Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 12:19 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: B-E-A-UTIFUL!
> >
> >
> > why not just use cfquery?
> >
19 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: B-E-A-UTIFUL!
>
>
> why not just use cfquery?
>
> On 2/3/06, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why not use cfinsert and cfupdate?
>
>
~|
Message: h
why not just use cfquery?
On 2/3/06, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not use cfinsert and cfupdate?
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:195700
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/thread
> -Original Message-
> From: Chesty Puller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 11:56 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: B-E-A-UTIFUL!
>
>
> That means you agree with me, doesn't it?
>
> Question for you - do you have a getter and setter
nence and
> reuse.
>
> Anyway, my question is, exactly why is Issac's code spiffy?
>
> - Matt
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "William Bowen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Community"
> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 10:06 AM
>
day, February 03, 2006 11:53 AM
Subject: RE: B-E-A-UTIFUL!
>I prefer data access objects, specific getters and setters as part of my
> object.
>
> By specifying columns and datatypes and so on, you get better performing
> queies.
>
> Tim
>
>> -Original Message-
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: B-E-A-UTIFUL!
>
>
> Not that I doubt that it is indeed spiffy, how in fact is it so? I don't
> understand why this complex-looking piece of sql abstraction is an
> improvement over either standard SQL or the object-relational database
&
ubject
> altogether), and you use classic OOP for code readability, maintenence and
> reuse.
>
> Anyway, my question is, exactly why is Issac's code spiffy?
>
> - Matt
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "William Bowen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: &
you're doing reporting, which is a different subject
altogether), and you use classic OOP for code readability, maintenence and
reuse.
Anyway, my question is, exactly why is Issac's code spiffy?
- Matt
- Original Message -
From: "William Bowen" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
> Everyone else just ignored you. :-p
Bah! Not ignoring! Just trying to figure out how I can use this!
it is indeed "damn spiffy code."
will
--
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~~
Isaac,
That was some damn spiffy code. I was humbled.
Everyone else just ignored you. :-p
On 1/27/06, S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just needed to share this while I was still euphoric about it. :)
~|
Message:
Wow...you disappear off the face of the list for ages and then return
with long lines of code ^_^
Welcome back :)
On 1/27/06, S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I generally consider myself a pretty competent programmer, but from
> day to day it's not very exciting... Every once in a whi
I generally consider myself a pretty competent programmer, but from
day to day it's not very exciting... Every once in a while, I do
something that just makes it difficult for me to sit in my chair
because I'm so jazzed about the end result... And it doesn't even have
to be anything really amazing.
13 matches
Mail list logo
