> Dana wrote:
> if that is true then it is another example of the man's mastery of
> deniability.
Yup. I don't have time to search but here's a few of my favorite
quotes on cost:
http://www.house.gov/schakowsky/iraqquotes_web.htm
Here's one from Rummy:
"Well, the Office of Management and Budget,
Satellite background on a flight simulator
http://www.isoma.net/games/GogglesBeta09.swf
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to
thank you. I had forgotten Samba.
On 8/7/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Correct, however, back in the NT4 days prior to group policy, you could
> join
> a linux server to a domain via Samba, however back then the only things
> you
> authenticated on were file shares and printers.
what we don't know is how much of Lamont's victory is due to such people. If
it's true that Lamont's campaign has been doing that, it's just as repugnant
as the Republican's purported use of YouTube. Though hardly new.
I primarily agree with the proposition that Democrats are entitled to vote
the
if that is true then it is another example of the man's mastery of
deniability. As I recall -- and I can't specifically put this in Bush's
mouth, no -- the entire paradigm of the time was quick in, quick out, and
the oil revenues will pay for it all. In fact, at one point they were saying
they woul
as previously noted:
some countries have governments that know a clusterfuck when they see one.
On 8/9/06, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> and now they are even chickening out on that duty
>
> On 8/8/06, Gruss wrote:
> >
> > > RoMunn wrote:
> > > put a huge amount of troops in Baghdad
and how's that working out for us?
sorry, I had to...
Dana
On 8/8/06, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You have no ideas, just complaints. Gotta love the Libertarians!
>
> As much as the US would love to see all the world's dictators give up
> their
> evil totalitarian ways, we
Her house is on my way home kinda. I'll check it out tonight if she is home.
Thanks for feeling my pain, lol.
On 8/9/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I know what you are talking about as far as the Data Fork is concerned.
> A standard CD won't cause a problem. Download the file, and
I know what you are talking about as far as the Data Fork is concerned.
A standard CD won't cause a problem. Download the file, and burn it to a
CD and then copy it over and run the installer.
Basically you could transfer files around, but the Mac stored meta data
used by the OS in a separate hidd
yum, opera's site says that v.5 will work but the lowest the downloads page
goes is 6. It looks like it really is netscape or nuthin...
On 8/9/06, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> nope, was rather boggled that she was really right about what was
> happening and hadn't slept for a couple of day
nope, was rather boggled that she was really right about what was happening
and hadn't slept for a couple of days when I was over there. I can take a
look for that the next time I go back. I'll try the netscape version though,
thanks. Do you remember the thing I am talking about with the data fork?
Hehe, I downloaded it, the data doesn't link back to individuals, and is
really exactly what you'd expect.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 7:13 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Classic F#$% up in America Online!
>
> that i
If it is OS 8 then she is basically hosed.
IIRC that is roughly the equivalent of win95, un supported, and
unusable.
Firefox and Safari will only run on OSX. IE for the Mac is unusable; MS
hasn't supported it in years. Looks like there is a version of Netscape,
still fairly old, but will run on O
I guess I don't see the issue. No, no news photo should be doctored. Not if
it calls itself a news photo. But if it doesn't materially change the
story... what's the point and why the outcry?
On 8/7/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So, so far, this has received fairly extensive cov
where's your sense of humour, man ;) I guess it's something that you don't
like the way she says it, as it's the overwhelming malice I can't stand,
with her and with Rush too. Of course, I don't agree with most of what they
say either. Wait... outside of the malice, do they in fact say anything?
O
that is truly... AOL. I want to say that anyone that is still using them
deserves what they get, but of course the people who are still using them
don't know any better. So even MORE care should have been taken.
On 8/8/06, Casey Dougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just as AOL starts releasing
addendum to this, can't find a safari download earlier than X either
On 8/9/06, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A friend of mine has been telling me how much trouble she is having
> getting on the web and/or getting email I finally rolled my eyes and
> went over to her house and began
A friend of mine has been telling me how much trouble she is having getting
on the web and/or getting email I finally rolled my eyes and went over
to her house and began to see her point as I tried to sign her up for gmail
and did not get past the authentication page, then hotmail only to find
ok, I realize that you guys have already been at this for a couple of days,
but how reliable is the blog, first of all?
On 8/9/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For those who say that investigative reporting takes a lot of time and
> money, just look what amateurs in the blogosph
> Gruss wrote:
> > That's a good point, but I'll still ask where the fault is. There are
> > a few candidates:
> >
> > (1.) The photographer. Here are possible motives:
> > 1.1) I'm too scared to go where the action is but I need product ...
> > 1.2) I need something big to make the nex
> Gruss wrote:
> That's a good point, but I'll still ask where the fault is. There are
> a few candidates:
>
> (1.) The photographer. Here are possible motives:
> 1.1) I'm too scared to go where the action is but I need product ...
> 1.2) I need something big to make the next career st
> RoMunn wrote:
> The photo and the accompanying caption attempt to appeal to the
> gut emotions of the viewer and convince them emotionally that Hezbollah is
> fighting a just war of defense against Israeli aggression.
>
That's a good point, but I'll still ask where the fault is. There are
a few
Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
> Got 'em from total training.
>
> http://www.totaltraining.com/prod/web/flex2_ria.asp?mscsid=
>
> $149.99
My coworker found a coupon somewhere and edned up paying $110
He's pretty happy with the DVDs.
Rick
~
you could just put up a few streams?
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four
times a year.
http://www.fusionauth
I'd like to hear your reviews on them, when you get around to it.
Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
> Got 'em from total training.
>
> http://www.totaltraining.com/prod/web/flex2_ria.asp?mscsid=
>
> $149.99
>
> Got the company to pay for it :)
>
>
> On 8/9/06, Crow T. Robot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Got 'em from total training.
http://www.totaltraining.com/prod/web/flex2_ria.asp?mscsid=
$149.99
Got the company to pay for it :)
On 8/9/06, Crow T. Robot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zeb, where are these DVD's? Free or ???
>
> Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
> > review to follow in.errr8 ho
How much did those things run you?
Man, I have to give it Adobe; they know how to really launch a product. The
amount of documentation and training material out there already for flex is
incredible.
> -Original Message-
> From: Zaphod Beeblebrox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesda
Zeb, where are these DVD's? Free or ???
Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
> review to follow in.errr8 hours or so.
>
>
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion inform
review to follow in.errr8 hours or so.
--
Soy un perdedor
I'm a loser baby, so why don't you kill me?
Get crazy with the cheese whiz!
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to
So.. is AT&T having problems this afternoon?
Trace routes look like swiss cheese.
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your
It's not my logicit's the logic of "the people". You speak as if the
American public is rational...it aint.
On 8/9/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > gMoney wrote:
> > But for every 2 that get caught, the concern is "how many more get
> through
> > undetected?"
> >
>
> Well, if we
13th longest home run in Royals Stadium history they saynot bad.
Could celebrate the Yankees loss a little more if it wasn't the Shite Sox
that beat them
Football season cannot get here fast enough! Chiefs have the potential to be
good...very good. Though the loss of Roaf and T-Rich could
bs. Look at the photo and the caption and take it in the context of the
gallery it was a part of on nytimes.com. The photog and the editor, and by
extension the publisher, are trying to tell a story about what is happening
in Lebanon. The photo and the accompanying caption attempt to appeal to the
I see major conspiracy here.
You asked are they killing innocents, how do we know they are innocents? At
worst they are part of the support structure for Hezbollah, and at best they
are allowing these terrorists to operate in their communities. They know
who the terrorists are, they know where t
heh heh. I jinxed 'em yesterday with my sweep talk. For some reason,
KC has really been a thorn in our side the past two years. The wins are
not as mighty as the matchup might make one think, only a one or two run
difference when they do win.
s'all good though, the Bronx (1/4)Billionaires lo
That's simply not true. I distinctly remember Mr. Bush stating that the war
would be a long, drawn out process beforehand. And I don't support the war.
- Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Gruss Gott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community"
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 10:37 AM
Subj
Ah, the beauty of capitalism. And the reason why we DON'T need the gov't.
-
Made in USA? Now, Customers Get to Choose
By CHRISTOPHER CONKEY
August 9, 2006; Page B1
WALL STREET JOURNAL
In the beginning, there was "Made i
> gMoney wrote:
> But for every 2 that get caught, the concern is "how many more get through
> undetected?"
>
Well, if we use your logic, let's define "the media" and then ask how
many they get right vs. wrong. My contention is the percentage of
intentional fraud would be minuscule and the percen
Sorry about that Ray...dunno what got into my boys last night. When we
brought our "closer" into the game in the 9th, with Ortiz due up third, I
was pretty sure everything would be set right.
Not sure what happened. We'll make it up to you tonight, promise.
~~
But for every 2 that get caught, the concern is "how many more get through
undetected?"
Does the appearance of a couple of doctored photos render the entire media
blameful? No. But do they go a long way in hurting the credibilty of ALL
media with the public? Absolutely.
On 8/9/06, Gruss Gott <[E
> Dino wrote:
> For those who say that investigative reporting takes a lot of time and money,
> just look what amateurs in the blogosphere can find if they just look.
I'd point out that we have no idea what the photo shows - it's
certainly no proof of staging. The guy could've been screwing arou
> tBone wrote:
> You and I must have been reading different material, because I remember a
> lot of "stay the course" and "long term war on terror" stuff being said back
> then.
>
That was AFTER we invaded. Before it was going to be a piece of cake;
Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Cheney. They were on all
Does anyone know of any good articles that give an overview of each of the
coldfusion frameworks with the strengths and weaknesses of each? I really
want to dive in and start using a framework but I am not sure which one to go
with.
Thanks!
Randy
You and I must have been reading different material, because I remember a
lot of "stay the course" and "long term war on terror" stuff being said back
then.
> -Original Message-
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 8:10 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Sub
This is getting out of hand.
On 8/9/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For those who say that investigative reporting takes a lot of time and
> money, just look what amateurs in the blogosphere can find if they just
> look.
>
> http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2006/08/new-york-ti
> RoMunn wrote:
> and now they are even chickening out on that duty
>
Well I dunno about that, but the implication in your statement is that
Lebanon is light duty. I know if I had to pick between getting rid of
Hussein in Iraq or Hezbollah in Lebanon, it'd be Hussein by a long
shot. Iraq is defi
and now they are even chickening out on that duty
On 8/8/06, Gruss wrote:
>
> > RoMunn wrote:
> > put a huge amount of troops in Baghdad on top of our current force level
> in
> > the country.
> >
>
> That's what France is for! At least that's our story when it's Lebanon
> ...
>
--
Classic. Message to the media: you can try to hide the truth, but the
bloggers will find it.
On 8/9/06, Michael wrote:
>
> For those who say that investigative reporting takes a lot of time and
> money, just look what amateurs in the blogosphere can find if they just
> look.
>
> http://gatewaypund
For those who say that investigative reporting takes a lot of time and money,
just look what amateurs in the blogosphere can find if they just look.
http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2006/08/new-york-times-busted-in-hezbollah.html
The NYTimes put this series of pictures up and either they are tot
49 matches
Mail list logo
