Sweet! Thanks for the tip!
On 8/3/06, Paul Ihrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> man.
> so much nicer the my 19" tube monitor.
> looks a bit bigger
>
> 109 bucks after 120 rebate.
> took 1 day free shipping after i paded total sale to 250..
> http://www.pcconnection.com/ProductDetail?SKU=6732798&Sou
Right, but I'm not talking about the whole Arab/Israel conflict. I'm talking
about Lebanon and Lebanon alone. Just as with this war, Israel went into
Lebanon the first time because they were being attacked from there. If that
was clearly stated, then the story takes on a slightly different light
> Dino wrote:
> Note how they dance around the reason Israel had to go into Lebanon in the
> first place.
Well there was a link that covered that too, but I think they were
trying to modern. But you're right. And you're right about Hezbollah
- they should be crushed.
That does, however, remind
Note how they dance around the reason Israel had to go into Lebanon in the
first place. If they actually did go into it they may stumble upon an
attempt by the PLO to take over Jordan which resulted in a true massacre
(they fled to Lebanon). They may stumble upon the PLO taking control of
parts
Why Hezbollah Is Proving So Tough On the Battlefield
Group Weds Sophistication With Martyrdom Ethos; Armed by Iran and Syria
Donkeys and Drone Planes
By KARBY LEGGETT in Jerusalem and JAY SOLOMON in Beirut, Lebanon
WALL STREET JOURNAL
August 3, 2006; Page A1
As Israel ended its 18-year occupation
> Nick wrote:
> The US Can't get involved here anyway. Even if we weren't in Iraq
Yeah, that's probabaly true, but I'm trying to address the 2 hawkish
audiences that seem to be out there:
1.) Those that think a military solution is the right one - but the
way Israel is doing it is wrong, and
2.)
Are there errors when it does not work on the public server.
Is the cfide directory moved or removed on the public server, a common
situation? The CFForm functions require a portion of the CFIDE directory to do
their magic.
--
Ian Skinner
Web Programmer
BloodSource
www.BloodSource
The US Can't get involved here anyway. Even if we weren't in Iraq, if we put
troops in we would lose support from the moderate Arab nations. Of course
moderate arab nation is an oxymoron.
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 8/3/2006 7:23 PM
To:
> Sam wrote:
> Yeah I know everyone hates Rush, but this is a must read.
>
For what? To hear, "Israel is under attack and must repel the
attackers!" Duh. The problem with this emotional hooey is that gets
nothing accomplished.
Or ... maybe it's just another example of why Rush sucks. Not only
> Sam wrote:
> All the right moves? You're an asshole. Do you cheer for Bin Laden too?
>
I'm not cheering for him, but I'm not underestimating him either.
Pretending things were different while facts on the ground say
otherwise is as dumb as ... well ... Bush's Iraq strategy. Wait ...
nothing's t
Yeah I know everyone hates Rush, but this is a must read.
RUSH: All right. Some observers in the United States are sensing a new
Israel here: less willing to commit to total victory as in the past,
on the basis of the way the current conflict with the Hezbollah
group's being waged. Is that true?
No you don't get it. Hezbollah should be allowed to attack Israel, cause
you know, stuff.
> -Original Message-
> From: Cameron Childress [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 6:35 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Lebanon: 900 Dead; 1,000,000 Displaced
>
> On 8/3/
On 8/3/06, Gruss Gott wrote:
> That's what I thought. You have no alternative set of fact, just an
> obfuscation of the ones I presented. As for the "hiding" part, yeah,
> you're right, he's smart.
Did you put your hands over your eyes and say lalalalalala while
reading my response?
> From his
On 8/3/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> More than 1 million people, a quarter of Lebanon's population, have
> been displaced, he said, adding that the fighting "is taking an
> enormous toll on human life and infrastructure, and has totally
> ravaged our country and shattered our economy.
dding that the fighting "is taking an
enormous toll on human life and infrastructure, and has totally
ravaged our country and shattered our economy."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060803/ap_on_re_mi_ea/lebanon_israel
~|
After Hillary pounded Rummy today he said, "This struggle against
violent extremism ... will go on for a long time."
So, no "War on Terror" anymore ... the Pentagon is back to "The Global
Struggle Against Violent Extremism." GSAVE. Sometime you have to
stick with the classics.
~
> Sam wrote:
> He's still in hiding.
That's what I thought. You have no alternative set of fact, just an
obfuscation of the ones I presented. As for the "hiding" part, yeah,
you're right, he's smart.
>From his hiding place he's running an effective war against Israel,
commanding his troops, put
i'll have to get back to you on this one... i'll need to check it at work.
-matt
- Original Message -
From: "Dana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community"
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 3:33 PM
Subject: matthew - quick Active Directory question
> If you know -- a domain joining a for
man.
so much nicer the my 19" tube monitor.
looks a bit bigger
109 bucks after 120 rebate.
took 1 day free shipping after i paded total sale to 250..
http://www.pcconnection.com/ProductDetail?SKU=6732798&SourceID=k1971&CustomerMemberID=sduid65229pt299171
deal found on slickdeals.net
~~~
On 8/3/06, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> 1.) The last 2 days have been the deadliest for Israel and the most
> prolific for Hezbollah. And that's after 2-1/2 weeks of aerial
> bombing.
You can't judge a wars progress by an individual battle.
> 2.) Nasrallah is blatantly threatening Tel Aviv ... IN THE
You're stretching too far for me to even bother trying figure it out.
On 8/3/06, Dana wrote:
> you just did say that!
>
> "He found a way to justify
> their reason to kill Jews."
>
> Dana
>
> >
> > WTF?
> > How the hell did you get me saying that?
> >
> > On 8/3/06, Dana wrote:
> > > Right but wha
> Sam wrote:
> Israel is losing in your mind because you're buying the propaganda.
I'm not buying any propaganda I'm looking at a few key facts:
1.) The last 2 days have been the deadliest for Israel and the most
prolific for Hezbollah. And that's after 2-1/2 weeks of aerial
bombing.
2.) Nasra
Ah. I actually also think Gel is out of line. But again, I cant... do..
this .. right.. now...
except I keep having to open my email for stuff.
Dana
I was referring to Gel not you.
>
> Israel is losing in your mind because you're buying the propaganda.
> You're looking at the corpses that deve
you just did say that!
"He found a way to justify
their reason to kill Jews."
Dana
On 8/3/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> WTF?
> How the hell did you get me saying that?
>
> On 8/3/06, Dana wrote:
> > Right but what you are saying is more specific and more granular than
> what
> > Sam wan
So what does the anti-war crowd think will stop all the fighting?
On 8/3/06, Nick McClure wrote:
> Group hug with people that support Suicide Bombers?
>
> I don't think so.
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80
Doing a basic cfform with validation. It works fine locally, but when I post
it to the public server the validation doesn't work at all. Any guess at
this issue?
thanks
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pag
On 8/3/06, Gruss Gott wrote:
> > Sam wrote:
> > He found a way to justify
> > their reason to kill Jews.
> >
>
> That's about the most melodramatic hogwash I've heard in a long while
> like I said ... you need a show.
I was referring to Gel not you.
Israel is losing in your mind because you
> gMoney wrote:
> Pull our troops out, let em fight it out, then tell whomever wins they
> either play ball with the US, or we go right back in and start up another
> war.
>
Sounds like a version of the Murtha Strategy. It's pretty shitty,
though, to think we started all of this.
~~~
> Sam wrote:
> He found a way to justify
> their reason to kill Jews.
>
That's about the most melodramatic hogwash I've heard in a long while
like I said ... you need a show.
Back to reality. I'm not justifying killing Jews. I'm saying there's
a smart way to fight and a dumb way - and "the
Group hug with people that support Suicide Bombers?
I don't think so.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 4:40 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Hezbollah Blames Bush, Threatens Tel Aviv
>
> Group hug?
>
> On 8/3/06, Nick McClu
I'm still waiting for a source on the 1000 innocent civilian thing.
_
From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, I see all you are really looking for is your excuse for the
murder of 1000 innocent civilians, women and children included.
~
Gel, sometimes you really are a dick.
Your condescending attitude, and ability to put stuff into people's
mouths they never said is sometimes frickin amazing.
I am very aware of the civil war Lebanon went through. I lost a few
neighbors and neighbors family in that "civil" fighting. I was brought
Group hug?
On 8/3/06, Nick McClure wrote:
> But when all sides won't surrender, then what?
>
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, deliver
WTF?
How the hell did you get me saying that?
On 8/3/06, Dana wrote:
> Right but what you are saying is more specific and more granular than what
> Sam wants to make it. He is trying to portray that as "it's all the jews,
> they start all the wars."
>
~
> Dana wrote:
> > He is just pointing out that they may feel somewhat threatened. I would
> if
> > someone were bombing my town. At no point did he "blame the jews."
If you lived in a suburb where illegal aliens were shooting rockets
into Albuquerque, because they don't think Americans have a righ
ok on that note I am outta here.
On 8/3/06, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In a democracy, how do you prevent a party from taking part in elections?
>
> If a militant arm of the Democratic party attacked Canada, and the
> country of the United States was too weak to reign them in...then you
> Nick wrote:
> So, what was the smart way?
>
The same time tested method that's worked for 4000 years of war. You
line up your allies and divide your enemies by physically,
politically, and diplomatically isolating them. Those in the middle
you force to your side of things via mutual benefit.
But when all sides won't surrender, then what?
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 4:28 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Hezbollah Blames Bush, Threatens Tel Aviv
>
> Nobody said die. I everyone surrenders there will be no war a
In a democracy, how do you prevent a party from taking part in elections?
If a militant arm of the Democratic party attacked Canada, and the
country of the United States was too weak to reign them in...then you
would have the US entering a civil war.
North and South.
Hezbollah against the governm
Nobody said die. I everyone surrenders there will be no war and we'll
have peace on earth.
On 8/3/06, Nick McClure wrote:
> Hmm, so die is the smart thing?
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hi
k thanks cheap at the price if it will keep me from choking the living shit
out of some self-satisfied bastard that desperately needs it ;)
and yes, I am joking.
On 8/3/06, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I got mine from Best Buy.but I think they were $30. That was like 2
> yea
Right but what you are saying is more specific and more granular than what
Sam wants to make it. He is trying to portray that as "it's all the jews,
they start all the wars."
On 8/3/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dana wrote:
> > He is just pointing out that they may feel somewhat th
Hmm, so die is the smart thing?
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 4:23 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Hezbollah Blames Bush, Threatens Tel Aviv
>
> Surrender
>
> On 8/3/06, Nick McClure wrote:
> > So, what was the smart way
Surrender
On 8/3/06, Nick McClure wrote:
> So, what was the smart way?
>
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four
So, what was the smart way?
> -Original Message-
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "The Jews" approached this whole thing in the dumbest manner possible.
> Sure they need to get rid of Hezbollah, but there's the stupid way
> and the smart way.
~~
I got mine from Best Buy.but I think they were $30. That was like 2
years ago tho.
Dana wrote:
> is there a bricks and mortar place to buy them? Like I dunno radio chack or
> CompUSA?
>
> On 8/3/06, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dana, spend the $20 bucks for the buds, you won'
Dana wrote:
> He is just pointing out that they may feel somewhat threatened. I would if
> someone were bombing my town. At no point did he "blame the jews."
"The Jews" approached this whole thing in the dumbest manner possible.
Sure they need to get rid of Hezbollah, but there's the stupid way
a
those look interesting. Won't stop me from smacking the dude who insists on
discussing his sex life on a cell phone at the wi-fi coffeehouse though
coffee now there's an idea
Dana
On 8/3/06, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've been thinking about getting a pair of wireless headph
seems to work much better on broadband. I suppose that's a duh...
--
"People seem not to see that their opinion of the world is also a confession
of their character." - Ralph Waldo Emerson
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Qu
is there a bricks and mortar place to buy them? Like I dunno radio chack or
CompUSA?
On 8/3/06, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dana, spend the $20 bucks for the buds, you won't disappointed. Less of
> an ear-bud and more of a true headphone without the extra plastic. They
> actually
> gMoney wrote:
> Brainwashed future-corpses.
>
> Phukk that whole area.
>
YEAH! Wipe out Oklahoma too! There's terrorists there! BOMB
OKLAHOMA TO RUBBLE! Brainwashed Okies are prolly all terrorists
anyway ...
~|
Introducing
Depends on if you want to stop this battle or all of them.
I don't think you can do both, in a couple years it will happen again.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 3:56 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Hezbollah Blames Bush,
I've been thinking about getting a pair of wireless headphone. I got a pair
for my wife a little while ago and she loves them. You can get decent deals
for them on eCost or on eBay. Prices vary widely. I think I got her a pair
of Sony 900Mhz wireless. Take a look at the options here:
*http://tinyu
Dana, spend the $20 bucks for the buds, you won't disappointed. Less of
an ear-bud and more of a true headphone without the extra plastic. They
actually create a nice "seal" around your ear canal and cancel out
almost all noise, while making sure all the sound doesn't bleed out of
the edges.
the combattants always determine the coverage of war, at least lately. The
same issue has arisen in Iraq. I do however agree with your distinction --
they should try to keep everyone honest. Everyone.
On 8/3/06, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No, it's the job of the press to get to the
No, it's the job of the press to get to the truth, which means questioning
everyone. The press has admitted that they have staged news and allowed
Hezbollah to determine the coverage of events in Lebanon.
On 8/3/06, Gruss wrote:
>
> > Sam wrote:
> > Let me get this straight. If Israel or the US s
I didn't say it gave them a right to send missiles into Israel and I don't
think it does. But this does explain why people would cheer when they talk
of attacking Israel, which the people see as a threat to them.
As for your comments about war, well yeah and that is what we have got. The
question
My headphones just died. This really really really sucks as I use them as a
way of filtering out extraneous noise. Looking for recommendations as to
replacements -- this is the third set of this brand and at this point I have
to say that it probably isn't freak accidents or mihandling, they just do
Yeah, that is what I understand also. However that doesn't give them the
right to launch missiles into Israel. If Hezbollah is part of the
government, then Israel's actions are even more on target with what they
should be doing.
If this is the case, then Hezbollah, a arm of the government committe
that seems like a pretty good analogy, to my limited understanding. Also
sounds plausible as to Lebanon's rationale. And yes, it does seem that
Israel is trying to limit casualties, but as in Katrina there are people who
cannot get out. Or just don't. As far as I can tell it is also true that
Hezbo
Doesn't matter, they didn't even try, and why would they. They don't like
the existence of Israel either.
At a minimum they should be making statements against Hezbollah, and their
tactics. Where were those?
> -Original Message-
> From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, Au
Has Lebanon asked the international community for help reigning in
Hezbollah? Nope.
They welcomed Hezbollah into the government. Even before Hezbollah
disarmed (as all other militias in Lebanon did), they allowed them
into the elections and into the government (which was not supposed to
happen unt
Also, remember that Hezbollah is PART OF the Lebanese government, in
both national posts and regional governance.
It is exactly as if the Democratic party attacked Canada. The US would
be (and should be) help responsible. So should Lebanon.
The fact that they cannot or will not reign Hezbollah in
If you are running thin clients from an image on the server your server
processing and bandwidth requirements are the sum of what each client is
using? I guess?
--
"People seem not to see that their opinion of the world is also a confession
of their character." - Ralph Waldo Emerson
~~~
"At this point with over 1000 civilians dead and their country
destroyed..."
- your justification
"who wouldn't cheer for the destruction of Israel?"
- for the destruction of.
On 8/3/06, Vivec wrote:
> How in the heck does that justify the destruction of Israel?
> *smirk*
>
> Is this more of the
Well based on what I was reading this morning they ARE Lebanon, kinda.
Southern Lebanon at least. So it isn't like "the government" can fix this.
Hezbollah has won elections. Which is even scarier, but there you are. May
as well be worried about reality if you are going to worry at all.
Dana
On 8
A government that has been in existence for just over a year?
A country that was only just pulling out of civil war and finding it's feet?
Please.
What did the International Community do to help them fend off
Hezbollah and strengthen their forces? Not a damned thing that's what.
On 8/3/06, Nick Mc
so why participate? why get all upset? why not just say ok kids, we admit we
don't understand jack shit about the area and get the hell out?
you know as well as I do what the answer is. Answers I suppose.
On 8/3/06, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Who even cares about with or against anymo
If you know -- a domain joining a forest has a bunch of legacy equipment.
Windows 98 clients in particular. I see where w95 is unsupported, what about
98?
would any of the above change if the thinking were to do a realm trust with
a Red Hat server? I am wondering if the neat little trick with the
If Lebanon does nothing to stop Hezbollah then aren't they guilty as well?
I'm not saying equally guilty, but isn't the government supposed to keep its
people from launching attacks on other countries?
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 03
Who even cares about with or against anymore? There is no "us"...there's
just hatred. It's hard to keep track of who hates who anymore, or why...so
why even bother justifying it? Kill, be killed. la-dee-dah.
On 8/3/06, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> yep you're either with us or you're against
How in the heck does that justify the destruction of Israel?
*smirk*
Is this more of the New American Way as popularised by the Republican Party:
Agree 100% or You Are The Enemy?
*chuckle*
I never justified, nor did I seek to justify, the destruction of
Israel. Please stop ascribing such nonsense
It must be.
He is just pointing out that they may feel somewhat threatened. I would if
someone were bombing my town. At no point did he "blame the jews." You can
question Israels' strategy without being Mel Gibson. You can think the US is
on the wrong track without being al-Qaeda.
I really don't
yep you're either with us or you're against us.
On 8/3/06, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There are no civilians, not anymore...and no one is innocent.
>
> On 8/3/06, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > At this point with over 1000 civilians dead and their country
> > destroyed who wo
BULLSHIT
Radical fundamentalism, insitutionalized brainwashing, and decades of
ingrained hatred has turned Lebanon into the Country of Hezbollah. But if
makes you feel better to blame the jews, you go right ahead.
is this Bigoted Asshole day and i just missed the memo?
On 8/3/06, Gruss Gott <[EM
Have any of you looked at the current issue of Time? According to the
stories there, it's the Boy Scouts, the welfare department and the army all
rolled into one.
On 8/3/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Gel wrote:
> > At this point with over 1000 civilians dead and their country
> >
There are no civilians, not anymore...and no one is innocent.
On 8/3/06, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At this point with over 1000 civilians dead and their country
> destroyed who wouldn't cheer for the destruction of Israel?
>
> On 8/3/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > BTW
Where are those civilian numbers from?
> -Original Message-
> From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 3:11 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Hezbollah Blames Bush, Threatens Tel Aviv
>
> At this point with over 1000 civilians dead and their country
> des
You found a way to justify the destruction of Israel.
Do you feel good?
On 8/3/06, Vivec wrote:
> At this point with over 1000 civilians dead and their country
> destroyed who wouldn't cheer for the destruction of Israel?
>
~|
In
So let em do it.
Pull our troops out, let em fight it out, then tell whomever wins they
either play ball with the US, or we go right back in and start up another
war.
It's time we started playing chess with OTHER people's pawns.
On 8/3/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> US Gen. Ab
Brainwashed future-corpses.
Phukk that whole area.
On 8/3/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Gruss wrote:
> > UNITED NATIONS - Hezbollah's leader threatened in a taped speech aired
> > on television Thursday to fire rockets at Tel Aviv if Beirut proper is
> > attacked.
> >
>
> BTW -
> Gel wrote:
> At this point with over 1000 civilians dead and their country
> destroyed who wouldn't cheer for the destruction of Israel?
>
Harsh! But, yeah, come to think of it the Average Joe probabaly ARE
Hezbollah. Basically Israel may have turned Lebanon into The Country
Of Hezzbollah.
~~
At this point with over 1000 civilians dead and their country
destroyed who wouldn't cheer for the destruction of Israel?
On 8/3/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> BTW - An NBC news correspondant in Beirut that was watching the speech
> live with various passersby said that when Nasrall
> Gruss wrote:
> UNITED NATIONS - Hezbollah's leader threatened in a taped speech aired
> on television Thursday to fire rockets at Tel Aviv if Beirut proper is
> attacked.
>
BTW - An NBC news correspondant in Beirut that was watching the speech
live with various passersby said that when Nasrallah
US Gen. Abizaid says civil war possible in Iraq
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The head of the U.S. Central Command on
Thursday said sectarian violence in Baghdad was as bad as he has ever
seen and could lead to a civil war.
"Sectarian violence probably is as bad as I've seen it, in Baghdad in
particular
UNITED NATIONS - Hezbollah's leader threatened in a taped speech aired
on television Thursday to fire rockets at Tel Aviv if Beirut proper is
attacked.
Sheik Hassan Nasrallah said Hezbollah would stop firing rockets on
Israeli cities only if Israel stops attacks on Lebanese towns.
Nasrallah said
> Sam wrote:
> Let me get this straight. If Israel or the US says they killed a
> terrorist, it's the job of the press to report that they're lying and
> these terrorists were really civilians?
No, it's the job of the press to make sure the dead person was a
terrorist. In short, to question the g
Let me get this straight. If Israel or the US says they killed a
terrorist, it's the job of the press to report that they're lying and
these terrorists were really civilians? Now if a terrorist
organization stages a murder scene the press has a responsibility to
report it as truth, because they're
> RoMunn wrote:
> good article. nice to see the Hezbollah media operation exposed.
>
I guess I have trouble finding anything of value here. It might be
easy to look at this and say, "the media hates Israel!", but really I
think much of it is a consequence of the fact that people are
skeptical of
> Ian wrote:
> That's a bit black or white isn't it? Couldn't it be the second or third to
> last gasp?
>
yeah, it is, but less so is the concept of goals and measures. If the
goal is a diminution of Hezbollah's military ability, then the
measures should be something like:
1.) Troop levels
2.)
When I first heard Israel say they had "greatly harmed" hezbollah, I
actually assumed it was a tactic to make the terrorists angry, and in
their desire to prove they were still around, maybe make a few
mistakes and not hide so well.
On 8/3/06, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Either this i
Either this is a last gasp or Israel's attacks have done nothing to compromise
Hezbollah's military ability and, in fact, have encouraged an increase in
activity.
That's a bit black or white isn't it? Couldn't it be the second or third to
last gasp?
--
Ian Skinner
Web Programmer
If you are going to buy books on line I would recommend getting them through
Amazon via the link on HOF. That way HOF gets a small percentage of your
purchase. You still get your books. It probably won't cost you any more than
buying them elsewhere and you are supporting the HOF community. Ever
"There's a media war against Israel"
Isn't this a truism?
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four
times a year.
> RoMunn wrote:
> However, there is no question that Hezbollah's capabilities have been
> seriously compromised.
But isn't it contradictory to say that Hezbollah's "capabilities have
been seriously compromised" and also say you're not sure if this is a
last gasp? Either this is a last gasp or Isr
Why don't you check out books online to see which ones you like best. 14
days free I believe!
http://safari.informit.com/
Casey
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusi
Because of the new job I have persuaded my wife that I need to buy some books.
Right now on mt list for the next several months are:
Dynamic HTML: The Definitive Reference, Second Edition
Code Complete, Second Edition
Rapid Development: Taming Wild Software Schedules
ColdFusion MX Bible
I need
> gMoney wrote:
> The one that's been bugging me lately is a spoken one, and it's amazingly
> common: Putting "me" before another person when beginning a sentence...such
> as "Me and Tom went fishing"
>
Especially because it's easy to remember: you wouldn't say, "me went
fishing" you'd say, "I
The one that's been bugging me lately is a spoken one, and it's amazingly
common: Putting "me" before another person when beginning a sentence...such
as "Me and Tom went fishing"
On 8/2/06, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ugh. Fundamental mistakes. I especially hate made-up words, e
I don't think he is claiming there is one, just that too much cooperation
with grand juries makes it hard to get any. Which is true.
On 8/3/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What source is being protected here? This is footage of an act that
> occurred in public.
>
> > -Original
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
