On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Kevin Krieser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Aug 26, 2008, at 12:36 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>
>> Alan and I are now talking about this so we can amend the Wiki article
>> appropriately. According to him, unifdef is not required on his
>> 32-bit system. I will upd
On Aug 26, 2008, at 12:36 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:32 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Rather than guessing, why not look at the output from the rpm
command
he ran, which gives the name of th
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 17:14 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Lanny: that line goes in /etc/fstab
> >
> > Indeed. Thank, Nicolas, for noticing this. I have amended the wiki
> > page to make it clearer.
>
> Akemi: If it
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>>>
>>> I have dkms now. On the wiki, it says:
>>> to mount read-write:
>>> /dev/sda1 /mnt/win ntfs-3g rw,umas
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ su -
>> Password:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /dev/hda6 /mnt/win ntfs-3g
>> rw,umask=,defaults 0 0
>
> What do you think this "command" does?
>
>> -bash: /dev/hda6: P
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ su -
> Password:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /dev/hda6 /mnt/win ntfs-3g
> rw,umask=,defaults 0 0
What do you think this "command" does?
> -bash: /dev/hda6: Permission denied
Sure. You just tried to execute a partition.
Ralph
pgpF6EkIt8Stg.pg
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>>
>> I have dkms now. On the wiki, it says:
>> to mount read-write:
>> /dev/sda1 /mnt/win ntfs-3g rw,umask=,defaults 0 0
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /dev/hda6 /mnt/win n
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> Actually, the documentation is here:
>>>
>>> http://wiki.centos.org/TipsA
Lanny Marcus wrote:
I have dkms now. On the wiki, it says:
to mount read-write:
/dev/sda1 /mnt/win ntfs-3g rw,umask=,defaults 0 0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /dev/hda6 /mnt/win ntfs-3g
rw,umask=,defaults 0 0-bash: /dev/hda6: Permission denied
Lanny: that line goes in /etc
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> Actually, the documentation is here:
>>> http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTr
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> MHR wrote:
I routinely build a kernel with NTFS rea
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 13:10 -0700, MHR wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Well... if you go for the fuse/dkms route, you will lose the chance to
> > build the module upon kernel update. :-)
> >
>
> True - decisions, decisions,
Well you can
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Actually, the documentation is here:
>>
>> http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/NTFSPartitions
>
> Akemi: Thank you. I discovered that I need fuse an
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> MHR wrote:
I routinely build a kernel with NTFS rea
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well... if you go for the fuse/dkms route, you will lose the chance to
> build the module upon kernel update. :-)
>
True - decisions, decisions,
mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
C
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:57 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> this is OT, but do you know you can get NTFS RW support by simply installing
>> fuse-ntfs-3g from rpmforge? Fuse (from rf) gets rebuilt for ne
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> MHR wrote:
>>>
>>> I routinely build a kernel with NTFS read/write support whenever a new
>>> kernel comes out, partly to get the support
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> this is OT, but do you know you can get NTFS RW support by simply installing
> fuse-ntfs-3g from rpmforge? Fuse (from rf) gets rebuilt for new kernels by
> dkms, so it's painless on kernel updates.
Yes, but the p
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MHR wrote:
>>
>> I routinely build a kernel with NTFS read/write support whenever a new
>> kernel comes out, partly to get the support
>
> this is OT, but do you know you can get NTFS RW support by simply installing
MHR wrote:
I routinely build a kernel with NTFS read/write support whenever a new
kernel comes out, partly to get the support
this is OT, but do you know you can get NTFS RW support by simply
installing fuse-ntfs-3g from rpmforge? Fuse (from rf) gets rebuilt for
new kernels by dkms, so it's
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You can certainly help. So, from what you wrote I suppose you
> encountered the same dependency problem and then manually installed
> unifdef. Was this indeed the case? Also, this happened on an x86_64
> system?
>
Yes,
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:12 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:32 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I remember running into this a while back. That being the case,
>>> shouldn't unifd
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:32 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I remember running into this a while back. That being the case,
>> shouldn't unifdef be included in kernel-devel, or at least one of the
>> packages that
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:32 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Rather than guessing, why not look at the output from the rpm command
>> he ran, which gives the name of the package he's missing? Filipe
>> nailed this on
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Rather than guessing, why not look at the output from the rpm command
> he ran, which gives the name of the package he's missing? Filipe
> nailed this one a little earlier in the thread with unifdef.x86_64
> needing to be in
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Romeo Ninov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about kernel-headers
Rather than guessing, why not look at the output from the rpm command
he ran, which gives the name of the package he's missing? Filipe
nailed this one a little earlier in the thread with unifdef.x86
What about kernel-headers
Ian jonhson wrote / napísal(a):
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Romeo Ninov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you have installed kernel-devel package?
Sure. but the problem is still there.
Any help?
___
CentOS mail
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Romeo Ninov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you have installed kernel-devel package?
>
Sure. but the problem is still there.
Any help?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/c
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 08:14, Ian jonhson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> error: Failed build dependencies:
>unifdef is needed by kernel-2.6.18-92.1.10.el5.x86_64
Yum is your friend.
$ yum whatprovides unifdef
...
unifdef.x86_64 : Unifdef tool for removing ifdef'd lines
Do you have installed kernel-devel package?
Ian jonhson wrote / napísal(a):
I have downloaded the src.rpm according the wiki instructions.
however, when I executed
$ rpm -i kernel-2.6.18-92.1.10.el5.src.rpm
I got a lot of warnings and after the following command:
$ rpmbuild -bp --target=`una
I have downloaded the src.rpm according the wiki instructions.
however, when I executed
$ rpm -i kernel-2.6.18-92.1.10.el5.src.rpm
I got a lot of warnings and after the following command:
$ rpmbuild -bp --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log |
tee prep-out.log
No files are created
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 08:14:19PM +0800, Ian jonhson wrote:
> My jobs need to recompile the kernel codes, but I don't know
> how to yum the kernel source codes.
This should download the .src RPM in the current dir:
yumdownloader --source kernel
yum-utils should be installed first.
Mihai
_
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 5:14 AM, Ian jonhson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My jobs need to recompile the kernel codes, but I don't know
> how to yum the kernel source codes.
>
> Any help?
First look in http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/I_need_the_Kernel_Source
and then http://wiki.centos.org/H
Hi,
My jobs need to recompile the kernel codes, but I don't know
how to yum the kernel source codes.
Any help?
Thanks in advance.
Ian
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
34 matches
Mail list logo
