Re: [CentOS] kernel update/reboot best practice question

On Mon, February 27, 2017 10:44 am, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 02/27/2017 08:21 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> Quite some time ago I have noticed that kernel updated quite often "come >> in pairs". > > > Looking at the errata list for the kernel package on RHEL 6, I don't see > any such pattern. It

Re: [CentOS] kernel update/reboot best practice question

On 02/27/2017 08:21 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: Quite some time ago I have noticed that kernel updated quite often "come in pairs". Looking at the errata list for the kernel package on RHEL 6, I don't see any such pattern. It's certainly happened that kernel updates are released withing a cou

[CentOS] kernel update/reboot best practice question

Dear All, Quite some time ago I have noticed that kernel updated quite often "come in pairs". That is, if there was no kernel update for quite some time, and, say, today kernel update for some system level (say, CentOS 6) was released, then it is quite likely that there will be yet one more kernel

Re: [CentOS] kernel update does not update grub boot list ...

On 26/01/16 12:23, Philippe BOURDEU d'AGUERRE wrote: Le 26/01/2016 12:53, lejeczek a écrit : .. in that expected way where newly installed kernel is set to boot as default. would you suggest where to look, what to check? In /etc/sysconfig/kernel : # UPDATEDEFAULT specifies if new-kernel-pkg

Re: [CentOS] kernel update does not update grub boot list ...

Le 26/01/2016 12:53, lejeczek a écrit : .. in that expected way where newly installed kernel is set to boot as default. would you suggest where to look, what to check? In /etc/sysconfig/kernel : # UPDATEDEFAULT specifies if new-kernel-pkg should make # new kernels the default UPDATEDEFAULT=ye

[CentOS] kernel update does not update grub boot list ...

.. in that expected way where newly installed kernel is set to boot as default. would you suggest where to look, what to check? many thanks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] kernel update

mahmoud mansy wrote: > and the main problem is that i wanna take the RHCE and the best > suggested OS is centos not fedora and i wanna run it on my laptop > which i tried to do so with the centos 5.5 but there was so many > miisings like the wireless card driverr and the display card drivers as me

Re: [CentOS] kernel update

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:57 PM, mahmoud mansy wrote: > hey guys, > i wanna update the kernel of thw centos 5.5,to the 2.6.32 version! > is there any compatablity issues with stuff like glibc or otheres! Someone suggested Fedora on the hardware and CentOS in a VM.. That works best if you're doing

Re: [CentOS] kernel update

On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 18:42 -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: > > Oracle does, I know. Does RH? Yea they sure do in "mERG". There's a difference though one is a Throughput based kernel and one is realtime based with full preemption: 2.6.33.7-rt29.47.el5rt RT based 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5 Throughput

Re: [CentOS] kernel update

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 06:42:38PM -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 06:03:34PM -0500, JohnS wrote: > > > > > Upgrading the kernel *can* work, but defeats the purpose of running an > > > enterprise OS. > > > > I find your statement to not be true at all. > > > > Upstream off

Re: [CentOS] kernel update

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 06:03:34PM -0500, JohnS wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 17:33 -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > > > Upgrading the kernel *can* work, but defeats the purpose of running an > > enterprise OS. > > I find your statement to not be true at all. > > Upstream offers two (2)

Re: [CentOS] kernel update

On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 01:06 +0200, mahmoud mansy wrote: > more explanation plz! Nothing much ado about nothing to really explain. Just have to search google :-)... This is the other one [1] the source from upstream. Of which you have to find one built for CentOS like this one [2] exclusively :

Re: [CentOS] kernel update

more explanation plz! On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 1:03 AM, JohnS wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 17:33 -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > >> Upgrading the kernel *can* work, but defeats the purpose of running an >> enterprise OS. > > I find your statement to not be true at all. > > Upstream offers

Re: [CentOS] kernel update

On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 17:33 -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > Upgrading the kernel *can* work, but defeats the purpose of running an > enterprise OS. I find your statement to not be true at all. Upstream offers two (2) different Enterprise Level kernels to pick, choose and play with. CentOS

Re: [CentOS] kernel update

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:40:56AM +0200, mahmoud mansy wrote: > ok,looks great but i wanna know what about the new centos6 support for > hardware will it be more oriented to desktops and laptops or what? It will likely work better with some of the newer hardware, but eventually will run into the

Re: [CentOS] kernel update

ok,looks great but i wanna know what about the new centos6 support for hardware will it be more oriented to desktops and laptops or what? On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 at 12:26am, mahmoud mansy wrote > >> well,i meant to upgrade to the RHEL ker

Re: [CentOS] kernel update

On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 at 12:26am, mahmoud mansy wrote > well,i meant to upgrade to the RHEL kernel and its module > ,libraries,headers if found of course but what i meant is there any > issue with that i.e no piece of software work with that module or > library>>etc, > > and the main problem is tha

Re: [CentOS] kernel update

well,i meant to upgrade to the RHEL kernel and its module ,libraries,headers if found of course but what i meant is there any issue with that i.e no piece of software work with that module or library>>etc, and the main problem is that i wanna take the RHCE and the best suggested OS is centos not

Re: [CentOS] kernel update

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of mahmoud mansy > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 4:57 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: [CentOS] kernel update > > hey guys, > i wanna update the kern

[CentOS] kernel update

hey guys, i wanna update the kernel of thw centos 5.5,to the 2.6.32 version! is there any compatablity issues with stuff like glibc or otheres! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

Devin Reade wrote on Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:19:54 -0600: > The symptoms you describe could be a side effect of being previously hit by > and > . Thanks for the belated info, anyway. But this doesn't seem to

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

[I saw this thread in the mailing list archives, but wasn't subscribed at the time, so sorry it's not a proper follow-up.] The symptoms you describe could be a side effect of being previously hit by and .

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

on 4-7-2009 2:16 PM Robert spake the following: > William L. Maltby wrote: >> On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 21:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: >> >>> Barry Brimer wrote on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:29:31 -0500: >>> >>> /etc/grub.conf should be a symlink to /boot/grub/grub.conf. If for some reas

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

William L. Maltby wrote on Wed, 08 Apr 2009 05:39:27 -0400: > The installonlypkgs and installonly_limit keywords. The first, according > to man yum.conf, defaults to kernel, kernel-smp, kernel-bigmem, > kernel-enterprise, kernel-debug, kernel-unsupported and the latter to 3. It seems to default t

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

William L. Maltby wrote on Wed, 08 Apr 2009 06:01:43 -0400: > Hmmm... Maybe the *64 systems are different? No, they are the same in this respect. I'm not seeing any difference. There is a difference between systems (no matter which arch) when the /etc/grub.conf symlink got created. On all my sys

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 01:43 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > William L. Maltby wrote on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:52:04 -0400: > > > AFAIK, my 5.3 is completely "box stock" in this area, and probably 98% > > of others too. I have no /etc/grub*. > > > >$ ls -l /etc/grub* > >ls: /etc/grub*: No such

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 01:43 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Barry Brimer wrote on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:30:44 -0500: > > > According to /sbin/new-kernel-pkg .. the file that actually gets updated on > > x86 > > and x86_64 systems is /boot/grub/grub.conf > > And as I already mentioned in my first pos

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

William L. Maltby wrote on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:52:04 -0400: > AFAIK, my 5.3 is completely "box stock" in this area, and probably 98% > of others too. I have no /etc/grub*. > >$ ls -l /etc/grub* >ls: /etc/grub*: No such file or directory > > I also checked my 4.6 Centos. It has the /boot

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

Barry Brimer wrote on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:30:44 -0500: > According to /sbin/new-kernel-pkg .. the file that actually gets updated on > x86 > and x86_64 systems is /boot/grub/grub.conf And as I already mentioned in my first posting this file *got* touched. The last modified date got changed, bu

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

Quoting Robert : > William L. Maltby wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 21:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > > > >> Barry Brimer wrote on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:29:31 -0500: > >> > >> > >>> /etc/grub.conf should be a symlink to /boot/grub/grub.conf. If for some > reason > >>> it is not, correct it, or l

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

> Since *lots* of other folks have also upgraded w/NP, one makes a first > assumption that something must be slightly different on your node. s/your/Kai's/ #? > -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/lis

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 16:16 -0500, Robert wrote: > William L. Maltby wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 21:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > > > > > > > Well, JIC, make sure yoyr /boot/grub entries look like this. > > > > ls -l /boot/grub/[gm]* > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root8 May 9 2008 /boot/g

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

William L. Maltby wrote: > On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 21:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > >> Barry Brimer wrote on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:29:31 -0500: >> >> >>> /etc/grub.conf should be a symlink to /boot/grub/grub.conf. If for some >>> reason >>> it is not, correct it, or look directly in /boot/g

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 21:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Barry Brimer wrote on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:29:31 -0500: > > > /etc/grub.conf should be a symlink to /boot/grub/grub.conf. If for some > > reason > > it is not, correct it, or look directly in /boot/grub/grub.conf and see if > > the > > ke

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

Lincohn john wrote on Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:49:17 -0700 (PDT): > Well, you can always manually > edit the grub.conf file, right? sure, but it should work automatically. And did on all the other upgrades. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.c

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

Barry Brimer wrote on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:29:31 -0500: > /etc/grub.conf should be a symlink to /boot/grub/grub.conf. If for some > reason > it is not, correct it, or look directly in /boot/grub/grub.conf and see if the > kernel was added there. Sorry, I was talking about /boot/grub/grub.conf. I

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

, JohnS wrote: > From: JohnS > Subject: Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2009, 11:17 AM > > On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 18:35 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > > Just updated another machine t

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

Quoting JohnS : > > On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 18:35 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > > Just updated another machine to 5.3, everything fine, but grub.conf wasn't > > updated to the 128 kernel. It got a new modified date and the kernel is > > there, but the content wasn't changed. /etc/sysconfig/kernel con

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 18:35 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Just updated another machine to 5.3, everything fine, but grub.conf wasn't > updated to the 128 kernel. It got a new modified date and the kernel is > there, but the content wasn't changed. /etc/sysconfig/kernel contains the > correct UPD

[CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

Just updated another machine to 5.3, everything fine, but grub.conf wasn't updated to the 128 kernel. It got a new modified date and the kernel is there, but the content wasn't changed. /etc/sysconfig/kernel contains the correct UPDATEDEFAULT=yes No errors in logs or during the update. No proble

Re: [CentOS] Kernel update for Centos 4

Hi, I've noticed that we already have an updated kernel for the Centos 5. Any idea of when the same thing will happen for Centos 4 386 ? If you're referring to a new kernel to handle the vmsplice vulnerability, it is not needed, as this vulnerability does not affect CentOS 4 (or below) kerne

[CentOS] Kernel update for Centos 4

Hi, I've noticed that we already have an updated kernel for the Centos 5. Any idea of when the same thing will happen for Centos 4 386 ? Thanks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Kernel Update and Ultra Monkey

Hi, We currently have an CentOS 4.5 running Ultra Monkey box serving web requests to two real servers. Info as below : ipvsadm-1.24-6 heartbeat-2.1.2-3.el4.centos CentOS 4.5(kernel-smp-2.6.9-55.0.6.EL) All was working fine this morning until I upgraded our OS and patched the kernel to kernel