Sure. It isn't just the R & D staff, it's the entire business. The dream
scenario for these folks is to have top management, local/regional/national
field people for Marketing and Sales, minimal internal support staff
(accounting, etc), and the bulk of the workers located somewhere else,
either as
Everyone please understand that this debate is irrelevant. Our structural
obligations, combined with our debt, are going to crush our economy. And it
is going to happen a lot sooner than anyone is predicting. There is a global
war underway right now, being fought with conventional and non-conventi
It's because they can use it to rationalize their philosophy of being
self-centered, selfish, greedy assholes.
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:grussg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 04:55 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Schools Find Ayn Rand Cant Be Shrugged as Don
Exactly right if you kept putting it on your credit card for 50 years.
There's hope for you yet.
.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
>
> That's like saying since you told your wife you should sign up for a
> $100 of cable per month that you've spent $60,000.
>
~
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/26/cbos-2020-vision-debt-will-rise-to-90-of-gdp/
The federal public debt, which was $6.3 trillion ($56,000 per
household) when Mr. Obama entered office amid an economic crisis,
totals $8.2 trillion ($72,000 per household) today, and its headed
toward
So happy for you.
So jealous at the same time.
So not trying to compare my life to yours.
So failing.
So long.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> Finally had our Open House party for the new office. We had a
> photographer come shoot it, and I uploaded the pics last
Sam wrote:
>
> Spin it however you want, Obama signed the bill into law that will
> spend $14 trillion more than we'll take in.
That's like saying since you told your wife you should sign up for a
$100 of cable per month that you've spent $60,000.
If that's your standard then President Washingt
Robert Munn wrote:
>
> BS. I have had lots of managers in the corporate world tell me that
> outsourcing is almost entirely about labor arbitrage because that's where
> the money is.
Sure. That's what they told you. Now ask them to open their books
and see how it all worked out. The correct a
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Spin it however you want, Obama signed the bill into law that will
> spend $14 trillion more than we'll take in.
> While we haven't spent the money yet we will owe it. It's law.
>
The President cannot Vito the budget, he can only suggest how we spe
Spin it however you want, Obama signed the bill into law that will
spend $14 trillion more than we'll take in.
While we haven't spent the money yet we will owe it. It's law.
I'm a little shocked that in this day and age you would knock Reagan
as a big spender while supporting Obama.
.
On Mon, M
That's why Ireland was so popular for tech for so many years. They
even had to import workers to keep up with demand. Now it's getting
too expensive so where's next?
.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> BS. I have had lots of managers in the corporate world tell me that
> o
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Vivec wrote:
> Dude your office looks amazing!! :-)
Thanks!!!
-Cameron
...
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=hous
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/16/foreclosure-fraud-audit-false-claims-act_n_862686.html
WASHINGTON -- A set of confidential federal audits accuse the nations five
largest mortgage companies of defrauding taxpayers in their handling of
foreclosures on homes purchased with government-backe
Dude your office looks amazing!! :-)
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/messa
Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> I don't recall saying it was super important. I referenced other material
> that said it was important. That said, I refuse to interpret the material
> that is right there before you. I will paste it here so you can try again.
>
>
You said: "2nd most important book".
G Money wrote:
>
> Let's just drop the silliness of saying "so and so outspent others from the
> past in terms of raw dollars", since that makes no sense.
>
> Debt, now and in the immediate future, is a huge concern. I would hope even
> ardent supporters of Obama would realize that. (this one doe
BS. I have had lots of managers in the corporate world tell me that
outsourcing is almost entirely about labor arbitrage because that's where
the money is. Loose environmental and employment regulations help, too, but
labor costs are the big enchilada, as labor in a typical US firm makes up
the si
Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> All I am saying it that the market cost of outsourcing, particularly in
> regards to employees, is more profitable than staying at home.
>
> Can I assume you disagree?
>
I'm not sure what you mean by "market cost" but yes, in general I
disagree, depending on who, what, wh
Thanks for the tip. I picked it up.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> I know we usually do new music on Tuesday, but for those of you who
> like country or acoustic music, Matraca Berg's new album Dreaming
> Fields is available today only on Amazon's Daily Deal for $2.99
>
> O
Finally had our Open House party for the new office. We had a
photographer come shoot it, and I uploaded the pics last week.
Thought I would share...
http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.215906328428610.58778.206714572681119
-Cameron
(What can I say... some people have babies - I have an
I know we usually do new music on Tuesday, but for those of you who
like country or acoustic music, Matraca Berg's new album Dreaming
Fields is available today only on Amazon's Daily Deal for $2.99
One of the best singer/songwriter albums that I've heard in a while.
http://www.amazon.com/The-Dre
Treasury to tap pensions to help fund government
The Obama administration will begin to tap federal retiree programs to help
fund operations after the government lost its ability Monday to borrow more
money from the public, adding urgency to efforts in Washington to fashion a
compromise over the
Justice David:* "We believe a right to resist an unlawful police entry into
a home is against public policy and is incompatible with modern Fourth
Amendment jurisprudence"
*Hmmm. The old "modern" fourth amendment jurisprudence. Very much like the
living and breathing document crowd.*
**
*J
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESCxYchCaWI&feature=youtu.be
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/gro
BTW, current law is a cop can walk up and beat the crap out of you
then charge you with resisting arrest. They don't even need an initial
charge that you were resisting.
Could be blocking a punch by an officer for all the courts care.
.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Jacob wrote:
>
> Have t
If an officer asks you to enter your home and you say yes then it's a
legal search. If you say no and he kicks in the door do you just pull
down your pants and grab your ankles?
With this new law they don't even have to ask, they are free to enter
any home anytime. No announcements necessary.
Sc
Have to be careful when resisting an illegal detention/arrest/search etc...
If the detention/arrest/search is illegal, it wont be determined until
probably months down the line in the courts. That decision wont be made
while the police are at your door step. You may think it is illegal, but
the
A misanthropic fiction author that the current Republican party essentially
bases is form of fascism off of...
-Original Message-
From: Ras Tafari [mailto:rastaf...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 09:20 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: _Schools_Find_Ayn_Rand_Can't_Be_Shrugged_as_Do
"So how about a little help explaining it to us dense folk: 'Rand's books
are super important because ..'"
I don't recall saying it was super important. I referenced other material
that said it was important. That said, I refuse to interpret the material
that is right there before you. I will
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> For the purpose of the statement that Obama has spent more than all
> other presidents combined? Yes.
>
> As for the reason I made that comment, GG used 2008 articles to state
> Bush was the biggest spender. I was just updating his outdated point
For the purpose of the statement that Obama has spent more than all
other presidents combined? Yes.
As for the reason I made that comment, GG used 2008 articles to state
Bush was the biggest spender. I was just updating his outdated point.
Since Obama has already spent, in the future and without
Mr. Obama's $3.6 trillion budget blueprint, by his own admission, redefines
the role of government in our economy and society. The budget more than
doubles the national debt held by the public, adding more to the debt than
all previous presidents -- from George Washington to George W. Bush --
comb
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Maureen wrote:
>
> You aren't very precise in your use of language. Proposed spending
> over 10 years is not the same as having actually spent that money.
> Obama will not even be in office in ten years, so he will hardly have
> control over what is being spent.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> 1946 was $264 Billion
>
> You need a lot of years like that to reach $14 trillion
>
Are you seriously comparing a dollar from 1946 to a dollar in 2011
~|
Order the Adobe Co
Exactly. So look it up.
.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> G Money wrote:
>>
>> I believe our debt as a percentage of our GDP was higher around world war 2
>> than it is now.
>>
>
> Yes, Sam has no facts around what he's saying so he's dodging the questions.
>
> Of cours
1946 was $264 Billion
You need a lot of years like that to reach $14 trillion
.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:39 AM, G Money wrote:
>
> I believe our debt as a percentage of our GDP was higher around world war 2
> than it is now.
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Sam wrote:
>
>>
>> Awe, you'
You aren't very precise in your use of language. Proposed spending
over 10 years is not the same as having actually spent that money.
Obama will not even be in office in ten years, so he will hardly have
control over what is being spent.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Awe, you'
"I'm assuming you wouldn't agree with that, so, to prove your point, why
don't you detail out those market infrastructure costs you think are
legitimate and then tie them to a broader fiscal policy and explain how that
would preserve markets and thus grow wealth"
Assume all you want.
All I am sa
"She's an author who wrote some fantasy books. For me the worlds and story
lines she creates are mediocre, but the worst part is the writing is slow
and massively tedious. If you enjoy listening to 2 people discuss boardroom
politics for hours on end you'll love Atlas Shrugged."
It is long and
G Money wrote:
>
> I believe our debt as a percentage of our GDP was higher around world war 2
> than it is now.
>
Yes, Sam has no facts around what he's saying so he's dodging the questions.
Of course all of this data is freely available from the CBO.
~
I believe our debt as a percentage of our GDP was higher around world war 2
than it is now.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Awe, you're upset.
>
> I'll give you another hint.
> BamBam is adding $14 trillion to the deficit over than next 10 years.
> Add up all the trillions that
Awe, you're upset.
I'll give you another hint.
BamBam is adding $14 trillion to the deficit over than next 10 years.
Add up all the trillions that all the other presidents left as debt
and see if it's higher than 14.
.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Sam wrote:
>>
>>
Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "Important how? "
>
> Check the link. I can't read for you.
>
> While you may put credence in current reviews, I certainly don't. Time is a
> better measure of importance.
>
I read it all. I didn't get any of the "important" you're talking about at all.
What I did get
Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "Let's take an example from the airline industry, and then you explain how
> and where government interference is causing unprofitability at home:"
>
> No. Let's not take your example. It misses the whole point.
>
Ok, let's take all that stuff which I'll call "market inf
wow, i fell asleep reading that. so yeah, no.
lol
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Ras Tafari wrote:
>>
>> who is ayn rand anyway? should i care?
>>
>
> She's an author who wrote some fantasy books. For me the worlds and
> story lines she creates are mediocre, but the w
Ras Tafari wrote:
>
> who is ayn rand anyway? should i care?
>
She's an author who wrote some fantasy books. For me the worlds and
story lines she creates are mediocre, but the worst part is the
writing is slow and massively tedious. If you enjoy listening to 2
people discuss boardroom politi
who is ayn rand anyway? should i care?
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
>
> what happens to some of these subject lines ... ???
>
> Michael?
>
>
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.
what happens to some of these subject lines ... ???
Michael?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/
I have spared my brain by never even attempting to read the Left
Behind series. Just hearing my fundy relatives gush about it was bad
enough.
I've spent many years studying theology of various stripes, and have
read hundreds of books on all the different traditions, but I have
deliberately avoid
"Let's take an example from the airline industry, and then you explain how
and where government interference is causing unprofitability at home:"
No. Let's not take your example. It misses the whole point.
Employers have to contribute to social security above and beyond what the
employees contr
"Important how? "
Check the link. I can't read for you.
"Atlas Shrugged received largely negative reviews after its 1957
publication"
While you may put credence in current reviews, I certainly don't. Time is a
better measure of importance.
J
-
Human freedom is the first wish of our heart,
No worst tripe ever goes to Left Behind...though the spoof, Right Behind,
was totally hilarious.
-Original Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 02:42 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: _Schools_Find_Ayn_Rand_Can't_Be_Shrugged_as_Don__ors_Buil d_
Actually the books were not too bad (I have definitely read a lot
better)...movie really sucked though.
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:grussg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2011 11:41 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: _Schools_Find_Ayn_Rand_Can't_Be_Shrugged_as_Don__ors_
That was a great quote hehehe...
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:grussg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2011 11:32 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Schools Find Ayn Rand Can't Be Shrugged as Don ors Build C
Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> I guess that makes it even more impres
"The expression 'know your enemy' comes to mind."
I don't consider Hubbard an enemy. I have read Alinsky, Marx and Engles, Al
Gore, and so on. Hubbard is a non-factor.
J
-
Ninety percent of politicians give the other ten percent a bad reputation. -
Henry Kissinger
Politicians are people who
Yeah, true. But you can know the evils of what Hubbard left behind
without slogging through his turgid prose. It is truly the worst I've
ever read. A friend gave me a copy of a Hubbard book. I attempted to
read it. Bad mistake.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> The expressio
The expression "know your enemy" comes to mind.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:42 AM, Maureen wrote:
>
> No one should be subjected to reading L. Ron Hubbard. Worst tripe ever.
>
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Eric Roberts
> wrote:
> >
> > Sounds like you need to read more...
> >
> > -Orig
No one should be subjected to reading L. Ron Hubbard. Worst tripe ever.
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Sounds like you need to read more...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry Barnes [mailto:critic...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2011 09:33 PM
> To: cf-c
58 matches
Mail list logo
