Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

Devin Reade wrote on Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:19:54 -0600: > The symptoms you describe could be a side effect of being previously hit by > and > . Thanks for the belated info, anyway. But this doesn't seem to

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

[I saw this thread in the mailing list archives, but wasn't subscribed at the time, so sorry it's not a proper follow-up.] The symptoms you describe could be a side effect of being previously hit by and .

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

on 4-7-2009 2:16 PM Robert spake the following: > William L. Maltby wrote: >> On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 21:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: >> >>> Barry Brimer wrote on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:29:31 -0500: >>> >>> /etc/grub.conf should be a symlink to /boot/grub/grub.conf. If for some reas

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

William L. Maltby wrote on Wed, 08 Apr 2009 05:39:27 -0400: > The installonlypkgs and installonly_limit keywords. The first, according > to man yum.conf, defaults to kernel, kernel-smp, kernel-bigmem, > kernel-enterprise, kernel-debug, kernel-unsupported and the latter to 3. It seems to default t

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

William L. Maltby wrote on Wed, 08 Apr 2009 06:01:43 -0400: > Hmmm... Maybe the *64 systems are different? No, they are the same in this respect. I'm not seeing any difference. There is a difference between systems (no matter which arch) when the /etc/grub.conf symlink got created. On all my sys

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 01:43 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > William L. Maltby wrote on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:52:04 -0400: > > > AFAIK, my 5.3 is completely "box stock" in this area, and probably 98% > > of others too. I have no /etc/grub*. > > > >$ ls -l /etc/grub* > >ls: /etc/grub*: No such

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 01:43 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Barry Brimer wrote on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:30:44 -0500: > > > According to /sbin/new-kernel-pkg .. the file that actually gets updated on > > x86 > > and x86_64 systems is /boot/grub/grub.conf > > And as I already mentioned in my first pos

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

William L. Maltby wrote on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:52:04 -0400: > AFAIK, my 5.3 is completely "box stock" in this area, and probably 98% > of others too. I have no /etc/grub*. > >$ ls -l /etc/grub* >ls: /etc/grub*: No such file or directory > > I also checked my 4.6 Centos. It has the /boot

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

Barry Brimer wrote on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:30:44 -0500: > According to /sbin/new-kernel-pkg .. the file that actually gets updated on > x86 > and x86_64 systems is /boot/grub/grub.conf And as I already mentioned in my first posting this file *got* touched. The last modified date got changed, bu

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

Quoting Robert : > William L. Maltby wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 21:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > > > >> Barry Brimer wrote on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:29:31 -0500: > >> > >> > >>> /etc/grub.conf should be a symlink to /boot/grub/grub.conf. If for some > reason > >>> it is not, correct it, or l

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

> Since *lots* of other folks have also upgraded w/NP, one makes a first > assumption that something must be slightly different on your node. s/your/Kai's/ #? > -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/lis

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 16:16 -0500, Robert wrote: > William L. Maltby wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 21:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > > > > > > > Well, JIC, make sure yoyr /boot/grub entries look like this. > > > > ls -l /boot/grub/[gm]* > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root8 May 9 2008 /boot/g

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

William L. Maltby wrote: > On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 21:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > >> Barry Brimer wrote on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:29:31 -0500: >> >> >>> /etc/grub.conf should be a symlink to /boot/grub/grub.conf. If for some >>> reason >>> it is not, correct it, or look directly in /boot/g

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 21:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Barry Brimer wrote on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:29:31 -0500: > > > /etc/grub.conf should be a symlink to /boot/grub/grub.conf. If for some > > reason > > it is not, correct it, or look directly in /boot/grub/grub.conf and see if > > the > > ke

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

Lincohn john wrote on Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:49:17 -0700 (PDT): > Well, you can always manually > edit the grub.conf file, right? sure, but it should work automatically. And did on all the other upgrades. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.c

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

Barry Brimer wrote on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:29:31 -0500: > /etc/grub.conf should be a symlink to /boot/grub/grub.conf. If for some > reason > it is not, correct it, or look directly in /boot/grub/grub.conf and see if the > kernel was added there. Sorry, I was talking about /boot/grub/grub.conf. I

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

, JohnS wrote: > From: JohnS > Subject: Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2009, 11:17 AM > > On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 18:35 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > > Just updated another machine t

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

Quoting JohnS : > > On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 18:35 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > > Just updated another machine to 5.3, everything fine, but grub.conf wasn't > > updated to the 128 kernel. It got a new modified date and the kernel is > > there, but the content wasn't changed. /etc/sysconfig/kernel con

Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 18:35 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Just updated another machine to 5.3, everything fine, but grub.conf wasn't > updated to the 128 kernel. It got a new modified date and the kernel is > there, but the content wasn't changed. /etc/sysconfig/kernel contains the > correct UPD

[CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf

Just updated another machine to 5.3, everything fine, but grub.conf wasn't updated to the 128 kernel. It got a new modified date and the kernel is there, but the content wasn't changed. /etc/sysconfig/kernel contains the correct UPDATEDEFAULT=yes No errors in logs or during the update. No proble