Hi,
Thank you. It's very helpful.
ceph osd pool rename -- "-help" aaa
that works well.
Best regards!
RONG
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Schwager [mailto:daniel.schwa...@dtnet.de]
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2013 2:56 PM
To: 'malm...@gmail.com'; You, RongX
Cc: 'cep
When I do gatherkeys, ceph-deploy tells me:
UnsupportedPlatform: Platform is not supported: debian
Given that I downloaded ceph-deploy from the ceph.com debian repository, I'm
hoping that Debian is supported and that I have something screwy somewhere.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
James
___
Hello every one,
Just ran a fresh install of version Emperor on an empty cluster, and I
am left clueless, trying to troubleshoot cephx. After ceph-deploy
created the keys, I used ceph-authtool to generate the client.admin
keyring and the monitor keyring, as indicated in the doc. The
configura
>
> When I do gatherkeys, ceph-deploy tells me:
>
> UnsupportedPlatform: Platform is not supported: debian
>
> Given that I downloaded ceph-deploy from the ceph.com debian repository,
> I'm hoping that Debian is supported and that I have something screwy
> somewhere.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
I
Hi,
>> So how does AWS S3 handle Public access to objects?
You have to explicitly set public ACL on each object.
Ok, but this also does not work with radosgw + s3cmd:
s3cmd setacl -P s3://test/fstab
ERROR: S3 error: 403 (AccessDenied):
Micha Krause
__
Hello all.
I have a Ceph cluster using XFS on the OSDs. Btrfs is not available to
me at the moment (cluster is running CentOS 6.4 with stock kernel).
I intend to maintain a full replica of an active ZFS dataset on the
Ceph infrastructure by installing an OpenSolaris KVM guest using
rbd-fuse to ex
The trouble with using ZFS copies on top of RBD is that both copies of
any particular block might end up on the same OSD. If you have
disabled replication in Ceph, then this would mean a single OSD
failure could cause data loss. For that reason, it seems it would be
better to do the replication i
Hi every one,
I am currently testing a use-case with large rbd images (several TB),
each containing an XFS filesystem, which I mount on local clients. I
have been testing the throughput writing on a single file in the XFS
mount, using "dd oflag=direct", for various block sizes.
With a defaul
Did you try moving the journals to separate SSDs?
It was recently discovered that due to a kernel bug/design, the journal
writes are translated into device cache flush commands, so thinking
about that I wonder also whether there would be performance improvement
in the case that journal and OSD
Looking at this review, it seems the SSD and spinning disk are in a
flat LBA address space:
http://www.techwarelabs.com/western-digital-black%C2%B2-dual-drive-review-two-drives-in-one/2/
So I guess that the Windows utility just submits SET MAX ADDRESS to
reveal the hidden (spinning) area of th
Hi guys!
Some experiment here:
http://www.sebastien-han.fr/blog/2013/09/19/how-I-barely-got-my-first-ceph-mon-running-in-docker/
Sébastien Han
Cloud Engineer
"Always give 100%. Unless you're giving blood.”
Phone: +33 (0)1 49 70 99 72
Mail: sebastien@enovance.com
Address : 10, ru
Hi James,
Unfortunately, SSDs are out of budget. Currently there are 2 SAS disks
in RAID0 on each node, split into 9 partitions: one for each OSD journal
on the node. I benchmarked the RAID0 volumes at around 500MB/s in
sequential sustained write, so that's not bad — maybe access latency is
a
An update on this issue:
Explicitly setting the "keyring" parameter to its default value, in the
client section, like this:
[client.admin]
keyring = /etc/ceph/ceph.client.admin.keyring
solves the problem in the particular case when ONLY
"auth_cluster_required" is set to "cephx", and the two
I will try to look into this issue of device cache flush. Do you have
a tracker link for the bug?
How I wish this were a forum! But here is a link:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-users/msg05966.html
And this:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/commit/?
Thanks for the input John.
So I should leave ZFS checksumming on, disable ZFS replicas and rely
on Ceph RBD replicas.
Is it even sane to use rbd-fuse for this?
On a related note, is there any discard/trim support in rbd-fuse? Else
I won't ever be able to thin-out the RBD image once it is allocate
On a related note, is there any discard/trim support in rbd-fuse?
Apparently so (but not in the kernel module unfortunately).
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Hi,
thanks for the hint. I tried this again and noticed that the time out message
does seem to be unrelated. Here is the log file for a stalling request with
debug turned on:
http://pastebin.com/DcQuc9wP
I really cannot really find a real "error" in the log. The download stalls at
about 500kb
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Charles 'Boyo wrote:
> That's because qemu-kvm
> in CentOS 6.4 doesn't support librbd.
RedHat just added RBD support in qemu-kvm-rhev in RHEV 6.5. I don't
know if that will trickle down to CentOS but you can probably
recompile it yourself like we did.
https://rh
Good day!
We ve noticed such things recently during some osd recovery things like
scrubbing or so. Restarting OSD did the trick. We had even 404 errors until
deep scrubbing ended.
Any noise in ceph -w?
Regards, Artem S.
29 нояб. 2013 г. 22:28 пользователь "Sebastian"
написал:
>
> Hi,
>
> thanks fo
I've got ceph up and running on a 3-node centos 6.4 cluster. However, after
I
a) set the cluster to nout as follows: ceph osd set noout
b) rebooted 1 node
c) logged into that 1 node, I tried to do: service ceph start osd.12
but it returned with error message:
/etc/init.d/ceph: osd.12 not found (
Hi,
our ceph -w is clean:
cluster e54d66c5-5191-4296-a217-f818e1f92830
health HEALTH_OK
monmap e1: 4 mons at
{a=5.9.67.9:6789/0,b=5.9.67.8:6789/0,c=5.9.67.7:6789/0,d=5.9.67.6:6789/0},
election epoch 19724, quorum 0,1,2,3 a,b,c,d
osdmap e1629: 4 osds: 4 up, 4 in
pgmap v4896303: 18
It's interesting, the responses are received but seems that they
aren't being handled (hence the following pings). There are a few
things that you could look at. First, try to connect to the admin
socket and see if you get any useful information from there. This
could include in-flight requests, lo
>> On a related note, is there any discard/trim support in rbd-fuse?
>
>
> Apparently so (but not in the kernel module unfortunately).
>
Ok, librbd (which is used by the qemu alternative) supports discard,
not the rbd kernel module does not. Neither of these are available to
me right now.
Is rbd-f
>> That's because qemu-kvm
>> in CentOS 6.4 doesn't support librbd.
>
> RedHat just added RBD support in qemu-kvm-rhev in RHEV 6.5. I don't
> know if that will trickle down to CentOS but you can probably
> recompile it yourself like we did.
>
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1754.html
> (h
Hi Yehuda,
> It's interesting, the responses are received but seems that they
> aren't being handled (hence the following pings). There are a few
> things that you could look at. First, try to connect to the admin
> socket and see if you get any useful information from there. This
> could include
Hi, i'm having issues while trying to add another monitor to my
cluster:
ceph@ceph-deploy01:~/ceph-cluster$ ceph-deploy mon create ceph-node02
[ceph_deploy.cli][INFO ] Invoked (1.3.3): /usr/bin/ceph-deploy mon
create ceph-node02
[ceph_deploy.mon][DEBUG ] Deploying mon, cluster ceph hosts
ce
This previous thread looks like it might be the same error, could be
helpful.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-users/msg05295.html
-Michael
On 29/11/2013 19:24, German Anders wrote:
Hi, i'm having issues while trying to add another monitor to my cluster:
ceph@ceph-deploy01:~/ceph-cluster$
Thanks a lot Sebastian, i'm going to try that, also i'm having an
issue while trying to test a rbd creation, i've install in the deploy
server the ceph-client:
ceph@ceph-deploy01:/etc/ceph$ sudo rbd -n client.ceph-test -k
/home/ceph/ceph-cluster/ceph.client.admin.keyring create --size 10240
c
Aside from the messages about ceph-deploy saying debian is not supported on two
of my nodes, I'm having some other problems moving to ceph-deploy.
I'm running with 2 OSD's on each node, and I'm using a numbering sequence of
osd., so node 7 has osd.70 and osd.71. This way it's immediately
obviou
29 matches
Mail list logo
