On 03/05/2023 10:49, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
On 01/05/2023 15:10, lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
Hi guys,
Does your 'mock' work when used with
'centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64' config?
It fails for me with every rpm packages I tried:
-> $ mock -r centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64 --rootdir=~/mock
--local
On 01/05/2023 15:10, lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
Hi guys,
Does your 'mock' work when used with 'centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64' config?
It fails for me with every rpm packages I tried:
-> $ mock -r centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64 --rootdir=~/mock
--localrepo=/devs/var/www/dnf.repo --chain --continue
Hi guys,
Does your 'mock' work when used with
'centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64' config?
It fails for me with every rpm packages I tried:
-> $ mock -r centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64 --rootdir=~/mock
--localrepo=/devs/var/www/dnf.repo --chain --continue
rpmbuild/rpm.src/pass-1.7.4-6.el9.src.rpm
...
On 3/1/22 06:02, lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
On 28/02/2022 21:48, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 2/28/22 08:49, lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
Hi guys.
I'm trying something I believe is trivial, on centOS 9 with mock
version 2.16
-> $ mock -r centos-stream-8-x86_64 --rootdir=~/mock
--localrepo=/00.STO
On 28/02/2022 21:48, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 2/28/22 08:49, lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
Hi guys.
I'm trying something I believe is trivial, on centOS 9 with mock
version 2.16
-> $ mock -r centos-stream-8-x86_64 --rootdir=~/mock
--localrepo=/00.STORAGE/1/var/www/repos --continue --chain
./mp
On 2/28/22 08:49, lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
Hi guys.
I'm trying something I believe is trivial, on centOS 9 with mock version
2.16
-> $ mock -r centos-stream-8-x86_64 --rootdir=~/mock
--localrepo=/00.STORAGE/1/var/www/repos --continue --chain
./mpfr-4.1.0-7.el9.src.rpm ./libmpc-1.2.1-4.el9
Hi guys.
I'm trying something I believe is trivial, on centOS 9 with mock version
2.16
-> $ mock -r centos-stream-8-x86_64 --rootdir=~/mock
--localrepo=/00.STORAGE/1/var/www/repos --continue --chain
./mpfr-4.1.0-7.el9.src.rpm ./libmpc-1.2.1-4.el9.src.rpm
...
CentOS Stream 8 - PowerTools 1
On Tue, 25 Aug 2020, Peter wrote:
On 25/08/20 11:27 am, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Aug 24, 2020, at 16:48, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
Also, I am trying to add a dist tag to rpms that I build in mock.
In the epel-7 configs I do something like the following:
config_opts['macros']['%dist'] = '.
On 25/08/20 11:27 am, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Aug 24, 2020, at 16:48, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
Also, I am trying to add a dist tag to rpms that I build in mock.
In the epel-7 configs I do something like the following:
config_opts['macros']['%dist'] = '.el7.tnt' to get a dist tag on the
rpms.
On Aug 24, 2020, at 16:48, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
>
> Also, I am trying to add a dist tag to rpms that I build in mock.
> In the epel-7 configs I do something like the following:
> config_opts['macros']['%dist'] = '.el7.tnt' to get a dist tag on the
> rpms. In epel/centos 8 this does not work.
>
Hi Jonathan,
On Sun, 23 Aug 2020, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Aug 23, 2020, at 12:07, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to create a mock configuration file that points to my local dnf
repo.
I have the following in the mock config template:
[local-repo]
name=my-Local
baseurl=http://yu
On Aug 23, 2020, at 12:07, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to create a mock configuration file that points to my local dnf
> repo.
> I have the following in the mock config template:
>
> [local-repo]
> name=my-Local
> baseurl=http://yumrepo.example.com/yum-repository/local/cento
Hi,
I am trying to create a mock configuration file that points to my local dnf
repo.
I have the following in the mock config template:
[local-repo]
name=my-Local
baseurl=http://yumrepo.example.com/yum-repository/local/centos/8/x86_64/
failovermethod=priority
skip_if_unavailable=False
When I
Message -
> From: "Alice Wonder"
> To: centos@centos.org
> Sent: Sunday, 30 August, 2015 12:10:43
> Subject: [CentOS] Mock build oddity
> When building packages in mock lately I see this a lot:
>
> error: Macro %py2_install has unterminated body
>
> Only s
When building packages in mock lately I see this a lot:
error: Macro %py2_install has unterminated body
Only started within last month, as far as I can tell the build actually
finishes just fine.
cause?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> Question: If I use mock to build package rpmA from tarballA but rpmA has a
> dependency that can only be satisfied by package rpmB which must also be built
> from tarballB then how does the rpmB built from the tarballB get pulled into
> mock when bui
Question: If I use mock to build package rpmA from tarballA but rpmA has a
dependency that can only be satisfied by package rpmB which must also be built
from tarballB then how does the rpmB built from the tarballB get pulled into
mock when building rpmA?
I am trying to build httpd-2.4.7 from Ap
James B. Byrne wrote:
> I am trying to build an rpm package for iaxmodem-1.2.0. At the
> moment I am still trying to get a working spec file put together. I
> have managed to get an SRPM produced but the binary build from this
> fails due to there being no install task in the Makefile.in provide
On Fri, April 5, 2013 15:45, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> you can try my SPEC below which builds iaxmodem-packages on
> Fedora since a long time, if this also does not work i suspect
> a bug in mock!
>
Thank you very much. I had to make several small changes but with
those in place your spec file w
I am trying to build an rpm package for iaxmodem-1.2.0. At the
moment I am still trying to get a working spec file put together. I
have managed to get an SRPM produced but the binary build from this
fails due to there being no install task in the Makefile.in provided
with the source.
I have fou
Hi.
Thanks I have managed to fix the issue.
Rather than modify a Fedora src.rpm - I used a Centos6 one.
I also changed the lines in the .spec file from
-
%build
# aclocal workaround - to be improved
cat `aclocal
--print-ac-dir`/{libtool,ltoptions,ltsugar,ltversion,lt~obsolete}.m4
>
If gmail will let u send a srpm just send to treyd...@gmail.com. might have
to tar or zip if rpm files cant be sent. I recently rebuilt PHP for centos
6 in mock so may be able to help debug.
On Oct 10, 2011 3:19 AM, "Morgan Cox" wrote:
> Hi trey.
>
> I would prefer being able to build my own pa
Hi trey.
I would prefer being able to build my own packages rather than rely on an
external repo.(that was I can always build what ever version I need to).
Its not the building of the RPM it the use of mock thats failing.
What is the best way of sending you the source RPM.
Regards
On 8 Octo
On Oct 7, 2011 3:34 AM, "Morgan Cox" wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Thank you for your extremely quick (and faster than support from any
> company..) reply.
>
> Sorry, can you give more detail ?
>
> >From the look of the error the 'mock centos5' is missing these files :-
>
> /usr/share/aclocal/ltoptions.m4
> /
Hi
Thank you for your extremely quick (and faster than support from any
company..) reply.
Sorry, can you give more detail ?
>From the look of the error the 'mock centos5' is missing these files :-
/usr/share/aclocal/ltoptions.m4
/usr/share/aclocal/ltsugar.m4
/usr/share/aclocal/ltversion.m4
/usr
Hi
Thank you for your extremely quick (and faster than support from any
company..) reply.
Sorry, can you give more detail ?
>From the look of the error the 'mock centos5' is missing these files :-
/usr/share/aclocal/ltoptions.m4
/usr/share/aclocal/ltsugar.m4
/usr/share/aclocal/ltversion.m4
/usr
There is my build of php-5.3.8 for el6:
http://yum.aclub.net/pub/linux/centos/6/umask/SRPMS/php-5.3.8-4.el6.src.rpm
You can find here BuildRequirements.
Differences with upstream php:
- subpackage for mod_php
- subpackage with php-fpm init-scripts
- suhosin patch / module
- some other modules (
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011, Morgan Cox wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I am trying to use Mock to rebuild a .src.rpm file I have made for PHP 5.3.8
> (for Centos6)
>
> I have managed to install deps fine with mock.
>
> When I try to rebuild the package though I get.
BuildRequires are wrong, since this SRPM requires fil
Hi.
I am trying to use Mock to rebuild a .src.rpm file I have made for PHP 5.3.8
(for Centos6)
I have managed to install deps fine with mock.
When I try to rebuild the package though I get.
(from build.log)
---
Solved,
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron
> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2010 17:22
> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
> Subject: [CentOS] Mock on 5.5 x86_64 failing with Could
I am atempting to work with some rpms in the c5-testing repo.
When I add:
[c5-testing]
name=CentOS-5 Testing
baseurl=http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/x86_64/
gpgcheck=1
gpgkey=http://dev.centos.org/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-testing
to centos-5-x86_64.cfg, saving as centos-5-x86_64-testdev.
Nice, thanks
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Wagoner
> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 13:40
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Mock build php i386 from x86_64 issue
>
&g
rry if that is so.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
>> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rick Barnes
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 7:45
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Mock build php i386 f
Maybe this shoul have been on the devel list, sorry if that is so.
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rick Barnes
> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 7:45
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Cent
On 07/07/2010 07:26 AM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> checking OpenSSL dir for SNMP... no
> /usr/bin/net-snmp-config: line 43: net-snmp-config-x86_64: command not found
> /usr/bin/net-snmp-config: line 43: net-snmp-config-x86_64: command not found
> /usr/bin/net-snmp-config: line 43: net-snmp-config-x86_64
[m...@ten-186 ~]$ mock php-5.1.6-27.el5.src.rpm
init
clean
prep
This may take a while
setup
build
Installing /builddir/build/SRPMS/php-5.1.6-27.src.rpm
Building target platforms: i386
Building for target i386
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.23317
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 13:40 -0400, Ryan Wagoner wrote:
Replying to you off list because this is a topic for the fedora devel list.
> Shouldn't it see the correct architecture inside of mock? I thought
> that was the point of mock so I could build both i386 and x86_64
> versions on the same syste
I've successfully rebuilt Red Hat EL PHP 5.2.10 RPMs using mock on a
CentOS 5.4 i386. I wanted to be able to build both x86_64 and i386
versions so I reinstalled my builder system with CentOS 5.4 x86_64.
Now I can build the PHP RPM successful for x86_64, but i386 fails with
the following during con
Todd Denniston napsal(a):
> I am looking to be a bit more standard in the builds of my CentOS rpms, and
> so I was about to
> install mock but noticed that there is one provided in the centos/5/extras
> and another in epel.
>
> epel is obviously newer, but are there reasons/experiences in this
Karanbir Singh wrote, On 11/03/2009 04:57 AM:
> The mock in extras is what we use to build the distro against and is the
> only version we work with on the buildsystems. depending on what you are
> doing, that issue might or might not be relevant.
>
Thanks for yours and Mr. X's feedback.
Off to
On 11/03/2009 12:09 AM, Todd Denniston wrote:
> Is the extras version the version used by the upstream provider and thus the
> CentOS team keeps it
> around to do the matching builds?
The mock in extras is what we use to build the distro against and is the
only version we work with on the builds
--- On Mon, 11/2/09, Todd Denniston
wrote:
> From: Todd Denniston
> Subject: [CentOS] mock, extras vs epel
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Date: Monday, November 2, 2009, 4:09 PM
> I am looking to be a bit more
> standard in the builds of my CentOS rpms, and so
I am looking to be a bit more standard in the builds of my CentOS rpms, and so
I was about to
install mock but noticed that there is one provided in the centos/5/extras and
another in epel.
epel is obviously newer, but are there reasons/experiences in this group that
would suggest sticking
wi
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 15:23 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
> Does anyone know why librelp-devel wouldn't be found?
Well, shit, I figured it out. librelp-devel is in epel, not in the
CentOS repos. So, after adding the epel repo to the mock config for
centos-5-x86_64 and centos-5-i386, the rsy
Hi All,
I'm not sure where I should ask this, so I'll try here and the Fedora
list.
I'm using mock-0.6.13-1.el5_2.3 on a CentOS 5 box to rebuild i386 and
x86_64 versions of rsyslog-3.21.10-2.fc10.src.rpm. But, the mock build
always dies (for both archs) with the following error:
No Package Foun
Farkas Levente napsal(a):
>
> imho _many_ people would like to know the solution...
>
Well,
solution is easy. Make sure pam is installed before the coreutils. :o)
Now seriously. 32bit and 64bit pam packages come from the very same
source, so both have to be installed after coreutils and that it
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> Rex Dieter wrote
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.77062: line 6: cat: command not found
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.77062: line 7: rm: command not found
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.77062: line 22: install: command not found
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.77062: line 25: install: command
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote
>>> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.77062: line 6: cat: command not found
>>> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.77062: line 7: rm: command not found
>>> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.77062: line 22: install: command not found
>>> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.77062: line 25: install: command not found
>>> error: %post
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Rex Dieter
>> wrote:
>>
>>> interestingly, I can no longer reproduce this failure myself on a
>>> recently upgraded centos-5.3 box using mock-0.9.14 (from epel).
>>
>> So, we can use mock-
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 04/13/2009 04:43 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>> Well, I heard from one of the CentOS devs that mock newer than 0.6 was
>>> broken.
>> OK, fair 'nuf. Just seemed silly to me that you'd assume epel would release
>> something that was broken.
>
> EPEL releases broken stuff all
On 04/13/2009 04:43 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Well, I heard from one of the CentOS devs that mock newer than 0.6 was
>> broken.
>
> OK, fair 'nuf. Just seemed silly to me that you'd assume epel would release
> something that was broken.
EPEL releases broken stuff all the time :)
Also mock > 0.6 d
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> Stuart Jansen wrote:
>>
>>> I recently upgraded an internal build server from C5.2 to C5.3 and now
>>> I'm experiencing problems initializing the mock buildroot. Specifically,
>>> I'm getting the following error:
>>>
>>> --
>>> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.77062:
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 07:26 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> > interestingly, I can no longer reproduce this failure myself on a recently
> > upgraded centos-5.3 box using mock-0.9.14 (from epel).
>
> So, we can use mock-0.9.14 from EPEL on CentO
Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Rex Dieter
> wrote:
>> Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
>>> So, we can use mock-0.9.14 from EPEL on CentOS 5.3 (with the current
>>> CentOS yum) without any issue?
>>
>> of course. (what would make you think otherwise?)
>
> Well, I heard from one of the
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> So, we can use mock-0.9.14 from EPEL on CentOS 5.3 (with the current
>> CentOS yum) without any issue?
>
> of course. (what would make you think otherwise?)
Well, I heard from one of the CentOS devs that mock newer than 0
Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Rex Dieter
> wrote:
>
>> interestingly, I can no longer reproduce this failure myself on a
>> recently upgraded centos-5.3 box using mock-0.9.14 (from epel).
>
> So, we can use mock-0.9.14 from EPEL on CentOS 5.3 (with the current
> CentOS yu
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> interestingly, I can no longer reproduce this failure myself on a recently
> upgraded centos-5.3 box using mock-0.9.14 (from epel).
So, we can use mock-0.9.14 from EPEL on CentOS 5.3 (with the current
CentOS yum) without any issue?
Akemi
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Stuart Jansen wrote:
>
>> I recently upgraded an internal build server from C5.2 to C5.3 and now
>> I'm experiencing problems initializing the mock buildroot. Specifically,
>> I'm getting the following error:
>>
>> --
>> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.77062: line 6: cat: command not fo
Stuart Jansen wrote:
> I recently upgraded an internal build server from C5.2 to C5.3 and now
> I'm experiencing problems initializing the mock buildroot. Specifically,
> I'm getting the following error:
>
> --
> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.77062: line 6: cat: command not found
> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.77062:
>I've got a shell script that takes a list of packages.
>
>The script defines a destination directory.
>Before it builds a package, it removes any repo stuff in that directory
>and runs createrepo on it.
>
>The destination directory is part of the mock configuration file.
>It then builds the packa
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> Just started using mock to rebuild some srpms. I have two I want to
> rebuild, problem is the first creates a dep that is required by the second.
>
> Is there an automated way to populate an additional repo/cache that mock
> would look at when building the second so I cou
On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 13:55 -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> Just started using mock to rebuild some srpms. I have two I want to
> rebuild, problem is the first creates a dep that is required by the second.
>
> Is there an automated way to populate an additional repo/cache that mock
> would look a
Just started using mock to rebuild some srpms. I have two I want to
rebuild, problem is the first creates a dep that is required by the second.
Is there an automated way to populate an additional repo/cache that mock
would look at when building the second so I could queue both?
Although I haven't
On 04/09/09 16:46, Stuart Jansen enlightened us:
> I recently upgraded an internal build server from C5.2 to C5.3 and now
> I'm experiencing problems initializing the mock buildroot. Specifically,
> I'm getting the following error:
>
> --
> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.77062: line 6: cat: command not foun
Stuart Jansen wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 16:54 -0700, Bill Campbell wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 09, 2009, Stuart Jansen wrote:
>>> I recently upgraded an internal build server from C5.2 to C5.3 and now
>>> I'm experiencing problems initializing the mock buildroot. Specifically,
>>> I'm getting the fo
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 16:54 -0700, Bill Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2009, Stuart Jansen wrote:
> >I recently upgraded an internal build server from C5.2 to C5.3 and now
> >I'm experiencing problems initializing the mock buildroot. Specifically,
> >I'm getting the following error:
> >
> >-
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009, Stuart Jansen wrote:
>I recently upgraded an internal build server from C5.2 to C5.3 and now
>I'm experiencing problems initializing the mock buildroot. Specifically,
>I'm getting the following error:
>
>--
>/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.77062: line 6: cat: command not found
>/var/tmp/
I recently upgraded an internal build server from C5.2 to C5.3 and now
I'm experiencing problems initializing the mock buildroot. Specifically,
I'm getting the following error:
--
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.77062: line 6: cat: command not found
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.77062: line 7: rm: command not found
/var/
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William L. Maltby
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 3:19 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: RE: [CentOS] mock
>
>
> On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 14:5
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 14:57 -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William L. Maltby
> >
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe
> > Brandenburger
> > > >
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karanbir Singh
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 2:57 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] mock
>
> Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4]$ fi
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William L. Maltby
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 2:45 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: RE: [CentOS] mock
>
>
> On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 14:3
Jason Pyeron wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 4]$ find /var/spool/mirrors/centos/4/ | wc -l
11529
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 4]$ find /var/spool/mirrors/centos/4/ | grep -i mock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 4]$
Good timing; I am just going to push a new mock into c4 and c5 repo's in
a few minutes. You can test it on c4 t
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 14:38 -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>
> >
> > Yes it does. You could have found that out with yum yourself.
]$ yum list available yourself\*
Loaded plugins: allowdowngrade, changelog, downloadonly, fastestmirror,
: fedorakmod, kernel-module, priorities, tsflag
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 14:38 -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Brandenburger
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 2:15 PM
> > To: CentOS mailing li
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Brandenburger
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 2:15 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] mock
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 13:45,
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 13:45, Jason Pyeron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does the centos project maintain a copy of mock to install?
Yes it does. You could have found that out with yum yourself.
HTH,
Filipe
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Does the centos project maintain a copy of mock to install?
If not which mock should I install?
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
Hi,
someone successfully using mock 0.9.{7,10} on Centos 5.2 (64bit)? I'm
trying to use 0.9.10, but I'm not able to produce right cfg files for
centos builds, cfg files for fedora work fine.
Thanks,
David
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
79 matches
Mail list logo
