[ceph-users] Re: upgraded to cluster to 16.2.6 PACIFIC

2021-11-09 Thread Ansgar Jazdzewski
> IIRC you get a HEALTH_WARN message that there are OSDs with old metadata > format. You can suppress that warning, but I guess operators feel like > they want to deal with the situation and get it fixed rather than ignore it. Yes, and if suppress the waning gets forgotten you run into other issue

[ceph-users] Re: upgraded to cluster to 16.2.6 PACIFIC

2021-11-09 Thread Ansgar Jazdzewski
Am Di., 9. Nov. 2021 um 11:08 Uhr schrieb Dan van der Ster : > > Hi Ansgar, > > To clarify the messaging or docs, could you say where you learned that > you should enable the bluestore_fsck_quick_fix_on_mount setting? Is > that documented somewhere, or did you have it enabled from previously? > Th

[ceph-users] Re: upgraded to cluster to 16.2.6 PACIFIC

2021-11-09 Thread Dan van der Ster
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:29 AM Stefan Kooman wrote: > > On 11/9/21 11:07, Dan van der Ster wrote: > > Hi Ansgar, > > > > To clarify the messaging or docs, could you say where you learned that > > you should enable the bluestore_fsck_quick_fix_on_mount setting? Is > > that documented somewhere, or

[ceph-users] Re: upgraded to cluster to 16.2.6 PACIFIC

2021-11-09 Thread Igor Fedotov
Hi Ansgar, I've submitted the following PR to recover broken OMAPs: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/43820 One needs a custom build for now to use it though. And this might be a bit risky to apply since this hasn't passed all the QA procedures... For now I'm aware about one success and one

[ceph-users] Re: upgraded to cluster to 16.2.6 PACIFIC

2021-11-09 Thread Dan van der Ster
Hi Ansgar, To clarify the messaging or docs, could you say where you learned that you should enable the bluestore_fsck_quick_fix_on_mount setting? Is that documented somewhere, or did you have it enabled from previously? The default is false so the corruption only occurs when users actively choose

[ceph-users] Re: upgraded to cluster to 16.2.6 PACIFIC

2021-11-09 Thread Marc
> > I did an upgrade from 14.2.23 to 16.2.6 not knowing that the current > > minor version had this nasty bug! [1] [2] > > I'm sorry you hit this bug. We tried to warn users through > documentation. Apparently this is not enough and other ways of informing > operators about such (rare) incidents m