Re: [CentOS] Re: Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0, Centos 5, and rpms

2007-06-19 Thread Johnny Hughes
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 08:23 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Axel Thimm wrote: On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:37:50PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I am making some progress on my Centos 5 notebook build. So I am looking at Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0. Should I install them? Or is

Re: [CentOS] Re: Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0, Centos 5, and rpms

2007-06-19 Thread Bart Schaefer
On 6/19/07, Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wrt a firefox 2 (or thunderbird) install ... they are fairly trivial to do with the binaries produced by Mozilla.org. Just as a point of interest -- we have one person here who installed FF2 from the those tarballs on her CentOS 4 machine, and

[CentOS] Re: Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0, Centos 5, and rpms

2007-06-15 Thread Axel Thimm
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:37:50PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I am making some progress on my Centos 5 notebook build. So I am looking at Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0. Should I install them? Or is Redhat correct that there is nothing improved here and wait for 3.0? (well I have not

Re: [CentOS] Re: Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0, Centos 5, and rpms

2007-06-15 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Axel Thimm wrote: On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:37:50PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I am making some progress on my Centos 5 notebook build. So I am looking at Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0. Should I install them? Or is Redhat correct that there is nothing improved here and wait for 3.0?