Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread Dana
mostly? How do you figure that? I get 2423 soldiers for central and eastern europe, and I spotted you moldava at that, because I couldn't be bothered to look it up and find out where it is. It sounds like it might be in the balkans. You can add 1650 to that if you want to count the ukraine but the

Re: Cannonball Run!! WOOOO!

2007-11-18 Thread Judah McAuley
That's a hell of a run. Totaly absurd, unsafe and criminal, but a hell of a run. My family helps put on the Oregon Trail Rally ( http://www.oregontrailrally.com/) every year. I've been stage captain, emergency communications, medical support, all sorts of things. Its a different style rally but a

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread Robert Munn
You ought to actually talk to people from that part of the world about the collapse of communism and their release from Soviet tyranny. Sure they want to be friends with the big kids on the block, but in this case it is because the big kid is protecting them from the neighborhood thugs, not because

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread Robert Munn
I blame Rumsfeld and Paul Bremer, aka Tweedledee and Tweedledum, for the complete lack of a coherent strategy after the initial fighting was over. On Nov 18, 2007 9:38 PM, Zaphod wrote: > yeah, but our problems first started when the fighting stopped. We > pulled off a pretty much flawless takedo

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread Gruss Gott
> RoMunn wrote: > The Left in this country is totally invested in failure in Iraq. I am > going to laugh my ass off when things go well for the next year Then you are deluding yourself. The person that won the lottery is laughing at you for not playing; does his winning mean it's a good idea to p

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
you could view it that way.or maybe they could be trying to gain favor of the U.S. Isn't it always best to be the buddy of the biggest guy on the block? I see it more as a political move, but then again I'm jaded by our own politics here. On 11/18/07, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
yeah, but our problems first started when the fighting stopped. We pulled off a pretty much flawless takedown of the saddam government. We just didn't do our homework and figure out what to do next. I would think most books on warfare would have a chapter or two on that. On 11/18/07, Robert Mu

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread Robert Munn
On Nov 18, 2007 8:52 PM, Dana wrote: > Aren't you the one who was whining about all those people at the > UN who wanted the United States to do stuff? Like wait for the > inspectors to finish? I am merely correcting the patently false statements flying around here. The US was not alone or even c

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread Robert Munn
As every book on warfare will tell you, all plans go out the window once the actual fighting starts. On Nov 18, 2007 8:54 PM, Zaphod wrote: > I think I heard that same phrase in, oh, about 2003 when it was > attached to "When we find the wmd" > > Seriously though, there didn't seem to be a go

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread Robert Munn
Funny how the coalition was mostly made up of poor Central and Eastern European countries who the US freed from decades of Soviet tyrrany. I can't imagine why they would contribute troops. Maybe they actually appreciate what the US did for them. How could it be? Could there actually be someone in t

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread Dana
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multinational_force_in_Iraq On Nov 18, 2007 10:03 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Effectively the U.S. went in with major support from G.B, but it was a > coalition in name only. Lot's of other countries sent token forces. > I'll always be glad that

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
Effectively the U.S. went in with major support from G.B, but it was a coalition in name only. Lot's of other countries sent token forces. I'll always be glad that we were able to count on Iceland's 2 troops. Heck just look at afganistans troop deployment. There you'll see a true multi-national f

RE: Stovetop Espresso Machines anyone?

2007-11-18 Thread Steve Kahn
Been using them for years, definitely makes the best in home coffee. Recently bought a larger one, looked at all the commercial sites for a good deal. Not too surprising, the stove top makers are more of a chefs tool and haven't really caught on to general consumers. I ended up finding a brand new

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread Dana
more ad hominems. How about you address these: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/11/16/politics/animal/main3514622.shtml http://www.gulfnews.com/opinion/columns/region/10168589.html Try to do it with the facts. Dana On Nov 18, 2007 9:48 PM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Left

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
I think I heard that same phrase in, oh, about 2003 when it was attached to "When we find the wmd" Seriously though, there didn't seem to be a good strategy going in, is there any strategy for the future? Other than this troop surge, I don't feel that anything has been planned. On 11/18/07,

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread Dana
Aren't you the one who was whining about all those people at the UN who wanted the United States to do stuff? Like wait for the inspectors to finish? I almost didn't send that post because I knew it would turn into a personal attack, and you sure did not disappoint. I don't blame America for eve

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread Robert Munn
The Left in this country is totally invested in failure in Iraq. I am going to laugh my ass off when things go well for the next year and the Democrats lose Congress and the Presidency because they bet on US failure. On Nov 18, 2007 8:41 PM, Zaphod wrote: > Do you seriously think that whenever we

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread Robert Munn
I know you are firmly in the camp of the "let's blame America for everything that has ever gone wrong in the world" crowd, but that is totally uncalled for. Not only have we not gassed any Kurds "lately", we have been, for the last sixty years, the single hope for oppressed people all over the worl

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
Do you seriously think that whenever we do leave Iraq (whenever that may be, even years out) that the insurgents won't step right back in and take up their old positions? Are there any examples of terrorism being stamped out? I think it's a rose-colored view that temporary diminishing body counts

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread Dana
ten years later?? It didn't pass the giggle test then and still doesn't. On Nov 18, 2007 9:08 PM, C. Hatton Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > See, I really don't like to defend the man -- he seems to have been a > > first-class asshole -- but I am not sure that justifies what has > > happene

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread C. Hatton Humphrey
> Why? That's where we disagree. There was no reason for the US to > invade Iraq and it's stirred up a hornet's nest as well as weakened > our armed forces and our bank account for little or no gain (I would > argue it's dug a very deep hole). Do you even read what I write? I've explained my pe

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread C. Hatton Humphrey
> See, I really don't like to defend the man -- he seems to have been a > first-class asshole -- but I am not sure that justifies what has > happened in Iraq. Some countries take the notion of sovereignty > seriously. Maybe he did not feel the US had any right to tell him what > to do. There is so

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread Gruss Gott
> cHat wrote: > Thanks for the compliment but I don't appreciate being misdiagnosed. > My comments weren't directed at you, but based on your text below I would have to include you. > I have stood by the President's decision to invade Iraq (albeit over a > decade too late) because it was the acti

Re: Cannonball Run!! WOOOO!

2007-11-18 Thread Gruss Gott
> Jochem wrote: > http://www.wired.com/cars/coolwheels/magazine/15-11/ff_cannonballrun?currentPage=all > That is my dream. ~| Download the latest ColdFusion 8 utilities including Report Builder, plug-ins for Eclipse and Dreamweav

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread Dana
See, I really don't like to defend the man -- he seems to have been a first-class asshole -- but I am not sure that justifies what has happened in Iraq. Some countries take the notion of sovereignty seriously. Maybe he did not feel the US had any right to tell him what to do. There is some support

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread C. Hatton Humphrey
> Yeah. That's the sad part of hearing the holier-than-thou > justifications for the largest foreign policy fuck up in American > history. > > The people still clinging to the belief that invading Iraq wasn't a > fuck up are suffering from cognitive dissonance. In short, they are > likely good mo

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread Todd
Yes, Dana. Also, I didn't mean to imply that the inspectors were there on behalf of the US soley. The US was just as behind it though. "Let the inspectors have free reign to run around your country, or we are going to come in there and start kicking some ass." Which is why I singled the US ou

Re: Pole tasered to death in Canada.

2007-11-18 Thread Dana
had the same experience in Detroit. Twice. First time on the freeway, second time on a major avenue. They tell me it's an ongoing thing there. On Nov 18, 2007 7:25 PM, C. Hatton Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Welcome to the brave new world. > > Yeah, 'Couver's a great Canadian burb, eh?

Re: Pole tasered to death in Canada.

2007-11-18 Thread C. Hatton Humphrey
> Welcome to the brave new world. Yeah, 'Couver's a great Canadian burb, eh? Last time I was there the curb took a bite out of my tire and left me stranded. Decided if the streets hated me that much I'd hate to see what the meter maids would do to me! ~~

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread Gruss Gott
> cHat wrote: > He was a murderous thug before he was a US ally. > Yeah. That's the sad part of hearing the holier-than-thou justifications for the largest foreign policy fuck up in American history. The people still clinging to the belief that invading Iraq wasn't a fuck up are suffering from c

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread C. Hatton Humphrey
> BTW, do you think he was a murderous thug when he was a US ally or > was it our WMD gift that made him a murderous thug? He was a murderous thug before he was a US ally. ~| Check out the new features and enhancements in the la

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread Gruss Gott
> RoMunn wrote: > Are you serious? The inspectors were there at the behest of the UN, > not the United States. The guy was a murderous thug who invaded > Kuwait, started a war with Iran, gassed the Kurds in the north, > butchered the Shiites in the south, and flouted multiple UN > resolutions for

Re: Pole tasered to death in Canada.

2007-11-18 Thread Dana
UM. Vancouver is in Canada ;) On Nov 18, 2007 6:04 PM, Dinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Welcome to the brave new world. > > Part of why I hate that we (the US) are setting such a poor example. > > World leader? God, I hope not. Heh. > > Seriously, I wish volk understood the kind of messages w

Re: Pole tasered to death in Canada.

2007-11-18 Thread Dinner
Welcome to the brave new world. Part of why I hate that we (the US) are setting such a poor example. World leader? God, I hope not. Heh. Seriously, I wish volk understood the kind of messages we're sending -or perhaps have sent. "Live in fear, good citizen, it's Best, and makes you Safe" -or

Re: Three Cheers for Canada

2007-11-18 Thread Dana
1) Abu Ghraib -- I agree. However that is even easier for me to say. 2) Glad to hear it's not frequent. It still sounds like a really tough call. You have to survive but... 3) I agree, but again, easy for me to say. Dana On Nov 18, 2007 5:53 PM, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well aga

RE: Three Cheers for Canada

2007-11-18 Thread Bruce Sorge
Well again I have to go back to the fact that these soldiers did not have to go to the extremes that they did. I don't see how putting naked prisoners in a pyramid stack or putting a hood over their head and tying electrical leads to them is the right way to keep them awake. If they were told to do

Re: Pole tasered to death in Canada.

2007-11-18 Thread Dana
No. I had not heard about this. It seems very sad. As far as I can tell he could not find his way out of customs? A couple of things are very troubling. Vancouver is a big city. Surely there are multilingual, international signs? Interpreters? Most importantly though -- I can see why they might c

Pole tasered to death in Canada.

2007-11-18 Thread Vivec
"I don't know if you tuners heard about the Taser death of Robert Dziekanski at Vancouver airport recently. This 40 yr Old Polish Immigrant who spoke no English was stuck in the Immigration section of Vancouver Airport for 9 hours. Due to Lack of Interpreters and A total Breakdown of immigration Se

We've started messing up Alligators now?

2007-11-18 Thread Vivec
http://video.msn.com/?mkt=en-us&fg=rss&vid=c32334b2-2acd-4acd-9f38-3f6031bb0845&from=im_m_25-34 One of the longest living and hardiest survivors that the planet has ever seen. *sigh* ~| Enterprise web applications, build robust,

Re: Three Cheers for Canada

2007-11-18 Thread Dinner
Coolness. And... coolness. We'll bump into each other in meat-space one of these days... with my best bud and former boss over on main campus now, I'll probably be over there more often. Where did you end up? Extended U or Media Tech? You can hit me up on the side if you don't wanna say here.

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread Dana
um. The US hasn't gassed any Kurds lately but it's currently starting a war with Iran and has been flouting multiple UN resolutions for almost a decadeoh and gee, it didn't invade Kuwait, but it did invade Iraq. I could be wrong, but I think that might be what he is saying. But wait, wait, do

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread Robert Munn
Are you serious? The inspectors were there at the behest of the UN, not the United States. The guy was a murderous thug who invaded Kuwait, started a war with Iran, gassed the Kurds in the north, butchered the Shiites in the south, and flouted multiple UN resolutions for a decade. Get your facts s

Re: Three Cheers for Canada

2007-11-18 Thread Dana
yep. But I wasn't saying otherwise, see. I know you weren't out to say so; your thoughts just kinda flow a bit fast for mere mortals to keep up. I think you're the only person I know who sees more sides of an issue than I do. We really should catch up with one another some time ;) Dana On 11/18/0

Re: Three Cheers for Canada

2007-11-18 Thread Dinner
On Nov 18, 2007 12:43 PM, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is wrong with the oath? Wasn't trying to put words in Dana's mouth. I was reflecting on the basic "do I serve my commander, or my country" bit- protecting the constitution, etc.. I find it pretty sad that we've succumbed

Re: Three Cheers for Canada

2007-11-18 Thread Dana
glad to hear you agree. But I seem to remember reading that some of those soldiers said they were ordered to "keep the prisoners awake" and "soften them up" and the like. (Quotes from memory and could be a bit wrong). So where are the guys who gave the orders, is my question. I blame them more than

Re: Speaking of Atheists ...

2007-11-18 Thread Dana
huh. If you want a real answer to that, I believe that what would be *best* would be good public schools. But I also believe that this is impossible in the current framework. Too many rewards for mediocrity, too high a price for original thought. You might be able to get someplace with a homeschool

Re: Speaking of Atheists ...

2007-11-18 Thread Dinner
On Nov 18, 2007 12:10 PM, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Go Galt ;) you don't feed your child's body toxic waste and tell him > it's good for him do you? > > my .02 Honestly, I don't know. It's so hard to separate the good from the bad- the wheat from the chaff- If it's even possible (I like

RE: Three Cheers for Canada

2007-11-18 Thread Bruce Sorge
You are absolutely right. The "soldiers" who committed the crimes that they committed at Abu Ghraib forsake their oath to satisfy their own perverted pleasures. They are no less a criminal than those imprisoned. Taking an oath does not mean you are going to suddenly give up what is moral and right,

Re: Three Cheers for Canada

2007-11-18 Thread Dana
nothing. He's putting words in my mouth. read on ;) Dana On 11/18/07, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is wrong with the oath? > > -Original Message- > From: Dinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 10:17 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Three Ch

Re: Three Cheers for Canada

2007-11-18 Thread Dana
Well. Did you ever read Eichmann in Jerusalem? He apparently never did understand what he did wrong. I think the phrase "the banality of evil" has a lot to say to us today. It's just that nobody is listening. They're all preparing their next sound byte. Still, I fault the kids who were ordered to

RE: Three Cheers for Canada

2007-11-18 Thread Bruce Sorge
What is wrong with the oath? -Original Message- From: Dinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 10:17 AM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Three Cheers for Canada Like the oath? ;-) ~| ColdFusion

Re: Three Cheers for Canada

2007-11-18 Thread Dinner
I dunno, I guess contracts are contracts, or whatever. Personally, I'd rather have someone who wanted to be on my team, than someone who was forced to be on my team against their will. No service, no glory. Give whatever you got back, and call it even. Of course I'm romantic about the idea of S

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread Dana
it's worse than that. They are saying what way, we don't need no stinking way On 11/18/07, Dinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 16, 2007 7:39 AM, C. Hatton Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > So let's make this analogy - if someone walks into any office > > building/ airpo

Re: Speaking of Atheists ...

2007-11-18 Thread Dana
Go Galt ;) you don't feed your child's body toxic waste and tell him it's good for him do you? my .02 Dana On 11/18/07, Dinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 14, 2007 10:14 AM, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > you, honest. But I think you are wrong if you believe that the sys

Re: new book confirms Saddam wanted a nuke

2007-11-18 Thread Dinner
On Nov 16, 2007 7:39 AM, C. Hatton Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So let's make this analogy - if someone walks into any office > building/ airport/ mall/ school (or whatever trigger point you want to > use) and SAYS they have a bomb and are going to set it off if their > demands are

Re: Speaking of Atheists ...

2007-11-18 Thread Dinner
On Nov 14, 2007 10:14 AM, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > you, honest. But I think you are wrong if you believe that the system is > so > flawed that NO ONE can succeed therebecause that's just not true. The majority of my stint in the public school system, sucked nuts. The thing

Re: Great press for Our Lord and Savior

2007-11-18 Thread Dana
you are welcome. I do not have time at the moment to read what Jim said, but it looks as though he has taken some time to answer this question. I'll try to get to it later but first I need to go write some stuff that I have been putting off for a while. If more questions arise I will try to answer

Re: Three Cheers for Canada

2007-11-18 Thread Dana
look, Nazi soldiers were told that the fact that they were under orders was not good enough, correct? So there is a line there where the fact that you have sworn an oath ceases to be the over-riding concern. I think what happened at Abu Ghraib was on the other side of it, myself. But I've never bee

Re: Three Cheers for Canada

2007-11-18 Thread Dinner
On Nov 17, 2007 10:20 AM, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > that people might not have signed up for... Abu Ghraib, say. But if > you sign up to be a soldier, you need to have a really good reason for > not serving Like the oath? ;-) --- My lawyer says only he has the skills to interpr

Re: Cannonball Run!! WOOOO!

2007-11-18 Thread Jochem van Dieten
http://www.wired.com/cars/coolwheels/magazine/15-11/ff_cannonballrun?currentPage=all ~| Check out the new features and enhancements in the latest product release - download the "What's New PDF" now http://download.macromedia.com

Cannonball Run!! WOOOO!

2007-11-18 Thread Gruss Gott
WASHINGTON (AFP) - Extreme sports fan Alex Roy said Friday he had smashed the record for the fastest "Cannonball run" across the United States, defying police and speed traps. Alex Roy, 35, who waited a year to boast about his exploits and remains vague about the exact dates in a bid to avoid any

Re: Great press for Our Lord and Savior

2007-11-18 Thread Gruss Gott
> Bruce wrote: > Thanks Gruss, I just ordered it. I'll let you know what I think after I read > it. > BTW - if you want to come at this from a religious perspective I think an excellent book to read is Elaine Pagels' Beyond Belief. http://tinyurl.com/ysfano While her award winning Gnostic Gospel

reupholstering is a pain

2007-11-18 Thread Paul Ihrig
i never new how much work it would be just to do a seat of a love seat in leather http://picasaweb.google.com/pihrig/ReupholsterLoveSeat spent at least 30 hours on it, and it still didnt come out right. o well, least i can seat a few more family/friends now. leather stretches too much and is not

Re: Great press for Our Lord and Savior

2007-11-18 Thread Gruss Gott
> Jim Davis wrote: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_man > An *excellent* book on human evolution is this coffee table type book: http://tinyurl.com/3647e3 It's got beautiful pictures fossils and describes what, how, and why we know what we know about human and primate evolution. And

Stovetop Espresso Machines anyone?

2007-11-18 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
Anyone used one of these before? http://www.beveragefactory.com/coffee/coffee/Moka+Express.shtml I recently went camping and took along my french press since my normal coffee pot is the plugin type. I marveled at how good the coffee tasted and I started back on the quest for better tasting coffe

Re: Great press for Our Lord and Savior

2007-11-18 Thread Larry Lyons
>OK, I am back. > >OK, so Darwin claims that organisms just evolve into better organisms, that >the less desirable traits of an organism die off and the more desirable >traits survive and evolve into other organisms, leading to the creation of >actual species, and that these species evolve into hig