xfs Warnings in syslog

2013-10-22 Thread Niklas Goerke
Hi My syslog and dmesg are being filled with the Warnings attached. Looking at todays syslog I got up to 1101 of these warnings in the time from 10:50 to 11:13 (and only in that time, else the log was clean). I found them on all four of my OSD hosts, all at about the same time. I'm running kern

[PATCH v2] ceph: add acl for cephfs

2013-10-22 Thread Guangliang Zhao
v2: remove some redundant code in ceph_setattr() Signed-off-by: Guangliang Zhao --- fs/ceph/Kconfig | 13 +++ fs/ceph/Makefile |1 + fs/ceph/acl.c| 286 ++ fs/ceph/dir.c|5 + fs/ceph/inode.c | 10 ++ fs/ceph/super.c |

[no subject]

2013-10-22 Thread COMPANY
UK NATIONAL.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document

Re: Removing disks / OSDs

2013-10-22 Thread Loic Dachary
On 21/10/2013 18:49, Gregory Farnum wrote: > I'm not quite sure what questions you're actually asking here... > In general, the OSD is not removed from the system without explicit > admin intervention. When it is removed, all traces of it should be > zapped (including its key), so it can't reconn

Re: xfs Warnings in syslog

2013-10-22 Thread Jeff Liu
Hello, So It's better to add XFS mailing list to the CC-list. :) I think this issue has been fixed by upstream commits: >From ff9a28f6c25d18a635abcab1f49db68108203dfb From: Jan Kara Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:30:54 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] xfs: Fix WARN_ON(delalloc) in xfs_vm_releasepage() T

Re: xfs Warnings in syslog

2013-10-22 Thread Andrey Korolyov
Just my two cents: XFS is a quite unstable with Ceph especially along with heavy CPU usage up to 3.7(primarily soft lockups). I used 3.7 for eight months before upgrade on production system and it performs just perfectly. On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Jeff Liu wrote: > Hello, > > So It's bett

Re: xfs Warnings in syslog

2013-10-22 Thread Jeff Liu
On 10/22/2013 08:36 PM, Andrey Korolyov wrote: > Just my two cents: > > XFS is a quite unstable with Ceph especially along with heavy CPU > usage up to 3.7(primarily soft lockups). I'm not the right person to clarify the reason as I only knew that Ceph recommend the user to deploy OSD daemon on

Re: Removing disks / OSDs

2013-10-22 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Loic Dachary wrote: > > > On 21/10/2013 18:49, Gregory Farnum wrote: >> I'm not quite sure what questions you're actually asking here... >> In general, the OSD is not removed from the system without explicit >> admin intervention. When it is removed, all traces of

Re: Removing disks / OSDs

2013-10-22 Thread Sage Weil
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, Gregory Farnum wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Loic Dachary wrote: > > > > > > On 21/10/2013 18:49, Gregory Farnum wrote: > >> I'm not quite sure what questions you're actually asking here... > >> In general, the OSD is not removed from the system without explicit >

Re: [PATCH v2] ceph: add acl for cephfs

2013-10-22 Thread Yan, Zheng
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Guangliang Zhao wrote: > v2: remove some redundant code in ceph_setattr() > > Signed-off-by: Guangliang Zhao > --- > fs/ceph/Kconfig | 13 +++ > fs/ceph/Makefile |1 + > fs/ceph/acl.c| 286 > ++ > f

CephFS & Project Manila (OpenStack)

2013-10-22 Thread Gregory Farnum
Hey all, The OpenStack community has spawned a newish "Project Manila", an effort spearheaded by NetApp to provide a file-sharing service analogous to Cinder, but for filesystems instead of block devices. The elevator pitch: Isn't it great how OpenStack lets you manage block devices for your hosts?

Re: Removing disks / OSDs

2013-10-22 Thread Loic Dachary
On 22/10/2013 19:26, Gregory Farnum wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Loic Dachary wrote: >> >> >> On 21/10/2013 18:49, Gregory Farnum wrote: >>> I'm not quite sure what questions you're actually asking here... >>> In general, the OSD is not removed from the system without explicit >>>