Just go for CentOS stream it will be at least as stable as CentOS and
probably even more.
CentOS Stream is just the next minor version of the current RHEL minor
which means it already contains fixes not yet released for RHEL but
available for CentOS stream. It is not as if CentOS stream would be a
Hi Matthew,
Starting of Ceph 4, RH does only support RHEL 7.x & 8.1. Ubuntu support has
been deprecated
Regards
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 5:19 PM Matthew Vernon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You can get support for running Ceph on a number of distributions - RH
> support both RHEL and Ubuntu, Canonical suppor
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 03:21:04PM -0800, Matt Wilder wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 9:20 AM Teoman Onay wrote:
>
> > Just go for CentOS stream it will be at least as stable as CentOS and
> > probably even more.
> >
> > CentOS Stream is just the next minor ver
I hope that you are using a tool like foreman or spacewalk to deploy your
dev & production environments as they allow you to "freeze" your repo
content. Then you deploy all your servers with the content of these
repositories (you may even use lifecycles to ease dev -> test -> prod)
therefore they a
Hi!
AFAIK the focus is on ceph-adm to replace ceph-ansible. Today it is still
missing some important features but it is just a matter of time. I don't
think that the devs will do twice the work, once for cephadm and once for
ceph-ansible but if someone feels the need to keep it working and impleme
A containerized environment just makes troubleshooting more difficult,
getting access and retrieving details on Ceph processes isn't as
straightforward as with a non containerized infrastructure. I am still not
convinced that containerizing everything brings any benefits except the
collocation of s
>
>
> > For similar reasons, CentOS 8 stream, as opposed to every other CentOS
> released before, is very experimental. I would never go in production with
> CentOS 8 stream.
>
>
Experimental?? Looks like you still don't understand what CentOS stream is.
If you have some time just read this:
https:
Hi,
Can you share the output of:
#ceph pg dump pgs | grep ^3\.1d5b
Thx
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 12:41 PM Andres Rojas Guerrero
wrote:
> Hi, recently in a Nautilus cluster version 14.2.6 I have changed the
> rule crush map to host type instead osd, all seems Ok, but now I have
> "PG not deep-sc
You seem to focus only on the controller bandwith while you should also
consider disk rpms. Most SATA drives runs at 7200rpm while SAS ones goes
from 10k to 15k rpm which increases the number of iops.
Sata 80 iops
Sas 10k 120iops
Sas 15k 180iops
MBTF of SAS drives is also higher than SATA ones.
AFAIK dynamic resharding is not supported for multisite setups but you can
reshard manually.
Note that this is a very expensive process which requires you to:
- disable the sync of the bucket you want to reshard.
- Stops all the RGW (no more access to your Ceph cluster)
- On a node of the master z
Hi Angelo,
I would go for this one: Ceph: Designing and Implementing Scalable Storage
Systems
https://www.amazon.com/Ceph-Designing-Implementing-software-defined-performance-ebook/dp/B07NC5NM5Q/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2AX7NYVK2486C&keywords=ceph+designing&qid=1651095041&s=books&sprefix=ceph+designing%2Cs
Hello,
Silly question but have you created the pool which will be used by the
gateway??
On Wed, 25 May 2022, 21:25 Heiner Hardt, wrote:
> Sorry to be intransigent asking again but is there anyone facing issues on
> deploying iscsi-gateway daemons through CEPHADM?
>
> I´m still having issues try
12 matches
Mail list logo
