Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

2011-05-06 Thread Les Mikesell
On 5/6/2011 7:53 AM, R P Herrold wrote: > >>> I'll try to blog about it, but once one knows the 'secret' it >>> is not all that hard to predict -- This unit has three NICs >>> (two onboard of the same type and an addon) which do NOT >>> 'wander around' through reboots > >> But can you swap the disk

[CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

2011-05-06 Thread R P Herrold
On Fri, 6 May 2011, Les Mikesell wrote: herrold: >> I'll try to blog about it, but once one knows the 'secret' it >> is not all that hard to predict -- This unit has three NICs >> (two onboard of the same type and an addon) which do NOT >> 'wander around' through reboots > But can you swap the di

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

2011-05-05 Thread Les Mikesell
On 5/5/11 11:34 PM, R P Herrold wrote: > On Thu, 5 May 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > >> I do not have personal experience with CentOS, but I have seen different >> X86-PC MB's on embedded units/routers recognizing LAN and Wireless NIC's >> differently ones from PCI1 to PCI5, others from PCI5 t

[CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

2011-05-05 Thread R P Herrold
On Thu, 5 May 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > I do not have personal experience with CentOS, but I have seen different > X86-PC MB's on embedded units/routers recognizing LAN and Wireless NIC's > differently ones from PCI1 to PCI5, others from PCI5 to PCI1, one MB > even without any order at al

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

2011-05-05 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
rs from PCI5 to PCI1, one MB even without any order at all. I had now Monitor so I had to power the unit, guess NIC to connect to, login and see what was recognized in what order. Ljubomir Drew Weaver wrote: > Original Message ---- > Subject: Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 bet

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

2011-05-05 Thread Drew Weaver
Original Message Subject: Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta From: Steve Clark <mailto:scl...@netwolves.com> To: CentOS mailing list <mailto:centos@centos.org> Date: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 10:40:51 AM On 05/02/2011 10:47 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 5/2/2011 8:57 AM, Steve

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

2011-05-04 Thread Les Mikesell
On 5/4/2011 10:43 AM, Blake Hudson wrote: > >> We create images and ghost them onto various hardware platforms. I >> just make sure I remove the >> net persistent rules and the ifcfg-ethn stuff and they are then >> redetected in the correct order. >> > > Ditto, working with Dell hardware mostly, 2

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

2011-05-04 Thread Blake Hudson
Original Message Subject: Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta From: Steve Clark To: CentOS mailing list Date: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 10:40:51 AM > On 05/02/2011 10:47 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On 5/2/2011 8:57 AM, Steve Clark wrote: >>> On 05/02/2011 09:38 AM, Lamar O

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

2011-05-03 Thread Les Mikesell
On 5/3/2011 10:40 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > >> The numbers chosen in the eth? scheme are more or less randomized even >> on identical hardware, so it is pretty much impossible to prepare a disk >> to ship to a remote site and have it come up working unattended or clone >> disk images for a large rol

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

2011-05-03 Thread Steve Clark
On 05/02/2011 10:47 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 5/2/2011 8:57 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 05/02/2011 09:38 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: On Monday, May 02, 2011 06:48:37 AM Christopher Chan wrote: biosdevname for nics...bye bye eth0! Not by default, and according to the release notes only for certain De

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

2011-05-02 Thread Les Mikesell
On 5/2/2011 11:19 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > >>> Anybody know *why*? Is it based on the order of response of the NIC >>> firmware? Certainly, were I writing the code, I'd have based it on the bus >>> address. >> I think the 2.4 kernel did it that way, and was single-threaded during >> detection. At

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

2011-05-02 Thread Steve Clark
On 05/02/2011 11:07 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 5/2/2011 9:58 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: But, yes, a different way of looking at NICs is coming down the pipe. It's about time. EGADS Why? After working with FreeBSD for ten years it so nice not to have to worry is this rl0, vr0, em0, fxp0, bg

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

2011-05-02 Thread Les Mikesell
On 5/2/2011 10:14 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > > Major networking gear does this; cisco, for instance, gives you things like > FastEthernet4/47, or GigabitEthernet2/2, or TenGigabitEthernet1/0, or POS3/0, > etc for networking interfaces. Having seen the PCI eth device flips before > between update r

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

2011-05-02 Thread Lamar Owen
On Monday, May 02, 2011 09:57:19 AM Steve Clark wrote: > On 05/02/2011 09:38 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > > But, yes, a different way of looking at NICs is coming down the pipe. It's > > about time. > EGADS Why? After working with FreeBSD for ten years it so nice not to have > to worry is this rl0,

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

2011-05-02 Thread Les Mikesell
On 5/2/2011 9:58 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > But, yes, a different way of looking at NICs is coming down the pipe. > It's about time. >>> EGADS Why? After working with FreeBSD for ten years it so nice not to > have to worry >>> is this rl0, vr0, em0, fxp0, bge0, ed0, etc in networking s

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

2011-05-02 Thread m . roth
Les Mikesell wrote: > On 5/2/2011 8:57 AM, Steve Clark wrote: >> On 05/02/2011 09:38 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: >>> On Monday, May 02, 2011 06:48:37 AM Christopher Chan wrote: biosdevname for nics...bye bye eth0! >>> Not by default, and according to the release notes only for certain Dell >>> serve

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

2011-05-02 Thread Les Mikesell
On 5/2/2011 8:57 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 05/02/2011 09:38 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: >> On Monday, May 02, 2011 06:48:37 AM Christopher Chan wrote: >>> biosdevname for nics...bye bye eth0! >> Not by default, and according to the release notes only for certain Dell >> servers ATM. >> >> But, yes, a

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

2011-05-02 Thread Peter A
On Monday, May 02, 2011 09:57:19 AM Steve Clark wrote: > On 05/02/2011 09:38 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > > On Monday, May 02, 2011 06:48:37 AM Christopher Chan wrote: > >> biosdevname for nics...bye bye eth0! > > > > Not by default, and according to the release notes only for certain Dell > > servers

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

2011-05-02 Thread Steve Clark
On 05/02/2011 09:38 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: On Monday, May 02, 2011 06:48:37 AM Christopher Chan wrote: biosdevname for nics...bye bye eth0! Not by default, and according to the release notes only for certain Dell servers ATM. But, yes, a different way of looking at NICs is coming down the pipe

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

2011-05-02 Thread Lamar Owen
On Monday, May 02, 2011 06:48:37 AM Christopher Chan wrote: > biosdevname for nics...bye bye eth0! Not by default, and according to the release notes only for certain Dell servers ATM. But, yes, a different way of looking at NICs is coming down the pipe. It's about time. __

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

2011-05-02 Thread Christopher Chan
On Monday, May 02, 2011 06:48 PM, Christopher Chan wrote: > On Saturday, April 30, 2011 04:10 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote: >> Some interesting developments coming: >> >> >> > > biosdevname for nics...bye

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

2011-05-02 Thread Christopher Chan
On Saturday, April 30, 2011 04:10 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote: > Some interesting developments coming: > > > biosdevname for nics...bye bye eth0! FUSE! control groups! a linux 2.2 feature! ipchains a

[CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

2011-04-29 Thread Kenneth Porter
Some interesting developments coming: ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos