On Wednesday, July 4, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian
Wiessner wrote:
Hi List,
i today upgraded from 0.43 to 0.48 and now i have one monitor which does not
want to start up anymore:
ceph version 0.48argonaut-125-g4e774fb
Hmmm — we generally try to modify these versions when the API changes, not on
every sprint. It looks to me like Sage added one function in 0.45 where we
maybe should have bumped it, but that was a long time ago and at this point we
should maybe just eat it?
-Greg
On Wednesday, July 4, 2012 at
On Wednesday, July 4, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian
Wiessner wrote:
Am 04.07.2012 18:25, schrieb Gregory Farnum:
On Wednesday, July 4, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian
Wiessner wrote:
Hi List,
i today upgraded from 0.43
On Wednesday, July 4, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Mitsue Acosta Murakami wrote:
Hello,
We are examining Ceph to use as email storage. In our current system,
several clients servers with different services (imap, smtp, etc) access
a NFS storage server. The mailboxes are stored in Maildir format, with
That particular assert means augh it's taking too long for the filesystem to
handle my requests! The disk format upgrade in particular seems to hit it, so
you may have some luck just increasing the timeout (increase
filestore_op_thread_suicide_timeout from its default 180 seconds) — but it is
On Tuesday, July 3, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Madhusudhana U wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to increase the throughput in the cluster by enabling
LACP on both in clients and all ceph cluster nodes. Each client and
ceph nodes has two 1G Ethernet interface which I want to aggregate
and make it 2G. LACP
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 09:44:38AM -0700, Tommi Virtanen wrote:
We've seen similar issues with btrfs, and others have reported that
the large metadata btrfs option helps. We're still compiling
information, but as of
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Josh Durgin josh.dur...@inktank.com wrote:
On 07/01/2012 11:58 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
Hi everyone,
just wanted to check if this was the expected behavior -- it doesn't
look like it would be, to me.
What I do is create a 1G RBD, and just for the heck of it,
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 4:44 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
Hi,
On 02-07-12 13:41, Florian Haas wrote:
Hi everyone,
radosgw(8) states that the following capabilities must be granted to
the user that radosgw uses to connect to RADOS.
ceph-authtool -n client.radosgw.gateway
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
s.pri...@profihost.ag wrote:
Hello list,
i found several people who use big metadata -n 64k -l 64k for ceph. But i
haven't found any ceph doc or info why to use this?
What's the reason to use big metadata feature with ceph?
One
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
s.pri...@profihost.ag wrote:
Am 02.07.2012 07:02, schrieb Alexandre DERUMIER:
Hi,
my 2cent,
maybe with lower range (like 100MB) of random io,
you have more chance to aggregate them in 4MB block ?
Yes maybe. If you have just a
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Noah Watkins jayh...@cs.ucsc.edu wrote:
I get the following assert failure during cleanup if ceph_mount() is passed a
non-existent directory, while ceph_mount() returns success. Nothing critical,
but it got triggered with Java unit test framework.
Amon,
I've been going through my backlog of flagged emails and came across
this one. Did you ever get that information for the bug that you were
going to try and find?
-Greg
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Amon Ott wrote:
Hello all,
I
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Vladimir Bashkirtsev
vladi...@bashkirtsev.com wrote:
On 01/07/12 11:59, Josh Durgin wrote:
On 06/30/2012 07:15 PM, Vladimir Bashkirtsev wrote:
On 01/07/12 10:47, Josh Durgin wrote:
On 06/30/2012 05:42 PM, Vladimir Bashkirtsev wrote:
Dear all,
Currently I
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Stefan Priebe s.pri...@profihost.ag wrote:
Am 28.06.2012 18:12, schrieb Josh Durgin:
On 06/28/2012 06:10 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
Hello list,
my cluster is now pretty stable i'm just wondering about the sequential
write values.
With rados
Hey guys,
Thanks for the problem report. I've created an issue to track it at
http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/2687.
It looks like we just assume that if you're using a file, you've got
enough space for it. It shouldn't be a big deal to at least do some
startup checks which will fail gracefully.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Alexandre DERUMIER aderum...@odiso.com wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to do random write bench with rados bench command ?
I have very base random write performance with 4K block size inside qemu-kvm,
1000 iops/s max with 3 nodes with 3x 5 disk 15k
(Maybe it's
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:09 AM, Alexandre DERUMIER
aderum...@odiso.com wrote:
Hi, more infos, I have active filestore debug = 20, min interval 29 and max
interval 30.
I see sync_entry each 30s, so it seem work as expected.
cat ceph-osd.0.log |grep sync_entry
2012-06-19 07:56:00.084622
On Saturday, June 30, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
Hi Laszlo,
On Sun, 1 Jul 2012, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
Hi Sage,
As previously noted, using leveldb caused some trouble with Ceph could
be included in Wheezy or not.
I've proposed that the supported architectures should
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
Sorry this got left for so long...
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:23 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
s.pri...@profihost.ag wrote:
Hi,
the Designing a cluster guide
http://wiki.ceph.com/wiki/Designing_a_cluster is pretty
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Brian Edmonds mor...@gmail.com wrote:
I've installed a little, four node Ceph (0.47.2) cluster using Xen
virtual machines for testing, and when I run bonnie against a (kernel
driver) mount of it, it seems to be somewhat flaky (disturbing log
messages,
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Brian Edmonds mor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
So right now you're using the Ceph filesystem, rather than RBD, right?
Right, CephFS. I'm actually not even very clear on what RBD is, and
how one
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Brian Edmonds mor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
If you lose a journal, you lose the OSD.
Really? Everything? Not just recent commits? I would have hoped it
would just come back up in an old
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Brian Edmonds mor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
Well, actually this depends on the filesystem you're using. With
btrfs, the OSD will roll back to a consistent state, but you don't
know how out
What versions are you using? This sound familiar, although I think we
previously fixed it for fcntl locks, which are different than flock locks in
some annoying ways.
Anyway, I imagine this is a Ceph bug, but have you run this on a non-Ceph mount
on the same system and checked that the behavior
, kernel 3.2.2 (kernel client)
Anyway, I imagine this is a Ceph bug, but have you run this on a non-Ceph
mount on the same system and checked that the behavior is as you expect?
Yes, I ran it on an ext4 mount and works as expected
2012/6/28 Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com:
What versions
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Barry Pederson wrote:
On Jun 20, 2012, at 4:59 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Travis Rhoden trho...@gmail.com
(mailto:trho...@gmail.com) wrote:
This incorrect syntax is still published in the docs at
http://ceph.com
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Travis Rhoden trho...@gmail.com wrote:
This incorrect syntax is still published in the docs at
http://ceph.com/docs/master/ops/manage/crush/#adjusting-crush
Are the docs that end up on that page in GitHub? I'd be happy to
start making fixes and issuing
You don't need to virtualize anything — I'd recommend running Ubuntu
12.04 on it (you don't need to, but a lot of things will be more
performant), building from source, and then setting up the daemons so
everybody gets a separate disk.
Check out http://ceph.com/docs/master/source/ and the other
ceph under RHEL 6/Oracle Linux 6? I'm more of an RPM guy.
-Terrance
On Tuesday, June 19, 2012, Gregory Farnum wrote:
You don't need to virtualize anything — I'd recommend running Ubuntu
12.04 on it (you don't need to, but a lot of things will be more
performant), building from source
Do I correctly assume that these nodes hosted only the OSDs, and the
monitors were on a separate node?
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Mark Nelson mark.nel...@inktank.com wrote:
Hi Guys,
I've been tracking down some performance issues over the past month with our
internal test nodes and
Locking is a separate mechanism we're already working on, which will
lock images so that they can't accidentally be mounted at more than
one location. :)
-Greg
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Martin Mailand mar...@tuxadero.com wrote:
Hi,
what's up locked, unlocked, unlocking?
-martin
Am
We've had some user reports lately on rbd images being broken by
misbehaving clients — namely, rbd image I is mounted on computer A,
computer A starts misbehaving, and so I is mounted on computer B. But
because A is misbehaving it keeps writing to the image, corrupting it
horribly.
To handle this,
On Thursday, June 7, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Martin Wilderoth wrote:
Hello,
Now my mds are all crashing after a while one by one.
Is it possible to recover without removing my rbd images ?
This is a pretty familiar MDS crash that we haven't tracked down yet. Sorry. :(
However, it has absolutely
On Monday, June 4, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Mark Nelson wrote:
Hi Alexandre,
A lot of our testing is on Ubuntu right now. I'm using the ceph and
kernel debs from ceph.gitbuilder.com (http://ceph.gitbuilder.com) for my
tests. Post some results to
the list once you get your cluster setup!
I
The library you're looking for is libceph. It does exist and it's fairly
full-featured, but it's not nearly as well documented as the librados C api is.
However, you'll probably get more use out of one of the Hadoop bindings. If you
check out the git repository you'll find one set in
Thanks for the bug report. I created a tracker entry for it:
http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/2484
I don't imagine it will take long for somebody who knows how to handle a .spec
to fix. ;)
-Greg
On Friday, May 25, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Guido Winkelmann wrote:
Hi,
Building ceph 0.47.2 from
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:51 AM, Frank frankwoo@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
I have a question about ceph.
When I mount ceph, I do the command as follow :
# mount -t ceph -o name=admin,secret=XX 10.1.0.1:6789/ /mnt/ceph -vv
now I create an user foo and make a secretkey by ceph-authtool
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Jerker Nyberg jer...@update.uu.se wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2012, Gregory Farnum wrote:
Direct users of the RADOS object store (i.e., librados) can do all kinds
of things with the integrity guarantee options. But I don't believe there's
currently a way to make
On Tuesday, May 22, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Grant Ashman wrote:
Awesome, that seemed to work!
However, I feel a bit silly - what I'm after is:
/mnt/ceph-data - mounted to pool 0 (data)
/mnt/ceph-backup - mounted to pool 3 (backup)
but this seemed to change both to mount to pool 3?
Am I simply
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Stefan Priebe s.pri...@profihost.ag wrote:
Hi Greg,
Am 17.05.2012 23:27, schrieb Gregory Farnum:
It mentions for example Fast CPU for the mds system. What does fast
mean? Just the speed of one core? Or is ceph designed to use multi core?
Is multi core
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Vladimir Bashkirtsev
vladi...@bashkirtsev.com wrote:
On 16/05/12 02:43, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Vladimir Bashkirtsev
vladi...@bashkirtsev.com wrote:
On 03/05/12 16:23, Greg Farnum wrote:
On Wednesday, May 2, 2012 at 11:24 PM
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Madhusudhana U
madhusudhana.u.acha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I assume in CEPH, by default, replications are set for both data and metadata.
Is it possible for setting replication for individual file/folders ? I find
this
very usefule. In most of the cases,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Felix Feinhals
f...@turtle-entertainment.de wrote:
Hi Josh,
i quoted the trace and some other stats in my first email, maybe it
got stuck in the spam filters.
Well next try:
snip
-3 2012-05-10 14:52:29.509940 7fb1c9351700 1 mds.0.40 handle_mds_map
i am
Are you actually running as root? (ie, right perms?)
What version of Ceph are you using? If you pulled and built binaries
off of master over the weekend, I believe it was broken for a few
hours in a way that will manifest somewhat like this.
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Stefan Priebe
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Stefan Priebe s.pri...@profihost.ag wrote:
Am 21.05.2012 16:59, schrieb Wido den Hollander:
Probably after, but both is fine. I just want to know how your cluster
is doing and what the PG states are.
will do so.
dmesg says at least:
[ 4975.850765]
://www.ddrdrive.com/
- Mail original -
De: Stefan Priebe s.pri...@profihost.ag
À: Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Envoyé: Samedi 19 Mai 2012 10:37:01
Objet: Re: Designing a cluster guide
Hi Greg,
Am 17.05.2012 23:27, schrieb Gregory Farnum
Sorry this got left for so long...
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:23 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
s.pri...@profihost.ag wrote:
Hi,
the Designing a cluster guide
http://wiki.ceph.com/wiki/Designing_a_cluster is pretty good but it
still leaves some questions unanswered.
It mentions for
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Vladimir Bashkirtsev
vladi...@bashkirtsev.com wrote:
On 03/05/12 16:23, Greg Farnum wrote:
On Wednesday, May 2, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Vladimir Bashkirtsev wrote:
Greg,
Apologies for multiple emails: my mail server is backed by ceph now and
it struggled this
Sorry for the long delay; we've all been really busy here...
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Nick Bartos n...@pistoncloud.com wrote:
I'm trying to get all logs going to syslog, and disable all ceph log
files. I added the following to [global]:
log file =
log to syslog = true
Which
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
I haven't had the chance to go over everything thoroughly (I notice a
few other users of EDOM that I want to check out), but those
definitely sound better to me.
More better review comments later today.
-Greg
After
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Vladimir Bashkirtsev
vladi...@bashkirtsev.com wrote:
On 03/05/12 16:23, Greg Farnum wrote:
On Wednesday, May 2, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Vladimir Bashkirtsev wrote:
Greg,
Apologies for multiple emails: my mail server is backed by ceph now and
it struggled this
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Oliver Francke oliver.fran...@filoo.de wrote:
Well,
Am 01.03.2012 um 18:15 schrieb Oliver Francke:
Hi *,
after some crashes we still had to care for some remaining inconsistancies
reported via
ceph -w
and friends.
Well, we traced one of them down via
2012/2/28 Székelyi Szabolcs szeke...@niif.hu:
On 2012. February 27. 09:03:11 Sage Weil wrote:
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012, Székelyi Szabolcs wrote:
whenever I restart osd.0 I see a pair of messages like
2012-02-27 17:26:00.132666 mon.0 osd_1_ip:6789/0 106 : [INF] osd.0
osd_0_ip:6801/29931 failed
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Noah Watkins jayh...@cs.ucsc.edu wrote:
I'm curious about what performance implications there may be when using
rados_ioctx_locator_set_key.
If a large number of objects are forced into a single PG using a fixed
locator key, are there performance
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Gregory Farnum
gregory.far...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Jens Rehpöhler
jens.rehpoeh...@filoo.de wrote:
Hi Gregory,
On 22.02.2012 18:12, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Feb 22, 2012, at 1:53 AM, Jens Rehpöhler jens.rehpoeh...@filoo.de
2012/2/27 Székelyi Szabolcs szeke...@niif.hu:
Hello,
whenever I restart osd.0 I see a pair of messages like
2012-02-27 17:26:00.132666 mon.0 osd_1_ip:6789/0 106 : [INF] osd.0
osd_0_ip:6801/29931 failed (by osd.1 osd_1_ip:6806/20125)
2012-02-27 17:26:21.074926 osd.0 osd_0_ip:6801/29931 1 :
:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:07, Gregory Farnum
gregory.far...@dreamhost.com wrote:
3 nodes, each running mon, mds osd with replication level 3 for data
met
adata pools.
...
Actually the OSDs will happily (well, not happily; the will complain.
But they will run) run in degraded mode
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Tommi Virtanen
tommi.virta...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 01:15, Дениска-редиска s...@inbox.lv wrote:
ehllo here,
i have tried to setup ceph .41 in simple configuration:
3 nodes, each running mon, mds osd with replication level 3 for data
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Jens Rehpöhler
jens.rehpoeh...@filoo.de wrote:
Hi Gregory,
On 22.02.2012 18:12, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Feb 22, 2012, at 1:53 AM, Jens Rehpöhler jens.rehpoeh...@filoo.de
wrote:
Some Additios: meanwhile we are at the state:
2012-02-22 10:38:49.587403
On Feb 22, 2012, at 1:53 AM, Jens Rehpöhler jens.rehpoeh...@filoo.de wrote:
Some Additios: meanwhile we are at the state:
2012-02-22 10:38:49.587403pg v1044553: 2046 pgs: 2036 active+clean,
10 active+clean+inconsistent; 2110 GB data, 4061 GB used, 25732 GB /
29794 GB avail
The
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 1:39 AM, madhusudhana
madhusudhana.u.acha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I have finally configured a ceph cluster with 8 nodes. I have 2 MDS
servers and 3 monitors and rest of 3 nodes are OSD. Each system has
2T SATA drives. I have 3 partitions created, one for root file
I didn't see him say so, but Sage pulled this in last week...thanks! :)
-Greg
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Holger Macht hma...@suse.de wrote:
OSDs (src/osd/ClassHandler.cc) specifically look for libcls_*.so in
/usr/$libdir/rados-classes, so libcls_rbd.so and libcls_rgw.so need to
be
Wido,
Sorry we lost track of this last week — we were all distracted by FAST 12! :)
So it looks like they're both on the same map and osd.4 is sending
pings to osd.19, but osd.19 is just ignoring them? Or do you really
have on debug_os and not debug_osd? :)
-Greg
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:12 AM,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Sage Weil s...@newdream.net wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Guido Winkelmann wrote:
Hi,
With Ceph 0.42, I am unable to create an RPM from supplied spec-file.
When running rpmbuild -ba ceph-0.42/ceph.spec, the command fails at the end
with this:
Checking for
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Noah Watkins jayh...@cs.ucsc.edu wrote:
Hi, we are trying to track down a performance problem with rados that is
leading no where.
We are using 23 OSDs. Running ceph osd tell osd bench we are seeing
decent performance on each osd.
However, running rados
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Noah Watkins jayh...@cs.ucsc.edu wrote:
On Feb 21, 2012, at 12:40 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
That's pretty much expected. -t is not actually controlling the number
of threads, but the number of requests the rados tool will dispatch at
a time. With -t 1 you're
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Paul Pettigrew
paul.pettig...@mach.com.au wrote:
G'day all
We wish to document a simple way to determine what version of ceph/rbd is
included with a given kernel on a Client machine, i.e. not the Ceph Cluster
nodes themselves (which we are running v0.42 on).
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Paul Pettigrew
paul.pettig...@mach.com.au wrote:
Thanks Sage
So following through by two examples, to confirm my understanding
HDD SPECS:
8x 2TB SATA HDD's able to do sustained read/write speed of 138MB/s each
1x SSD able to do sustained read/write
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Tommi Virtanen
tommi.virta...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 04:47, Upendra Moturi upendr...@hexagrid.com wrote:
Can we create a rbd device without filesystem mounted and can it be a
shared device.
Yes. Yes.
Note that if you do this, it's not
at 1:17 PM, Gregory Farnum
gregory.far...@dreamhost.com wrote:
We on the team decided a while ago that it's past time to start
looking seriously at how we can do proper testing of more of our core
components without spinning up a full Ceph instance. We've been trying
to sneak it in as we can
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Jim Schutt jasc...@sandia.gov wrote:
On 02/06/2012 10:22 AM, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Jim Schuttjasc...@sandia.gov wrote:
The above suggests to me that the slowdown is a result
of requests not getting submitted at the
On Feb 3, 2012, at 8:18 AM, Jim Schutt jasc...@sandia.gov wrote:
On 02/02/2012 05:28 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Jim Schuttjasc...@sandia.gov wrote:
I found 0 instances of waiting for commit in all my OSD logs for my last
run.
So I never waited on the journal
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Tommi Virtanen
tommi.virta...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:48, Jens Rehpöhler j...@shadow.gt.owl.de wrote:
one of my test mds servers died a few days ago. (hardware crash) I will
not buy a new one.
Is there any chance to remove this laggy mds
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Jim Schutt jasc...@sandia.gov wrote:
I'm currently running 24 OSDs/server, one 1TB 7200 RPM SAS drive
per OSD. During a test I watch both OSD servers with both
vmstat and iostat.
During a good period, vmstat says the server is sustaining 2 GB/s
for multiple
I went to merge this but then had a question on part of it (below).
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Jim Schutt jasc...@sandia.gov wrote:
Under heavy write load from many clients, many reader threads will
be waiting in the policy throttler, all on a single condition variable.
When a wakeup is
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Jim Schutt jasc...@sandia.gov wrote:
On 02/02/2012 10:53 AM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
I went to merge this but then had a question on part of it (below).
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Jim Schuttjasc...@sandia.gov wrote:
Under heavy write load from many
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Jim Schutt jasc...@sandia.gov wrote:
On 02/02/2012 10:52 AM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Jim Schuttjasc...@sandia.gov wrote:
The typical pattern I see is that a run starts with tens of seconds
of aggregate throughput 2 GB/s
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Amon Ott a@m-privacy.de wrote:
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 wrote Gregory Farnum:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Amon Ott a@m-privacy.de wrote:
Hi again!
We are running Ceph 0.41 and kernel 3.2.2 with current for-linus code
(commit
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Jim Schutt jasc...@sandia.gov wrote:
I found 0 instances of waiting for commit in all my OSD logs for my last
run.
So I never waited on the journal?
Looks like it. Interesting.
So far I'm looking at two behaviours I've noticed that seem anomalous to
me.
if there are physical failure correlations that aren't reflected in
your CRUSH model. Does that make sense?
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Gregory Farnum
gregory.far...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:35 AM, 胡瀚森 softrank@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone.
I've received a nice and welcome
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
yehud...@gmail.com wrote:
(resending to list, sorry tv)
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Tommi Virtanen
tommi.virta...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 16:33, Sage Weil s...@newdream.net wrote:
Currently rgw logs objects it
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
yehud...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Gregory Farnum
gregory.far...@dreamhost.com wrote:
You are dramatically overstating the impact of latency on an
inherently parallelizable and non-interactive operation. A couple
[ This branch follows from the osd op tracking thread:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ceph.devel/4940]
I pushed this branch yesterday and just updated it with some
suggestions from Sage. It implements basic op tracking for the OSD,
essentially as described in the previous
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Jim Schutt jasc...@sandia.gov wrote:
Hi,
FWIW, I've been trying to understand op delays under very heavy write
load, and have been working a little with the policy throttler in hopes of
using throttling delays to help track down which ops were backing up.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Amon Ott a@m-privacy.de wrote:
Hi again!
We are running Ceph 0.41 and kernel 3.2.2 with current for-linus code (commit
3d882ce47de80e0294a536bec771b5651885b4d3) now.
After some heavy workloads we see quite a few directories that cannot be
deleted,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 7:46 AM, JJ jjo...@cirrhus9.com wrote:
I am trying to follow the direction at
http://ceph.newdream.net/wiki/Installing_on_RedHat_or_CentOS
This is my 3rd or 4th attempt trying to install ceph on 2 different OSs,
(CentOS 5.[57] and Ubuntu 11.10
Lately, on CentOS 5.5,
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Madhusudhan
madhusudhana.u.acha...@gmail.com wrote:
I have configured ceph in centos5.6 after a
very long fight. Now, i am in the way
to evaluate the Ceph. Forget me if my
question looks amateur. If we consider a
situation where my core switch fails,
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Christian Brunner c...@muc.de wrote:
Hi,
reading the list archives, I get the impression that XFS is the second
best alternative to btrfs. But when I start an ceph-osd on an XFS
volume, there is still a big warning:
WARNING: not btrfs or ext3. We don't
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Sage Weil s...@newdream.net wrote:
Please review.
If the monitor sees an osdmap go by where nodes go down (or up) it will
scan its pg_map and mark any pg whose primary is down as 'stale'. If/when
the pg recovers, that will get refreshed. If not, the admin
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Martin Mailand mar...@tuxadero.com wrote:
Hi,
today I tried the btrfs patch mentioned on the btrfs ml. Therefore I
rebooted osd.0 with a new kernel and created a new btrfs on the osd.0, than
I took the osd.0 into the cluster. During the the resync of osd.0
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Martin Mailand mar...@tuxadero.com wrote:
Hi Greg,
ok, do you guys still need the core files, or could I delete them?
Sam thinks probably not since we have the backtraces and the
logs...thanks for asking, though! :)
-Greg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 4:25 AM, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian
Wiessner f.wiess...@smart-weblications.de wrote:
Am 22.01.2012 02:19, schrieb Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian
Wiessner f.wiess...@smart-weblications.de wrote:
2) v1 --
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Andrey Stepachev oct...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/1/19 Gregory Farnum gregory.far...@dreamhost.com:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Andrey Stepachev oct...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/1/19 Gregory Farnum gregory.far...@dreamhost.com:
On Wednesday, January 18, 2012
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Sage Weil s...@newdream.net wrote:
The current pattern is
void Foo::encode(bufferlist bl, unsigned features) const
{
if (features NEW_THING) {
// encode normally
} else {
// encode old way (wahtever was in this func)
}
}
I'm not sure what
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Andrey Stepachev oct...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/1/19 Gregory Farnum gregory.far...@dreamhost.com:
On Wednesday, January 18, 2012, Andrey Stepachev oct...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/1/19 Gregory Farnum gregory.far...@dreamhost.com:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:48 PM
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Andrey Stepachev oct...@gmail.com wrote:
But still don't know what happens with ceph, so it can't
respond and hang. It is not a good behavior, because
such situation leads to unresponsible cluster in case of
temporal network failure.
I'm a little concerned
version?
Everything I checked looked good for the rest of the system; did you
check if new clients could do things appropriately?
-Greg
(note: I removed a huge chunk of the alpha mds log covering approx 1 minute)
--
Karoly Horvath
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Gregory Farnum
gregory.far
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Andrey Stepachev oct...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/1/17 Gregory Farnum gregory.far...@dreamhost.com:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Andrey Stepachev oct...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/1/17 Sage Weil s...@newdream.net:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012, Andrey Stepachev wrote:
Ops
[http://roland.entierement.nu/blog/2012/01/15/looking-for-the-ultimate-distributed-filesystem.html]
Roland,
I had just a few comments on your characterization of Ceph that I
thought I should share. :)
Availability/redundancy 1: Saying Ceph works on the net is a bit
of a stretch. It will probably
801 - 900 of 1146 matches
Mail list logo
