Condolences, Jim. Sounds like a great man.
--
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w
Archive:
http://www.hou
Thanks Tony. I really wish there to be another solution... been
running the logic loops 'round and 'round.
Again, Thanks.
We're gonna stop thinking about it for a bit and enjoy the SB. W00t!
Yes, football will be good!
--
On Feb 3, 2008 3:39 PM, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I feel your
Thanks for the ideas, and offers, Dana.
He's actually more of an AmStaff, with a beautiful brindle coat. The
scars from the skin infection he had blend right in. =]
Lovely looking dog, really. So regal.
We're worried about his behavior, which is rooted in pain... if he
were to bite someone aft
On Feb 3, 2008 9:38 AM, Crow T. Robot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I gotta agree with gel here - your solution is the most fucked up thing i
> have heard. unless there is something you're not telling us, there has to
> be some other reason besides death??? besides, what kind of vet would just
> p
On Feb 3, 2008 8:18 AM, Paul Ihrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yeah told my wife.
> she said there must be some one in your area who can cheaply deal with this
> type of problem.
Bottom line, it's about quality of life.
If living is the only parameter, there are options.
Living is not our only
On Feb 3, 2008 2:28 AM, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ???
>
> Shelter? Adoption?
He's basically a pit bull, which makes it a little hard, and then he's
got physical problems, which makes it worse.
Been treated like a family member for as long as we've had him (he was
a rescue).
He was never
We're putting our dog down.
He cannot handle the baby's newfound mobility.
We tried rationalizing various other solutions.
It's surreal. He's sleeping under my arm as I type this.
We've been through so much together -- tears me up.
shitty shitty shit shit.
My heart hurts.
--
~
Too late, now I'm Erika. Or, wait, maybe I'm Gruss?
Damnit, see what person switching can lead too?
On Jan 30, 2008 5:40 PM, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> oKAY then. You can be Erika this time. I'll be Dinner.
~
On Jan 30, 2008 3:34 PM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, what is this preemptive nonsense, unilateral, I'll give you, but
I was sorta poking at the fact that we didn't attack Iraq because of
the no-fly zone, or any of those other reasons.
We attacked, because we were attacked. You said
On Jan 30, 2008 3:32 PM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes it was as we were still at a state of war with them and they
> violated the terms of the cease fire.
And Iraq is the only country that has "violated" us?
My point, such as it is, is that War is a chess game-- of politics,
numbers, p
On Jan 30, 2008 12:40 PM, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Denny wrote:
> > In Real Life I sound much more like Julie Andrews.
> >
>
> Which brings up a good point: list anonymity means you have plausible
> deniability of association.
Which is extremely important, in an era where the gove
On Jan 29, 2008 6:20 PM, Matt Quackenbush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Funny, you don't look or sound much like Julie Andrews. ;-)
How do you know that? My anonymity has been borken!!!
Those .wav files were from when I was really wasted tho, so you gotta
cut me some slack.
In Real Life I soun
Actually, all that I said can be scrapped.
I forgot that we're not at war with Iraq.
We're at war with terror.
Hmmm this one, we can win! *wink*
--
Success is not the result of spontaneous combustion. You must set
yourself on fire.
Reggie Leach
On Jan 29, 2008 9:13 PM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you are going to argue about military action, at least address the
> realities of the theater you are talking about. We could have pulverized
> North Korea years ago, but it would have cost of the lives of 70,000+ US
> servicemen
On Jan 29, 2008 6:54 PM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, what act of war did North Korea commit?
Captured one of our wessels in international waters?
> They have done lots of stuff we don't like, but want deliberate acts of war?
>
> Iran has committed several, mainly revolving around the
On Jan 29, 2008 2:58 PM, Matt Quackenbush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then there's another side of that argument. I know someone who was recently
> sought out and hired specifically because of his involvement with lists and
> blogs, and had his name not been out there in the open, he most assured
Acts of war? Really?
*cough*North Korea*cough*
There's plenty of people we "should" wallop, many higher on the list
than the hanged man.
But whatever works for folks, I reckon.
Let's git 'em!
--
"He's right. No one can deny the results of No Child Left Behind,
because thanks to the program, n
Yay! If it's the neighborhood I think it is, I've got some friends in
the area. I've always liked it. Very "melded" to the terrain...
And the roads are super fun! Crazily curved, up and down, really quite a blast.
Yesh, congratz!!!
--
Could you imagine how horrible things would be if we alwa
On Jan 25, 2008 6:32 AM, Adam Churvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Take a look at how PowerPoint does its reflective title page type:
> > the base
> > > of the main object appears below the horizon, and the fade is more
> > subtle
> > > and more rapidly dissolving from that point downward.
> >
On Jan 25, 2008 6:30 AM, Deanna Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You know, I know I'm old school about this, but I have issues with a
> site where you can't get to any of the content if you turn off
> javascript, and you can't send a link to anything but the home page
> for no particular reas
On Jan 25, 2008 2:18 AM, Adam Churvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Take a look at how PowerPoint does its reflective title page type: the base
> of the main object appears below the horizon, and the fade is more subtle
> and more rapidly dissolving from that point downward.
Maybe it's on a shinyer
peace.
Amelia Earhart
On Jan 24, 2008 10:58 PM, Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *points to his "All I need to know, I learned from Star Wars" poster.*
>
> All too easy.
>
> DT
> -
> Ruling the galaxy with an iron fist, for a peaceful tomorrow.
>
&
hing cracked
> me up. I will have to look for it now.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Community"
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 1:04 AM
> Subject: Re: Stargate SG1
>
>
On Jan 24, 2008 5:31 PM, Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> She deletes the files and his only recourse is to have them recovered by a
> data recovery service = no backups of any kind. Off-site anyway. If my
> very business depended on $2.5 million worth of files, you can bet I would
> have backup
On Jan 24, 2008 4:24 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thanks for the offer, but I ended up getting the app working using the
> n-gram method.
Sure you did. ;]
That was some cool stuff tho... isn't math like, rock'n?
--
There is a sacredness in tears. They are not the mark of w
On Jan 24, 2008 3:25 PM, Rick Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I goo'ugled it to find out how to spell it.
Oh. Oh my.
*golf clap*
Very nice. Very nice indeed. =]
***
Firefly dusts SG, but I do enjoy SG quite allot.
Replaced my Andromeda, and then Farscape, late night SF fix.
--
On Jan 24, 2008 12:53 PM, Adkins, Randy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using CFEclipse and the CVS repository.
>
> I have several projects created within CFEclipse. Most of them are not
> associated to a CVS repository (backups copies and such).
> However out of maybe 10 projects, 2 of them are
On Jan 24, 2008 6:20 AM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Spooky dna test?
Haha! I just thought "maybe the mark of the beast is really our
epidermis" -- That's some ID people are always carrying.
Pretty scary, really.
Hmmm... do you think the founding fathers invisioned a land where
folks
On Jan 24, 2008 6:48 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ooopssorry, I thought we were talking about the cool kids... :)
Hey!
Loathe is so hip, he can't see over his pelvis!
I've had smooth sailing with ubuntu too-- been using it for everything
besides games, however. I find
It will drive you mad trying, Zaph.
I give grammar checkers mad props.
--
Sport is imposing order on what was chaos.
Anthony Starr
On Jan 24, 2008 8:15 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I"m trying to tweak my document management system so that typos are
> eliminated. Ideall
On Jan 23, 2008 8:08 PM, C. Hatton Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wait, won't Todd be pissed?
I was unaware that he was in the running, but man, Jim's got a tough
platform to beat, ya know?
Sly... "I'm not running" type spin... wow, he knows how work this crowd.
And his stance on frag'n r
On Jan 23, 2008 12:17 PM, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lets do a poll. Who do you think our next president will be?
I nominate Jim!
--
I bought some batteries, but they weren't included.
Steven Wright
~|
Adob
On Jan 23, 2008 11:05 AM, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bottom line is it would seem we're all screwed.
Oh my fucking god! I almost died laughing when I got to that line.
--
Creative work is play. It is free speculation using materials of one's
chosen form.
Stephen Nachmanovitch
~
On Jan 23, 2008 9:29 AM, Adam Churvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Damned Ambien :(
> > I am loathe to take sleeping pills unless I have someone
> > else who isn't on them sleeping with me that can monitor me.
>
> Folks, I'm wondering: do people no longer take a snifter of warm brandy
> before be
On Jan 21, 2008 5:15 PM, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll use a silicon muffin pan instead of the customary cast iron muffin pan
> everyone else gets. How's that?
I think I prefer the cast iron. More flava, ya know? =]
--
It's odd that you can get so anesthetized by your own pa
On Jan 21, 2008 4:58 PM, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
with a herring, I hope! Or perhaps a wet noodle?
> kisses
A *blush* =]
--
Getting ahead in a difficult profession requires avid faith in
yourself. That is why some people with mediocre talent, but with great
inner
On Jan 21, 2008 4:42 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is this xhtml? if so, does it make a difference to use selected="selected"
Ooo! Nice one, Zaph!
You know, Erika, if you had a loop, you'd only need to change it in
one place... ;-]
LOL
--
An epigram often flashes lig
On Jan 21, 2008 4:26 PM, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not doing a loop. I just want the select to have the value in the DB
> selected. there's ONLY those two values. Only two salespeople, and I am
> keeping it DEAD simple right now.
Assuming it isn't a caching issue, what happens w
On Jan 21, 2008 3:47 PM, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> got a variable. form.QISALESPERSON
>
> It is equal to "Jay"
>
> I have the following form element:
>
>
>Please Choose
> "Mike">selected>Mike
> "Jay">selected>Jay
>
I'd switch to looping over a list, rather than
I've offered to try to find a coder for a project at work, because
it's been really hit and miss with the contractors that have been
found for me.
I think part of the problem is poor specs.
I've never been asked to create any-- this is the first time I've been
given the chance to do it all.
I th
Like twin dirigibles emerging from a hangar...
On Jan 15, 2008 10:34 AM, Crow T. Robot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My top of the list would be "Mams of Mayhem".
Excellent!
--
Money frees you from doing things you dislike. Since I dislike doing
nearly everything, money is handy.
Groucho Marx
On 1/12/08, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That should have read least costly.
Ha! it's funny that you mention Iraq (I'm assuming you mean Desert
Storm?), since I keep thinking about that John Boyd. His biography
was an excellent read!
Just an interesting perspective on things.
We're bad-
On 1/12/08, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 12, 2008 10:10 AM, Dinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I wasn't talking about anything besides their existence.
> >
> > You aren't one of those people who goes to the funerals with the signs
> >
On 1/12/08, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Denny typed:
> > I'm pretty sure you're not a real. Has anyone actually met Sam in
> > person? Are you sure you're not Gruss? ;-)
> >
>
> Not cool dude.
>
I can't tell if you're being sarcastic
~~~
I thought we weren't taking casualties for those conflicts like we are
with this entrenched battle type stuff? Part of what pisses me off...
stupid people in power, not listening to those who should know. "Our
tech is like 5 troops for every one troop! People? We don't need no
stinking people!"
On Jan 11, 2008 1:52 PM, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Tons of people holding signs reading something along the lines of "we
> > tried, but the bastards usurped our rights"?
>
> You value what signs of tools say? Do you worship Shehan also?
I wasn't talking about anything besides their existe
On Jan 11, 2008 11:05 AM, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The truth of it is, these people are working, in many cases paying
> taxes, and our unemployment rate is at historic lows.
>
> So what's the problem?
I think that the last economic program I saw said the problem is more
between the
On Jan 11, 2008 7:01 AM, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> really. A lot of places I have worked allow in small doses. However, if a
> guy does it he is a good family man. If a woman does it (more than maybe
> once) she is too disorganized to set up proper daycare. Since this is an
> overwhelmingly
On Jan 10, 2008 7:20 PM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well let's remember Clinton was responsible for killing Americans that had
> weird religious ideas, or were entrapped into violating federal firearms
> laws.
>
> He also sold secrets, our entire patent catalogue and a Navy base to the
> C
On Jan 10, 2008 1:30 PM, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What part was BS? The part that states pro-American conservative
> leaders are very popular?
I'll butt in and say that if they are popular, they're popular with
the wrong kind of folks.
Have you no qualms about our current configurati
On Jan 9, 2008 6:42 PM, Mary Jo Sminkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For a full list of citations, here's the document to read. This lists most
> known papers on the shroud, hypotheses on the image formation, and summarizes
> the information in groups, from what is known fact, confirmed obse
Um, that would be "principle" not "principal". Yeesh!
(Yeah, that finger will hold the dam, sotospeak ;)
--
If thou are a master, be sometimes blind; if a servant, sometimes deaf.
Thomas Fuller
On Jan 8, 2008 9:28 PM, Dinner <[
On Jan 7, 2008 3:25 PM, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William Bowen wrote:
> > Science is not faith-based.
> And it is also NOT the antithesis of faith. Which is a big part I do
> not understand about many such supporters. That Science and Faith is an
> Us versus Them winner take all b
On Jan 7, 2008 7:22 PM, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Back in my day, we didn't have ones. We just had zeros. If we wanted
> >ones, we had to get a hammer and squish 'em flat. Dadburned kids and
> >your premade ones. No appreciation for old-time craftsmanship.
> >
> >--BenD
>
> 0's
On Jan 7, 2008 7:22 PM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Letter from one "Angry Woman"
> I don't know who wrote it but they should have signed it. Some
> powerful words. This woman should run for president.
Are you trolling, Loathe? Shame on you!
The only problem is, and I hate to say it like
On Jan 7, 2008 3:34 PM, Don L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This question may have been raised many times, however, I deem it necessary
> to give it a kick again here. Share your thoughts. Thanks.
Lack of representation. The big heads on the totem pole generally
don't have a single clue.
On Jan 7, 2008 12:34 PM, Ben Doom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dinner wrote:
> > Do /this/ and get some bacon-cake.
Sadly, /this/ is a trade secret.
Even more sadly, if you *don't* do /this/, you do not get the cake (of
the aforementioned heavenly delight).
But I ask you
Well, I don't know about you Script Kiddies, but I do it all in ones
and zeros, on paper, and then run down the line, flipping switches by
hand.
We're just s "green", ya know?
--
A doctor saves lives -- It's up to people to create lives that are worth saving.
Philip Gold
On Jan 7, 2008 1
On Jan 7, 2008 9:30 AM, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Don't do that, or you will get detention"
> "Don't do that, or you will get X punishment"
>
> These are fear motivated. Fear of detention, fear of punishment. Hell is
> just the acme of thisfear of eternal damnation.
Do /this/ a
On Jan 5, 2008 10:07 PM, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actual VR really hasn't come very far. I worked with the original
> "CyberPods" long ago in Boston - four short games ("Dactyl Nightmare" and
Those were the ones that were going to be linked to a network, and
there was going to be s
'helmet' type option
> http://www.maximumpc.com/article/eMagin-Z800-3DVisor
>
> On Jan 5, 2008 2:13 PM, Dinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I see some VR googles for like, $150, that do h
On Jan 5, 2008 1:59 AM, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > One was cool enough to look at the wave patterns and match music by
> > 'em, which I thought was pretty cool, and I even
like what he
> demonstrated. a head tracking device that changes the display on your normal
> monitor.
>
> On Jan 5, 2008 2:42 AM, Dinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > http://www.google.com/search?q=vr+goggles
> >
> > --
> > If you think you can, you c
http://www.google.com/search?q=vr+goggles
--
If you think you can, you can. And if you think you can't, you're right.
Mary Kay Ash
On Jan 4, 2008 6:36 PM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm talking retail, not DIY
>
>
> On Jan 4, 2008 5:02 PM,
On Jan 5, 2008 1:15 AM, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> population, etc. I do think that's appropriate for high-school level -
> there are serious debates WITHIN THE THEORY.
I was ready way before high-school. "the consensus" approach really
pissed me off-- "when you get to the 'real
On Jan 5, 2008 12:19 AM, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think (with my bonus in March) I'll be picking up another box... I'm
Keep us posted on what you come up with. I'm looking for one before
too long (reads: whenever) myself.
Speaking of, I'm going to go bust a god damn blog ent
2008 12:35 AM, Dinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You see, I too am on the Music Quest (no duplicates, whole albums,
> good quality, tagged, etc.). But finishing it is like quitting
> smoking. (I keep just dumping gigs around, ya know-- and it's been a
> while since I wo
On Jan 4, 2008 11:21 PM, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > You know Jim, there are utilities that will automagically go out to
> > the relevant DBs and set all your tags and album art.
&
On Jan 4, 2008 9:59 PM, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am sure I am asking for it on this list, but hey, I guess I never have
> learned to keep my mouth shut. Either that or I am just a glutton for
> punishment. Either way.
On your point about more church goers (I don't know one way
On Jan 4, 2008 9:04 PM, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not sure what point your making if any but this is what I came up with
> after reading it.
>
> ID doesn't claim to be deity based.
> Could be a far away experiment checking the nature of evolution with
> new life forms got lost in space and l
Proving ID would be like proving God exists-- And how does that HHGTTG quote go?
*poof* =-]
--
"'Now it is such a bizarrely improbable coincidence that anything so
mind-bogglingly useful could have evolved purely by chance that some
thinkers have chosen to see it as a final and clinching proof
PC for over 10 years. :-)
Used to be some glasses with screens and whatnot you could buy
on-line, haven't seen any for a while tho (been a bit since I looked).
Mercury -- it's what's for Dinner (sorta). :-)
--
Forgive your enemies, but never forget th
On Jan 4, 2008 2:00 PM, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >purchased "One". I scrolled down the purchase confirmation page and
> >the "Customers who bought this song" section caught my eye. Yeah,
> >let's check out Megadeth! Click->PurchaseH so Megadeth
> >purchasers like My Che
On Jan 4, 2008 11:17 AM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We're not talking about 1950. There have been warnings about smoking as
> long as you or I have been alive Sean.
Mere quibbles. Lets sue the bastards!
--
Nothing you can't spell will ever work.
Will Rogers
~~~
Hell yeah. Plus! Due to the angle, I believe there's a bit of side-tit, too.
Mm side-tit
--
I don't confuse greatness with perfection. To be great anyhow is
the
higher achievement.
Lois McMaster Bujold,
On Jan 4, 2008 12:00 PM, J.J. Merrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I love th
On Jan 4, 2008 11:34 AM, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Filigree, apogee, pedigree, perigee!
>
> you turned them into rabbits!
>
> :-\
Who knew the power of a few simple words?
Will, yer another ray of hope, in these dark times.
I tell you what.
--
I was battered and bruised but t
On Jan 4, 2008 12:18 AM, Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> haha the night just keeps getting better and better, doesn't it?
>
> Seriously though .. how .. how does that happen? You know what? Never
> mind.
Right? I've been cracking up a few times, was scared I almost woke
the wife or kid.
Anal
Mein Leben!
On Jan 3, 2008 8:06 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2008 11:55 AM, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Since this thread has anyone heard anything from ole Gruss Gott?
> >
> > Nein!
> >
> >
>
> Willst du bis zum tod der scheide
> Sie lieben auch
On Jan 3, 2008 7:50 PM, Crow T. Robot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dinner wrote:
> >Maybe if people took the time to care, we wouldn't need so much government.
>
> I think that this was my point a while ago. If people could have a bit of
> freakin' considerati
On Jan 3, 2008 7:19 PM, Sean Corfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2008 5:51 PM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > By entering the smoking establishment, and by choosing to stay there you can
> > no longer blame them.
> >
> > It was your choice to be there.
>
> But your theoretical pe
I can smell the fumes from cars when I go outside. Perhaps I'm just
nasally gifted, but it's true. When I think about it.
Why is smoking so much more important than, say, non-burning energy?
Is this really the top priority for you, considering all we face?
--
It's like your batteries get low,
of the rant pool.
> However I did want to clarify that I am not from California, I just
> lived there 4 years. I am from Atlanta, where I now live.
>
> -Cameron
>
>
> Dinner wrote:
> > On Jan 3, 2008 1:26 PM, Cameron Childress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
&
On Jan 3, 2008 6:31 PM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's funny, I never thought you and I would see eye to eye.
Heh. Stranger things have happened. :-)
--
Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be.
Abraham Lincoln
~~
Um, some strange time-lapse deal obviously just occurred.
Disregard previous question, now already answered.
--
The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget;
the wise forgive but do not forget.
Thomas Szasz,
On Jan 3, 2008 7:16 PM, Dinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Jan 3, 2008 3:39 PM, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Gel wrote:
> > Since this thread has anyone heard anything from ole Gruss Gott?
> >
>
> I'm back! Just returned from vacation. Boo. Had a fun time though!
You can't scare me. I know you're just a figment.
Where did you may
uff in the morning helps the medicine go down
> the medicine go down-wown
> The medicine go down
> Just two puffs in the morning
> helps the medecine go down,
> in the most delightful way!
>
> *pirouettes*
> *allegro!*
> *Allegro!*
>
>
> On Jan 3, 2008 6:50 PM, Di
It seems to be deeper than just the amount of stuff packed into a day.
I honestly think it's related to age, or perhaps experience, and the
way the brain works.
Time (and perceived time) is pretty fun, really. I keep just playing
with it tho, instead of really utilizing it the way I probably sh
On Jan 3, 2008 6:05 PM, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 3, 2008 11:36 AM, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >A bar isn't a public place, public means owned by the government,
> > it is a
> > > >private place owned by an individual or company.
> > >
> > > Nope that one h
s/country/county [=
On Jan 3, 2008 6:25 PM, Dinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We just passed some bans in my country. At first, bars, eateries and
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and
On Jan 3, 2008 1:26 PM, Cameron Childress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dinner wrote:
> > It's not a total free for all, Cameron. I just want to be able to do
> > what I want, without *forcing* anyone do do anything.
> >
> > As much as possible.
> >
&
Belief. It's what's for dinner.
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Dinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Community"
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 3:17 PM
> Subject: Re: FW: The Seven Warning Signs of Bogus Science
>
>
&
On Jan 3, 2008 1:27 PM, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I saw a public announcement about some type of radioactive gas that
> > they are now attributing a bunch of these "mystery" cancer cases with.
>
> Radon?
That's probably it. I remembered it because they had been attributing
a lo
On Jan 3, 2008 12:57 PM, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Speaking of smoking
>
> lol!
>
You don't think time is mind-blowing?
I'm still amazed at how slow it seemed to go as a kid.
And how fast it goes now, especially doing typing like this.
Guess I should focus more on my projec
On Jan 3, 2008 12:57 PM, Dinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2008 12:03 PM, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 3, 2008 8:52 AM, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > But to stand there and bald-face say "it couldn't be
et punched, or not to
> smoke. His decision.
>
> Of course, given the mood of the crowd around him, there might have
> been a lynching instead.
>
> Smoking sucks. Many smokers suck. If you need to do it, just like
> playing with yourself, go do it over there, away from me.
>
y
> about smoking.. well not smoking.
>
>
> On Jan 3, 2008 1:23 PM, Dinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Damn Greg! Feel strongly about this, eh? =]
> >
> > Let's chill out folks. I don't want to have to wave the bouncer over here.
> >
> > On
On Jan 3, 2008 12:03 PM, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2008 8:52 AM, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > But to stand there and bald-face say "it couldn't be *us*!" is pretty
> > > ballsy.
> >
> > And entirely human.
>
> Neither one of you seem to be able to pay attention.
On Jan 3, 2008 12:32 PM, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How so?
> >
> > Even if He does have a purpose for you, and is watching you, can't you
> > always choose to tell him to take his purpose and shove it?
>
> And wouldn't that, from a believer's point of view, *also* be included
> i
On Jan 3, 2008 12:03 PM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd rather pick up a gun.
More power to you, Loathe. We need more like you. (We being the US of A).
--
Normal is getting dressed in clothes that you buy for work and driving
through traffic in a car that you are still paying for - in
freedom" arguments, but I really don't think a total free for
> all would work out very well.
>
> -Cameron
>
>
> Dinner wrote:
> > On Jan 3, 2008 11:06 AM, Cameron Childress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> So would you be upset if your wife/siste
1 - 100 of 660 matches
Mail list logo
