On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 4:02 PM, denstar wrote:
>
>>> Read it. It was overturned.
>>
>> If I read it right only the data-mining stuff was dismissed. The rest
>> stood. Right?
>
> Probably didn't, read it again and let me know.
It *looks* like only t
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Medic wrote:
>>
>> Hope that helps,
>>
>
> So is selective breeding actually considered genetic engineering?
No, sorry, didn't mean to leave that impression. I'm not aware of
anyone who calls selective breeding "genetic engineering". Maybe
Monsanto, so they can gi
that's the problem when a religion is so arrogant that it names it's
god...well, God. Then it thinks that anytime someone says I believe in a god
that of course they're referring to their one true goderrr God.
On Jun 7, 2010, at 10:03 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> You just don't get it. I co
You just don't get it. I could worship the lowercase god of bullshit
and be a deist. I don't have to believe in the Judeo-Christian GOD.
If the founders had been Christian or Jewish and believed in that GOD,
they would have said so. They certainly had no problem expressing
themselves.
On Mon,
not Texas!
On Jun 7, 2010, at 1:37 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Eric Roberts <
> ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Most blue states have overturned them or just dont enforce them.
>>
>
> In case you haven't noticed, so have many red states.
>
> --
Reverse engineering, perhaps.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> So is selective breeding actually considered genetic engineering?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusio
btw speciation has also been observed in the field, with different
species of wrens in New Zealand and several different species of
finches in the Galapagos Islands.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Evolution is a very commonly misunderstood term and the
> socio-political
>
> Hope that helps,
>
So is selective breeding actually considered genetic engineering?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoff
Hardcore forking action!
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 7, 2010, at 6:48 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> Fork and pull...hmmm
> what sort of CMS are YOU talking about?
>
> :)
>
> On 7 June 2010 19:44, Zaphod Beeblebrox
> wrote:
>>
>> Why not throw it on github and see what happens. All of my
>> contr
Fork and pull...hmmm
what sort of CMS are YOU talking about?
:)
On 7 June 2010 19:44, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
>
> Why not throw it on github and see what happens. All of my
> contributions to open source have been through github.
>
> It really lowers the barriers for involvement as you ca
Why not throw it on github and see what happens. All of my
contributions to open source have been through github.
It really lowers the barriers for involvement as you can fork a
project, make your changes and issue a pull request.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 7, 2010, at 5:44 PM, Judah McAul
I see 712 CF projects listed at Riaforge:
http://www.riaforge.org/index.cfm?event=page.category&id=1
But in particular, I'd say the proliferation of fairly mature
frameworks (Fusebox, MG, Coldbox), ORM's (Reactor and Transfer), DI
frameworks (Coldspring and Lightwire), Validation frameworks
(Val
How has CF Open Source been expanding?
What complete applications are out there now?
On 7 June 2010 18:44, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> The CF open source world has really been expanding, so I think that
> there is a desire out there, but CF doesn't have as many people with
> more free time on thei
I think that there is a demand for a good open source CMS but a lot of
it depends on quality, maintainability and documentation of the code.
For instance, is the code already in a framework that other people are
familiar with, like Fusebox, ModelGlue or Coldbox? Is it procedural or
object oriented
alright, so there's definatly a demand for open-source baking & hot beverage
apps.
enter your ingredients, how hot to make/bake it and go!
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Ant
Muffins.
blueberry muffins.
with the coffee..
yumm...
On 7 June 2010 18:25, Peter Shumar wrote:
>
> It's using more and more Ajax as I re-write portions of it.
>
> The help desk module does offer a PDF conversion, but we havent had any
> clients looking for PDF conversions, so we havent added
It's using more and more Ajax as I re-write portions of it.
The help desk module does offer a PDF conversion, but we havent had any clients
looking for PDF conversions, so we havent added them in.
No on facebook/twitter, we use other widgets to add that to the sites.
But, it should make coff
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7061020378445596414#
0_0
*hopeful look*
On 7 June 2010 18:13, Peter Shumar wrote:
>
> I meant to say that I'm interested in turning this project into an
> open-source/free application...
>
> Cheers
~
Genetically Modified is kind of a catch all phrase for a bunch of
different work. Historically, there was selective breeding that used a
strong selection model (killing off anything that didn't go the
direction you wanted like sweeter or more cold tolerant) and breeding
the few remaining individua
I meant to say that I'm interested in turning this project into an
open-source/free application...
Cheers
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/143027
Does it use AJAX?
Can it turn pages into PDF files with a clicky?
Does it have native integration with Facebook and Twitter?
Can it make coffees? 0_0
On 7 June 2010 18:10, Peter Shumar wrote:
>
> Anyways, I'm gettin lonley on this project, and while it's come a long ways,
> I know it could be
I've been workign on a CMS for over 5 years now, and it's almost at version 2.0
(I know, but there's 26 revisions between major releases)
Anyways, it's an enterprise CMS with features for editing web pages, serious
ecommerce options, flash slideshow/calendar builders, ready made websites,
pol
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
> A lot to digest, I know, but hopefully it will help people thinking
> about the arguments around Evolution and, more specially, that we are
> really talking about an argument regarding speciation.
>
We evolved with the help of the Anunnaki
Thank you two.
That was the most interesting, informative, useful post I have seen on this
list in 2010.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Evolution is a very commonly misunderstood term and the
> socio-political use of the word doesn't really match up with the
> scien
On 6/7/2010 1:38 PM, Sam wrote:
> http://innovation.cq.com/atlas/district_08
>
Looking at that map, one would probably not intuit that Obama won 252
(~56%) of the 435 congressional districts.
Many of those districts in the middle of the country are obviously quite
large. (I.E. the entire
Evolution is a very commonly misunderstood term and the
socio-political use of the word doesn't really match up with the
scientific use, leaving things rather muddy. Even within the
scientific realm there is a lot you have to specify in order to really
get to what you mean by the word, it's a big
LOL!
Flashback: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01NHcTM5IA4
:Den
--
People commonly travel the world over to see rivers and mountains, new
stars, garish birds, freak fish, grotesque breeds of human; they fall
into an animal stupor that gapes at existence and they think they have
seen something.
http://innovation.cq.com/atlas/district_08
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "I think a more accurate heatmap (without state lines) would show red in
> rural areas and blue in urban areas. Conservative values tend to
> work better in rural communities and progressive val
"I think a more accurate heatmap (without state lines) would show red in
rural areas and blue in urban areas. Conservative values tend to
work better in rural communities and progressive values in urban areas."
I agree.
"I've seen maps, I'll others search for links, that break down recent
elec
Aww darnit!!
Why didn't I think of that lol lol :-)
On 7 June 2010 15:50, denstar wrote:
>
> Am I the first? Yay!
>
> "*That's* not a knife... /this/ is a knife"
>
> Dundee FTW!
>
> :en
>
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Ant
When I was in the SCA that happened to one person in our Barony. Some
idiot pulled a knife on him and Greg took a step back pulled out his
bastard sword from its scabbard and said "You call that a knife, this
is a knife." I don't think they heard the last part, as they were
showing a good set of h
Am I the first? Yay!
"*That's* not a knife... /this/ is a knife"
Dundee FTW!
:en
--
Patience is necessary, and one cannot reap immediately where one has sown.
Soren Kierkegaard
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 6:20 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> The knife looks like a little fish knife.
>
> And I don't know th
I would like to replace the word cfgridkey in the url by the column name that
it reference.
I am using cfgrid html format.
i.e.
if I have a
on clicking on the link I have in the url xxx.cfm?cfgridkey=1
I would like to have it xxx.cfm?id=1
Thanks
~~
On 6/7/2010 12:10 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
> I guess my point is that a state is a pretty huge area to lump
> everyone into either "red" or "blue".
>
> I think a more accurate heatmap (without state lines) would show red
> in rural areas and blue in urban areas. Conservative values tend to
>
That's why those colors always threw me off, Russert switched them.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "I have always thought of the whole Red vs Blue state as being pretty lame
> except in the context of describing the electorate."
>
> The colors didn't become "official" u
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
> The colors didn't become "official" until 2000. In elections before that,
> democrats were more often than not associated with red and conservatives
> with blue, particularly in respect to district maps.
I guess my point is that a state is a
They do have a big influence on CA black population.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> It also didn't hurt for the Mormon Church to spend almost 10 million
> in support of the ban.
>
~|
Order the Adobe C
"I have always thought of the whole Red vs Blue state as being pretty lame
except in the context of describing the electorate."
The colors didn't become "official" until 2000. In elections before that,
democrats were more often than not associated with red and conservatives
with blue, particular
My bad..I missed that or assumed it was a typo. Still inaccurate in my
opinion, though. :D
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Btw...that was god given...not God given...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 07, 2
It also didn't hurt for the Mormon Church to spend almost 10 million
in support of the ban.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Most of that was fueled by funding from the Mormon Church in Utah
> btw...also, with the large Catholic population in CA, is that really that
> surp
>Just like there are town in red states that have activities that would make
>most liberals blush. There are always exceptions. I would be willing to
>bet that blues laws are more strictly enforced in red states overall than
>they are in blue states.
>
>Eric
Well, I can only speak for my own st
Hey I'll be out of the country in less than 24 hours. Either that or
I'll be one of the first up against the wall in front of a firing
squad.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Or many other people for that matter...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kris Sisk [mailto:k
What?
Try to buy a beer in Connecticut after 11pm on a Saturday. Or any
night after 9 pm I think it is. NY before noon on a Sunday? Should I
go on?
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Most blue states have overturned them or just dont enforce them.
~~
>
> > They are just doing it using natural processes rather than cutting and
> splicing genes.
>
I invoke my cone of ignorance.
*rolls 2 die 10*
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusio
I have been to more red states that have blue laws that are enforced than I
have been to blue states that have blue laws enforced.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: G Money [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 1:38 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Thought this was great
Exit polls showed the majority of blacks were strongly against gay
marriage while voting strongly democrats. I don't know if the Latinos
were against it but I know they are heavily populated in large cities
and vote mostly for D's.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Most of
Or many other people for that matter...
-Original Message-
From: Kris Sisk [mailto:ks...@gckschools.com]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 1:27 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Thought this was great
>google Dominionist if you want to see some examples of American Taliban.
>
OkI just di
Just like there are town in red states that have activities that would make
most liberals blush. There are always exceptions. I would be willing to
bet that blues laws are more strictly enforced in red states overall than
they are in blue states.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Kris Sisk
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> Most blue states have overturned them or just dont enforce them.
>
In case you haven't noticed, so have many red states.
--
My life has been a poor attempt to imitate the man
I'm just a living legacy to
Selective breeding is genetic engineering. They are just doing it using
natural processes rather than cutting and splicing genes.
-Original Message-
From: Medic [mailto:hofme...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 12:53 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Thought this was great
Isn't
Most blue states have overturned them or just dont enforce them.
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 12:52 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Thought this was great
You do realize blue states have blue laws?
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:48
>google Dominionist if you want to see some examples of American Taliban.
>
OkI just did thisBelieve it or not that is the stuff of my nightmares.
I only had a vague idea of Dominionism before. If they ever manage to take over
you won't be hearing from me again.
~~
Most of that was fueled by funding from the Mormon Church in Utah
btw...also, with the large Catholic population in CA, is that really that
surprising? I think the proposition that overturned the CSC ruling was just
overly funded which is why it won.
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:
>Many states have it to be illegal to have sex outside of marriage...whether
>it's enforced or not is another story. What about all those blue laws?
>
I've never seen any such law. Even if they do exist they aren't and still
wouldn't be enforced.
As for blue laws, they're everywhere. I've hea
>Is the dogs/wolves example even an example of evolution? Isn't it
>domestication?
>
Domestication is usually a perfect example of that type of evolution. I think
that micro evolution is the one that would be wolves to dogs, but I never could
keep the two terms straight for some reason. Another
Well I think GM is completely different as you can modify genes to get
combinations that you couldn't really get from breeding.
I think I'll just wait until Judah drops some science on us and make me feel
intellectually inadequate through no fault of his own.
/me waits
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:
Aren;t they very closely related?
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> Isn't (wasn't) it selective breeding and not genetic engineering?
>
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Eric Roberts <
> ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> It's genetic engineering where instead of natu
I know people who do not believe in evolution who support
bio-engineering, so I am nto so sure why you guys think it would
vanish in you biazrro world of Red and Blue states.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> I just don't see how believing that life is fixed and non-changi
Isn't (wasn't) it selective breeding and not genetic engineering?
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> It's genetic engineering where instead of nature selecting trait that are
> moved on to the next generation, man did. If it was just domes
You do realize blue states have blue laws?
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Many states have it to be illegal to have sex outside of marriage...whether
> it's enforced or not is another story. What about all those blue laws?
~
It's genetic engineering where instead of nature selecting trait that are
moved on to the next generation, man did. If it was just domestication,
then all dogs would still look like wolves.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Medic [mailto:hofme...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 12:3
Odd thing about that map.
California failed to pass same sex marriage because minorities are
very religious and very blue as voters. Actually I think Latino's are
the most religious of all.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Or do we go by the Jesusland map?
> (http://en.w
Many states have it to be illegal to have sex outside of marriage...whether
it's enforced or not is another story. What about all those blue laws?
-Original Message-
From: Kris Sisk [mailto:ks...@gckschools.com]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 12:31 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Thought
google Dominionist if you want to see some examples of American Taliban.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Kris Sisk wrote:
>
>>The red states represent that largest
>>drain on Medicare and welfare funds.
>
> That may or may not be (I don't know), but that welfare drain would go away
> quickly if
Does anyone else find it strange that we have half a dozen seperate threads of
people at each other's throats over this incident? I know emotions always tend
to run hot when Israel's involved, but that seems voer the top.
~|
O
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> Last I checked Canada is an independent country.
That's nothing to do with it unless we attacked Canada to annex her.
We never did, each attack was a message for the British to leave the
US and stop interfering with our sea trade. Each ti
Is the dogs/wolves example even an example of evolution? Isn't it
domestication?
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Kris Sisk wrote:
>
> >part of the credo of creationism is that all lifeforms are fixed and
> >unchanging. Ergo no forced and guided evolution is possible.
> >
> >
> >>
>
> Umno
>The red states represent that largest
>drain on Medicare and welfare funds.
That may or may not be (I don't know), but that welfare drain would go away
quickly if conservatives had their way. Meanwhile over in the blue states all
the welfare programs that get shot down now would go through un
Most of the founders were Christian, I think two were suspected of being deists.
The ones that were thought to be deists believed in God, they just had
a problem with how religions had abused the message.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Actually no. It is fully possibly to b
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Kris Sisk wrote:
> Even the most hard headed Bible literalist
> creationist doesn't try to tell you that dogs didn't evolve from wolves.
I'd buy that "most" wouldn't say that, but the most hard headed 10% or
so most definitely would. I've met them.
-Cameron
...
Last I checked Canada is an independent country.
That said, you are so ignorant of your own history. I'm not going to
bother enlightening you. You make ignorance a virtue
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>> If you mean the 4
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Sam wrote:
> Blue states are more blue in the inner cities than on main street.
I have always thought of the whole Red vs Blue state as being pretty
lame except in the context of describing the electorate.
I think it's more accurate to describe it as:
Red = Rura
>part of the credo of creationism is that all lifeforms are fixed and
>unchanging. Ergo no forced and guided evolution is possible.
>
>
>>
Umno it's not. It's a matter of macro evolution vs micro evolution. I
forget which is which. One is dogs evolving from wolves and the other is birds
evo
>the whole issue of evolution has been discussed so often here and the
>creationist point of view has been so roundly rejected on scientific
>grounds that I'm not going to discuss this piece of fetid manure.
Who said anything about creationism? All I said was that biotech would advance
just fine
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> If you mean the 4 separate invasions of Canada then no you did not
> win.
Di we lose?
> If you mean the 3 raids on Britain, then again no you the US did
> not win, and that was just during the War of Independence.
We didn't win our indep
Actually no. It is fully possibly to believe in a Creator with a
metaphysical dimension without believing in the Jehovah of the Bible.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Same God, they just didn't believe all the stories.
~~~
Well you can believe what you want. I am sure it gives you a warm and
fuzzy feeling.
But you should know that the free clinics give out special creams for that now.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Same God, they just didn't believe all the stories.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12
I thought this section from the wiki page was appropriate:
The red states in these variant maps are called "Jesusistan",
"Redstateistan", "Redneckistan",[4] the "United States of
Evangelicals",[5] "the United State of Texas", or in the most extreme
case, "Dumbfuckistan"
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:
Same God, they just didn't believe all the stories.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> But not in the way that the bible thumpers believe - it was more of
> the nature of the blind watchmaker than the giant bearded old white
> guy in the robes floating around in the clou
well since purple is the colour of "homosexuality" according to St.
Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, it ought to be obvious...
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> So do purple states go with red or blue?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmai
Blue states are more blue in the inner cities than on main street.
Yes professors tend to be blue also but many thinkers on the coasts
are red, they're just out numbered by non thinkers :)
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:37 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
Or do we go by the Jesusland map?
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesusland_map)
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 11:32 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Thought this was great
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
So do purple states go with red or blue?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 11:32 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Thought this was great
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> The red states represent that la
I just don't see how believing that life is fixed and non-changing would
allow for successful theories and practices in changing life...that would
contradict each other just a bit ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 11:36 AM
To:
So we have three idiots that believe the Revolution was about killing
British and if they had sharks with laser they would have killed every
British person.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> The 19th century American military wasn't as kick-ass powerful as I'm sure
> you're thin
Btw...that was god given...not God given...
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 10:53 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Israel attacks and kills peace activists in international
waters.
Who says the right to life, liberty and the p
If you mean the 4 separate invasions of Canada then no you did not
win. If you mean the 3 raids on Britain, then again no you the US did
not win, and that was just during the War of Independence. If you are
referring to the War of 1812, then no the US did not win that one
either, last I looked Can
No...not dumber...just smaller in number...it's the rest of the population
that lowers the averages greatly ;-)
-Original Message-
From: G Money [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 11:37 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Thought this was great
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at
Again with the claim America lost that war? Do you have no memory
retention art all? How many times do we need to discuss this before
you remember?
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> Yes and when they did, they got their butts kicked royally. Then when
> they tried going
Just because they might not view bio-engineering as 'evolution', does
nto mean they cannot excel at it.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> part of the credo of creationism is that all lifeforms are fixed and
> unchanging. Ergo no forced and guided evolution is possible.
>
You think we went to war to kill British?
Nothing about them taking our ships and trying to control Europe sound familiar?
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> We didn't have the means (we barely pulled off defeating them on our own
> soil) and they were an Ocean away...
>
>
But not in the way that the bible thumpers believe - it was more of
the nature of the blind watchmaker than the giant bearded old white
guy in the robes floating around in the clouds. If you actually read
the writings of Madison, Jefferson or Adams instead of the
ideologically correct right wing m
The 19th century American military wasn't as kick-ass powerful as I'm sure
you're thinking.
No sharks with lasers on their heads.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> If it were we would have followed them back to Britain.
>
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Medic wrote:
> >
> > So
part of the credo of creationism is that all lifeforms are fixed and
unchanging. Ergo no forced and guided evolution is possible.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> I agree that bio-engineering is forced, guided evolution (a great way
> to explain it,m by the way), but that
You do realize deists believe in God don't you?
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> Given that the writers of the DOI and the constitution were mostly
> deists, the reference is not to "God" but to a more generic reference.
>
~
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> I am sure you are able to provide proof, especially ones that meet
> Larry strict standards?
>
You know what bugs me about this "red state" generalization bullshit?
It assumes that those of us who reside in those states who ARE educated, ar
I agree that bio-engineering is forced, guided evolution (a great way
to explain it,m by the way), but that is because I believe in
evolution.
Just because someone does nto believe that we evolved from other
creatures does nto mean that they cannot see what we are made up of
and force and guide c
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> The red states represent that largest
> drain on Medicare and welfare funds.
I am sure you are able to provide proof, especially ones that meet
Larry strict standards?
--
Scott Stroz
---
You can make things happen, you can
Yeah well...I learned from watching you, OK!
(Sorry...flashback to a cheesy 80's public service announcement.)
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> Yup...I will agree...you are babbling like a psycho ;-)
>
> -Original Message-
> Fro
If evolution is false then it shouldn't be possible to genetically modify
something to do something else. Really, all bio-engineering is, is forced
and guided evolution.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 11:27 AM
To: cf-community
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
