Danny,
It would be great if it is accepted. It would require as you noted,
all contributers (external of enovance's employ if they have
delegation of rights terms with their employees) and enovance's
approval as well.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Danny Al-Gaaf wrote:
> Am 17.10.2013 22:29, s
Am 17.10.2013 22:29, schrieb Andrew Woodward:
> We need to have a reasonable license on this preferably Apache 2.0.
> the enovance module is AGPL which can't come in contact with nearly
> anything with out causing massive license issues. Starting with any of
> the enovance code is a Non-starter as
Woodward
> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 1:29 PM
> Cc: Ceph Development
> Subject: Re: Ceph puppet module
>
> We need to have a reasonable license on this preferably Apache 2.0.
> the enovance module is AGPL which can't come in contact with nearly
> anything with out causi
We need to have a reasonable license on this preferably Apache 2.0.
the enovance module is AGPL which can't come in contact with nearly
anything with out causing massive license issues. Starting with any of
the enovance code is a Non-starter as it will require the AGPL
License.
On Wed, Oct 16, 201
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Dan van der Ster wrote:
> Hi,
> We would support this. The enovance module is a good starting point if
> you will accept something that doesn't yet use all the udev magic.
My only concern is that it may be challenging to make a smooth transition
from the old-style to new-styl
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Sébastien Han
wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> During the cephdays you mentioned that you were about to redistribute all the
> changes you’ve made on puppet-ceph to the enovance repo.
> It would be great to merge both before starting anything.
>
> What’s the progress?
I
Hi Dan,
During the cephdays you mentioned that you were about to redistribute all the
changes you’ve made on puppet-ceph to the enovance repo.
It would be great to merge both before starting anything.
What’s the progress?
Thanks :)
Sébastien Han
Cloud Engineer
"Always give 100%. Unless y
Hi,
We would support this. The enovance module is a good starting point if
you will accept something that doesn't yet use all the udev magic.
Cheers, Dan
CERN IT
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Hi Ceph,
>
> How about creating
>
> https://github.com/ceph/puppet-ceph
>
> to
Hi Ceph,
How about creating
https://github.com/ceph/puppet-ceph
to federate the development efforts for a puppet module exclusively focused on
deploying / maintaining a Ceph cluster ? It looks like we are at a point in
time where the fragmentation of the work created a desire for a central p
