Well THAT I can't argue with 8-)
On Jan 21, 2012, at 2:42 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> oh come on a campaign narrative that's completely true and factual? Now
> you *do* have my BS detector going ;)
>
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
>>
>> Well, I would say those people
Questioning is good. They should question all the candidates.
.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Well, I would say those people don't have facts on their side.
>
> Romney founded a PE company that's doing quite well - that's not easy. In
> addition he was a key contribu
oh come on a campaign narrative that's completely true and factual? Now
you *do* have my BS detector going ;)
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Well, I would say those people don't have facts on their side.
>
> Romney founded a PE company that's doing quite well - that
Well, I would say those people don't have facts on their side.
Romney founded a PE company that's doing quite well - that's not easy. In
addition he was a key contributor to a company that helps other companies do
well; the only one of its type that will take stock in lieu of fees ( vs BCG
an
I am not here to argue the point. I dislike Romney but at least he is sane,
unlike most of his opponents. Just pointing out that some people question
his narrative.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> My only point would be that the shareholders decided to take it private -
My only point would be that the shareholders decided to take it private - which
is usually either because they're in big trouble or they collectively decide
its time to cash out and take profits.
Either way, it was the shareholders call to sell. If Bain bought and sold for
profit then they mu
it was publicly traded as I understand it
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> You win some you lose some. It was Bains company to do with what they
> wanted. Would it have lasted on its own without them? Why was it sold to
> them?
>
>
>
> On Jan 19, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Dana
You win some you lose some. It was Bains company to do with what they wanted.
Would it have lasted on its own without them? Why was it sold to them?
On Jan 19, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Dana wrote:
>
> for what it may be worth, one Florida's experience with Bain Capital does
> not support the r
for what it may be worth, one Florida's experience with Bain Capital does
not support the refrain of job creation:
http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/01/18/2596300/in-miami-story-of-profits-and.html
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion A
