On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 3:50 AM, Giulio Fidente wrote:
> On 11/10/2014 11:51 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/11/2014 11:34, Sebastien Han wrote:
>>>
>>> Indeed, that’s what we discussed with Giulio, using HAProxy for the
>>> Monitors is a bit overkill since the client is natively able to
On 11/10/2014 11:51 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:
On 10/11/2014 11:34, Sebastien Han wrote:
Indeed, that’s what we discussed with Giulio, using HAProxy for the Monitors is
a bit overkill since the client is natively able to switch between different
monitor source.
Loic, maybe you can elaborate a
On 10/11/2014 11:34, Sebastien Han wrote:
> Indeed, that’s what we discussed with Giulio, using HAProxy for the Monitors
> is a bit overkill since the client is natively able to switch between
> different monitor source.
>
> Loic, maybe you can elaborate a bit more on the usage of HAProxy for
Indeed, that’s what we discussed with Giulio, using HAProxy for the Monitors is
a bit overkill since the client is natively able to switch between different
monitor source.
Loic, maybe you can elaborate a bit more on the usage of HAProxy for the
monitors?
> On 09 Nov 2014, at 22:54, Justin Ere
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 4:35 AM, Giulio Fidente wrote:
> The architecture we're considering is as follows:
>
> keepalived
> haproxy
> ceph-mon
>
> where haproxy and ceph-mon are always up on all openstack 'controller' nodes
> (also running cinder) and keepalived is taking care of managi
How do you envision the HAProxy setup?
I’m in the dev room, we can discuss that.
HAProxy is a good idea but you need to be careful on how you monitor the
ceph-mon.
> On 07 Nov 2014, at 10:56, Giulio Fidente wrote:
>
> On 11/07/2014 10:50 AM, David Moreau Simard wrote:
>> Giulio,
>>
>> Right.
On 11/07/2014 10:50 AM, David Moreau Simard wrote:
Giulio,
Right. The volume part is tricky because the volume is ultimately tied to one
cinder-volume instance.
I don't have a magic solution for that yet.
yep but this can be worked around by customizing the host= setting in
Cinder so all ins
Giulio,
Right. The volume part is tricky because the volume is ultimately tied to one
cinder-volume instance.
I don't have a magic solution for that yet.
I'm not going to the contributor summit unfortunately.
I'm not personally a fan of keepalived since I've been spoiled by corosync.
Let's see
On 11/07/2014 09:46 AM, David Moreau Simard wrote:
Loic,
Was there an etherpad ? I'm curious as I didn't attend that one.
HA with Cinder mostly revolves around setting up multiple cinder-api and
cinder-volume servers. Was there something else involved ?
I can probably contribute my knowledge o
n Nov 6, 2014, at 4:57 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
>
> Hi Florian,
>
> I attended the Ceph & Cinder & HA session today at the summit. I've never
> really thought about strategies to implement HA and how Ceph can help. The
> extent of my knowledge on this topic is to mak
Hi Florian,
I attended the Ceph & Cinder & HA session today at the summit. I've never
really thought about strategies to implement HA and how Ceph can help. The
extent of my knowledge on this topic is to make sure I do not confuse something
that is "highly reliable"
11 matches
Mail list logo
