OK, no worries. Was just after maximum availability.
On 08/16/2013 08:19 PM, Mikaël Cluseau wrote:
On 08/17/2013 02:06 PM, Dan Mick wrote:
That loosk interesting, but I cannot browse without making an account;
can you make your source freely available?
gitlab's policy is the following :
Pub
On 08/17/2013 02:06 PM, Dan Mick wrote:
That loosk interesting, but I cannot browse without making an account;
can you make your source freely available?
gitlab's policy is the following :
Public access
If checked, this project can be cloned /without any/ authentication. It
will also be list
On 08/17/2013 02:06 PM, Dan Mick wrote:
That loosk interesting, but I cannot browse without making an account;
can you make your source freely available?
umm it seems the policy of gitlab is that you can clone but not browse
online... but you can clone so it's freely available :
$ GIT_SSL_N
That loosk interesting, but I cannot browse without making an account;
can you make your source freely available?
On 08/14/2013 10:54 PM, Mikaël Cluseau wrote:
Hi lists,
in this release I see that the ceph command is not compatible with
python 3. The changes were not all trivial so I gave up,
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Jeppesen, Nelson
wrote:
> Sage et al,
>
> This is an exciting release but I must say I'm a bit confused about some of
> the new rgw details.
>
> Questions:
>
> 1) I'd like to understand how regions work. I assume that's how you get
> multi-site, multi-datacenter
Hi lists,
in this release I see that the ceph command is not compatible with
python 3. The changes were not all trivial so I gave up, but for those
using gentoo, I made my ceph git repository available here with an
ebuild that forces the python version to 2.6 ou 2.7 :
git clone https://git.i
Sage et al,
This is an exciting release but I must say I'm a bit confused about some of the
new rgw details.
Questions:
1) I'd like to understand how regions work. I assume that's how you get
multi-site, multi-datacenter support working but must they be part of the same
ceph cluster still?
: [ceph-users] v0.67 Dumpling released
There are version specific repos, but you shouldn't need them if you want the
latest.
In fact, http://ceph.com/rpm/ is simply a link to http://ceph.com/rpm-dumpling
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.cep
Thanks for that bit, too, Ian.
For what it's worth, I updated /etc/yum.repos.d/ceph.repo , installed the
latest version (from cuttlefish), restarted (monitors first, then
everything else) and everything looks great.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Ian Colle wrote:
> There are version specific
There are version specific repos, but you shouldn't need them if you want
the latest.
In fact, http://ceph.com/rpm/ is simply a link to
http://ceph.com/rpm-dumpling
Ian R. Colle
Director of Engineering
Inktank
Cell: +1.303.601.7713
Email: i...@inktank.com
Delivering the Future of Storage
<
On Wednesday, August 14, 2013, wrote:
>
> Hi Sage,
>
> I just upgraded and everything went quite smoothly with osds, mons and
> mds, good work guys! :)
>
> The only problem I have ran into is with radosgw. It is unable to start
> after the upgrade with the following message:
>
> 2013-08-14 11:57:25
Ah, didn't realize the repos were version-specific. Thanks Dan!
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Dan van der Ster wrote:
> http://ceph.com/rpm-dumpling/el6/x86_64/
>
>
> --
> Dan van der Ster
> CERN IT-DSS
>
>
> On Wednesday, August 14, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Kyle Hutson wrote:
>
> > Any suggestions
http://ceph.com/rpm-dumpling/el6/x86_64/
--
Dan van der Ster
CERN IT-DSS
On Wednesday, August 14, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Kyle Hutson wrote:
> Any suggestions for upgrading CentOS/RHEL? The yum repos don't appear to have
> been updated yet.
>
> I thought maybe with the "improved support for Red Ha
Any suggestions for upgrading CentOS/RHEL? The yum repos don't appear to
have been updated yet.
I thought maybe with the "improved support for Red Hat platforms" that
would be the easy way of going about it.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:08 AM, wrote:
> On 2013-08-14 07:32, Sage Weil wrote:
>
>> A
On 2013-08-14 07:32, Sage Weil wrote:
Another three months have gone by, and the next stable release of Ceph
is
ready: Dumpling! Thank you to everyone who has contributed to this
release!
This release focuses on a few major themes since v0.61 (Cuttlefish):
* rgw: multi-site, multi-datacenter
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Markus Goldberg
wrote:
> is it ok to upgrade from 0.66 to 0.67 by just running 'apt-get upgrade' and
> rebooting the nodes one by one ?
Did you see http://ceph.com/docs/master/release-notes/#upgrading-from-v0-66 ??
___
> Hi,
> is it ok to upgrade from 0.66 to 0.67 by just running 'apt-get upgrade'
> and rebooting the nodes one by one ?
Is a full reboot required?
James
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-c
Hi,
is it ok to upgrade from 0.66 to 0.67 by just running 'apt-get upgrade'
and rebooting the nodes one by one ?
Thanks.
Regards,
Markus
Am 14.08.2013 07:32, schrieb Sage Weil:
Another three months have gone by, and the next stable release of Ceph is
ready: Dumpling! Thank you to everyone wh
Another three months have gone by, and the next stable release of Ceph is
ready: Dumpling! Thank you to everyone who has contributed to this
release!
This release focuses on a few major themes since v0.61 (Cuttlefish):
* rgw: multi-site, multi-datacenter support for S3/Swift object storage
*
19 matches
Mail list logo
