Too bad you missed it. It was a great game.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Me. It's on early here on the west coast compared to what I'm used to and I
> was doing some work and the next thing I know someone was telling me the
> score and I really didn't care.
>
> I'm
Me. It's on early here on the west coast compared to what I'm used to and I
was doing some work and the next thing I know someone was telling me the score
and I really didn't care.
I'm actually getting back into pro football after a hiatus but ... I dunno.
Just eh.
~~~
Both Gingrich and Romney guilty of voter fraud?
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=9099
stay tuned
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archi
This Congress. Existing problems. What does the Bill of Rights have
to do with that.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Let's start with the Bill of Rights and then work our way through the
> centuries.
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Maureen wrote:
>>
>> Even sadder is that
Let's start with the Bill of Rights and then work our way through the centuries.
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Even sadder is that you will never realize why that statement makes
> sense, because you seem to be unable to recognize the difference
> between facts and opini
Even sadder is that you will never realize why that statement makes
sense, because you seem to be unable to recognize the difference
between facts and opinion. However, if you are convinced that the
fact as stated is wrong offer your proof.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Sad thi
Sad thing is you believe that statement makes sense. Even sadder is
other fools will high five you.
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> No. I am saying that the statement "Congress has solved none of the
> existing problems" is a fact. It has nothing to do with me being
> righ
Remind me when I see you to tell you the story of the cat and the dildo.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> but usually cats figure it out after a day or two ;)
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
>>
>> Yeah, but it's funny as hell to watch him run in circles chasi
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Dana wrote:
> but usually cats figure it out after a day or two ;)
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
>>
>> Yeah, but it's funny as hell to watch him run in circles chasing his tail.
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Dana wrote:
>> >
>> >
but usually cats figure it out after a day or two ;)
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Yeah, but it's funny as hell to watch him run in circles chasing his tail.
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Dana wrote:
> >
> > quickly tiresome and ultimately pointless?
> >
> > On Sun,
Yeah, but it's funny as hell to watch him run in circles chasing his tail.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> quickly tiresome and ultimately pointless?
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
>>
>> Yeah, it's the same kind of fun as teasing the cat with the laser poin
quickly tiresome and ultimately pointless?
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Yeah, it's the same kind of fun as teasing the cat with the laser pointer.
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Larry C. Lyons
> wrote:
> >
> > please don't confuse Sam with facts. He starts to pout an
Yeah, it's the same kind of fun as teasing the cat with the laser pointer.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> please don't confuse Sam with facts. He starts to pout and gets upset.
~|
Order the Adobe Cold
please don't confuse Sam with facts. He starts to pout and gets upset.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> No. I am saying that the statement "Congress has solved none of the
> existing problems" is a fact. It has nothing to do with me being
> right or wrong. Facts are facts.
>
and you certainly are opinionated. I wonder if there is a connection.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> You know what they say about opinions?
> ...
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Maureen wrote:
>>
>> No, what Congress is doing is wasting time and taxpayer money making
>> po
No. I am saying that the statement "Congress has solved none of the
existing problems" is a fact. It has nothing to do with me being
right or wrong. Facts are facts.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Your response is congress does nothing good so you are always right?
> Do you kno
the point is, Sam, that it was one part of a primary care visit. You're
belittling a group that provides primary care where it's needed, and you're
saying the *left* is looking for a boogeyman? Go be outraged about people
who aren't saving lives, Sam.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Sam wrote:
And the class clown says something stupid as expected.
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 8:01 PM, PT wrote:
>
> No. No. You need to answer in Sam-think.
>
> Ahem.
>
> So, are you saying this is a real problem?
~|
Order the Adobe Col
Your response is congress does nothing good so you are always right?
Do you know Eric?
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> When Congress actually produces a solution to any of the existing
> problems facing the nation, you can label this opinion. Based on
> their current recor
Yeah, we've been over this. There other services have little to do
with breast cancer funding. The mammogram they sent you for at a
reduced price was paid for by the State. It's good to know they told
you where to get it done but they don't get finders credit. The breast
checks are good to have b
No. No. You need to answer in Sam-think.
Ahem.
So, are you saying this is a real problem?
On 2/5/2012 7:57 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> When Congress actually produces a solution to any of the existing
> problems facing the nation, you can label this opinion. Based on
> their current record, it's a
When Congress actually produces a solution to any of the existing
problems facing the nation, you can label this opinion. Based on
their current record, it's a stone fact.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> You know what they say about opinions?
> ...
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 6:
ok well, yanno... I'm speaking as someone who has been a Planned Parenthood
patient, and you aren't interested, which probably tells us everything we
need to know. But I'll explain this one more time. I show up and say yanno,
just got here, haven't made contact with the coumadin clinic, but I hav
no. Why should it be?
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Is that a breast cancer treatment?
>
> .
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Dana wrote:
> >
> > it's not even just GYN care! They were keeping me in coumadin when I
> first
> > moved to California, which probably only saved
You know what they say about opinions?
...
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> No, what Congress is doing is wasting time and taxpayer money making
> political hay on this red herring nonsense instead of finding
> solutions for the real problems.
>
~~
The shoes and gloves fit in this case...
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 4:38 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: FW: Susan G. Komen backs down on Planned Parenthood
if the shoe fits...
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:26 PM,
...and don't forget the millions spent of suing other cancer orgs for using
"For the cure"...
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 3:47 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Susan G. Komen backs down on Planned Parenthood
Sam
No, what Congress is doing is wasting time and taxpayer money making
political hay on this red herring nonsense instead of finding
solutions for the real problems.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> That what congress is doing.
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Maureen wrote:
>>
>
I am responding to your comment in a non meaningful way?
On 2/5/2012 6:13 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> That what congress is doing.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/14302721
That what congress is doing.
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> There is no evidence that any of the Komen funds were used for
> anything other than breast exams and screenings. There is also no
> evidence, in spite of the political nonsense being spread by the
> opposition,
There is no evidence that any of the Komen funds were used for
anything other than breast exams and screenings. There is also no
evidence, in spite of the political nonsense being spread by the
opposition, that any taxpayer funds were used for abortions.
If you have proof, you should produce it.
Stating the obvious confuses you? It's the odds lar. It's known what
they do, it's just catching them at it. This is a distraction to take
focus away.
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> so how does that demonstrate they they used fed funds for that. I
> though the whole
You just spin around until you get dizzy hoping nobody notices your lost?
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> false equivalence argument. Like a 10 year old who says well the
> others are doing it.
>
> Sigh, just because other do such, does it make it right? Moreover in
I swear you guys are twins
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> if the shoe fits...
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=hous
Is that a breast cancer treatment?
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> it's not even just GYN care! They were keeping me in coumadin when I first
> moved to California, which probably only saved my life. The thing that
> really makes me angry about this latest post is that we've
The primary age group is teen to low thirties.
Yes they might have a few over thirty.
PP does not perform mammograms. And of you did tell me things before
they were wrong then too.
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> No. Not at all. This money was mammograms. You are wrong both a
so how does that demonstrate they they used fed funds for that. I
though the whole idea of j'accuse went out with the execution of
Robespierre.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> 300,000 abortions a year and you don't think any Federal money wen
> towards even one?
>
> .
>
> On Sun,
false equivalence argument. Like a 10 year old who says well the
others are doing it.
Sigh, just because other do such, does it make it right? Moreover in
terms of what is spent on salaries etc., the Komen foundation has been
criticized multiple times over their inflated payroll.
On Sun, Feb 5,
You're turning an investment in curing breast cancer into a
contraception argument.
The Komen funds aren't intended to go to condoms or abortions.
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Less than 4% of the services provided by Planned Parenthood involve
> abortion. The other se
if the shoe fits...
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> You shouldn't enter every discussion calling people facist or nazis
> and expect to participate.
>
> .
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Eric Roberts
> wrote:
>>
>> The clinic I used to ALSO provided ob/gyn care to many pregna
300,000 abortions a year and you don't think any Federal money wen
towards even one?
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> and your hypocrisy make me laugh.
>
> That so called investigation has been shown to be entirely a political
> show by an anti-abortion fanatic.
Don't all charities have overhead and doesn't PP pay it's executives
huge salaries?
What was your point again?
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> Sam do you understand what women's health is? Or what the mission of
> the Koman foundation is? Its not just funding for can
You shouldn't enter every discussion calling people facist or nazis
and expect to participate.
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> The clinic I used to ALSO provided ob/gyn care to many pregnant women
> throughout their pregnancy. They do support life if that's the choice.
You're using emotion rather than logic to attack. The issue is breast
cancer, but you made my point. Many younger women that aren't likely
to get breast cancer use PP.
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
>
> OMFG. Really? You turned it into abortions and you're coming down
Do you not now the difference between breast cancer and a pap smear?
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> It is this sort of ignorance why I hold you in contempt. Have you any
> idea about what Planned Parenthood does? Aside from the reich wing
> mantra of abortion that
who said they were doing research? They do basic doctor stuff, yanno, like
checkups? Duh.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> I love the fake outrage.
>
> My view of PP is they are not doing breast cancer research and they
> are under investigation. Shouldn't charitable contributions
they are cheap if you need them to be, Sam. They'll ask for a certain
amount for an office visit -- which is rather low, around $45 as I recall
-- but if you can't pay it they will take what you can.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> One, we're discussing breast cancer.
> Two, the
it's not even just GYN care! They were keeping me in coumadin when I first
moved to California, which probably only saved my life. The thing that
really makes me angry about this latest post is that we've already had this
conversation and it's like I was talking to a wall when I told you before.
No. Not at all. This money was mammograms. You are wrong both about the age
group they serve and about the services they offer. They do primary care in
a lot of places; I told you that before.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> They don't need that small change. When a girl goes in
Less than 4% of the services provided by Planned Parenthood involve
abortion. The other services they do provide likely prevent more
abortions than all the rhetoric from the opposition. What is not
being said is that most of the opposition, especially that funded by
the Catholic church, is not j
and your hypocrisy make me laugh.
That so called investigation has been shown to be entirely a political
show by an anti-abortion fanatic.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> I love the fake outrage.
>
> My view of PP is they are not doing breast cancer research and they
> are under
Sam do you understand what women's health is? Or what the mission of
the Koman foundation is? Its not just funding for cancer research. All
in all about 17% of the money raised by the Komen foundation goes to
cancer research, while another 13% goes for preventative services
which includes breast e
Under investigation by 1 Christo-fascist wackjob rep from Florida...somehow
I dont think that fits any sane or intelligent person's definition of Under
Investigation.
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 11:49 AM
To: cf-community
Su
The tax dollars subsidize them so they don't cost as much dumbass.
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 11:42 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: FW: Susan G. Komen backs down on Planned Parenthood
One, we're discussing breast cancer.
T
Pap smears and breast exams are among the MANY services PP provides
besides abortion care.
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 11:39 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: FW: Susan G. Komen backs down on Planned Parenthood
And they hav
The clinic I used to ALSO provided ob/gyn care to many pregnant women
throughout their pregnancy. They do support life if that's the choice.
Hence the name PLANNED Parenthood
This as opposed to the Christo-fascist's FORCED parenthood
-Original Message-
From: Erika L. Rich [mailto:elr.
OMFG. Really? You turned it into abortions and you're coming down on me?
Whatever dude.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> And they have $billions for that, mostly tax dollars.
>
> We're discussing breast cancer prevention and you're talking pap smears.
> Stay focused and stop bei
I love the fake outrage.
My view of PP is they are not doing breast cancer research and they
are under investigation. Shouldn't charitable contributions go to
business that aren't under legal investigation for the fraudulent use
of funds? I would expect at least that from my contributions.
To ma
One, we're discussing breast cancer.
Two, they are not cheap. They take tax dollars and charge for service.
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> It is this sort of ignorance why I hold you in contempt. Have you any
> idea about what Planned Parenthood does? Aside from th
And they have $billions for that, mostly tax dollars.
We're discussing breast cancer prevention and you're talking pap smears.
Stay focused and stop being led by the fake outrage.
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
>
> Sam, I tend to largely ignore most of the stuff you ta
Why are you shifting focus?
If SGK doesn't like PP's mission then they should simply own it and publish
their view. You just published yours. (sadly).
Komen's actions are cowardly and that should disturb you as much as your view
of PP disturbs me.
On Feb 5, 2012, at 7:34 AM, Sam wrote:
It is this sort of ignorance why I hold you in contempt. Have you any
idea about what Planned Parenthood does? Aside from the reich wing
mantra of abortion that is. Frequently it is the only provider for
women's health in many areas, and for women who are poor. Frankly Sam
you really need to try
Sam, I tend to largely ignore most of the stuff you talk about because I'm
not interested in politics like you are ... but I find these comments to be
so abhorrent and ignorant it warranted a response.
Since you aren't a woman though, I guess I need to take your view point
with a grain of salt as
They don't need that small change. When a girl goes in for an
Abortion, I mean to plan parenthood, they get a quick breast exam
among a few other routine exams. That doesn't cost them extra but
qualifies them for other monies since it appears their purpose is no
longer solely abortion. Seams to wo
64 matches
Mail list logo
