Hi,
You may want to check out this doc:
https://docs.ceph.com/en/quincy/radosgw/config-ref/#lifecycle-settings
As I understand it in short:
- if there are thousands of buckets, we should increase the rgw_lc_max_worker.
- if there are a few buckets that have hundreds of thousands of objects, we
I'm hoping to see at least one more, if not more than that, but I have no
crystal ball. I definitely support this idea, and strongly suggest it's given
some thought. There have been a lot of delays/missed releases due to all of the
lab issues, and it's significantly impacted the release cadence
Hi Experts,
We plan to setup a Ceph Object to support a S3 workload, that will need to
delete 100M file daily via lifecycle.
Appreciate your suggestion and setting to handle this kind of scenario
Best Regards,
Ha
___
ceph-users mailing list --
Hi,
> On 17 Jul 2023, at 12:53, Ponnuvel Palaniyappan wrote:
>
> The typical EOL date (2023-06-01) has already passed for Pacific. Just
> wondering if there's going to be another Pacific point release (16.2.14) in
> the pipeline.
Good point! At least, for possibility upgrade RBD clusters from
Hi all,
now that host masks seem to work, could somebody please shed some light at the
relative priority of these settings:
ceph config set osd memory_target X
ceph config set osd/host:A memory_target Y
ceph config set osd/class:B memory_target Z
Which one wins for an OSD on host A in class B?
Hi,
The typical EOL date (2023-06-01) has already passed for Pacific. Just
wondering if there's going to be another Pacific point release (16.2.14) in
the pipeline.
--
Regards,
Ponnuvel P
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To
It looks indeed to be that bug that I hit.
Thanks.
Luis Domingues
Proton AG
--- Original Message ---
On Monday, July 17th, 2023 at 07:45, Sridhar Seshasayee
wrote:
> Hello Luis,
>
> Please see my response below:
>
> But when I took a look on the memory usage of my OSDs, I was
