either glaring incompetence or an attempted cover-up. either way, this story
looks to be headed toward a major lawsuit for wrongful death.
On 3/14/06, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "The results were in contrast to the initial autopsy,"
>
> Who carried out the first autopsy, and how did they
> "The results were in contrast to the initial autopsy,"
> Who carried out the first autopsy, and how did they come
> to such a
> wildly incorrect conclusion? And when are they going to be
> held
> accountable for such a glaring error?
> http://tinyurl.com/mdc45
Here's your answer, right in the
"The results were in contrast to the initial autopsy,"
Who carried out the first autopsy, and how did they come to such a
wildly incorrect conclusion? And when are they going to be held
accountable for such a glaring error?
http://tinyurl.com/mdc45
~~~
