---BeginMessage---
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ceph found with
Coverity Scan.
6 new defect(s) introduced to ceph found with Coverity Scan.
3 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent
build analyzed by Coverity Scan.
Looks like recent changes from Greg, Loic, and I.---BeginMessage---
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ceph found with
Coverity Scan.
Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing 4 of 4 defect(s)
** CID 1242019: Data race condition (MISSING_LOCK)
I'll fix the aio.cc problems, thanks !
On 30/09/2014 15:59, Sage Weil wrote:
Looks like recent changes from Greg, Loic, and I.
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com wrote:
Looks like recent changes from Greg, Loic, and I.
-- Forwarded message --
From: scan-ad...@coverity.com
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Cc:
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 06:21:08 -0700
Subject: New Defects reported by
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com wrote:
Looks like recent changes from Greg, Loic, and I.
-- Forwarded message --
From: scan-ad...@coverity.com
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Cc:
Date: Tue, 30 Sep
On 09/30/2014 01:38 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com wrote:
Looks like recent changes from Greg, Loic, and I.
-- Forwarded message --
From: scan-ad...@coverity.com
To:
---BeginMessage---
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ceph found with
Coverity Scan.
Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing 1 of 1 defect(s)
** CID 1241497: Thread deadlock (ORDER_REVERSAL)
Nice to see that coverity and lockdep agree :-)
This should go away with the fix for #9562.
John
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: scan-ad...@coverity.com
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Cc:
Date: Thu, 25 Sep
---BeginMessage---
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ceph found with
Coverity Scan.
Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing 20 of 38 defect(s)
** CID 717233: Uninitialized scalar field (UNINIT_CTOR)
/mds/Capability.h: 249 in
---BeginMessage---
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ceph found with
Coverity Scan.
Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing 9 of 9 defect(s)
** CID 1232599: Bad bit shift operation (BAD_SHIFT)
/os/HashIndex.cc: 433 in
---BeginMessage---
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ceph found with
Coverity Scan.
Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing 5 of 5 defect(s)
** CID 1201388: Missing unlock (LOCK)
/mon/Monitor.cc: 438 in Monitor::preinit()()
** CID 1225099: Unchecked
---BeginMessage---
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ceph found with
Coverity Scan.
Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing 1 of 1 defect(s)
** CID 1223276: Division or modulo by zero (DIVIDE_BY_ZERO)
/tools/rados/rados.cc: 1368 in
I've now looked at the defects. And according to me, there are mostly
irrelevant.
There are 2 cases :
- the 2 division by zero will never happen because we will never run
the test with a zero parameter. Still, I've added an ASSERT to avoid
their report.
- all the rest is a clash between gtest
Not surprising, this was just integrated and I did not have the
possibility to run a coverity scan myself.
I'll fix all this.
Sebastien
On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 09:12 -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
Mostly stuff in teh new libradosstriper code, it looks like.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
Mostly stuff in teh new libradosstriper code, it looks like.---BeginMessage---
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ceph found with
Coverity Scan.
Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing 20 of 41 defect(s)
** CID 1221498: Division or modulo by zero
---BeginMessage---
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ceph found with
Coverity Scan.
Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing 1 of 1 defect(s)
** CID 1220854: Invalid iterator comparison (MISMATCHED_ITERATOR)
/osd/PG.cc: 981 in
---BeginMessage---
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ceph found with
Coverity Scan.
Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing 1 of 1 defect(s)
** CID 1214678: Unchecked return value (CHECKED_RETURN)
/osd/OSD.cc: 318 in
---BeginMessage---
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ceph found with
Coverity Scan.
Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing 4 of 4 defect(s)
** CID 1204293: Buffer not null terminated (BUFFER_SIZE_WARNING)
/mds/MDS.cc: 1714 in MDS::respawn()()
** CID
I'll deal with the problems found in gf-complete:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8083
On 12/04/2014 06:06, Sage Weil wrote:
Several new defects. This wasn't running for the last couple of weeks
because the submodules didn't update on the test checkout.
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel
Several new defects. This wasn't running for the last couple of weeks
because the submodules didn't update on the test checkout.
---BeginMessage---
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ceph found with
Coverity Scan.
Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:23 PM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
** CID 1188299: Data race condition (MISSING_LOCK)
/mds/MDSUtility.cc: 142 in MDSUtility::handle_mds_map(MMDSMap *)()
Is there a trick to getting coverity to realise that the lock is held,
but by the calling function? Does it
Then it seems that Coverity is only able to perform intra-procedure
check, is there any inter-procedure check option to turn on?
On 2014/3/4 6:53, John Spray wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:23 PM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
** CID 1188299: Data race condition (MISSING_LOCK)
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: scan-ad...@coverity.com
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Cc:
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 00:57:57 -0800
Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for ceph
Hi,
Please find the
---BeginMessage---
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ceph found with
Coverity Scan.
Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing 7 of 13 defect(s)
** CID 1138583: Dereference null return value (NULL_RETURNS)
/mds/MDCache.cc: 5074 in
---BeginMessage---
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ceph found with
Coverity Scan.
Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing 4 of 4 defect(s)
** CID 1138366: Resource leak (RESOURCE_LEAK)
/test/librados/tier.cc: 96 in
Coverity picked up some issues with the filestore code. These are mostly
old issues that appear new becuase code moved around, but this is probably
a good opportunity to fix them... :)
sage---BeginMessage---
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ceph found with
---BeginMessage---
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ceph found with
Coverity Scan
Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
** CID 1057291: Resource leak (RESOURCE_LEAK)
/rgw/rgw_rados.cc: 2643
Several new rgw issues from the recent merge...---BeginMessage---
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ceph found with
Coverity Scan
Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing 7 of 61 defects
** CID 1049252: Wrapper object use after free (WRAPPER_ESCAPE)
Hi Sage,
I believe
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/366
fixes the issue. It was introduced by
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/b16fdf23e5325623874ee1a02e134f577c5a7dcd#L0R364
which was merged in master yesterday.
Cheers
On 06/19/2013 09:36 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
Dereferencing iterator p
29 matches
Mail list logo
