system-config-lvm appears to be deprecated:
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=centos+%22system-config-lvm%22&t=ffab&ia=web
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi,
I'm trying to find a YUM package. My system runs a CentOS-7.2.1511 (yes, it's a
old version, but some software is "stable" with this CentOS version). Now, I'm
looking for a package with YUM. When a run "yum provides */system-config-lvm",
I get this error:
[root@mysystem ~]# yum provides */s
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Negative
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Daniel J Walsh
wrote:
On 11/12/2014 10:54 PM, Peter wrote:
> On 11/13/2014 12:10 PM, Negative wrote:
>> I have a Brother MFC 7360N, and it is refusing to print.
> I have a DCP
On 07.Sep.2013, at 18:41, Phil Dobbin wrote:
> On 07/09/13 15:07, Brian Miller wrote:
>> On Sat, 2013-09-07 at 13:01 +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
>>> I'm experiencing a problem with Yum. When I call 'sudo yum update' it
>>> tells me that it can't find any mirrors & after doing a 'sudo yum clean
>>>
On 07/09/13 15:07, Brian Miller wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-09-07 at 13:01 +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
>> I'm experiencing a problem with Yum. When I call 'sudo yum update' it
>> tells me that it can't find any mirrors & after doing a 'sudo yum clean
>> all' it just informs me it can't find any base repo &
On Sat, 2013-09-07 at 13:01 +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
> I'm experiencing a problem with Yum. When I call 'sudo yum update' it
> tells me that it can't find any mirrors & after doing a 'sudo yum clean
> all' it just informs me it can't find any base repo & quits.
>
> This is on a brand new instal
Hi, all.
I'm experiencing a problem with Yum. When I call 'sudo yum update' it
tells me that it can't find any mirrors & after doing a 'sudo yum clean
all' it just informs me it can't find any base repo & quits.
This is on a brand new installation of CentOS 6.2 x86_64. I suffered the
same prob
Timothy,
> -Original Message-
> The problem is that the server is a long way away (in another country)
> and I won't have any way of contacting it if it stops running.
--
If your system is half-way around the world (or even half-way around the state),
you might consider investing and inst
Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> Johnny Hughes suggested the command, so on that basis alone
>> I would give it a high probability of success.
>
> If you have ALL the latest glibc/nscd files to replace all the installed
> RPMS in the same place, and if you upgrade them all at the same time
> (including an
On 05/27/2012 06:03 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> John Stanley wrote:
>
> Now this is my last question:
> Can I be reasonably (say 90%) sure that the above command
> will not stop the server running?
>>> The command in question was: rpm -Uvh --force *.rpm
>>> where the RPMs were glibc and
Les Mikesell wrote:
> I've had yum sessions fail (probably mostly from starting them in a
> freenx session...) but never to the point where
> yum-complete-transaction did not fix it, so I don't have a good
> feeling for what is actually happening. However, I wouldn't expect a
> forced install of a
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
>>> > Wait and schedule a downtime window for it.
>>>
>>> I don't know what a "downtime window" is in this context.
>>> I'm either in the same place as the server, or I am not.
>>
>> Downtime Window: It's when you schedule a specific time t
John Stanley wrote:
>> >> Now this is my last question:
>> >> Can I be reasonably (say 90%) sure that the above command
>> >> will not stop the server running?
>>
>> The command in question was: rpm -Uvh --force *.rpm
>> where the RPMs were glibc and glibc-common.
>>
>> > No you can NOT and don'
On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 01:01 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> John Stanley wrote:
>
> >> Now this is my last question:
> >> Can I be reasonably (say 90%) sure that the above command
> >> will not stop the server running?
>
> The command in question was: rpm -Uvh --force *.rpm
> where the RPMs were g
John Stanley wrote:
>> Now this is my last question:
>> Can I be reasonably (say 90%) sure that the above command
>> will not stop the server running?
The command in question was: rpm -Uvh --force *.rpm
where the RPMs were glibc and glibc-common.
> No you can NOT and don't ever assume that.
>
On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 12:45 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Now this is my last question:
> Can I be reasonably (say 90%) sure that the above command
> will not stop the server running?
No you can NOT and don't ever assume that. That's a mistake thinking
that.
> The problem is that the server is
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Based on your errors, what I would do is this:
Thanking you again for all your help.
I have one last question, and then I promise to ask no more!
Could the rpm --force suggestion you make possibly stop the server working?
> 1. You only need 1 version of glibc-common.x86_
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> I think I understand how it occurred.
>> I tried to yum-remove a package
>> (I don't remember which one, but it wasn't important)
>> and I was told that 300+ packages would be removed.
>> I wasn't sure it I would be asked yes/no to this
>> (I know now that I will always
Tim,
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 05/23/2012 04:41 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>>> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> 3. The real issue here is to make sure you figure out HOW you got in
>> this position and how NOT to get into it again.
>
> I think I understand how it occurred.
> I tri
Johnny Hughes wrote:
First, thanks very much for continuing to help me.
> On 05/23/2012 04:41 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
---
Error: Protected multilib versions: glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64 !=
glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.9.i686
>>>
On 05/23/2012 04:41 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>>> ---
>>> Error: Protected multilib versions: glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64 !=
>>> glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.9.i686
>>> ** Found 3 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows:
>>> bash-4
Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> ---
>> Error: Protected multilib versions: glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64 !=
>> glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.9.i686
>> ** Found 3 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows:
>> bash-4.1.2-9.el6_2.x86_64 is a duplicate with
>> bash-4.1.2-
On 05/22/2012 05:05 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Is anyone getting a yum update problem with glibc and glibc-common?
> I'm getting the error message
> ---
> Error: Protected multilib versions: glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64 !=
> glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.9.i686
> ** Found 3
Is anyone getting a yum update problem with glibc and glibc-common?
I'm getting the error message
---
Error: Protected multilib versions: glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64 !=
glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.9.i686
** Found 3 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows
Hello,
Thanks to KB for the suggestion. The problem was indeed related to the file
/etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo
A number of the sections (e.g. base, updates) had been set to enabled=0. When I
commented out these lines, the yum updates worked fine...
Thanks,
John.
Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 18/06/2010 12:04, John Kelly wrote:
> I'm having a yum problem updating a system on Centos 5.3, 64-bit ...
> i.e. 'yum update' returns "No Packages Marked for Update". Problem
> appears to be related to connecting to the mirrors where the
> repositories are located but I could be wrong in tha
Hello,
I'm having a yum problem updating a system on Centos 5.3, 64-bit ...
i.e. 'yum update' returns "No Packages Marked for Update". Problem
appears to be related to connecting to the mirrors where the
repositories are located but I could be wrong in that. What's confusing
me is that I have
@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>>> Behalf Of James Bensley
>>> Sent: Tuesday, 27 January 2009 7:49 PM
>>> To: CentOS mailing list
>>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] yum problem
>>>
>>> It doesn't matter if its in resolv.conf yo
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 4:04 AM, Anthony Kamau wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>> Behalf Of James Bensley
>> Sent: Tuesday, 27 January 2009 7:49 PM
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>&g
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of James Bensley
> Sent: Tuesday, 27 January 2009 7:49 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] yum problem
>
> It doesn't matter if its in resolv.
It doesn't matter if its in resolv.conf you don't seem to have a
working DNS provider.
I would start there, use nslookup, can you solve anything? Check with
your resolv.conf, what name server are you using, can you ping it? Try
another name server?
2009/1/27 Mad Unix :
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 9
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 9:45 AM, James Bensley wrote:
> Can you surf the web ok? Is it a DNS resolution problem, 'Temporary
> failure in name resolution' ?
>
> Have you tried another mirror?
>
>
> -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
> Version: 3.1
> GIT/MU/U dpu s: a--> C++>$ U+> L++> B-> P+> E?> W++
Can you surf the web ok? Is it a DNS resolution problem, 'Temporary
failure in name resolution' ?
Have you tried another mirror?
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GIT/MU/U dpu s: a--> C++>$ U+> L++> B-> P+> E?> W+++>$ N K W++ O M++>$ V-
PS+++ PE++ Y+ PGP t 5 X+ R- tv+ b+> DI D+++ G+
Hi all
Am trying to update my system Cento
r...@king Tue Jan 27 ~ $ yum update
Loading "fastestmirror" plugin
Determining fastest mirrors
Could not retrieve mirrorlist
http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=5&arch=x86_64&repo=os error was
[Errno 4] IOError:
Error: Cannot find a valid baseurl for
>Hello all, I've been googling and haven't found an answer. I have a
>Centos 4.6 box that is having an issue since the last yum update. The
>nss_ldap and kernel packages were the only packages installed/updated.
>When I try to run yum I now receive:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# yum update
>There was a p
Hello all, I've been googling and haven't found an answer. I have a
Centos 4.6 box that is having an issue since the last yum update. The
nss_ldap and kernel packages were the only packages installed/updated.
When I try to run yum I now receive:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# yum update
There was a problem
Jun Salen ha scritto:
Jun Salen ha scritto:
Hi,
I have no problem running yum update inside the root prompt, but when
running yum using sudo as logged-in as ordinary user and command the
'sudo yum update', I am having below error:
Could not retrieve mirrorlist
http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el5/
Jun Salen ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I have no problem running yum update inside the root prompt, but when
running yum using sudo as logged-in as ordinary user and command the
'sudo yum update', I am having below error:
>
> Could not retrieve mirrorlist
http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el5/en/mirrors-rpmfor
Jun Salen ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I have no problem running yum update inside the root prompt, but when
running yum using sudo as logged-in as ordinary user and command the
'sudo yum update', I am having below error:
>
> Could not retrieve mirrorlist
http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el5/en/mirrors-rpmfor
Jun Salen ha scritto:
Hi,
I have no problem running yum update inside the root prompt, but when running
yum using sudo as logged-in as ordinary user and command the 'sudo yum update',
I am having below error:
Could not retrieve mirrorlist http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el5/en/mirrors-rpmforge
error
Hi,
I have no problem running yum update inside the root prompt, but when running
yum using sudo as logged-in as ordinary user and command the 'sudo yum update',
I am having below error:
Could not retrieve mirrorlist http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el5/en/mirrors-rpmforge
error was
[Errno 4] IOError:
41 matches
Mail list logo
