Hi
My syslog and dmesg are being filled with the Warnings attached.
Looking at todays syslog I got up to 1101 of these warnings in the time
from 10:50 to 11:13 (and only in that time, else the log was clean). I
found them on all four of my OSD hosts, all at about the same time.
I'm running kern
v2: remove some redundant code in ceph_setattr()
Signed-off-by: Guangliang Zhao
---
fs/ceph/Kconfig | 13 +++
fs/ceph/Makefile |1 +
fs/ceph/acl.c| 286 ++
fs/ceph/dir.c|5 +
fs/ceph/inode.c | 10 ++
fs/ceph/super.c |
UK NATIONAL.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
On 21/10/2013 18:49, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> I'm not quite sure what questions you're actually asking here...
> In general, the OSD is not removed from the system without explicit
> admin intervention. When it is removed, all traces of it should be
> zapped (including its key), so it can't reconn
Hello,
So It's better to add XFS mailing list to the CC-list. :)
I think this issue has been fixed by upstream commits:
>From ff9a28f6c25d18a635abcab1f49db68108203dfb
From: Jan Kara
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:30:54 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] xfs: Fix WARN_ON(delalloc) in xfs_vm_releasepage()
T
Just my two cents:
XFS is a quite unstable with Ceph especially along with heavy CPU
usage up to 3.7(primarily soft lockups). I used 3.7 for eight months
before upgrade on production system and it performs just perfectly.
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Jeff Liu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> So It's bett
On 10/22/2013 08:36 PM, Andrey Korolyov wrote:
> Just my two cents:
>
> XFS is a quite unstable with Ceph especially along with heavy CPU
> usage up to 3.7(primarily soft lockups).
I'm not the right person to clarify the reason as I only knew that
Ceph recommend the user to deploy OSD daemon on
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
>
>
> On 21/10/2013 18:49, Gregory Farnum wrote:
>> I'm not quite sure what questions you're actually asking here...
>> In general, the OSD is not removed from the system without explicit
>> admin intervention. When it is removed, all traces of
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 21/10/2013 18:49, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> >> I'm not quite sure what questions you're actually asking here...
> >> In general, the OSD is not removed from the system without explicit
>
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Guangliang Zhao wrote:
> v2: remove some redundant code in ceph_setattr()
>
> Signed-off-by: Guangliang Zhao
> ---
> fs/ceph/Kconfig | 13 +++
> fs/ceph/Makefile |1 +
> fs/ceph/acl.c| 286
> ++
> f
Hey all,
The OpenStack community has spawned a newish "Project Manila", an
effort spearheaded by NetApp to provide a file-sharing service
analogous to Cinder, but for filesystems instead of block devices. The
elevator pitch:
Isn't it great how OpenStack lets you manage block devices for your
hosts?
On 22/10/2013 19:26, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 21/10/2013 18:49, Gregory Farnum wrote:
>>> I'm not quite sure what questions you're actually asking here...
>>> In general, the OSD is not removed from the system without explicit
>>>
12 matches
Mail list logo