August 2011 09:11, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Anne Wilson
> wrote:
>> Aug 22 14:02:11 borg postfix/qmgr[1499]: B4693A377C:
>> from=,
>> size=7487, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
>> Aug 22 14:02:12 borg postfix/smtp[2071]: B4693A377C: to=,
>> relay=mailhost.zen.co.uk[
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Anne Wilson wrote:
> Aug 22 14:02:11 borg postfix/qmgr[1499]: B4693A377C: from=,
> size=7487, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
> Aug 22 14:02:12 borg postfix/smtp[2071]: B4693A377C: to=,
> relay=mailhost.zen.co.uk[212.23.3.98]:25, delay=0.43,
>
> mydestination = $myhostname,
On 23 August 2011 07:47, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On 22 August 2011 19:45, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>>
>>> Anne
>>
>> alternatives --config mta
>>
>> Switch to Postfix. Validate by
>>
>> alternatives --display mta
>>
>> then remove Sendmail if you do not use it.
>>
>
> Thanks - that's what I was looki
On 22 August 2011 19:45, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>
>> Anne
>
> alternatives --config mta
>
> Switch to Postfix. Validate by
>
> alternatives --display mta
>
> then remove Sendmail if you do not use it.
>
Thanks - that's what I was looking for.
alternatives --display mta
mta - status is manual.
l
One of the first things I do after the installation of a system is a yum
install postfix followed by a yum remove sendmail. No need to deal with
alternatives if you don't intend to deal with sendmail anyway.
Regards.
Dennis
On 08/22/2011 08:45 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> It is obvious you
It is obvious you run both Sendmail and Postfix, ending in trouble. The
sendmail binary (which is a symlink) still points to Sendmail, though you
seem to have configured Postfix as you system's MTA.
> I have been careful to re-map transports and restart postfix after any
> changes to the config fi
On 22/08/2011, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:12:54PM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 13:07 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
>>
>> > : host mailhost.zen.co.uk[212.23.3.98] said:
>
> If you're running postfix, you might want to also edit /etc/aliases.
> The las
On 8/22/2011 9:26 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Actually, the "main suspect" is the program or person that is sending out
> mail with an unqualified sender, e.g. just "user". Change it to a
> qualified sender (e.g. with a resolvable FQDN).
>
With sendmail you can set 'MASQUERADE_AS' in sendmail.mc to
Actually, the "main suspect" is the program or person that is sending out
mail with an unqualified sender, e.g. just "user". Change it to a
qualified sender (e.g. with a resolvable FQDN).
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.cen
Le lun 22 aoû 2011 14:29:29 CEST, Anne Wilson a écrit:
> ...
> Aug 22 14:02:12 borg postfix/smtp[2071]: B4693A377C: to=,
> relay=mailhost.zen.co.uk[212.23.3.98]:25, delay=0.43,
> delays=0.09/0.02/0.15/0.18, dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (host
> mailhost.zen.co.uk[212.23.3.98] said: 550-Verificatio
On 22/08/2011 15:29, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Monday 22 Aug 2011 13:12:54 Always Learning wrote:
>> Once your email is out on the Internet is needs a genuine Internet email
>> address. xxx.lan is known only to your internal system and it is not an
>> Internet email address.
>>
> Exactly - and my pro
On Monday 22 Aug 2011 13:12:54 Always Learning wrote:
> Once your email is out on the Internet is needs a genuine Internet email
> address. xxx.lan is known only to your internal system and it is not an
> Internet email address.
>
Exactly - and my problem is knowing where it is getting this from.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:12:54PM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 13:07 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
>
> > : host mailhost.zen.co.uk[212.23.3.98] said:
> > 550-Verification
> > failed for 550-Unrouteable address 550 Envelope
> > Sender:
> > Domain must resolve in DN
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Barry Brimer wrote:
>> : host mailhost.zen.co.uk[212.23.3.98] said: 550-Verification
>> failed for 550-Unrouteable address 550 Envelope Sender:
>> Domain must resolve in DNS! (in reply to RCPT TO command)
>
> It looks like your outgoing mail from your local
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 13:07 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> : host mailhost.zen.co.uk[212.23.3.98] said:
> 550-Verification
> failed for 550-Unrouteable address 550 Envelope
> Sender:
> Domain must resolve in DNS! (in reply to RCPT TO command)
Once your email is out on the Internet is needs
> : host mailhost.zen.co.uk[212.23.3.98] said: 550-Verification
>failed for 550-Unrouteable address 550 Envelope Sender:
>Domain must resolve in DNS! (in reply to RCPT TO command)
It looks like your outgoing mail from your local user(s) needs to be
masqueraded or the whole server does.
_
On Monday 22 Aug 2011 12:49:21 Anne Wilson wrote:
> Although I have the alias defined in /etc/aliases and /etc/postfix/aliases,
> I'm not receiving root mail. Following the previous thread about
> unreceived logwatch mail, I tested with a manual run of logwatch, and
> found that my ISP is rejectin
Although I have the alias defined in /etc/aliases and /etc/postfix/aliases,
I'm not receiving root mail. Following the previous thread about unreceived
logwatch mail, I tested with a manual run of logwatch, and found that my ISP
is rejecting the mail because it is seeing an envelope carrying my
30 matches
Mail list logo
