On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 10/04/2016 03:24 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
>
>> This can be accomplished by just this (generates ifcfg files etc):
>>
>> # virsh iface-bridge eth0 br0
>>
>
>
> Brilliant! I'm not sure why I haven't noticed that in the docs, before.
> I've
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Gordon Messmer
> Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 1:18 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
>
> On 10/04/2016 04:18 A
On 04/10/16 11:24, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 04.10.2016 um 08:46 schrieb Gordon Messmer :
>> On 10/03/2016 07:00 PM, TE Dukes wrote:
>>> /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-eth1
>>> GATEWAY=192.168.1.1
>> ...
>>> /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-lo
>>> GATEWAY=192.168.1.1
>>
>> Don't specify GATEWAY in interface files where
On 10/04/2016 04:18 AM, TE Dukes wrote:
I disabled NetworkManager and created one.
You don't need to do that on CentOS 7, and I wouldn't recommend it. Use
NetworkManager where it works.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.cent
On 10/04/2016 03:24 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
This can be accomplished by just this (generates ifcfg files etc):
# virsh iface-bridge eth0 br0
Brilliant! I'm not sure why I haven't noticed that in the docs,
before. I've definitely been to the page where Red Hat documents
it... Thanks.
_
> Date: Monday, October 03, 2016 22:00:07 -0400
> From: TE Dukes
>
> I posted some files previously but that was like 20 or so installs
> ago. I don't know the files you need.
>From what you've indicated, you appear to be deleting/reinstalling
when the networking isn't working right. If the iss
Am 04.10.2016 um 08:46 schrieb Gordon Messmer :
> On 10/03/2016 07:00 PM, TE Dukes wrote:
>> /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-eth1
>> GATEWAY=192.168.1.1
> ...
>> /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-lo
>> GATEWAY=192.168.1.1
>
> Don't specify GATEWAY in interface files where it isn't used. This should be
> set on eth0 onl
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Gordon Messmer
> Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 2:47 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
>
> On 10/03/2016
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Richard
> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 10:41 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
>
>
>
> > Date: Monday
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of John R Pierce
> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 10:18 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
>
> On 10/3/2016 7:00 P
On 10/03/2016 07:00 PM, TE Dukes wrote:
/etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-eth1
GATEWAY=192.168.1.1
...
/etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-lo
GATEWAY=192.168.1.1
Don't specify GATEWAY in interface files where it isn't used. This
should be set on eth0 only.
# brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP e
> Date: Monday, October 03, 2016 22:00:07 -0400
> From: TE Dukes
>
>> From: Gordon Messmer
>> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 4:25 PM
>>
>> On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote:
>> > I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every
>> > was possible to be able to access the guest
On 10/3/2016 7:00 PM, TE Dukes wrote:
4: vboxnet0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state
UNKNOWN qlen 1000
link/ether 0a:00:27:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
are there any other /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg- files
beyond the ones you listed?
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Gordon Messmer
> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 4:25 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
>
> On 10/03/2016 04:54 A
On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote:
I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every was possible
to be able to access the guest from the LAN or even the host. Nothing I have
tried works.
The only thing all documentation leaves out is how to set up the guest
networking during
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 07:54:36AM -0400, TE Dukes wrote:
>
> OK, I'm about done trying to get this to work. I have spent HOURS reading,
> installing, re-installing, etc.
>
> I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every was possible
> to be able to access the guest from the LAN
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Liam O'Toole
Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 10:28 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
On 2016-10-03, TE Dukes
wrote:
>
>
>>
On 2016-10-03, TE Dukes
wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message- From:
>> centos-boun...@centos.org
>> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>> Behalf Of Liam O'Toole Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 9:19 AM To:
>> centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS]
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Liam O'Toole
> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 9:19 AM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
>
> On
On 2016-10-03, TE Dukes
wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message- From:
>> centos-boun...@centos.org
>> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>> Behalf Of Michael Cole Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 9:41 PM To:
>> centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 1:54 PM, TE Dukes wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> > Behalf Of Michael Cole
> > Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 9:41 PM
> > To: centos@centos.org
>
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Michael Cole
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 9:41 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
>
> Deletion does not re
Deletion does not remove all, Try a erase if that did not work.
Configuration files are not always where you expect then to be.
Regards Michael Cole
On Friday, September 30, 2016 9:16:44 PM TE Dukes wrote:
> I deleted all virtualization packages and re-installed.
>
> Something must have been ho
I deleted all virtualization packages and re-installed.
Something must have been hosed up.
Installing a VM and it didn't even ask to setup the network. Hopefully
that's a good sign.
Will know shortly
TIA
___
CentOS mailing list
Ce
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Richard
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 8:50 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
>
>
>
> > Date: Fr
> Date: Friday, September 30, 2016 07:14:59 -0400
> From: TE Dukes
>> From: Gordon Messmer
>> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 1:01 AM
>>
>> On 09/29/2016 07:54 PM, TE Dukes wrote:
>> > For whatever reason, the default NAT setup no longer works.
>>
>> Start over with a new install. Record e
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Gordon Messmer
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 1:01 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
>
> On 09/29/2016
On 09/29/2016 07:54 PM, TE Dukes wrote:
For whatever reason, the default NAT setup no longer works.
Start over with a new install. Record each change you make, carefully.
I got some kind
of bridge network (mactap) setup that has access to the outside but I still
can't connect locally.
As
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Gordon Messmer
> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 11:47 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
>
> On
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of John R Pierce
> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 2:16 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
>
> On
On 09/28/2016 08:43 AM, tdu...@palmettoshopper.com wrote:
I have one of those free domains/DNS from no-ip.com, centos7vm.ddns.net
I plan to use as the host name.
I want to be able to access this VM from the internet.
...
This is what I was seeing. Either it lands on the DSL router's login
page
On 9/28/2016 11:09 AM, tdu...@palmettoshopper.com wrote:
I guess this is why I'm confused. I thought a VM could be setup as its
own domain with all available services.
it can, if its got its own internet IP address... but if you're on
consumer internet, with only one public IP address, then th
Original Message
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
From: Warren Young
Date: Wed, September 28, 2016 1:19 pm
To: CentOS mailing list
On Sep 28, 2016, at 9:43 AM,
wrote:
>
> The first one, I created in my / file system but didn't really have the
&
Original Message
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
From: John R Pierce
Date: Wed, September 28, 2016 12:54 pm
To: CentOS mailing list
On 9/28/2016 8:43 AM, tdu...@palmettoshopper.com wrote:
> I'm a little confused on which networking option I need t
On Sep 28, 2016, at 9:43 AM,
wrote:
>
> The first one, I created in my / file system but didn't really have the
> space so I deleted it.
One of the primary advantages of VMs over real machines is that you can pause
them, move them, and then restart them, with the VM guest OS not realizing tha
On 9/28/2016 8:43 AM, tdu...@palmettoshopper.com wrote:
I'm a little confused on which networking option I need to choose when
setting up a VM.
the host thats running the VM, is it connected to a LAN behind a
firewall/router, or directly to the internet? if directly, is there a
dedicated in
36 matches
Mail list logo
