When we say things like "didn't take jobs" that implies that there were
jobs for the taking. There were not a lot of unfilled jobs out there, so
how could unemployment benefits have any affect on whether or not an
individual got a job?
If there were a bunch of unfilled jobs and people were choosi
Looks like the middle is taking the hit:
http://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2014/05/just-released-what-kinds-of-jobs-have-been-created-during-the-recovery.html
In fact, upstate New York and Puerto Rico have continued to lose
middle-skill jobs during the recovery, while there were essen
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Cameron Childress
wrote:
> I have a much more optimistic outlook than that. Humans are so bad at
> driving compared to a computer. No matter how dumber idiots get, I think a
> computer will always react faster and more reliably to them.
>
You obviously have bett
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Sam wrote:
> I read it as people with unemployment benefits didn't take jobs until
> the benefits expired. Question is, are they low paying jobs? When I
> was unemployed, it would have been a waste to take a $10 hr job and
> not get benefits vs spending hours a d
I read it as people with unemployment benefits didn't take jobs until
the benefits expired. Question is, are they low paying jobs? When I
was unemployed, it would have been a waste to take a $10 hr job and
not get benefits vs spending hours a day looking for a high paying
one.
.
On Tue, Jan 27,
That article made no sense at all to me.
"The new new working paper found that the expiration of benefits was
responsible for the creation of over 1.8 million jobs. Nearly 1 million of
those jobs were created by workers who would have otherwise stayed out of
the labor force if unemployment benefi
I have been holding back on lots of news articles because they were
political in nature recently ^_^
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:51 PM, C. Hatton Humphrey wrote:
> Yes *but* the old axiom of, "build a better mousetrap, you get a smarter
> mouse" can also be phrased, "make things idiot-proof, get dumber idiots".
>
I have a much more optimistic outlook than that. Humans are so bad at
driving compar
I would say this group is good talking about policy, but not so good with
politics. Especially the unthinking/unmoving/name calling sort that sadly
passes for much political discourse in this country today.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:50 PM, C. Hatton Humphrey
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Cameron Childress
wrote:
> From what I understand that is a total non-issue. The autonomous cars that
> are *already* out there on the road deal with "rouge idiots" far better
> than humans do. The tech capabilities around this seems to be growing
> exponentiall
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Maureen wrote:
> The two articles mentioned do seem out of place in the Money section.
> Looks like perhaps some Money staffer has an agenda.
>
Thanks for the background and yes, she does look like she's protesting a
bit too much.
Until Later!
C. Hatton Humph
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Cameron Childress
wrote:
> I hereby deem the list cured.
I disagree, this list is nothing like ham... plus that's an anti-semitic
statement!
(*GDnR*)
Until Later!
C. Hatton Humphrey
http://www.eastcoastconservative.com
Like the saying goes, "Measure Twice, C
Harf-Psaki is an insidious disease
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/01/harfpsaki_is_an_insidious_disease.html
Very biased of course but what the hey
.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/
Done
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 7:49 AM, C. Hatton Humphrey
wrote:
>
> Done
>
> Until Later!
> C. Hatton Humphrey
> http://www.eastcoastconservative.com
>
> Like the saying goes, "Measure Twice, Cut Onc..."
>
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Judith Dinowitz <
> jdino...@houseoffusion.com
> > wro
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Sam wrote:
> I was told nobody here likes talking politics.
>
> Try something else.
I hereby deem the list cured.
-Cameron
...
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.
I was told nobody here likes talking politics.
Try something else.
.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> Just trying to get the list-people going a bit. :)
>
> -Cameron
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusio
CNN Money is a separate site from CNN.COM although .COM will link to
articles on Money. The articles on Money are there because they were
written by Money staffers instead of .COM staffers. All articles are
tagged but the display created by automatically selecting the tags
only happens below th
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:44 AM, C. Hatton Humphrey wrote:
>
> In a perfect world autonomous cars will be able to function moderately well
> but there is going to be an issue of legacy drivers to deal with.
>From what I understand that is a total non-issue. The autonomous cars that
are *already
He's been reading too much sci-fi.
In a perfect world autonomous cars will be able to function moderately well
but there is going to be an issue of legacy drivers to deal with.
Until Later!
C. Hatton Humphrey
http://www.eastcoastconservative.com
Like the saying goes, "Measure Twice, Cut Onc..."
http://zackkanter.com/2015/01/23/how-ubers-autonomous-cars-will-destroy-10-million-jobs-by-2025/
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusio
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Cameron Childress
wrote:
> The article obviously has an agenda, as does the source I am sure.
>
> Just trying to get the list-people going a bit. :)
>
Yeah, it's been way quiet around these halls lately. Might be too much
grog or not enough nog.
Me personally
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 8:58 AM, C. Hatton Humphrey wrote:
> I'm sure someone is going to criticize the source, the method of research
> or the organization that sponsored the study.
The article obviously has an agenda, as does the source I am sure.
Just trying to get the list-people going a b
A part of me wants to say, "imagine that..."
Another part wants to make some nebulous comment about causation and
correlation.
I'm sure someone is going to criticize the source, the method of research
or the organization that sponsored the study.
Until Later!
C. Hatton Humphrey
http://www.eastc
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/article/2559267
...
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/
24 matches
Mail list logo
