The tendency has been (I am also guilty of this) to go down the route
of 'here I made this $bandwidth test' using some
$combination_of_scripts - tell users to use this It's better and more
reflective of what users should be testing for"
That route is the one I am kinda trying to steer away from,
On 12 Sep, 2014, at 4:49 am, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote:
> So if ookla implemented a udp based test, changed it's statical weighting and
> data mining methods overnight. At least in NZ that might help.
Isn't that the whole point of this discussion?
- Jonathan Morton
_
Jonathan,
> Could we make use of the existing test servers (running netperf) for that
> demonstration? How hard is the protocol to fake in Javascript?
Not having coded a stitch of this, I *think* it would require the following:
- Web page on netperf-xxx.bufferbloat.net that served out the java
Changing to better test suites isn't the answer, I know I've tried a lot to
educate and push for bespoke test sites for our customers .
This is all about happy illusions on the user side.
This is a branding and markets problem. In NZ, 'the' site for reference
that users go to is speedtest. Becaus
The speedof.me API probably can be used directly as the measurement of download
and upload - you can create a competing download or upload in Javascript using
a WebWorker talking to another server that supports the websocket API to force
buffer overflow. (sort of poor man's RRUL).
The speedo
On 12 Sep, 2014, at 3:35 am, dpr...@reed.com wrote:
> Among friends of mine, we can publicize this widely. But those friends
> probably would like to see how the measurement would work.
Could we make use of the existing test servers (running netperf) for that
demonstration? How hard is the p
Among friends of mine, we can publicize this widely. But those friends
probably would like to see how the measurement would work.
On Thursday, September 11, 2014 8:13pm, "Rich Brown"
said:
> ___
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists
I will sign. It would be better if we had an actual demonstration of how to
implement a speedtest improvement.
On Thursday, September 11, 2014 12:03pm, "Dave Taht" said:
> The theme of networks being "engineered for speedtest" has been a
> common thread in nearly every conversation I've
Dave,
I'll sign too. (And I like the 98th percentile measure for each direction to
give a single number that represents what's happening. It could include ping
loss rate, as well...)
But more importantly, an open letter would likely be more powerful than the
results I got from sending a note t
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 04:06:33PM -0400, Jim Gettys wrote:
>
> We need a volunteer to write an installation page for those demented enough
> to want to run CeroWrt in bridging mode, or at an alternate minimum, a page
> to explain to people why they really don't want to do that ;-).
Or someone to
My exterior router has now been up for 40 days; bug 442 seems well and
truly dead! I seldom survived more then 24 hours before 3.10.50.
I've started reconstituting my network empire, which had withered to a
single router to ensure I could reproduce 442 unambiguously and as quickly
as possible f
I use the ip "unreachable" mechanism to export a covering route for
babel in cerowrt, so I don't have to export all the /27s, just the
/24, to other routers. I am presently dumping that one line of code
into /etc/firewall.user
e.g.:
ip route add unreachable 172.30.42.0/24 proto static
and runnin
FWIW, I'll sign it.
--
Please excuse my brevity, this was sent from my Android.
On Sep 11, 2014 2:20 PM, "Maciej Soltysiak" wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> > If Verizon can petition the FCC to change the definition of
> > broadband... why can't we petition speedtes
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> If Verizon can petition the FCC to change the definition of
> broadband... why can't we petition speedtest to *change their test*?
> Switching to merely reporting the 98th percentile results for ping
> during an upload or download, instead of the
Two bits of potential inspiration for the morning:
Vint Cerf, "Bufferbloat and other Internet Challenges"
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6886125
and for a little bit of revolutionary fervour:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/eG8wZh7Qshs
On Wed, S
The theme of networks being "engineered for speedtest" has been a
common thread in nearly every conversation I've had with ISPs and
vendors using every base technology out there, be it dsl, cable,
ethernet, or fiber, for the last 4 years. Perhaps, in pursuing better
code, and RFCs, and the like, w
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:31 PM, wrote:
> I'm confused
>
>
>
> SFP is not SFP+. SFP carries at most 4.25 Gb/sec. SFP+ works at >10
> Gb/sec. So, it's not clear that the MikroTik is very useful in a 10 Gig
> world. It's not immediately clear but VERY likely, that this is an "edge
> swi
17 matches
Mail list logo
