Both NICs show up in the Xen hardware details display.
Looking at dmesg output from rebooting the domU, I see both eth0 and eth1
appearing there.
By chance did you set the macs manually? Are they valid, look for a typo?
I recall hearing about this behavior in lieu of that mistake.
jlc
On Mon, August 25, 2008 11:21, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Both NICs show up in the Xen hardware details display.
Looking at dmesg output from rebooting the domU, I see both eth0 and eth1
appearing there.
By chance did you set the macs manually? Are they valid, look for a typo?
I recall hearing
I set the second one manually; copied the first one and added one.
vif = [ mac=00:16:3e:5b:44:5f,bridge=pubbr,
mac=00:16:3e:5b:44:60,bridge=virtbr ]
Looks good to me?
Interfaces are associated with both bridges properly, but only an eth0
device appears in the domU.
If the low-order bits are
On Mon, August 25, 2008 15:24, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I set the second one manually; copied the first one and added one.
vif = [ mac=00:16:3e:5b:44:5f,bridge=pubbr,
mac=00:16:3e:5b:44:60,bridge=virtbr ]
Looks good to me?
Thanks for the second set of eyes. It's amazing what I can look past
As in /usr/sbin/system-config-network? The yes. Or something else
(probably officially called network manager)? At this point there are
Well, I am probably about to be char broiled in flame, but I just edit
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth{n} and what ever else like resolv.conf
by hand
On Mon, August 25, 2008 16:55, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
As in /usr/sbin/system-config-network? The yes. Or something else
(probably officially called network manager)? At this point there are
Well, I am probably about to be char broiled in flame, but I just edit
6 matches
Mail list logo
