Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: [homenet] Routing protocol comparison document

2015-03-02 Thread Dave Taht
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > Dave Taht writes: > >> Any objections here? > > Yes! I certainly wouldn't want to run that. Not a problem. You are fortunate enough to have stable ipv6 addresses where you are - and me, I have to go bat-s**t crazy everytime I get r

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: [homenet] Routing protocol comparison document

2015-03-02 Thread Aaron Wood
I would definitely be interested in being involved with how to secure and firewall, but still provide access to, internal IPv6 hosts. Ie, the internet the way it's supposed to work (peer to peer), but with the security that we've inadvertently picked up along the way by using NAT everywhere for th

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: [homenet] Routing protocol comparison document

2015-03-02 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Dave Taht writes: > Any objections here? Yes! I certainly wouldn't want to run that. > Suggestions for how to make one of the ipv6 translation techniques > work right? Turn them off? ;) -Toke ___ Cerowrt-devel mailing list Cerowrt-devel@lists.buffer