The reason we have separation of church and state is the behavior of
some of the previous Archbishops of Canterbury.
On Feb 7, 2008 9:55 AM, Scott Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And people wonder why I scream so much about the separation of church and
state.
On Feb 7, 2008 11:13 AM, Gruss Gott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He added Muslims
should not have to choose between the stark alternatives of cultural
loyalty or state loyalty.
I wholly reject that notion. State laws are derived from the dominant
culture present within. The laws should strive to
He added Muslims
should not have to choose between the stark alternatives of cultural
loyalty or state loyalty.
well... good thing he's only the Archbishop of Canterbury and not a lawmaker.
--
will
If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable.
-
So, a religious leader is suggesting that religious laws should be
allowed to take precedence over secular laws.
Not too surprising to me.
I bet he would _love_ to have his own version of laws eventually.
On Feb 7, 2008 12:13 PM, Gruss Gott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Archbishop of Canterbury
: Thursday, February 07, 2008 12:14 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: [Troll?] Cultural Invasion?
Ya know, people have been telling me that there's a vast Islamic
conspiracy to invade the west and take us over from the inside out
rather the historical way, from the outside in via military invasion.
I thought
Ya know, people have been telling me that there's a vast Islamic
conspiracy to invade the west and take us over from the inside out
rather the historical way, from the outside in via military invasion.
I thought it was a bunch of bunk. Especially my Jewish friends
claimed to know this better than
