Mandatory elementary school up to a full diploma. Get some education
into her. The only way to cure stupid is education.
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Dana wrote:
>
> hmm and Palin?
>
> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Michael Dinowitz
> wrote:
>>
>> The punishment should fit the crime. A yea
hmm and Palin?
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Michael Dinowitz
wrote:
>
> The punishment should fit the crime. A years sentence where anyone who
> wants can come into his house, move or use anything they want and
> change the locks when they leave.
>
> --
> Michael Dinowitz
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, M
The punishment should fit the crime. A years sentence where anyone who
wants can come into his house, move or use anything they want and
change the locks when they leave.
--
Michael Dinowitz
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Much as I dislike the woman in question, breaking
look, if you aren't going to discuss this in good faith, I have things
to do and getting tarred with that brush you are waving around would
get in the way of doing them, so... I will say (I think for the fifth
time now) that yes yes of course it is a crime and no I don't think it
was ok.
I'd appr
Just so I understand.
It's OK to hack into someone's private email account so long as the
person who is getting hacked is stupid when it comes to the security
on that account?
Regardless of what she did or did not do and regardless of the content
of the email messages that were read, Palin was t
I just realized I really hate the old one and I sent this to the person who
asked for the rewrite, but I could appreciate a second or third pair of eyes
checking for typos and other wierdnesses before I put it up anywhere...
~|
ok in what world does a prospective president circumvent an entire IT
department trying to prevent exactly this, do so SO THAT SHE CAN EVADE THE
LAW, and then get to whine?
I don't know what sentence the kid got. I gather it wasn't community
service. Fine. I disagree but that changes nothing.
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> I do, especially in this case. She testified at his trial and when
> they asked her why she chose such an easy-to-guess security question
> she said that she wasn't trying to keep the answer secret. Headsmack.
>
> See my point?
If your point is tha
Much as I dislike the woman in question, breaking into an email
account is and should be a crime and the punishment should fit the
crime regardless of the identity, public or otherwise, of the victim.
Or the strength of her password.
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> I do, especial
It is still a crime, no matter what analogy you tie to it.
The fact that the victim may have been 'stupid' does not make it any
less fo a crime and does not make him any less guilty of committing
that crime.
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
wrote:
>
> a more correct analogy wo
a more correct analogy would be someone who walked into your house, looked at a
bunch of stuff, then left and changed the locks.
the guy didn't actually steal anything...at least as far as I can tell.
>
>
> So, if you purposely leave your house unlocked, it would be OK for
> someone to just
nope, Lucid Lynx
On May 2, 2010, at 9:47 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> is that modest meercat?
>
> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
> wrote:
>>
>> Upgraded all of my boxes at home this weekend. All were mythbuntu boxes and
>> all went great.
>>
>>
>> On Apr 30, 2010, at 10:32 AM,
is that modest meercat?
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
wrote:
>
> Upgraded all of my boxes at home this weekend. All were mythbuntu boxes and
> all went great.
>
>
> On Apr 30, 2010, at 10:32 AM, Scott Raley wrote:
>
>>
>> Resistance is futile!
>>
>>
>> -Original Message
No...but dont be surprised when they do.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 3:57 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Palin email hacking case - guilty!
So, if you purposely leave your house unlocked, it would be OK for
someone to ju
Actually the ability of the federal government to effect interstate commerce
is well documented...even ruled on by the supreme court. Nice try...next...
Eric
-Original Message-
From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 10:07 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE:
Upgraded all of my boxes at home this weekend. All were mythbuntu boxes and
all went great.
On Apr 30, 2010, at 10:32 AM, Scott Raley wrote:
>
> Resistance is futile!
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Zaphod Beeblebrox [mailto:zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 30
Huh. Never would have think it. Neither would they mind you if the box
hadn't told them to
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "I am sure the teabaggers love it."
>
> I don't think the teabaggers care. They don't need sex scandals to drive
> dislike for Obama, his policies a
"I am sure the teabaggers love it."
I don't think the teabaggers care. They don't need sex scandals to drive
dislike for Obama, his policies are enough.
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let t
last good one i played was warcraft 3. prefer steam. drop it.
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/group
I have not seen what the sentence was. And I am not saying he did
nothing wrong. He was stupid and so was she. But you know how that
saying goes - I may be fat but you are stupid, and I can diet? Ever
hear that one?
He was dumb, she was dumber, but there's still hope for him.
On Sun, May 2, 201
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> hacking an fool does not mean the guy is any less guilty.
>
> That said, I think the guy got a much stiffer sentence than if he had
> done the same to a neighbour.
>
I think I am inclined to agree with you on that.
--
Scott Stroz
-
hacking an fool does not mean the guy is any less guilty.
That said, I think the guy got a much stiffer sentence than if he had
done the same to a neighbour.
Equal justice before the law has often been shown to be more of an
ideal than a practice. I think that this is a typical example.
On Sun,
So, if you purposely leave your house unlocked, it would be OK for
someone to just walk in a take stuff?
Or is it only if you think the person leaving themselves open to
attack are stupid or disagree with your political ideology?
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> I do, especially
I do, especially in this case. She testified at his trial and when
they asked her why she chose such an easy-to-guess security question
she said that she wasn't trying to keep the answer secret. Headsmack.
See my point?
Mind you, the idiot at Yahoo who wrote the stupid question, which
would be e
Just because he found 'wrongdoing' does not give him a pass.
"Yes your honor, I did take his wallet from his jacket but to be fair,
he left the jacket on a chair and I found a picture of him with a
woman other than his wife. His bad should outweigh mine."
I'm not arguing on whatever sentence he m
OK, first 'crooked politician' is redundant. You cannot get to the
level VP or presidential level without some skeletons in your closet.
SOme are juts better at keeping them hidden or making people believe
the skeletons don't actually exist.
I don't think the criteria of 'is the person dangerous
Very sorries :(
best thoughts with you.
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.c
So sorry to hear Scott, but in a way it's good to hear that he's in
good spirits. Make the most of the time you have with him and know
what all of our thoughts are with you and your family.
-Cameron
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> Today has been a rough day. This morning
The 10th amendment.
BTW I agree on the other points and you know it.
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 11:03 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Palin email hacking case - guilty!
Like warrantless wiretapping. Like pillaging the nati
Like warrantless wiretapping. Like pillaging the nation's resources
for eight years on behalf of people who were sending it so swiss bank
accounts.
I don't even see how you get health care as unconstitutional. So was
emancipation once upon a time.
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 7:16 AM, LRS Scout wrote
he's less than a script kiddy. He's a total amateur. Did he have any
kind of a record? You guys are going to make me go read the news
stories, aren't you... I do not have time for that shineola! I have
stuff to do. But the danger he currently represents to society is
pretty small, and the danger t
I am sure the teabaggers love it.
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> It's interesting to follow the Vera Baker story on twitter. A lot of
> traffic.
>
>
>
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with so
It's interesting to follow the Vera Baker story on twitter. A lot of
traffic.
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive:
http://www.houseoff
They blew up the National Enquirer.
I can't get to the link anymore.
0_0
On 2 May 2010 08:33, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> Here's the link:
>
> http://www.nationalenquirer.com/reports_obama_cheating_scandal_vera_baker_investigation/celebrity/68590
>
> Summary: Obama had and affair with Vera Bake
You mean prison, jail is a cake walk. If he get's six months or less
he's got nothing to worry about, unless of course he's an asshole.
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Dana wrote:
>
> can't remember if he is an adult but if he is 19 or 20 he's basically
> shark chum if he goes to jail, is my poi
There like three or four countries that we allow dual citizenship for,
the rest you're supposed to surrender your passport when you become a
citizen but I hear a lot people just say the lost it.
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> Those are US citizens born in the US who are naturali
Don't break the law.
I weighed 100 pounds soaking wet and made it through the system. Hope he
has a tooth brush hahah
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 8:38 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Palin email hacking case - guilty!
can'
Like health care?
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 8:24 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Palin email hacking case - guilty!
you're such a victim ;) I just happen to think that perverting the
constitution under cover of authority i
word
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 8:13 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Palin email hacking case - guilty!
I can't help but think that if this guy 'hacked' into Obama's email
account that people would be calling for blood.
You're coming at this from the point of view of an ethical hacker and
professional. I assure you on the black hat side of things you know as well
as I do that the intrusion method isn't as important as the intrusion
itself.
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com]
S
TY, I was gonna say.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munn [mailto:cfmuns...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 12:57 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Palin email hacking case - guilty!
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Dana wrote:
> but it's not a jail time thing in a world where S
That's the truth.
That should be in the constitution:
Leave me the fuck alone.
-Original Message-
From: morchella [mailto:morchella.delici...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 10:06 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Have Republicans even read the Constitution?
every one needs to
I have I have
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 7:21 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Have Republicans even read the Constitution?
You've never been to BC. That is obvious.
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Eric Roberts
So then dumpster diving and shoulder surfing aren't hacking either?
You know better than that Dana.
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 2:01 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Palin email hacking case - guilty!
actually I think the
can't remember if he is an adult but if he is 19 or 20 he's basically
shark chum if he goes to jail, is my point
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 6:21 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> I think he should get some jail time. Nothing serious though. A month or
> maybe even weekends for 2 or 3 months. Much more
Here's the link:
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/reports_obama_cheating_scandal_vera_baker_investigation/celebrity/68590
Summary: Obama had and affair with Vera Baker during his 2004 Senate
Campaign.
This is an old story. I can remember reading about it during the 2008
election campaign. For
you're such a victim ;) I just happen to think that perverting the
constitution under cover of authority is a bigger issue than invading
the privacy of a public figure who is misbehaving. Sue me ;)
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 6:13 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> I can't help but think that if this guy 'ha
I think he should get some jail time. Nothing serious though. A month or
maybe even weekends for 2 or 3 months. Much more effective punishment that
doesn't derail a life completely.
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community w
I can't help but think that if this guy 'hacked' into Obama's email
account that people would be calling for blood.
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> This is a good result for anyone interested in their own privacy. I
> don't think the kid should get 20 years for it, but th
49 matches
Mail list logo
