On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> Nothing at all wrong with it, except that Schmidt is basically saying
> many young people will be forced into changing their names by the
> invasiveness of his search engine. Did he manage to say that with a
> straight face?
>
To be fair,
Nothing at all wrong with it, except that Schmidt is basically saying
many young people will be forced into changing their names by the
invasiveness of his search engine. Did he manage to say that with a
straight face?
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Maureen wrote:
>
> The majority of all woma
The majority of all woman and some men change their name at marriage, which
is definitely a rite of passage. No one questions that. Why would any
other name change matter?
I've changed mine five times. Other than the paperwork - SSN, drivers
license, etc..not a big deal.
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> What bits did you find especially kooky? I disagree with Schmidt's
> position that we don't need privacy regulation because the market will
> correct itself, but most of the things he is saying in the interview
> that El Reg is selectively
What bits did you find especially kooky? I disagree with Schmidt's
position that we don't need privacy regulation because the market will
correct itself, but most of the things he is saying in the interview
that El Reg is selectively quoting is pretty spot on in my opinion.
Here is the original in
Good gravy, is he serious? His lack of understanding about people just
amazes me.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/08/16/schmidt_wsj/
---
Increasingly bonkers Google governor Eric Schmidt has seen the future,
and you might have to change your name to be a part of it.
According to the man in c
