RE: Oops! Wis Gov Thinks Caller is Koch

2011-02-28 Thread Eric Roberts
Prior to having private for profit hospitals, the hospitals were usually run by religious groups and other non-profits Good luck with your surgery Mo...heal quickly so you can come back and argue ;-) I understand the hits...we haven't had insurance for a while, so every time the wife gets sick s

Re: Oops! Wis Gov Thinks Caller is Koch

2011-02-28 Thread Maureen
Cost and profiteering is what got us into this mess. Health care has always been private. It wasn't until the hospitals because profit centers for corporations that healthcare costs became unmanageable. I will fully confess to being biased on this topic, as I once again have to have heart surge

Re: Oops! Wis Gov Thinks Caller is Koch

2011-02-28 Thread Gruss Gott
Judah McAuley wrote: > > I agree that the consolidation of health insurance companies has led > to fewer choices and that the combined companies wield an unfair > amount of influence over providers and do everything in their power to > discourage competition, reform and meaningful change in heal

RE: Oops! Wis Gov Thinks Caller is Koch

2011-02-28 Thread Eric Roberts
I didn't see exclusion...so yeah...you are right on that. -Original Message- From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com] Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 18:30 To: cf-community Subject: Re: Oops! Wis Gov Thinks Caller is Koch On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Eric Roberts wrote

Re: Oops! Wis Gov Thinks Caller is Koch

2011-02-28 Thread Judah McAuley
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Eric Roberts wrote: > > Privatizing healthcare is what got us into this mess.  Insurance companies > caused healthcare costs to rise because they weren't paying what docs wanted > them to pay, so they raised prices.  People can't afford insurance on their > own or

RE: Oops! Wis Gov Thinks Caller is Koch

2011-02-28 Thread Eric Roberts
Privatizing healthcare is what got us into this mess. Insurance companies caused healthcare costs to rise because they weren't paying what docs wanted them to pay, so they raised prices. People can't afford insurance on their own or they can't get it because of pre-existing conditions and thus h

RE: Walker, Wisconson Lier

2011-02-28 Thread Eric Roberts
LOL -Original Message- From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2011 17:30 To: cf-community Subject: Re: Walker, Wisconson Lier On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Cameron Childress wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Eric Roberts > wrote: >> I

RE: Walker, Wisconson Lier

2011-02-28 Thread Eric Roberts
My point is that is not what they are protesting...they already agreed to those concessions. They are protesting the removal of collective bargaining rights. So there is no hypocrisy...his comparison of the situation was incorrect. If they were protesting having to pay more for benefits, then h

Re: you're a guy

2011-02-28 Thread Medic
> > It doesn't matter how big your breasts are, Also, please never utter this sentence again. Utter... haha awesome. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/

Re: you're a guy

2011-02-28 Thread C. Hatton Humphrey
> It doesn't matter how big your breasts are, how many children you have > birthed, or what your genetic code looks like. If you're asked online if > you're a girl or guy, you're answer should always be guy. No one will > believe you're a girl. Unless there is a voice chat module in the game - th

Re: you're a guy

2011-02-28 Thread Casey Dougall
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Medic wrote: > > Is there something you need to tell us Michael? > > Yeah, Michael is actually Michelle when he plays online games. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amaz

Re: you're a guy

2011-02-28 Thread Michael Dinowitz
Just something I observed last night in a game. There's never any question or doubt if you're character is male but anyone in a female 'body' is questioned about their real gender and then doubted if the answer is anything other than male. On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Medic wrote: > > Is t

Re: you're a guy

2011-02-28 Thread Medic
Is there something you need to tell us Michael? On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Michael Dinowitz < mdino...@houseoffusion.com> wrote: > > It doesn't matter how big your breasts are, how many children you have > birthed, or what your genetic code looks like. If you're asked online if > you're a

Re: Walker, Wisconson Lier

2011-02-28 Thread Cameron Childress
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Medic wrote: > Well I care enough. E, Cam is just pointing out the irony in the fact that > the unions complain about the gov taking money from it's employees to > invest > and return, whereas unions automatically take dues with no intention of > investing or ret

you're a guy

2011-02-28 Thread Michael Dinowitz
It doesn't matter how big your breasts are, how many children you have birthed, or what your genetic code looks like. If you're asked online if you're a girl or guy, you're answer should always be guy. No one will believe you're a girl. -- The rules of online gaming ~

Re: 50% of GOP don't believe Barak is American...

2011-02-28 Thread Judah McAuley
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote: > > "The same Patriot Act that progressives voted against actually." > > > Obama signs temporary extension of Patriot > Act > > Interesting.  Does that mean O

Re: Oops! Wis Gov Thinks Caller is Koch

2011-02-28 Thread Gruss Gott
Well, there's 2 components of the healthcare debate: (A.) Escalating costs. (B.) The finance mechanism. "single payer" is a finance mechanism which, if you don't control escalating costs is relevant. Said differently, if I owe my doctor $1M for medical treatment it doesn't matter if he sends t

Re: Walker, Wisconson Lier

2011-02-28 Thread Medic
Well I care enough. E, Cam is just pointing out the irony in the fact that the unions complain about the gov taking money from it's employees to invest and return, whereas unions automatically take dues with no intention of investing or returning it to the user base. It's a comment on the apparent

Re: Walker, Wisconson Lier

2011-02-28 Thread Maureen
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Cameron Childress wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Eric Roberts > wrote: >> I still don't see what this has to do with anything. > > I know.  It's okay.  I don't care enough to explain it to you. > > -Cameron Translation: I am wrong but I don't want