Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of Frank Cox
>> Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2008 4:04 PM
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] sendmail and spam
>>
>> On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:39:31 -0400
>> Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Frank Cox
> Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2008 4:04 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] sendmail and spam
>
> On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:39:31 -0400
> Mark Weave
On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:39:31 -0400
Mark Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I.e. if a business in Pennsylvania only does business in the lower 48
> there isn't any need to accept port 25 traffic from Asia, Europe, Latin
> America, etc...
Until "something comes up" and your users and/or customers
Alain Terriault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is todays most effective combination to filter spam ?
>
> On my old Redhat 3 system I used Sendmail and Spamassasin .. it was
> good, but with the current setup we are getting way to much spam.
have you considered using geo-blocking in concert with SpamAssas
Thanks, This is a very useful mailing list and CentOS works like charm
on PowerEdge hardware.
Merci, alain
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 00:23 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Alain Terriault wrote:
> >
> > What is todays most effective combination to filter spam ?
> >
> > On my old Redhat 3 system I used Sendmail and Spamassasin .. it was
> > good, but with the current setup we are getting way to much spam.
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 16:53 -0400, Alain Terriault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is todays most effective combination to filter spam ?
>
> On my old Redhat 3 system I used Sendmail and Spamassasin .. it was
> good, but with the current setup we are getting way to much spam.
>
> Looking around I found
Alain Terriault wrote:
>
> What is todays most effective combination to filter spam ?
>
> On my old Redhat 3 system I used Sendmail and Spamassasin .. it was
> good, but with the current setup we are getting way to much spam.
>
> Looking around I found new players, well some I did not know then a
Craig White wrote:
Those things alone and greylisting knock down most of it so spamassassin
has a much lighter load and MailScanner is awesome.
Since I set up milter-greylist we went from 90% spam daily to < 10%, and
that part is easily handled by spamassassin. Load on the mail server is
way
Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 16:53 -0400, Alain Terriault wrote:
Hi,
What is todays most effective combination to filter spam ?
On my old Redhat 3 system I used Sendmail and Spamassasin .. it was
good, but with the current setup we are getting way to much spam.
Looking around I fo
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Alain Terriault wrote:
What is todays most effective combination to filter spam ?
We use a three-way combination (on a CentOS 5 base), in this order:
1. sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
2. clamav-milter
3. spamass-milter (milter-ized spamassassin)
Our server only handles about
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 16:53 -0400, Alain Terriault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is todays most effective combination to filter spam ?
>
> On my old Redhat 3 system I used Sendmail and Spamassasin .. it was
> good, but with the current setup we are getting way to much spam.
>
> Looking around I found ne
Alain Terriault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is todays most effective combination to filter spam ?
>
> On my old Redhat 3 system I used Sendmail and Spamassasin .. it was
> good, but with the current setup we are getting way to much spam.
>
> Looking around I found new players, well some I did not know
Hi,
What is todays most effective combination to filter spam ?
On my old Redhat 3 system I used Sendmail and Spamassasin .. it was
good, but with the current setup we are getting way to much spam.
Looking around I found new players, well some I did not know then and
they are very interesting..
14 matches
Mail list logo
