Ok now THATS funny!
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson wrote:
>
>
> http://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/showbiz/2013/05/29/fod-clinton-foundation-celebrity-division.funny-or-die.html
>
>
>
~|
Order the Ad
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Civil Unions do not create equality, If they did, we would call them
> marriage.
>
Kinda stupid if you think about it.
Why not call civil unions marriage? Why do you think only the use of the
word marriage can create equality? Seems lik
Who feeds you this gibberish?
.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Not a Constitutional right, but an unalienable one - you know, part of
> life, liberty, pursuit of hapiness
>
>
~|
Order the Adobe Cold
Apples and oranges. That ruling is based on thousands of years of
traditions from around the world. By introducing it that way, the same-sex
marriage has no standing. I'm sure that ruling can also apply to
sacrificial lambs the way you're using it.It doesn't declare what a
marriage is, but uses tr
Civil Unions do not create equality, If they did, we would call them
marriage.
We have proven time and time again, 'separate but equal' simply does not
work.
I cannot understand how denying a person something granted to another
solely based on the gender of the person they love cannot be constru
Not a Constitutional right, but an unalienable one - you know, part of
life, liberty, pursuit of hapiness
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> So you do agree with the statement that if you don't support gay marriage
> you hate gays. That's just bizarre. Most of my gay friends don't
I say out loud that there is a noose with my name on it somewhere.
My son quips "Tatty (father), Michael is the most common name"
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1
Marriage is a right according the ruling in Loving vs. Virginia in 1967
In Chief Justice Earl Warren's opinion for the decision he stated that:
" Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our
very existence and survival..."
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sa
IF that is not true...they give me a good reason as to why Gay marriage
should not be allow that is not due to religion or hate...
-Original Message-
From: GMoney [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 3:57 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: BITTER SCALIA LEAVES U.S.
U
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:10 PM, GMoney wrote:
> I don't like to use the word "hate". Do they hate the people who are gay? I
> doubt it.
The article you found funny implied Scalia hated (disliked) gays so much he
was looking for a country that didn't have them.
Are they grossed out or uncomf
Ugh...absolutes.
You, George W. Bush, and the Sith.
Nice company.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> It's all based on Religion and Hate...period...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Vivec [mailto:gel21...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursd
It's all based on Religion and Hate...period...
-Original Message-
From: Vivec [mailto:gel21...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 3:43 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: BITTER SCALIA LEAVES U.S.
I'm interested in this as well, because I haven't yet heard one.
On 27 June 2013 16
I'm interested in this as well, because I haven't yet heard one.
On 27 June 2013 16:10, GMoney wrote:
>
> Samgive me one valid argument AGAINST gay marriage that does NOT
> involve a view that would prejudice against homosexuals, or in some way
> cast their love as inferior or even harmful
The SCOTUS ruled that marriage is a basic fundamental right...
Where the constitutional issue comes into play is that by denying gay
marriages, you are violating people's 1st amendment rights and violating the
5th Amendment's Equal Protection clause. That was highlighted in this where
this woman
On the other hand, won't it also add to it as well...look at weddings,
anniversaries, etc?
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Milo Johnson [mailto:jmi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 2:31 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: BITTER SCALIA LEAVES U.S.
It is going to cost more money
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> So you do agree with the statement that if you don't support gay marriage
> you hate gays.
I don't like to use the word "hate". Do they hate the people who are gay? I
doubt it. Are they grossed out or uncomfortable with people who are gay?
Most l
I don't know how or why the government didn't pay out the benefits it
should and I think that's a crime. Put to use the court to label people
bigots is a turn for the worse. That's the issue here, not the funds.
.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:43 PM, GMoney wrote:
>
> Heh...it would cost too muc
So you do agree with the statement that if you don't support gay marriage
you hate gays. That's just bizarre. Most of my gay friends don't give a
rats ass about gay marriage and they don't hate gays. Only the ones that
hate hero-sexuals do. In my experience.
Marriage isn't a constitutional right
Heh...it would cost too much money to provide benefits to people who always
should have had them from the beginning!
Even that argument would probably be rooted in bigotry. People only dislike
government money being spent if it's being spent on something or SOMEONE
they don't like. Conservatives
It is going to cost more money out of the federal tax base, because people
that were previously denied are now going to qualify for things.
(estate taxes, health care, ss benefits, immigration marriage issues, etc).
(Not a good argument, imho, but possibly factual)
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:26
Ok then, I have a serious question (or series of questions):
For what other reason, besides bigotry, would someone oppose gay marriage?
What possible argument could anyone have to oppose gay marriage that would
not contain the sense that for some reason a "straight marriage" is
superior to a "gay
He doesn't even have a legitimate legal opinion when he states that it's not
the SCOTUS' job to compare state and federal laws to the Constitution...that
is exactly their job as per the Constitution.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 27,
http://go.bloomberg.com/political-capital/2013-06-25/obamas-flat-earth-society-tweetospheric-warming/
...
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoff
That's funny.
.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> you must remember, the guy is quick to recognize hate (since he's so full
> of it) and rarely recognized humor - since he's so humorless.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:50 PM, GMoney wrote:
>
> >
> > what's hateful ab
What do you take?
.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> > Really?
> >
> > So you must also believe that Scalia and everyone else that didn't agree
> > with this legal decision hates gays. You really need to get past the
Calling someone a bigot because of lack of understand of the facts is never
funny. It's promoting hate to paint someone with a legitimate legal
position as a hater. The only way that can be even a little funny is if
you truly believed he hates gays.
.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:21 PM, GMoney
you must remember, the guy is quick to recognize hate (since he's so full
of it) and rarely recognized humor - since he's so humorless.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:50 PM, GMoney wrote:
>
> what's hateful about it?
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> >
> > Ignorant hate di
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Sam wrote:
> Really?
>
> So you must also believe that Scalia and everyone else that didn't agree
> with this legal decision hates gays. You really need to get past the "agree
> with me or you're a bigot" attitude.
>
Man, that chip has to cause you shoulder pain.
Luckily I don't have that attitude, so you have misread me (once again).
I was just asking a question. Satire always takes a person's views, good or
bad, and exaggerates them. YOu call it hate because it's making fun of a
position you agree with. I call it sort-of funny...but not all that
origina
Really?
So you must also believe that Scalia and everyone else that didn't agree
with this legal decision hates gays. You really need to get past the "agree
with me or you're a bigot" attitude.
just saying
.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:50 PM, GMoney wrote:
>
> what's hateful about it?
>
>
>
what's hateful about it?
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Ignorant hate disguised as humor.
>
> Yeah.
>
> .
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Cameron Childress >wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/borowitzreport/2013/03/bitter-scalia-leaves-us.h
Ignorant hate disguised as humor.
Yeah.
.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
>
> http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/borowitzreport/2013/03/bitter-scalia-leaves-us.html
>
> ...
>
>
>
~|
Order the
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/borowitzreport/2013/03/bitter-scalia-leaves-us.html
...
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archiv
Seems awfully sketchy at best. You'd think that he would have had more of a
legacy with building more successful planes afterwards.
On Jun 27, 2013, at 9:14 AM, Bruce Sorge wrote:
>
> So according to an Australian documentary, Gustav Whitehead was the first to
> fly, not Orville and Wilbur
I'll have to update my wife's phone and see what it's about.
Sent from my iPhone 4S.
On Jun 27, 2013, at 10:43 AM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> Anyone else get the update?
>
> Multi screen is pimp as shit
>
>
>
~|
Order the Ad
Anyone else get the update?
Multi screen is pimp as shit
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/grou
There's also Samuel Pierpont Langley, the Secretary of the Smithsonian. He
flew an early airplane called the Aerodrome about two years before the
Wright brothers. It was launched via a catapult over the Potomac
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Bruce Sorge wrote:
>
> So according to an Austral
Its kind of like the whole Marconi, Tesla, Bell and the rest.
Lots of people were working in the same efforts during those years am often
the guys who got the credit didn't deserve it.
Hell ohio and nc both claim to be the birthplace of flight both over the
Wright's.
On Jun 27, 2013 10:14 AM, "B
So according to an Australian documentary, Gustav Whitehead was the first to
fly, not Orville and Wilbur Wright. And the Connecticut governor has OK'd a law
erasing the wright brothers from the history books.
The Smithsonian says that this is wrong.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/06/27
39 matches
Mail list logo
