Re: DNA suggests little genomic variety

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:34 AM, Vivec wrote: > > > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/21/AR2009062101726_2.html?wprss=rss_nation&sid=ST2009062200350 > > Among West Africans, a chance mutation in the blood protein hemoglobin > turned out to partially protect against mala

Re: DNA suggests little genomic variety

> Vivec wrote: > "There is a simplicity and all-inclusiveness to the number three -- > the triangle, the Holy Trinity, three peas in a pod. So it's perhaps > not surprising that the Family of Man is divided that way, too. > Best argument I've seen for the validity of Nurture in a long time.

Re: DNA suggests little genomic variety

Very cool. Thanks for sharing that. On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Vivec wrote: > > > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/21/AR2009062101726_2.html?wprss=rss_nation&sid=ST2009062200350 > > "There is a simplicity and all-inclusiveness to the number three -- > the trian

DNA suggests little genomic variety

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/21/AR2009062101726_2.html?wprss=rss_nation&sid=ST2009062200350 "There is a simplicity and all-inclusiveness to the number three -- the triangle, the Holy Trinity, three peas in a pod. So it's perhaps not surprising that the Family of Ma