On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:56, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 03/08/2017 09:39 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 03/08/2017 09:10 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have noticed
that
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 13:54, wwp wrote:
Hello Andreas,
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:03:12 +0200 Andreas Benzler wrote:
Hello every one I installed the official
flash plugin from adobe
About Plugins tells me:
Datei: libflashplayer.so
Pfad: /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so
Versi
on 5-29-2008 4:55 AM Daniel de Kok spake the following:
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Stephen John Smoogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It will depend upon if Red Hat will release a version for Red Hat
Enterprise Linux. The best bet will be that they will not release it
until RHEL-4.7 goes into
on 5-27-2008 4:22 PM Robert Spangler spake the following:
Can anyone tell me if there are plans to update Firefox to the new 3.0 for
Centos 4.5? Seems like only the 1.5 version has been placed in the repos and
I think it should be time for an upgrade.
If I'm looking in the wrong place let me
Bart Schaefer wrote:
Just as a point of interest -- we have one person here who installed
FF2 from the those tarballs on her CentOS 4 machine, and she's been
having problems with it crashing every few days. I on the other hand
I have -- and I'm betting a lot of other folks are -- been running
On 6/19/07, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
wrt a firefox 2 (or thunderbird) install ... they are fairly trivial to
do with the binaries produced by Mozilla.org.
Just as a point of interest -- we have one person here who installed
FF2 from the those tarballs on her CentOS 4 machine, an
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 08:23 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:37:50PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> >
> >> I am making some progress on my Centos 5 notebook build.
> >>
> >> So I am looking at Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0.
> >>
> >> Should I inst
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:37:50PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am making some progress on my Centos 5 notebook build.
So I am looking at Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0.
Should I install them? Or is Redhat correct that there is nothing
improved here and wait for 3.0? (
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:37:50PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I am making some progress on my Centos 5 notebook build.
>
> So I am looking at Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0.
>
> Should I install them? Or is Redhat correct that there is nothing
> improved here and wait for 3.0? (well I have
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:37:52PM -0700, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
> > Or is Redhat correct that there is nothing improved here and wait
> > for 3.0?
>
> Sorry to jump in, but where is that you saw Red Hat saying "there is
> nothing _improved_ in FF2"?! I suppose RHEL5 doesn't have FF2 because
Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:37:50PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> I have the install steps we covered here back on 2/2/07; but are there
>> rpms? I did not find anything over at ATrpms.
>
> There are no FF/TB rpms at ATrpms, maybe you mean
> rpmforge/Dag/plus/extras/karan?
11 matches
Mail list logo
