> RoMunn wrote:
> Al Qaeda wants to set up a global caliphate from Spain to Indonesia. And
> does anyone really think they'll stop there? They seek global domination.
>
Good thing for them that the US invaded Iraq! Until then most Arabs
thought they were psychos, but now they celebrate Bin Laden
> RoMunn wrote:
> Have they made progress? I think they have. Judge for yourself.
>
Nope. The average Iraqi agrees with 100,000 dying a month.
~|
Create robust enterprise, web RIAs.
Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with
> Nick wrote:
> Should Iraq or any other country stop pumping oil, they would only harm
> themselves
>
You assume that they would act as you do: rationally. Bin Laden,
however, is not rational to your way of thinking. He's a millionaire
that's always been perfectly happy living in caves as long
Iraq four years ago was a murderous dictatorship on the verge of wriggling
its way out of sanctions, when they could re-start their nuclear program.
Iraq today is a democracy divided, with a capital city and environs in the
midst of a geographically limited civil war.
Have they made progress? I t
Al Qaeda wants to set up a global caliphate from Spain to Indonesia. And
does anyone really think they'll stop there? They seek global domination.
On 1/13/07, Gruss wrote:
>
> > RoMunn wrote:
> > just as 9/11 was the declaration by Al Qaeda that the forces of global
> > jihadism view us as their
I ceased a long time ago to care about the original reasons given for the
invasion. I have always been in favor of the idea of overthrowing some
dictators and giving freedom a chance. Glad to see you favor the dictators.
On 1/13/07, Dana wrote:
>
> see, that's the comic book version,
>
> We are t
Congratulations :)
~|
Create robust enterprise, web RIAs.
Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU
Archi
em and i were just glad to see that your little wanker actually worked.
good stuff.
:) love ya kid! and mucho, Majore, GRANDE!!! congrats...
uncle t
On 1/14/07, Mike Tangorre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just realized I never shared the good news with everyone here, sorry
> about
> that!
>
I just realized I never shared the good news with everyone here, sorry about
that!
http://www.cfcoder.com/blog/index.cfm/2007/1/3/Baby-on-the-way
Just when you thought you heard it all! :-)
~|
Create robust enterprise, web
> From: Cameron Childress [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 62 and sunny. had to take out a light jacket today...
62 is like summer for me! It's 62 here in Rockville and I am sporting the
shorts and t-shirt! :-)
~|
Create robust en
Hell, I'd still have to be at work after that. We had one of those a
couple years ago, didn't even cancel classes at UK.
Of course I don't have to go to work tomorrow because of MLK Jr. Day
> -Original Message-
> From: Zaphod Beeblebrox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, January 14
Our dog (Herbie) has been sick for over a month now. He was in the hospital
for a week and has been slowly recovering. He is on a slew of medications,
most of which he is almost done taking. A couple of the medications give him
the runs... no fun for anyone. When we take him out to do his business
62 and sunny. had to take out a light jacket today...
On 1/14/07, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so, we've been having an ice rain for about 24 hours now. The power
> just went out at 3:00, it's frigid outside. I swear I heard a
> transformer blow right before the power went out
I don't think Rice is inarticulate, but she is having a hard time selling a
lie that it doesn't sound like she believes.
It all depends on what your definition of "escalation" is.
I just love the fact that this administration berated Clinton for his
parsing of he English language, when in fact eh
But all of that assumes that those countries would in some way stop
wanting to make boat loads of money by selling oil to the highest
bidder.
Should Iraq or any other country stop pumping oil, they would only harm
themselves
> -Original Message-
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
so, we've been having an ice rain for about 24 hours now. The power
just went out at 3:00, it's frigid outside. I swear I heard a
transformer blow right before the power went out. It's just about
dark and my only connection to the internet is using my cell phone as
dial-up networking.
Well, at
Sen. Chuck Hagel on Iraq:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=3wlMxxyKztw
And Sec Rice's rambling attempt and defending the indefensible.
~|
Create robust enterprise, web RIAs.
Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2
http://
> Nick wrote:
> How? How in the world does us invading Iraq change anything with the
> Oil?
>
The TOP interest of the US (and, really, the World) is guaranteeing
it's energy supply. No oil, little oil, or an oil embargo would throw
not only the US economy into a tail spin but the world economy.
> Sam wrote:
> these enemies are going after the lands with the oil. Money is power.
>
* Bin Laden is a millionaire who lives in a cave. He doesn't care
about oil or money - he cares about Islam. To finish his life's goal,
he must eject the Saudi royal family from the penninsula and unite
Mecca
How? How in the world does us invading Iraq change anything with the
Oil?
Opec still exists, and will for some time. The oil is on an open market
where the price is determined by supply and demand.
> -Original Message-
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, January 1
On 1/14/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1.) It's the theory of Bush administration that I agree with.
> 2.) The US wants a centralized ME presence which, originally, was
> Saudi. Now it's Iraq.
> 3.) The US would respond from Iraqi bases if Saudi was attacked. No
> change. We protect
> Sam wrote:
> We were in Saudi Arabia because of Iraq. Wouldn't that have made Iraq
> Bin Laden's problem and not the US? Yet they were trying to work
> together to destroy the US. Now that Saddam Hussein is gone we're no
> longer in Saudi Arabia. Blows apart your whole theory.
>
1.) It's the the
> Nick wrote:
> The weapons was the reason for invasion,
Nope, oil was the reason. America doesn't give a crap about the
Middle East except for the oil.
~|
Create robust enterprise, web RIAs.
Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion
Three in reality, as most people seem to forget that we fought in northern
Africa.
- Original Message -
From: "William Bowen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community"
Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 10:56 PM
Subject: Re: 12% Support More Troops
>> Then why did we fight Germany and leave
Typically that analogy has nothing to do with the discussion. It's quit bizarre.
On 1/14/07, Mike Tangorre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Here's an analogy:
> > I want you out of your house so I wait until you can see me and then
> > egg it. You come
We were in Saudi Arabia because of Iraq. Wouldn't that have made Iraq
Bin Laden's problem and not the US? Yet they were trying to work
together to destroy the US. Now that Saddam Hussein is gone we're no
longer in Saudi Arabia. Blows apart your whole theory.
On 1/13/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTEC
We're aligned because the US found the oil and built the pipelines in
Saudi Arabia.
On 1/13/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nope, it's not fortunes per se, it's energy. The US allied itself
> with Saudi Arabia because the ME was close to Russia during the Cold
> War and the US was afr
Later != After
On 1/13/07, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Then why did we fight Germany and leave Japan for later?
>
> Do you have any understanding of how WWII was fought?
>
> Or were you just reading the Cliff Notes again?
>
> The war in the Pacific was not prosecuted *after* the w
Who knew better? The French and the Russians who stood to loose business
deals that went against the Sanctions? The same countries that gave us
intel stating that Iraq still had and was making the banned weapons.
The host of Democrats that voted in favor of it?
The weapons was the reason for inva
I don't think so, online forums only work for those who participate, and
actually read the posts, and can take along time to do so, just look at
this list as an example.
In the class room an instructor can call on students that aren't
actively participating in the current topic, and everybody hear
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Here's an analogy:
> I want you out of your house so I wait until you can see me and then
> egg it. You come out with 5 of your buddies to beat the crap out of
> me. I run across the street into the woods and kick over a massive bee
> hive. You foll
> From: Robert Munn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Had Iraqis never been able to hold elections or form a government, we
> would not still be in Iraq. But they did both- against a backdrop of
> brutal violence. Should we now abandon them when they have come so far?
Come so far? Are you serious? The
32 matches
Mail list logo
