> Not sure the outcome of copying the yum directory. I would have just
> run yum clean all then yum update.
Ah, thanks, I will put that in my personal Wiki for future reference.
Noob here and it is a test environment at home :). Thanks for your help.
--
Kind regards,
Hans Vos
_
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 11:07 -0400, Ryan Wagoner wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Hans Vos wrote:
> > Well, I copied the /var/cache/yum/timedhosts.txt file from server 1 to
> > server 2. Then run yum update and all kinds of errors came flying at me.
> > So I just SCP'ed the whole /var/cac
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 17:00 +0200, Hans Vos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > Ryan is right. The mirrors need to sync up. That's most likely the
> > cause. Still, it's curious why you have two kernels listed in grub.conf
> > and only one listed from yum. You should also see the 2.6.18-238.el5xen
> > kernel li
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Hans Vos wrote:
> Well, I copied the /var/cache/yum/timedhosts.txt file from server 1 to
> server 2. Then run yum update and all kinds of errors came flying at me.
> So I just SCP'ed the whole /var/cache/yum directory of server 1 to
> server 2. Ran yum update and
Hello,
> Ryan is right. The mirrors need to sync up. That's most likely the
> cause. Still, it's curious why you have two kernels listed in grub.conf
> and only one listed from yum. You should also see the 2.6.18-238.el5xen
> kernel listed.
Well, I copied the /var/cache/yum/timedhosts.txt file fr
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 16:37 +0200, Hans Vos wrote:
> Hello Cal,
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> > It's possible that your #2 server has not rebooted or had problems with
> > the latest kernel or just has the default set to something other than
> > "0" in grub.conf.
>
> I did a reboot and check
Hello,
> The 9.1 kernel update was released last night. The mirrors must still
> be catching up. I was update to update one box to 9.1 and my other
> boxes still don't see the 9.1 update.
Ah, that might also explain why on server 1 there were 51 updates and on
server 2 only 33. Could not figure
Hello Cal,
Thank you for your reply.
> It's possible that your #2 server has not rebooted or had problems with
> the latest kernel or just has the default set to something other than
> "0" in grub.conf.
I did a reboot and checked the grub.conf. Should have mentioned that.
> What's the output of
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Hans Vos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Earlier this week I installed a test server with CentOS 5.6 with
> Virtualization enabled during the installer. Today I installed another
> server using the same method (they are identical servers). I just did a
> yum update and I foun
It's possible that your #2 server has not rebooted or had problems with
the latest kernel or just has the default set to something other than
"0" in grub.conf.
What's the output of:
egrep 'default|title' /etc/grub.conf
yum list kernel | grep kernel
./Cal
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 16:18 +0200, Hans
Hello,
Earlier this week I installed a test server with CentOS 5.6 with
Virtualization enabled during the installer. Today I installed another
server using the same method (they are identical servers). I just did a
yum update and I found something curious. Both servers have a different
kernel.
11 matches
Mail list logo
