I'm looking at this and getting a little confused. Can you provide a
log of the crash occurring? (preferably with debug_ms=20,
debug_osd=20)
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Ma, Jianpeng jianpeng...@intel.com wrote:
When do
is contained within a centralized sort of
metadata server? I understand that for simple object store MDS is not
used but is there a way to utilize it for faster querying?
Regards,
Shayan Saeed
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:29 AM
Thanks! I've fixed this up in master.
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 11:41 PM, 李沛伦 lpl6338...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems that the 2 log sentences
OSD.cc:1220 dout(10) init creating/touching snapmapper object dendl;
OSD.cc:1230
:
Yeah I wish there was a way to do it inline.
You can add them as comments at the bottom of the Gist or as a reply to this
email. Whatever is easiest.
- Luis
On 07/02/2014 03:44 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
I had a few minutes unexpectedly free so I was going to answer (some
of) these, but I
. As this mail was some days unseen - i
thought nobody has an idea or could help.
Stefan
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
s.pri...@profihost.ag wrote:
Am 02.07.2014 00:51, schrieb Gregory Farnum:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
s.pri
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Stefan Priebe s.pri...@profihost.ag wrote:
Am 02.07.2014 16:00, schrieb Gregory Farnum:
Yeah, it's fighting for attention with a lot of other urgent stuff. :(
Anyway, even if you can't look up any details or reproduce at this
time, I'm sure you know what
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Stefan Priebe s.pri...@profihost.ag wrote:
Hi Greg,
Am 02.07.2014 21:36, schrieb Gregory Farnum:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Stefan Priebe s.pri...@profihost.ag
wrote:
Am 02.07.2014 16:00, schrieb Gregory Farnum:
Yeah, it's fighting for attention
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
s.pri...@profihost.ag wrote:
Hi Greg,
Am 26.06.2014 02:17, schrieb Gregory Farnum:
Sorry we let this drop; we've all been busy traveling and things.
There have been a lot of changes to librados between Dumpling and
Firefly
Looking at our gitbuilder page, we haven't built Ceph on Fedora for a
while, but it's fine elsewhere. And the Fedora issues look to be some
config issue; it never actually makes it to the compilation stage...
http://ceph.com/gitbuilder.cgi
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com |
Sorry we let this drop; we've all been busy traveling and things.
There have been a lot of changes to librados between Dumpling and
Firefly, but we have no idea what would have made it slower. Can you
provide more details about how you were running these tests?
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Shayan Saeed shayansaee...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
CRUSH placement algorithm works really nice with replication. However,
with erasure code, my cluster has some issues which require making
changes that I cannot specify with CRUSH maps.
Sometimes, depending on
challenging.
The source changes you're talking about will prove really challenging. ;)
-Greg
Regards,
Shayan Saeed
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Shayan Saeed shayansaee...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
CRUSH placement algorithm
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:41 AM, Alexandre DERUMIER
aderum...@odiso.com wrote:
They are also a tracker here
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/7191
Replace Mutex to RWLock with fdcache_lock in FileStore
seem to be done, but I'm not sure it's already is the master branch ?
I believe this
.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Milosz Tanski mil...@adfin.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Milosz Tanski mil...@adfin.com
wrote
Hey all,
It's a bit of a broken record, but we are again trying to kickstart
CephFS development going forward. To that end, I've created one
blueprint for the next CDS on CephFS Forward Scrub
(https://wiki.ceph.com/Planning/Blueprints/Submissions/CephFS%3A_Forward_Scrub)
based off discussions on
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Guang Yang yguan...@outlook.com wrote:
On Jun 11, 2014, at 6:33 AM, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Guang Yang yguan...@outlook.com wrote:
Hi ceph-devel,
Like some users of Ceph, we are using Ceph for a latency
That doesn't sound right. Can you supply your decompiled CRUSH map,
the exact commands you ran against the ceph cluster, and the exact
version(s) you ran the test against?
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:17 AM,
, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Haomai Wang haomaiw...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, maybe you can add it in your branch. Because it will happen when
creating object and set spill out
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Haomai Wang haomaiw
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Guang Yang yguan...@outlook.com wrote:
Hi ceph-devel,
Like some users of Ceph, we are using Ceph for a latency sensitive project,
and scrubbing (especially deep-scrubbing) impacts the SLA in a non-trivial
way, as commodity hardware could fail in one way or
We discussed a great deal of this during the initial format 2 work as
well, when we were thinking about having bitmaps of allocated space.
(Although we also have interval sets which might be a better fit?) I
think there was more thought behind it than is in the copy-on-read
blueprint; do you know
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
Hi Andreas,
On 06/06/2014 13:46, Andreas Joachim Peters wrote: Hi Loic,
the basic implementation looks very clean.
I have few comments/ideas:
- the reconstruction strategy using the three levels is certainly efficient
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Haomai Wang haomaiw...@gmail.com wrote:
The fix should make clone method copy cephos prefix xattrs
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 2:54 AM, Haomai Wang haomaiw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Greg,
I have found the reason. user.cephos.spill_out can't be apply to new
object
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Josh Durgin josh.dur...@inktank.com wrote:
On 06/02/2014 10:22 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
Ideally the change comes from Josh, who originally put the notice there,
but I think it shouldn't matter. We relicensed rbd.cc as LGPL2 a while
back (it was GPL due to a
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Haomai Wang haomaiw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Gregory,
I try to reproduce the bug in my local machine but failed.
My test cmdline:
./ceph_test_rados --op read 100 --op write 100 --op delete 50
--max-ops 40 --objects 1024 --max-in-flight 64 --size 400
I got a bug report a little while ago that we were hitting leveldb on
every xattr lookup with Firefly, and after looking into it I indeed
discovered that we never set the XATTR_SPILL_OUT_NAME xattr when
creating new files.
I pushed a branch wip-xattr-spillout containing a fix for that, plus
some
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
Hi Matt,
I've rebased this branch on top of master and pushed it to wip-xio in
ceph.git, and then opened a pull request to capture review:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/1819
I would like to get some of the
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Amit Vijairania
amit.vijaira...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
Does CEPH rely on any multicasting? Appreciate the feedback..
Nope! All networking is point-to-point.
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Holger Hoffstätte
holger.hoffstae...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2014 15:07:44 -0700, Gregory Farnum wrote:
[..]
Unfortunately, I don't know anything about Linux's suspend
functionality or APIs, and my weak attempts at googling and grepping
aren't
There's a recent ticket discussing the behavior of ceph-fuse after the
machine it's running on has been suspended:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8291
In short, CephFS clients which are disconnected from the cluster for a
sufficiently long time are generally forbidden from reconnecting —
after a
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Matt W. Benjamin m...@cohortfs.com wrote:
Hi Ceph Devs,
I've pushed two Ceph+Accelio branches, xio-firefly and xio-firefly-cmake to
our
public ceph repository https://github.com/linuxbox2/linuxbox-ceph.git .
These branches are pulled up to the HEAD of
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Matt W. Benjamin m...@cohortfs.com wrote:
Hi Greg,
1. there isn't support for for mark_down() yet (!), but we're working
on it. I've had good discussions with the Accelio team regarding exposing
explicit channel and flow control interfaces, which round out
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Guang yguan...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks Sage and Greg!
I just capture a crash from which I get the logs from both side (sadly we
still use debug_ms=0 as increasing the debug_ms level dramatically consume
more disk spaces), from the log, I think I get some more
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Dan van der Ster
daniel.vanders...@cern.ch wrote:
Hi,
Sage Weil wrote:
* *Primary affinity*: Ceph now has the ability to skew selection of
OSDs as the primary copy, which allows the read workload to be
cheaply skewed away from parts of the cluster
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Mike Dawson mike.daw...@cloudapt.com wrote:
On 5/7/2014 11:53 AM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Dan van der Ster
daniel.vanders...@cern.ch wrote:
Hi,
Sage Weil wrote:
* *Primary affinity*: Ceph now has the ability to skew
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
[CCing Greg and ceph-devel]
On Wed, 7 May 2014, Guang Yang wrote:
Hi Sage,
Sorry to bother you directly, I am debugging / fixing issue
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8232, during which time I studied the
messenger component
The Ceph bit is fine.
Acked-by: Greg Farnum g...@inktank.com
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Jeff Layton jlay...@poochiereds.net wrote:
Currently, the fl_owner isn't set for flock locks. Some filesystems use
byte-range locks to simulate flock locks and there is a common idiom in
those that
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Matt W. Benjamin m...@linuxbox.com wrote:
Hi Greg,
- Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
The re-org mostly looks fine.
I notice you're adding a few more friend declarations though, and I
don't think those should be necessary — Connection can label
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Dan Van Der Ster
daniel.vanders...@cern.ch wrote:
Hi all,
Why is the default max sync interval only 5 seconds?
Today we realized what a huge difference that increasing this to 30 or 60s
can do for the small write latency. Basically, with a 5s interval our 4k
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Stefan Priebe s.pri...@profihost.ag wrote:
H Greg,
Am 29.04.2014 22:23, schrieb Gregory Farnum:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Dan Van Der Ster
daniel.vanders...@cern.ch wrote:
Hi all,
Why is the default max sync interval only 5 seconds?
Today we
A few days later than I wanted, but I got through various pieces of
this today. It wasn't a thorough review but more a shape of things
check, but I have a bunch of notes.
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Matt W. Benjamin m...@linuxbox.com wrote:
Hi Greg,
Sure. I'm interested in all feedback
Hmm, it looks like your on-disk SessionMap is horrendously out of
date. Did your cluster get full at some point?
In any case, we're working on tools to repair this now but they aren't
ready for use yet. Probably the only thing you could do is create an
empty sessionmap with a higher version than
Bobtail is really too old to draw any meaningful conclusions from; why
did you choose it?
That's not to say that performance on current code will be better
(though it very much might be), but the internal architecture has
changed in some ways that will be particularly important for the futex
Awesome! I'll try and take a preliminary look at this in the next day
or two. What kind of feedback are you interested in right now?
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Matt W. Benjamin m...@linuxbox.com wrote:
Hi,
We've
What distro are you running on?
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 5:28 AM, David McBride dw...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently experimenting with a Ceph deployment, and am noting that
some of my machines are having processes
as well — it might be a tcmalloc issue they can
resolve in their repo.
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 7:04 AM, David McBride dw...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
On 14/04/14 14:53, Gregory Farnum wrote:
What distro are you running on?
-Greg
Hi Greg
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Milosz Tanski mil...@adfin.com wrote:
I'd like to restart this debate about tcmalloc slow leaks in MDS. This
time around I have some charts. Looking at OSDs and MONs, it doesn't
seam to affect those (as much).
Here's the chart: http://i.imgur.com/xMCINAD.png
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:05 AM, Haomai Wang haomaiw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to share some ideas about how to improve performance on
ceph with SSD. Not much preciseness.
Our ssd is 500GB and each OSD own a SSD(journal is on the same SSD).
ceph version is 0.67.5(Dumping)
At
This would be really nice but there are unfortunately even more
hiccups than you've noted here:
1) Thrashing is both time and disk access sensitive, and hardware differs
2) The teuthology thrashing is triggered largely based on PG state
events (eg, all PGs are clean, so restart an OSD)
3) The
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
On 07/04/2014 18:55, Gregory Farnum wrote:
This would be really nice but there are unfortunately even more
hiccups than you've noted here:
1) Thrashing is both time and disk access sensitive, and hardware differs
2
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Milosz Tanski mil...@adfin.com wrote:
Loic,
The writeup has been helpful.
What I'm curious about (and hasn't been mentioned) is can we use
erasure with CephFS? What steps have to be taken in order to setup
erasure coding for CephFS?
Lots. CephFS takes
Not yet, no. There are a couple different approaches to this that a
third-party contributor could work on without too much difficulty (I
*think* there's a blueprint floating around somewhere), but nobody's
done so yet.
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
On Fri,
Nope, I don't think anybody's looked into it. If you have core dumps
you could get a backtrace and the return value referenced.
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 2:54 AM, Filippos Giannakos philipg...@grnet.gr wrote:
Hello,
We recently
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Shinji Matsumoto
shinji.matsum...@us.sios.com wrote:
Hello all,
I have a question about Ceph notification mechanism.
http://ceph.com/docs/master/architecture/#object-watch-notify
Scenario:
(1) 3 clients (client1, client2, client3) have interests on a Ceph
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Andreas Joachim Peters
andreas.joachim.pet...@cern.ch wrote:
Hi,
I did some Firefly ceph-0.77-900.gce9bfb8 testing of EC/Tiering deploying 64
OSD with in-memory filesystems (RapidDisk with ext4) on a single 256 GB box.
The raw write performance of this box
This is not currently a priority in Inktank's roadmap for the MDS. :(
But we discussed client security in more detail than those tickets
during the Dumpling Ceph Developer Summit:
http://wiki.ceph.com/Planning/CDS/Dumpling (search for 1G: Client
Security for CephFS -- there's a blueprint, an
, 1129 GB / 1489 GB avail
6553604/9830406 objects degraded (66.667%)
1776 active+degraded
Thanks Regards
Somnath
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Farnum [mailto:g...@inktank.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 3:38 PM
To: Somnath Roy
Cc: Sage Weil
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Yaron Haviv yar...@mellanox.com wrote:
Im happy to share test results we run in the lab with Matt's latest
XioMessenger code which implements Ceph messaging over Accelio RDMA library
Results look pretty encouraging, demonstrating a * 20x * performance boost
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Shaun Keenan skee...@gmail.com wrote:
When trying to mount off my ceph cluster I get this:
mount error 5 = Input/output error
cluster looks healthy:
[root@ceph-mds2 ~]# ceph -s
cluster 61b6dda1-5412-41f7-9769-3ae7e47241b7
health HEALTH_OK
monmap
, why not map
object_id to OSD combinations directly, will it achieve a more uniform
distribution?
On 2014/3/8 1:43, Sage Weil wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:10 AM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014, Dan van der Ster wrote
Okay, this problem makes sense to me and I think your basic approach
is good. I've got no problem with it after all. :)
Just throwing this out there, if we're worried about exposing kernel
addresses to external processes, and don't want them to collide,
should we just keep a mapping of
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:10 AM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014, Dan van der Ster wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
Sheldon just
pointed out a talk from ATC that discusses the basic problem:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:10 AM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014, Dan van der Ster wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 7:21 AM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014, Gregory Farnum wrote:
We/you/somebody need(s) to sit down and decide on what kind of
interface we want to actually expose to users for working with caching
pools. What we have right now is very flexible
There are some options within CRUSH to let you decide where you want
to place particular classes of data, but it's not really available on
a per-object or per-file basis. You should look through the CRUSH
stuff at ceph.com/docs to get an idea of what's possible.
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @
Do you have logs? The assert indicates that the messenger got back
something other than okay when trying to grab a local Mutex, which
shouldn't be able to happen. It may be that some error-handling path
didn't drop it (within the same thread that later tried to grab it
again), but we'll need more
,
Unfortunately we don't keep any Ceph related logs on the client side. On the
server side, we kept the default log settings to avoid overlogging.
Do you think that there might be something usefull on the OSD side ?
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 07:28:30AM -0800, Gregory Farnum wrote:
Do you have logs? The assert
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Guang yguan...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello,
Most recently when looking at PG's folder splitting, I found that there was
only one sub folder in the top 3 / 4 levels and start having 16 sub folders
starting from level 6, what is the design consideration behind this?
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Guang Yang yguan...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi ceph-users,
We are using Ceph (radosgw) to store user generated images, as GET latency
is critical for us, most recently I did some investigation over the GET path
to understand where time spend.
I first confirmed that
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Jean-Tiare LE BIGOT
jean-tiare.le-bi...@ovh.net wrote:
Hi,
I started to implement 'DISCARD' support in RBD kernel driver as described
on http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/190
This first (easy) step was to add at the end of
drivers/block/rbd.c:rbd_init_disk
that
$ fstrim /mnt
# neither
Maybe missing something there ? I expected '-o discard' to be enough ?
On 01/30/14 16:24, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Jean-Tiare LE BIGOT
jean-tiare.le-bi...@ovh.net wrote:
Hi,
I started to implement 'DISCARD' support in RBD
Looks like you got lost over the Christmas holidays; sorry!
I'm not an expert on running rgw but it sounds like garbage collection
isn't running or something. What version are you on, and have you done
anything to set it up?
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
On
The FileJournal is also for data safety whenever we're using write
ahead. To disable it we need a backing store that we know can provide
us consistent checkpoints (i.e., we can use parallel journaling mode —
so for the FileJournal, we're using btrfs, or maybe zfs someday). But
for those systems
Wang haomaiw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
The FileJournal is also for data safety whenever we're using write
ahead. To disable it we need a backing store that we know can provide
us consistent checkpoints (i.e., we can use parallel
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Alexandre Oliva ol...@gnu.org wrote:
On Jan 6, 2014, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Alexandre Oliva ol...@gnu.org wrote:
On Dec 20, 2013, Alexandre Oliva ol...@gnu.org wrote:
back many of the osds to recent snapshots
A little late on this (I was on vacation and my phone doesn't do
plain-text email!), but I prefer the morning slot to the later ones.
:)
-Greg
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
2014 will be the Year of the Linux Desktop^W^W^WCephFS! To that end, we
should
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Alexandre Oliva ol...@gnu.org wrote:
On Dec 20, 2013, Alexandre Oliva ol...@gnu.org wrote:
back many of the osds to recent snapshots thereof, from which I'd
cleaned all traces of the user.ceph._parent. I intended to roll back
Err, I meant user.ceph._path, of
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Alexandre Oliva ol...@gnu.org wrote:
On Dec 18, 2013, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Alexandre Oliva ol...@gnu.org wrote:
Here's an updated version of the patch, that makes it much faster than
the earlier version
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Alexandre Oliva ol...@gnu.org wrote:
On Aug 27, 2013, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 24 Aug 2013, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Aug 23, 2013, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
FWIW Alexandre, this feature was never really complete. For it to
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Alexandre Oliva ol...@gnu.org wrote:
On Feb 20, 2013, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Alexandre Oliva ol...@gnu.org wrote:
It recently occurred to me that I messed up an OSD's storage, and
decided that the easiest way
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Dec 18, 2013, Yan, Zheng uker...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Alexandre Oliva ol...@gnu.org wrote:
# setfattr -n ceph.parent /cephfs/mount/path/name
Can
Sage applied this in commit f5d32a33d25a5f9ddccadb4c3ebbd5ccd211204f; thanks!
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Alexandre Oliva ol...@gnu.org wrote:
I was looking at inconsistencies in xattrs in my OSDs, and found out
that only
(Sorry for the delay getting back on this.)
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Matt W. Benjamin m...@cohortfs.com wrote:
Hi Greg,
I haven't fixed the decision to reify replies in the Messenger at this
point, but it is what the current prototype code tries to do.
The request/response model is
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Milosz Tanski mil...@adfin.com wrote:
I wanted to bring up an issue with Ceph's use of tcmalloc. I know that
in Ubuntu (12.04) Ceph uses the distro version of tcmalloc which
older.
I've personally ran into issues with tcmalloc for our application
where the
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Matt W. Benjamin m...@cohortfs.com wrote:
Hi Ceph devs,
For the last several weeks, we've been working with engineers at
Mellanox on a prototype Ceph messaging implementation that runs on
the Accelio RDMA messaging service (libxio).
Very cool! An RDMA
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Josh Durgin josh.dur...@inktank.com wrote:
On 12/06/2013 06:24 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Josh Durgin josh.dur...@inktank.com
wrote:
Don't bother trying to stop ENOSPC on the client side, since it'd need
some
restructuring
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Josh Durgin josh.dur...@inktank.com wrote:
On 12/05/2013 08:58 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Josh Durgin josh.dur...@inktank.com
wrote:
On 12/03/2013 03:12 PM, Josh Durgin wrote:
These patches allow rbd to block writes instead
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Josh Durgin josh.dur...@inktank.com wrote:
On 12/03/2013 03:12 PM, Josh Durgin wrote:
These patches allow rbd to block writes instead of returning errors
when OSDs are full enough that the FULL flag is set in the osd map.
This avoids filesystems on top of rbd
Does the MDS have access to a keyring which contains its key, and does
that match what's on the monitor? You're just referring to the
client.admin one, which it won't use (it's not a client). It certainly
looks like there's a mismatch based on the verification error.
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @
=102450 size=10
mtime=2013-11-25 15:46:15.539420 caps=- objectset[134 ts
1/18446744073709551615 objects 0 dirty_or_tx 0] parents=0x31d4ba0 0x3253480)
2013-11-25 15:46:15.539563 7fb1b37a4780 10 client.5705 nothing to flush
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Farnum [mailto:g
Merged; thanks guys.
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Dietmar Maurer diet...@proxmox.com wrote:
Can we take that diff you provided as coming with a signed-off-by, as in the
pull
request Loic generated? :)
Sure.
--
To
I haven't looked at the Filer code (or anything around it) in a while,
but if I were to guess, in-snapid is set to something which doesn't
exist.
Are you actually using the Filer in some new code that includes
inodes, or modifying the Client classes? Looking at how they
initialize things should
Can we take that diff you provided as coming with a signed-off-by, as
in the pull request Loic generated? :)
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
Hi,
It turns out there was no pull request or
Hrm, I don't think many of the developers do builds like that too
often, so it's not surprising it got a little busted. :( Can you make
a ticket in the tracker with whatever you've figured out about the
cause and timing so we don't lose it? :)
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com |
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Dan van der Ster d...@vanderster.com wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Dan van der Ster d...@vanderster.com
wrote:
Hi all,
This mail is just to let you know that we've
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Arne Wiebalck arne.wieba...@cern.ch wrote:
On Nov 14, 2013, at 5:37 PM, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Dan van der Ster d...@vanderster.com
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Dan van der Ster d...@vanderster.com wrote:
Hi all,
This mail is just to let you know that we've prepared a draft
blueprint related to adding strong(er) authn/authz to cephfs:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Li Wang liw...@ubuntukylin.com wrote:
Hi,
We want to implement encryption support for Ceph.
Currently, we have the draft design,
1 When user mount a ceph directory for the first time, he can specify a
passphrase and the encryption algorithm and length of
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 3:04 AM, John Spray john.sp...@inktank.com wrote:
This is a really useful summary from Malcolm.
In addition to the coordinator/copytool interface, there is the question of
where the policy engine gets its data from. Lustre has the MDS changelog,
which Robinhood uses
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Atchley, Scott atchle...@ornl.gov wrote:
On Nov 9, 2013, at 4:18 AM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
The SimpleMessenger implementation of the Messenger interface has grown
organically over many years and is one of the cruftier bits of code in
Ceph. The
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2013, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
I typed up what I think is remaining for the cache tier work for firefly.
Greg, can you take a look? I'm most likely
301 - 400 of 1146 matches
Mail list logo
