Hi Matt,
Can you please upstream the implementation you are mentioning?
Varada
-Original Message-
From: Matt W. Benjamin [mailto:m...@cohortfs.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 5:26 AM
To: Somnath Roy
Cc: Varada Kari; Ceph Development; Sage Weil
Subject: Re: Adding a proprietary
Of course ! Using teuthology tasks to configure the node makes perfect sense.
Thanks !
On 09/03/2015 14:37, Andrew Schoen wrote:
Loic,
After locking the node like normal, you can use teuthology to install the
kernel you need. Just include the kernel stanza in your yaml file.
Hi Danny,
As of now, git checkout master ; git merge origin/hammer gets a conflict on
gmock
When we last discussed it you found that git merge -m 1 was a solution. But I'm
not sure I fully understand the consequences.
Cheers
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
signature.asc
Hi Sage,
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 2:51 AM, Sage Weil s...@newdream.net wrote:
On Mon, 9 Feb 2015, David McBride wrote:
On 09/02/15 15:31, Gregory Farnum wrote:
So, memory usage of an OSD is usually linear in the number of PGs it
hosts. However, that memory can also grow based on at least
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Dan van der Ster d...@vanderster.com wrote:
Hi Sage,
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 2:51 AM, Sage Weil s...@newdream.net wrote:
On Mon, 9 Feb 2015, David McBride wrote:
On 09/02/15 15:31, Gregory Farnum wrote:
So, memory usage of an OSD is usually linear in the
QE validation is finished for this release and v0.80.9 is ready for next steps.
Summary of all runs is in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10641 with details.
The following suites were executed and passed as part of this validation:
rados
rbd
rgw
fs
krbd
kcephfs
samba
ceph-deploy
upgrade/firefly
-- All Branches --
Adam Crume adamcr...@gmail.com
2014-12-01 20:45:58 -0800 wip-doc-rbd-replay
Alfredo Deza alfredo.d...@inktank.com
2014-07-08 13:58:35 -0400 wip-8679
2014-09-04 13:58:14 -0400 wip-8366
2014-10-13 11:10:10 -0400 wip-9730
Andrew Shewmaker
Hi Loic,
this one is a tricky one. I didn't find a smooth/automatic solution yet.
This seems to work:
git checkout master
git merge --no-ff origin/hammer
git mergetool
- for the conflict: select 'local' for src/gmock (this should keep
the changes im master and ignore changes from hammer)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
subscribe ceph-devel
- --
Freundliche Grüße - Kind regards,
Joshua Schmid
Trainee - Storage SAP HANA
SUSE Linux GmbH - Maxfeldstr. 5 - 90409 Nürnberg
-
Hi All,
This is a new release of ceph-deploy that changes a couple of behaviors.
On RPM-based distros, ceph-deploy will now automatically enable
check_obsoletes in the Yum priorities plugin. This resolves an issue
many community members hit where package dependency resolution was
breaking due to
On Mon, 9 Mar 2015, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
QE validation is finished for this release and v0.80.9 is ready for next
steps.
Summary of all runs is in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10641 with details.
Thanks, Yuri!
I've updated the release notes to include the last few patches. I think
On 03/07/2015 01:03 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
which I eventually found in [rhel6-server-optional] as installed
with http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11061#note-2
How do you suggest I script this in
https://ceph.com/git/?p=ceph.git;a=blob;f=install-deps.sh so people
don't worry about it ?
Am 09.03.2015 um 20:35 schrieb Mark Nelson:
On 03/09/2015 02:06 PM, Deneau, Tom wrote:
I'm trying to gather information on what it would take to get packages
for an architecture other than x86_64 up on http://download.ceph.com
What we've done in the past for certain non-X86 architectures
-Original Message-
From: Danny Al-Gaaf [mailto:danny.al-g...@bisect.de]
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 3:46 PM
To: Mark Nelson; Deneau, Tom; ceph-devel
Subject: Re: packages on download.ceph.com
Am 09.03.2015 um 20:35 schrieb Mark Nelson:
On 03/09/2015 02:06 PM, Deneau, Tom
On Mon, 9 Mar 2015, Danny Al-Gaaf wrote:
Am 09.03.2015 um 20:35 schrieb Mark Nelson:
On 03/09/2015 02:06 PM, Deneau, Tom wrote:
I'm trying to gather information on what it would take to get packages
for an architecture other than x86_64 up on http://download.ceph.com
I'm guessing you're
On 03/09/2015 02:06 PM, Deneau, Tom wrote:
I'm trying to gather information on what it would take to get packages
for an architecture other than x86_64 up on http://download.ceph.com
What we've done in the past for certain non-X86 architectures (such as
ARM) is to get build nodes in place
Hi,
My assumption was I can't map the same image from two clients (and run IO
concurrently) as this can corrupt the image. But, in the latest rbd cli I saw
--image-shared and --sharedtag, wondering what is the use case of this ?
This means that I can now map same image from two different
There generally is no built-in RBD restriction about having multiple clients
perform IO on the same image -- but if two clients were performing write
operations on the same image they would need to coordinate their activities
outside of librbd/krbd to ensure they aren't corrupting the image.
I'm trying to gather information on what it would take to get packages
for an architecture other than x86_64 up on http://download.ceph.com
-- Tom Deneau, AMD
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
Hi Ken,
Thanks for the detailed explanation. I updated
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3871 accordingly (I think ;-)
Cheers
On 09/03/2015 18:46, Ken Dreyer wrote:
On 03/07/2015 01:03 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
which I eventually found in [rhel6-server-optional] as installed
with
I've found commit 9b9a682fe035c985e416ee1c112fa58f9045a27c and I see
that when 'osd heartbeat use min delay socket = true' it will mark the
packet with DSCP CS6. Based on the setting of the socket in
msg/simple/Pipe.cc is it possible that this can apply to both OSD and
monitor? I don't understand
Thanks for the detailed explanation Jason !
Regards
Somnath
-Original Message-
From: Jason Dillaman [mailto:dilla...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 1:31 PM
To: Somnath Roy
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regarding rbd --image-shared and --shared tag
There
Hi Andrew,
I successfully installed a 3.19 kernel (details at http://dachary.org/?p=3594).
It turns out that the loop module is compiled in and defaults to having zero
partitions allowed by default. Since I was looking for a solution to have
/dev/loop useable for tests, I rebooted with
On 09/03/2015 18:31, Danny Al-Gaaf wrote:
Hi Loic,
this one is a tricky one. I didn't find a smooth/automatic solution yet.
This seems to work:
git checkout master
git merge --no-ff origin/hammer
git mergetool
- for the conflict: select 'local' for src/gmock (this should keep
Am 10.03.2015 um 00:06 schrieb Loic Dachary:
On 09/03/2015 18:31, Danny Al-Gaaf wrote:
Hi Loic,
this one is a tricky one. I didn't find a smooth/automatic
solution yet.
This seems to work:
git checkout master git merge --no-ff origin/hammer git
mergetool - for the conflict: select
Jian,
Thanks for the clarification. I'll mark traffic destined for the
monitors as well. We are getting ready to put our first cluster into
production. If you are interested we will be testing the heartbeat
priority to see if we can saturate the network (not an easy task for
40 Gb) and keep the
The atomicity semantics of transaction must not be violated. Suppose
there are two concurrent transactions, T1 (Transaction 1) writes a set
of objects {A, B, C}, and T2 touches {B, C, D}, where each object is in
a different OSD. And A and D are selected as the master, respectively.
For
Yeah, I agree with this. So this is a little dive into XFS internal if
we want to
do better this xattrs. If xfs can export this or boundary of xattr
type(btree, inline or list)
would be great.
yeah, but need modified version of kernel and self-defined system
call. I do not prefer this way
So do
Only OSD calls set_socket_priority().
See https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3353
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 3:36 AM, Robert LeBlanc rob...@leblancnet.us wrote:
I've found commit 9b9a682fe035c985e416ee1c112fa58f9045a27c and I see
that when 'osd heartbeat use min delay socket = true' it will mark
I was having trouble building man pages on my Ubuntu 14.04 build
machine, so I looked at gitbuilder-doc. I saw that it was running
Ubuntu 11.10. Even though the end-of-life for Ubuntu 11.10 was May 9,
2013, I installed a new virtual machine with it. I needed to change
/etc/apt/sources.list
Hi Ian,
I now see a Public checkbox in the edit form of the custom query. I made them
public, thank you !
Cheers
On 09/03/2015 04:29, Ian Colle wrote:
Loic,
I was unable to see those queries. I made you an administrator so you can
publish your queries - please let me know if you have any
31 matches
Mail list logo
