On Thursday 07 May 2009, Bent Terp wrote:
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 11:27:27AM +0200, Bent Terp wrote:
> >> We've got a 110 TB xfs system in production based on a logical volume
> >> striped over 9 boxes of SATA disk, works like a charm wi
thus Pasi Kärkkäinen spake:
> On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 11:27:27AM +0200, Bent Terp wrote:
>> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Adrian Sevcenco
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB?
>>> This is for an production server (that is, no ext4 recommen
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 11:27:27AM +0200, Bent Terp wrote:
>> We've got a 110 TB xfs system in production based on a logical volume
>> striped over 9 boxes of SATA disk, works like a charm with great
>> throughput as we stripe over 3 control
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 11:27:27AM +0200, Bent Terp wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Adrian Sevcenco
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB?
> > This is for an production server (that is, no ext4 recommendations
> > please :) )
> > What
Timo Schoeler wrote:
> However, one has to clearly distinct JFS from JFS2... (at least in the
> AIX world, see wikipedia which states 'In the other operating systems,
> such as OS/2 and Linux, only the second generation exists and is called
> simply JFS.[3] This should not be confused with JFS in A
John R Pierce wrote:
> Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>> BTW: ext3 handles "Out of power" corruptions better than xfs does.
>>
>
>
> power failure is -not- the only cause of this sort of condition...
> noone here has ever had a kernel panic? I had a perfectly good
> server panic shortly after
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> BTW: ext3 handles "Out of power" corruptions better than xfs does.
>
power failure is -not- the only cause of this sort of condition...
noone here has ever had a kernel panic? I had a perfectly good
server panic shortly after a cooling fan had failed combined w
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Angenendt
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 3:55 AM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] fs for > 16 TiB partition
>
> Rainer Duffner w
Rainer Duffner wrote:
> It's running in a datacenter with UPSs. But once I reboot it, it it's
> the "fsck-every-n-days" thing.
>
> I don't think it's a good idea to disable that behaviour.
Hmmm. xfs will not do that, the normal behaviour is not check the file
system on every nth reboot. I normall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tthus Rainer Duffner spake:
| Adrian Sevcenco schrieb:
|> Rainer Duffner wrote:
|>
|>> Adrian Sevcenco schrieb:
|>>
|>>> Hi,
|>>> What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB?
|>>> This is for an production server (that is, no
Adrian Sevcenco schrieb:
> Rainer Duffner wrote:
>
>> Adrian Sevcenco schrieb:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB?
>>> This is for an production server (that is, no ext4 recommendations
>>> please :) )
>>> What experiences did you had with
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Bent Terp wrote:
> Lesson learned: don't use xfs_grow unless you're in the general
> vicinity of the server ;-)
Correction: the command is xfs_growfs not xfs_grow
/B
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://list
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Adrian Sevcenco
wrote:
> Hi,
> What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB?
> This is for an production server (that is, no ext4 recommendations
> please :) )
> What experiences did you had with your preferred FS ? (good and not so
> good
Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Adrian Sevcenco schrieb:
>> Hi,
>> What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB?
>> This is for an production server (that is, no ext4 recommendations
>> please :) )
>> What experiences did you had with your preferred FS ? (good and not so
>> good p
Adrian Sevcenco schrieb:
> Hi,
> What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB?
> This is for an production server (that is, no ext4 recommendations
> please :) )
> What experiences did you had with your preferred FS ? (good and not so
> good points)
>
> Thank you,
> Adrian
2009/5/6 Timo Schoeler :
> Hi,
>
>> Hi,
>> What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB?
>> This is for an production server (that is, no ext4 recommendations
>> please :) )
>> What experiences did you had with your preferred FS ? (good and not so
>> good points)
>>
>> Tha
Hi,
> Hi,
> What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB?
> This is for an production server (that is, no ext4 recommendations
> please :) )
> What experiences did you had with your preferred FS ? (good and not so
> good points)
>
> Thank you,
> Adrian
I personally woul
Hi,
What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB?
This is for an production server (that is, no ext4 recommendations
please :) )
What experiences did you had with your preferred FS ? (good and not so
good points)
Thank you,
Adrian
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptogra
18 matches
Mail list logo
