Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic on 6.8 release with kernel-2.6.32-642.el6.x86_64

2.6.32- > 642.el6.x86_64 > > On Thu, 26 May 2016, Sorin Srbu wrote: > > > Uninstalled NFS, as it wasn't needed anyway. > > > > Still got the panic. > > Seriously, what panic? The one I posted a screen dump of earlier. -- //Sorin ___

Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic on 6.8 release with kernel-2.6.32-642.el6.x86_64

2.6.32- > 642.el6.x86_64 > > Sorin Srbu wrote: > >> Behalf Of Johnny Hughes > >> Sent: den 26 maj 2016 14:30 > >> > >> If lockd is failling to start: > >> > >> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10927 > > > > Uninstalled NFS,

Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic on 6.8 release with kernel-2.6.32-642.el6.x86_64

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Johnny Hughes > Sent: den 26 maj 2016 12:39 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic on 6.8 release with kernel-2.6.32- > 642.el6.x86_64 > > Did you see it in every

Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic on 6.8 release with kernel-2.6.32-642.el6.x86_64

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Subscriber > Sent: den 26 maj 2016 13:32 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic on 6.8 release with kernel-2.6.32- > 642.el6.x86_64 > > Im

Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic on 6.8 release with kernel-2.6.32-642.el6.x86_64

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of John Hodrien > Sent: den 26 maj 2016 11:14 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic on 6.8 release with kernel-2.6.32- > 642.el6.x86_64 > > >

Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic on 6.8 release with kernel-2.6.32-642.el6.x86_64

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Johnny Hughes > Sent: den 26 maj 2016 14:30 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic on 6.8 release with kernel-2.6.32- > 642.el6.x86_64 > > If lockd is failling to

Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] Kernel panic on 6.8 release with kernel-2.6.32-642.el6.x86_64

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Sorin Srbu > Sent: den 27 maj 2016 07:43 > To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic on 6.8 release with kernel-

Re: [CentOS] Utility to zero unused blocks on disk

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of EGO-II.1 > Sent: den 9 februari 2016 09:00 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Utility to zero unused blocks on disk > > > > >> the only truly safe way to destroy data on

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Peter Duffy > Sent: den 26 januari 2016 13:16 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent > > reminds me of first installing windows 95 (by the > choice of my

Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Richard > Sent: den 25 januari 2016 16:19 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6? > > > You're just seeing this now on a 6.7 system? I don't

Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Leon Fauster > Sent: den 25 januari 2016 17:03 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6? > > > upstream provide a EL6 supplementary repository with

Re: [CentOS] In A UEFI World, "rm -rf /" Can Brick Your System

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us > Sent: den 1 februari 2016 20:34 > To: CentOS > Subject: [CentOS] In A UEFI World, "rm -rf /" Can Brick Your System > > As a public service announcement, recursively

[CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?

on CentOS and how to get around this problem? Are the views on this matter still infected? I'm not looking forward to go back to the sluggish Firefox. 8-/ -- BW, Sorin --- # Sorin Srbu, Sysadmin # Uppsala University # Dept of

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of John Hodrien > Sent: den 24 januari 2016 12:47 > To: CentOS mailing list > Cc: Mark LaPierre > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent > > My opinion is that there's a silent majority

Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7??

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Akemi Yagi > Sent: den 10 mars 2016 20:27 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7?? > > > > > Looks like installing openshot 2.x on C7 isn't as

Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7??

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Chris Beattie > Sent: den 11 mars 2016 16:53 > To: 'CentOS mailing list' > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7?? > > On 3/11/2016 2:02 AM, Sorin

Re: [CentOS] Centos in the Browser string ?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of g > Sent: den 24 mars 2016 16:56 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos in the Browser string ? > > if you have a file in profile directory, add this to it. if not, >

Re: [CentOS] Centos in the Browser string ?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of g > Sent: den 24 mars 2016 17:22 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos in the Browser string ? > > > now i goofed. :-\ > > > if you have file "user.js" in profile

Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7??

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Nux! > Sent: den 7 april 2016 15:04 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7?? > > Well, by the looks of it, it bundles all the

Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7??

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Lamar Owen > Sent: den 7 april 2016 16:21 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7?? > > It does take more disk space to do this.

Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7??

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Sorin Srbu > Sent: den 14 mars 2016 07:31 > To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7?? > > > >&

Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7??

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Nux! > Sent: den 7 april 2016 18:09 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7?? > > Indeed, it's pretty new AFAIK and I am as

Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7??

> > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > - Original Message - > > From: "Sorin Srbu" <sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se> > > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org> > > Sent: Thursday, 7 April, 2016 10:02:42 > > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Opensh

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2, nouveau won't go away

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Akemi Yagi > Sent: den 3 mars 2016 08:20 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2, nouveau won't go away > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:05

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2, nouveau won't go away

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of John Hodrien > Sent: den 29 februari 2016 17:55 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2, nouveau won't go away > > > Fully updated 7.2 system. I installed the

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2, nouveau won't go away

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us > Sent: den 29 februari 2016 19:50 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2, nouveau won't go away > > Because I was looking late Friday afternoon,

Re: [CentOS] Upcoming OwnCloud changes

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of James Hogarth > Sent: den 23 maj 2016 08:54 > To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Upcoming OwnCloud changes > > On 23 M

Re: [CentOS] Upcoming OwnCloud changes

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Chuck Munro > Sent: den 22 maj 2016 17:11 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Upcoming OwnCloud changes > > > Just a FYI folks ... > > I am running OwnCloud 9.0.2 on

Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Phelps, Matthew > Sent: den 18 april 2016 14:34 > To: Karanbir Singh > Cc: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Alternative GUI

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Greg Bailey > Sent: den 30 september 2016 04:26 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Alternative GUI > > Only additional thing I did was to install the

Re: [CentOS] Alternative GUI

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Mark LaPierre > Sent: den 29 september 2016 01:26 > To: Mail List CentOS Users ; Mark LaPierre > > Subject: [CentOS] Alternative GUI > > I'm

Re: [CentOS] Alternative GUI

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Greg Bailey > Sent: den 30 september 2016 08:30 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Alternative GUI > > >> Only additional thing I did was to install

Re: [CentOS] Alternative GUI

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Sorin Srbu > Sent: den 30 september 2016 09:40 > To: 'CentOS mailing list' <centos@centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Alternative GUI > > > >

Re: [CentOS] Desktop for newbies

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Gary Stainburn > Sent: den 4 oktober 2016 11:24 > To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Desktop for newbies > > On Monday

Re: [CentOS] Alternative GUI

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Frank Saporito > Sent: den 4 oktober 2016 15:00 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Alternative GUI > > I looked at Mate Desktop for a CentOS 7 and recall having a problem:

Re: [CentOS] Desktop for newbies

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Sorin Srbu > Sent: den 4 oktober 2016 13:25 > To: 'CentOS mailing list' <centos@centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Desktop for newbies > > > --

Re: [CentOS] Desktop for newbies

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Gary Stainburn > Sent: den 4 oktober 2016 12:49 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Desktop for newbies > > > > That's a shame, because I was hoping to use it for the same

Re: [CentOS] Desktop for newbies

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Gary Stainburn > Sent: den 4 oktober 2016 12:33 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Desktop for newbies > > > > > The most important thing to not forget though, is to add

Re: [CentOS] Alternative GUI

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Gianluca Cecchi > Sent: den 30 september 2016 14:22 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Alternative GUI > > > Worked fine. Seems to be a little

Re: [CentOS] Desktop for newbies

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Valeri Galtsev > Sent: den 30 september 2016 18:14 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Desktop for newbies > > >> > I'm about to set up a non-root user

Re: [CentOS] "Shortcut" for creating a software RAID 60?

are RAID 60? > > On 10/25/2016 10:41 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote: > > Never mind. Found this to start with. > > > Additionally, see the man page for "md". Gotcha'. Thanks. -- //Sorin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] "Shortcut" for creating a software RAID 60?

> > -Original Message- > > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > > Behalf Of Gordon Messmer > > Sent: den 25 oktober 2016 20:54 > > To: CentOS mailing list > > Subject: Re: [CentOS] "Shortcut" for creating a software RAID 60? > > > >

Re: [CentOS] "Shortcut" for creating a software RAID 60?

are RAID 60? > > On 10/25/2016 05:41 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote: > > I found a shortcut for creating a software RAID 10 ("--level=10"), device in > > CentOS 6. > > That's not really a shortcut, per se. RAID10 in Linux is not > necessarily similar to RAID1+0.

Re: [CentOS] "Shortcut" for creating a software RAID 60?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of John R Pierce > Sent: den 26 oktober 2016 07:42 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] "Shortcut" for creating a software RAID 60? > > On 10/25/2016 11:54 AM, Gordon Messmer

[CentOS] "Shortcut" for creating a software RAID 60?

extra time. Besides, I haven't found any way to fail a member disk, as is possible to do when using RAID level 10. Am I missing something here? -- BW, Sorin --- # Sorin Srbu, Sysadmin # Uppsala University # Dept of Medicinal Chemi

Re: [CentOS] Centos.org down??

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Syam G Krishnan > Sent: den 16 november 2016 10:45 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] Centos.org down?? > > Hi guys, > > Is there any problem with www.centos.org? > It seems

Re: [CentOS] Thunderbird vs. Evolution vs. OwnCloud

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Nicolas Kovacs > Sent: den 3 november 2016 06:59 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] Thunderbird vs. Evolution vs. OwnCloud > > I'm currently using Thunderbird synced to

Re: [CentOS] Thunderbird vs. Evolution vs. OwnCloud

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Nicolas Kovacs > Sent: den 3 november 2016 09:16 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Thunderbird vs. Evolution vs. OwnCloud > > Le 03/11/2016 à 0

Re: [CentOS] Thunderbird vs. Evolution vs. OwnCloud

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Nicolas Kovacs > Sent: den 3 november 2016 09:51 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Thunderbird vs. Evolution vs. OwnCloud > > Le 03/11/2016 à 0

Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of geo > Sent: den 15 december 2016 12:32 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list > > >>> Am I looking for something in particular? > >>> > >> }} > >> > >> when you look

Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Lamar > Owen > Sent: den 15 december 2016 16:45 > To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list > > On 12/15/2

[CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list

--- # Sorin Srbu, Sysadmin # Uppsala University # Dept of Medicinal Chemistry # Div of Org Pharm Chem # Box 574 # SE-75123 Uppsala # Sweden # # Phone: +46 (0)18-4714482 # Visit: BMC, Husargatan 3, D5:512b # Web: http://www.orgfarm.uu.se

Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Frank Cox > Sent: den 15 december 2016 08:10 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list > > On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 07:03:53 + > Sorin Srbu wr

Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of > geo.inbox.ignored > Sent: den 15 december 2016 11:28 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list > > > > > Ok, can view the source now. > > AFAICT, it looks

Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Sorin Srbu > Sent: den 15 december 2016 08:16 > To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list > > > -Original

Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John > Hodrien > Sent: den 15 december 2016 10:13 > To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list > > On Thu, 15 Dec 201

Re: [CentOS] Noise Cancellation of Server Noise

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce > Sent: den 24 december 2016 23:18 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Noise Cancellation of Server Noise > > On 12/24/2016 1:57 PM, Digimer wrote: > > There are rack chassis

Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Valeri > Galtsev > Sent: den 19 december 2016 17:29 > To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list > > > On Mon,

Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Lamar > Owen > Sent: den 16 december 2016 17:11 > To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list > > On 12/16/2016 01:35 AM

Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of > geo.inbox.ignored > Sent: den 16 december 2016 15:03 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list > > > > On 12/16/2016 07:29 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Fri,

Re: [CentOS] firewalld management on a headless server

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Valeri > Galtsev > Sent: den 27 mars 2017 23:43 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] firewalld management on a headless server > > > On Mon, March 27, 2017 3:58 pm, Mike

Re: [CentOS] firewalld management on a headless server

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce > Sent: den 28 mars 2017 09:28 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] firewalld management on a headless server > > On 3/27/2017 10:20 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote:

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 6.9 i386 and x86_64

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Leon Fauster > Sent: den 5 april 2017 17:01 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 6.9 i386 > and x86_64 > > > We are pleased to announce the immediate

Re: [CentOS] CentOS, PHP & OwnCloud/Nextcloud: the version dilemma

-Original Message- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas Kovacs Sent: den 19 september 2017 10:01 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS, PHP & OwnCloud/Nextcloud: the version dilemma Le 19/09/2017 à 09:48, Sorin Srbu a écrit : > I agree

Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement

-Original Message- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of FHDATA Sent: den 18 september 2017 18:10 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> You may have reasons to prefer

Re: [CentOS] CentOS, PHP & OwnCloud/Nextcloud: the version dilemma

-Original Message- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas Kovacs Sent: den 19 september 2017 09:37 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] CentOS, PHP & OwnCloud/Nextcloud: the version dilemma Hi, I'm currently experimenting with

Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement

-Original Message- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Leon Fauster Sent: den 19 september 2017 13:44 To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement > Am 19.09.2017 um 11:18 schrieb Sorin Srbu <sorin.s...@o

Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement

-Original Message- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Valeri Galtsev Sent: den 19 september 2017 17:16 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement > OT-sidetrack: > > What is/are a good cloud-less password manager if I'd

Re: [CentOS] owncloud on CentOS - I have problems installing/updating recently

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of James > Hogarth > Sent: den 22 september 2017 12:14 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] owncloud on CentOS - I have problems > installing/updating recently > >> I know

Re: [CentOS] owncloud on CentOS - I have problems installing/updating recently

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas > Kovacs > Sent: den 20 september 2017 18:55 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] owncloud on CentOS - I have problems > installing/updating recently > > > Does anybody have any

Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of H > Sent: den 21 september 2017 00:35 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement > > I have installed keypass2android on my phones which should be able to use > the same database

Re: [CentOS] owncloud on CentOS - I have problems installing/updating recently

ing recently > > > On Thu, September 21, 2017 1:00 am, Sorin Srbu wrote: > >> -Original Message- > >> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas > >> Kovacs > >> Sent: den 20 september 2017 18:55 > >> To:

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7: changes to php.ini

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of James > Hogarth > Sent: den 21 september 2017 15:51 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7: changes to php.ini > > When you have different applications with

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7: changes to php.ini

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of m.roth@5- > cent.us > Sent: den 21 september 2017 15:55 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7: changes to php.ini > > Y'all should note the existence of

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7: changes to php.ini

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas > Kovacs > Sent: den 21 september 2017 11:05 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 7: changes to php.ini > > I'm hosting a few web apps like OwnCloud, Wordpress and Dolibarr on > CentOS

Re: [CentOS] [External] /boot partition too small

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Toralf Lund > Sent: den 12 oktober 2017 10:15 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [External] /boot partition too small > > >> Since a lot of people seem to say none of the

Re: [CentOS] yum groupinstall vs. yum group install

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas > Kovacs > Sent: den 25 september 2017 08:46 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] yum groupinstall vs. yum group install > > Is there a difference between 'yum groupinstall' and 'yum group >

Re: [CentOS] Semi-OT: hardware: NVidia proprietary driver, C7.4

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Phil Perry > Sent: den 27 september 2017 20:47 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Semi-OT: hardware: NVidia proprietary driver, C7.4 > > >> There was a bug with recent legacy releases that

Re: [CentOS] Semi-OT: hardware: NVidia proprietary driver, C7.4

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas > Kovacs > Sent: den 26 september 2017 23:47 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Semi-OT: hardware: NVidia proprietary driver, C7.4 > > Le 26/09/2017 à 19:59, Scott Robbins a écrit : >

Re: [CentOS] Semi-OT: hardware: NVidia proprietary driver, C7.4

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Phil Perry > Sent: den 26 september 2017 21:46 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Semi-OT: hardware: NVidia proprietary driver, C7.4 > > On 26/09/17 18:40, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > This is

Re: [CentOS] /boot partition too small

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of KM > Sent: den 10 oktober 2017 15:55 > To: CentOS Mailing List > Subject: [CentOS] /boot partition too small > > First off - let me say I am not an administrator. I need to know if

Re: [CentOS] /boot partition too small

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of KM > Sent: den 10 oktober 2017 21:06 > To: centos@centos.org; Phil Perry > Subject: Re: [CentOS] /boot partition too small > > Do i need to do something special or is it as easy as: > -

Re: [CentOS] /boot partition too small

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Sorin Srbu > Sent: den 11 oktober 2017 07:57 > To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] /boot partition too small > > > -Original Message- &

Re: [CentOS] [ot] Skype crackling (was: skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update)

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Peter > Sent: den 23 november 2017 23:44 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [ot] Skype crackling (was: skypeforlinux lacks > dependencies, won't update) > > On 23/11/17

Re: [CentOS] skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of ken > Sent: den 22 november 2017 20:14 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update > > On 11/19/2017 12:53 PM, vychytraly . wrote: > > Maybe try flatpak

Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas > Kovacs > Sent: den 29 november 2017 08:31 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS > > Le 29/11/2017 à 08:26, Sorin Srbu

Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Joseph L. > Casale > Sent: den 28 november 2017 14:06 > To: 'centos@centos.org' > Subject: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS > > With a few exceptions, I see most admins

Re: [CentOS] Chromium on CentOS 6

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of H > Sent: den 27 november 2017 19:45 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Chromium on CentOS 6 > > >> I have chromium installed on CentOS 7 and it works fine, I now need > >> to install it on a

Re: [CentOS] Chromium on CentOS 6

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Nux! > Sent: den 28 november 2017 09:17 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Chromium on CentOS 6 > > Sorin, > > Indeed, CentOS 6 is not longer officially supported by

Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

--Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Sorin Srbu > Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 12:26 AM > To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS > > > Seriously,

Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Pete Biggs > Sent: den 30 november 2017 09:50 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS > > > > No, it's Varian/Agilent. A big player in lab instruments. > > >

Re: [CentOS] HP laptops with CentOS 7?

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of ken > Sent: den 16 november 2017 17:00 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] HP laptops with CentOS 7? > > > I'm looking into getting HP laptops for our department running CentOS 7. > > For two

Re: [CentOS] HP laptops with CentOS 7?

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Gary > Stainburn > Sent: den 3 november 2017 11:43 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] HP laptops with CentOS 7? > > yeah, it's just a normal USB dongle, and it's

[CentOS] CentOS 6 P2V alternatives?

(I inherited this server some fifteen years ago). Are there any easier ways to do a P2V at all? -- BW, Sorin --- # Sorin Srbu, Sysadmin # Uppsala University # Dept of Medicinal Chemistry # Div of Org Pharm Chem # Box 574 # SE-75123

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 P2V alternatives?

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of hw > Sent: den 3 november 2017 12:10 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 P2V alternatives? > > I think I would try to create a VM that has the physical disks passed through > and also

Re: [CentOS] HP laptops with CentOS 7?

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Valeri > Galtsev > Sent: den 3 november 2017 18:33 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] HP laptops with CentOS 7? > > Whoever wants to listen to my advise, it will be: stay

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 P2V alternatives?

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Robert > Nichols > Sent: den 3 november 2017 14:46 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 P2V alternatives? > > How would you recover if that server were suddenly destroyed, let's say by a

Re: [CentOS] HP laptops with CentOS 7?

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Johnny > Hughes > Sent: den 3 november 2017 14:43 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] HP laptops with CentOS 7? > > > For the vast majority of laptops that are not based on the absolute >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 P2V alternatives?

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Mark > Haney > Sent: den 3 november 2017 18:03 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 P2V alternatives? > > > I'll toss my two cents worth in having dealt with a similar situation >

Re: [CentOS] HP laptops with CentOS 7?

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R > Pierce > Sent: den 6 november 2017 07:56 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] HP laptops with CentOS 7? > > On 11/5/2017 10:45 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote: >

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >